How LA wildfires are making an already tough rental market even worse
'I know they're expensive, and it sucks,' she said.
Tenants who were just getting by before the fires now face a daunting housing search after the January fires leveled entire neighborhoods. The LA fires destroyed more than 16,000 homes, businesses and other structures in upscale Pacific Palisades and working-class Altadena, where the U.S. Census reports 22% of homes were occupied by renters.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
It's hard to quantify exactly how the wildfires are affecting the rental market, but LA rents rose faster than prices nationwide in January compared to the previous month, according to housing platform Zillow.
Advertisement
The added competition from residents displaced by the fires is likely to worsen housing affordability, increase overcrowding and contribute to homelessness, says Sarah Karlinsky, research director at the Terner Center for Housing Innovation at the University of California, Berkeley. Already, more than half of all renter households — or a little over 1 million households — in LA County spend 30% or more of their income on rent.
Shane Phillips, housing initiative project manager at the UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies, expects prices to increase significantly for months, if not a few years.
'There's only so many people moving at any given time, and suddenly adding another 20,000 households to that amount is just an extraordinary pressure,' he said.
Rental pageviews in LA County on the real estate platform Redfin are up 50% from a year ago, said Daryl Fairweather, the company's chief economist.
She said people will feel the impact of 'shorter supply, more fierce competition for rentals.'
Egregious rents cropped up soon after the fires broke out, prompting an ad-hoc group of tenant organizers, web programmers and others to crowdsource examples. The Rent Brigade found more than 1,300 examples of illegal rent increases advertised between Jan. 7 and Jan. 18. Many have since been removed or relisted at lower prices.
Advertisement
California Attorney General Rob Bonta has warned repeatedly of the state's anti-gouging laws, which limits price increases to no more than 10% from whatever the price was before the emergency. His office has so far filed three misdemeanor criminal price-gouging charges.
A 10% cap is still too high for Wendy Dlakic. She was paying about $3,000 a month for a now uninhabitable two-bedroom condo in Altadena, a community she loved. She's searched rental websites, but for now is staying with friends, family and at Airbnbs.
'It was already expensive,' said Dlakic, an educator who moved to Southern California two years ago. 'It's tough to be in LA on one income. You're right on the edge, you know?'
The 'typical rent' in the U.S. was $1,968 as of Jan. 31 — up 0.2% from the previous month, according to Zillow. But in the LA metro area, the typical rent was up 0.8% to $2,954. Zillow calculates the typical rent figure by averaging the middle 30% of rents.
Daniel Yukelson, executive director of the Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles, says fears of rent-gouging have been overblown by tenant advocates and he's angry that Bonta has filed criminal charges.
'Some mistakes were unknowingly made,' he said. 'If these infractions were pointed out to these few owners, corrections would have surely been made immediately,'
McAlpine, the displaced tenant, realized the Eaton Fire was coming for her in-law unit while she was helping to evacuate neighbors as a Altadena Mountain Rescue Team volunteer. She scooped up her cat, ski gear and camera equipment and fled the 300-square-foot (28-square-meter) cottage.
Advertisement
She's grateful for donations through GoFundMe, which will help with essentials, but is worried about finding a standalone unit close to nature and within her monthly budget of $1,800 for rent and utilities.
The cottage that McAlpine, a photographer, and her boyfriend wanted was listed for $2,750 a month. Even though they have a bigger budget together, the hunt has been dispiriting.
'I'm quickly looking for the photos. 'Oh, does this look sketchy or not?' Or, 'you know, is this the right price?'' she said. 'It's just very different from how I would normally look for a place to live.'
Har reported from San Francisco.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
4 hours ago
- CNBC
Is it smart to buy a home right now? The U.S. housing market is a 'mixed bag,' broker says
For potential homebuyers, the U.S. housing market is hard to read right now. Affordability remains an obstacle, with elevated mortgage rates and a median home price of $442,000 — up 0.9% from a year ago, according to Redfin data. However, inventory is rising in many markets, especially in the South, giving buyers more leverage to negotiate prices. Redfin expects home prices to decline 1% year over year by the end of 2025, a forecast that aligns with Zillow's projected 1.4% drop over the same period. Overall, the market is "a mixed bag," says Ben Jacobs, a real estate broker with Douglas Elliman. "On one hand, we're seeing more inventory and seller concessions, which offer some breathing room for buyers. On the other, mortgage rates aren't expected to drop significantly anytime soon, which continues to impact affordability." Most major forecasts expect 30-year fixed mortgage rates — currently around 6.85% — to stay above 6% throughout the year, consistent with where they've been so far in 2025: Tariffs are adding to the uncertainty. Tariffs on building materials are expected to drive construction costs higher, which could slow new homebuilding and add upward pressure to prices. "It's a catch-22 for homebuyers," Chen Zhao, Redfin's head of economics research, wrote in a May statement. "Mortgage rates are unlikely to fall unless all of the new tariffs are eliminated, or if the country falls into a fairly severe recession — which would cut housing budgets for many Americans." Buyers have more negotiating power than they did a year ago, due to more inventory on the market, fewer bidding wars and a growing share of sellers offering concessions. Price reductions are more common. In May 2025, about 22% of listings had price cuts, a year-over-year increase of roughly five percentage points, according to Redfin's most recent data. Sellers are increasingly willing to offer other incentives, too. In April, Redfin reported that sellers gave concessions in 44% of home sales — about 10 percentage points higher than last summer. These concessions are separate from price reductions and include money toward repairs, closing costs or mortgage-rate buydowns. Housing inventory is improving in several markets. States such as Texas, Florida, Tennessee and Colorado now have more homes for sale than they did before the Covid-19 pandemic, according to Now is "still a good time to buy, especially for well-prepared buyers who find a home that fits their long-term needs and can negotiate favorable terms," says Jacobs. He notes the risk that "new tariffs on building materials could push prices higher again, particularly for new construction." "This summer presents a real opportunity for serious buyers," says Nancy Batchelor, vice president at real estate firm Compass. But with a still-shifting market, she cautions that buyers should be prepared and realistic about what they can comfortably afford. "Timing the market perfectly is nearly impossible," she says, but finding the right home at a price and payment that fits your budget "is always a smart move."
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
It's official! Tenant-paid rental broker fees in New York City are history.
A longtime scourge of New York City renters — paying a hefty broker fee to move into an apartment — is officially a thing of the past. The city's FARE Act — which prohibits landlords from passing broker fees to their tenants — took effect on Wednesday after a judge denied a petition from a real estate trade group seeking to block the law. It's expected to dramatically lower the up-front costs of renting an apartment in one of the nation's most costly and competitive real estate markets. The change is taking effect just as the city enters its leasing high season. By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy Many tenants are cheering the changes, while others in the real estate industry are noticeably less thrilled. Landlords are fretting about their thin margins getting even thinner, and brokers fear their earnings will fall. 'I think the days of paying high fees are going to be over,' said Micky Lalchandani, the managing broker of Undivided Real Estate. 'It may also open up avenues for different business models.' Until recently, around half of the 2.3 million rentals in the city's five boroughs required tenants to pay a fee to the rental broker hired by their landlord when they signed a lease. Fees varied, but were typically between one month's rent and 15% of the annual cost of a lease. That meant tenants had to pony up thousands of dollars in addition to the standard start-up costs of the first month's rent, application fee, and security deposit. For example, a renter hunting for an apartment that costs $3,850 a month — the city's median rent as of April — could end up paying $14,630 in up-front move-in costs, with $6,930 of that sum going toward a nonrefundable 15% broker fee. New York City Council passed the FARE Act last fall with a veto-proof majority, putting an end to tenant-paid fees and requiring more transparency around rental costs. Under the law, tenants are still permitted to hire and pay their own brokers if they want apartment-hunting assistance, but no longer have to pay for the brokers that landlords hire. Violators, who can be reported via a complaint to the city's Department of Consumer and Worker Protection, face city fines of up to $2,000 and a potential additional $2,000 fine from the state. StreetEasy, the Zillow-owned New York listings platform, estimates that the broker fee ban will drop the up-front costs of renting a formerly fee apartment more than 40% on average — from nearly $13,000 to $7,537. 'I think that's really significant for people," said Christian Emanuel, a real estate agent at Brown Harris Stephens who had primarily been working with no-fee rentals before the FARE Act. "You're already lopping off all of this money that has to come out of people's pockets up front." Rental brokers work all over the country, helping landlords with the administrative aspects of finding new tenants. In the pre-Internet days, they could effectively be gatekeepers to little-advertised listings. But now, many tenants turn to listings sites to screen potential apartments and may not interact with a broker until they request to tour a unit. Read more: Popular housing types for buyers and renters Everywhere except for New York and Boston, it's been standard for landlords to pay the brokers they hire. The changes in New York are poised to bring the city more in line with how rental markets work elsewhere in the country. But in many ways, the New York rental market is unlike any other. For one, 70% of residents rent, and more than half of all households are considered rent-burdened, meaning rent eats up more than 30% of their monthly income. And inventory in the city is also extremely constrained. Manhattan, home to 1.6 million people, had just 6,300 active rental listings in April, according to Corcoran Group data. In recent years, the citywide vacancy rate has fallen to as low as 1.4%. The New York Real Estate Board, a trade group that, along with several brokerage firms, sued the city to block the law, argued in its lawsuit that the changes will drive up rents and worsen the inventory shortage. Some brokers contacted by Yahoo Finance shared those fears. 'The sentiment is that that fee is already baked into your rent,' said Michael Jeneralczuk, team leader at Living New York, a real estate firm that represents landlords. 'I think long term, the implications will be much higher rent growth.' Exactly how much monthly rent could rise is up for debate. No-fee apartments in New York have generally rented at somewhat of a premium to their fee-based counterparts as landlords work some of their costs into their tenants' rent, according to an analysis by StreetEasy Senior Economist Kenny Lee. But how big that no-fee premium is depends on broader market conditions. When New York lost population during the pandemic, landlords broadly advertised listings as no-fee and ate the costs associated with working with brokers to attract tenants. When rental demand roared back in 2022, they passed those fees back onto tenants in the form of rent that was 6.4% higher than comparable fee-based rentals. Lee analyzed properties that switched to no-fee ahead of the FARE Act's implementation and found that rents rose, but not wildly out of step with the broader market. In April, rentals that dropped their broker fees were listed for 5.3% higher than they were a year earlier, compared with 4.6% rent growth in units that kept the fees. 'Market conditions will still prevail over landlord expenses,' Lee said. 'Property managers pay a lot of attention to demand and supply.' Ahead of the FARE Act's implementation, many properties had already switched over to no-fee. Some landlords and brokers holding out in the hours before the law went into effect were testing two-tiered pricing models, like listing a two-bedroom East Village rental at $4,200 with a broker fee, or $5,000 without one. On Wednesday morning, many were re-listed as no-fee, with rents a few hundred dollars higher. Jeneralczuk has concerns about inventory levels going forward. He's seen fee-avoidant landlords opt to pull listings from the market with the intent of only showing them to tenants who hire their own broker instead of paying for a broker to advertise them broadly. Though there's another argument that the FARE Act could end up improving inventory by making it easier for New Yorkers to move. High up-front moving costs effectively lock some New York renters into their homes, StreetEasy's Lee said, and lowering them should ease that friction. Time will tell. Lease turnover typically peaks in New York in July and August, as families move before the next school year and the city's many students and recent graduates relocate or settle in, giving the market a busy adjustment period. 'The goal is, sometime in the next couple of months, everything normalizes,' Jeneralczuk said. 'This will be the new normal, and we'll be able to go from there.' Claire Boston is a Senior Reporter for Yahoo Finance covering housing, mortgages, and home insurance. Sign up for the Mind Your Money newsletter
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
It's official! Tenant-paid rental broker fees in New York City are history.
A longtime scourge of New York City renters — paying a hefty broker fee to move into an apartment — is officially a thing of the past. The city's FARE Act — which prohibits landlords from passing broker fees to their tenants — took effect on Wednesday after a judge denied a petition from a real estate trade group seeking to block the law. It's expected to dramatically lower the up-front costs of renting an apartment in one of the nation's most costly and competitive real estate markets. The change is taking effect just as the city enters its leasing high season. By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Condiciones and Política de privacidad Many tenants are cheering the changes, while others in the real estate industry are noticeably less thrilled. Landlords are fretting about their thin margins getting even thinner, and brokers fear their earnings will fall. 'I think the days of paying high fees are going to be over,' said Micky Lalchandani, the managing broker of Undivided Real Estate. 'It may also open up avenues for different business models.' Until recently, around half of the 2.3 million rentals in the city's five boroughs required tenants to pay a fee to the rental broker hired by their landlord when they signed a lease. Fees varied, but were typically between one month's rent and 15% of the annual cost of a lease. That meant tenants had to pony up thousands of dollars in addition to the standard start-up costs of the first month's rent, application fee, and security deposit. For example, a renter hunting for an apartment that costs $3,850 a month — the city's median rent as of April — could end up paying $14,630 in up-front move-in costs, with $6,930 of that sum going toward a nonrefundable 15% broker fee. New York City Council passed the FARE Act last fall with a veto-proof majority, putting an end to tenant-paid fees and requiring more transparency around rental costs. Under the law, tenants are still permitted to hire and pay their own brokers if they want apartment-hunting assistance, but no longer have to pay for the brokers that landlords hire. Violators, who can be reported via a complaint to the city's Department of Consumer and Worker Protection, face city fines of up to $2,000 and a potential additional $2,000 fine from the state. StreetEasy, the Zillow-owned New York listings platform, estimates that the broker fee ban will drop the up-front costs of renting a formerly fee apartment more than 40% on average — from nearly $13,000 to $7,537. 'I think that's really significant for people," said Christian Emanuel, a real estate agent at Brown Harris Stephens who had primarily been working with no-fee rentals before the FARE Act. "You're already lopping off all of this money that has to come out of people's pockets up front." Rental brokers work all over the country, helping landlords with the administrative aspects of finding new tenants. In the pre-Internet days, they could effectively be gatekeepers to little-advertised listings. But now, many tenants turn to listings sites to screen potential apartments and may not interact with a broker until they request to tour a unit. Read more: Popular housing types for buyers and renters Everywhere except for New York and Boston, it's been standard for landlords to pay the brokers they hire. The changes in New York are poised to bring the city more in line with how rental markets work elsewhere in the country. But in many ways, the New York rental market is unlike any other. For one, 70% of residents rent, and more than half of all households are considered rent-burdened, meaning rent eats up more than 30% of their monthly income. And inventory in the city is also extremely constrained. Manhattan, home to 1.6 million people, had just 6,300 active rental listings in April, according to Corcoran Group data. In recent years, the citywide vacancy rate has fallen to as low as 1.4%. The New York Real Estate Board, a trade group that, along with several brokerage firms, sued the city to block the law, argued in its lawsuit that the changes will drive up rents and worsen the inventory shortage. Some brokers contacted by Yahoo Finance shared those fears. 'The sentiment is that that fee is already baked into your rent,' said Michael Jeneralczuk, team leader at Living New York, a real estate firm that represents landlords. 'I think long term, the implications will be much higher rent growth.' Exactly how much monthly rent could rise is up for debate. No-fee apartments in New York have generally rented at somewhat of a premium to their fee-based counterparts as landlords work some of their costs into their tenants' rent, according to an analysis by StreetEasy Senior Economist Kenny Lee. But how big that no-fee premium is depends on broader market conditions. When New York lost population during the pandemic, landlords broadly advertised listings as no-fee and ate the costs associated with working with brokers to attract tenants. When rental demand roared back in 2022, they passed those fees back onto tenants in the form of rent that was 6.4% higher than comparable fee-based rentals. Lee analyzed properties that switched to no-fee ahead of the FARE Act's implementation and found that rents rose, but not wildly out of step with the broader market. In April, rentals that dropped their broker fees were listed for 5.3% higher than they were a year earlier, compared with 4.6% rent growth in units that kept the fees. 'Market conditions will still prevail over landlord expenses,' Lee said. 'Property managers pay a lot of attention to demand and supply.' Ahead of the FARE Act's implementation, many properties had already switched over to no-fee. Some landlords and brokers holding out in the hours before the law went into effect were testing two-tiered pricing models, like listing a two-bedroom East Village rental at $4,200 with a broker fee, or $5,000 without one. On Wednesday morning, many were re-listed as no-fee, with rents a few hundred dollars higher. Jeneralczuk has concerns about inventory levels going forward. He's seen fee-avoidant landlords opt to pull listings from the market with the intent of only showing them to tenants who hire their own broker instead of paying for a broker to advertise them broadly. Though there's another argument that the FARE Act could end up improving inventory by making it easier for New Yorkers to move. High up-front moving costs effectively lock some New York renters into their homes, StreetEasy's Lee said, and lowering them should ease that friction. Time will tell. Lease turnover typically peaks in New York in July and August, as families move before the next school year and the city's many students and recent graduates relocate or settle in, giving the market a busy adjustment period. 'The goal is, sometime in the next couple of months, everything normalizes,' Jeneralczuk said. 'This will be the new normal, and we'll be able to go from there.' Claire Boston is a Senior Reporter for Yahoo Finance covering housing, mortgages, and home insurance. Sign up for the Mind Your Money newsletter Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
