logo
India believed to have 'slightly expanded' nuclear arsenal in 2024: Report

India believed to have 'slightly expanded' nuclear arsenal in 2024: Report

Nearly all of the nine nuclear-armed states, including India and Pakistan, continued intensive nuclear modernisation programmes in 2024, upgrading existing weapons and adding newer versions, according to a report by a global think-tank.
India is believed to have once again "slightly expanded" its nuclear arsenal in 2024 and continued to develop new types of nuclear delivery systems, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) said in a statement.
Pakistan also continued to develop new delivery systems and "accumulate fissile material" in 2024, suggesting that its nuclear arsenal might expand over the coming decade, it said.
The think-tank on Monday launched its annual assessment of the state of armaments, disarmament and international security in SIPRI Yearbook 2025.
The statement on the release of its yearbook also makes a reference to the recent military conflict between India and Pakistan.
The four-day military confrontation between the two nuclear-armed neighbours in May brought the two countries to the brink of full-scale war.
The SIPRI Yearbook provided a country-wise assessment of the state of armaments, disarmament and international security.
"Nearly all of the nine nuclear-armed states -- the United States, Russia, the United Kingdom, France, China, India, Pakistan, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea) and Israel --continued intensive nuclear modernisation programmes in 2024, upgrading existing weapons and adding newer versions," the statement said.
Of the total global inventory of an estimated 12,241 warheads in January 2025, about 9,614 were in "military stockpiles for potential use", it claimed.
"India is believed to have once again slightly expanded its nuclear arsenal in 2024 and continued to develop new types of nuclear delivery system," it said.
"India's new 'canisterised' missiles, which can be transported with mated warheads, may be capable of carrying nuclear warheads during peacetime, and possibly even multiple warheads on each missile, once they become operational," the think-tank claimed.
In early 2025 tensions between India and Pakistan briefly spilled over into armed conflict, it said.
The combination of strikes and third-party disinformation "risked turning a conventional conflict into a nuclear crisis," Matt Korda, Associate Senior Researcher with SIPRI's Weapons of Mass Destruction Programme and Associate Director for the Nuclear Information Project at FAS (Federation of American Scientists), was quoted as saying in the statement.
"This should act as a stark warning for states seeking to increase their reliance on nuclear weapons," he said.
The think-tank further said since the end of the Cold War, the gradual dismantlement of retired warheads by Russia and the USA has normally outstripped the deployment of new warheads, resulting in an overall year-on-year decrease in the global inventory of nuclear weapons.
"This trend is likely to be reversed in the coming years, as the pace of dismantlement is slowing, while the deployment of new nuclear weapons is accelerating," it cautioned.
Key findings of SIPRI Yearbook 2025 are that a "dangerous new nuclear arms race" is emerging at a time when arms control regimes are "severely weakened," it claimed.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Trump-Putin Alaska summit explained: A real-time history lesson for students on world affairs
The Trump-Putin Alaska summit explained: A real-time history lesson for students on world affairs

Time of India

time42 minutes ago

  • Time of India

The Trump-Putin Alaska summit explained: A real-time history lesson for students on world affairs

On August 15, 2025, the world watched as US President and Russian President met in Anchorage, Alaska, at Joint Base Elmendorf–Richardson. At first glance, Alaska might seem like an unusual choice for a summit between two of the most powerful leaders on Earth. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now But when you dig deeper, the location, timing, and history behind this meeting reveal a fascinating story that connects history, geography, and global politics. For students, the summit is more than a headline—it's a living lesson in how past events shape current decisions, how physical places influence diplomacy, and how world affairs affect both countries and local communities. From the Cold War to the modern era, US–Russia relations have been complex and ever-changing. The Alaska summit is the latest chapter in a decades-long story of cooperation, conflict, negotiation, and mistrust. By examining the history of previous summits, the significance of Alaska as a venue, and the broader geopolitical context, students can gain a deeper understanding of how international politics works—and why it matters to citizens around the world. A timeline of US-Russia summits Vladimir Putin has met nearly every US president since 1999, making these summits a window into the evolution of diplomacy over time. From early post-Cold War cooperation to the tense interactions of recent years, each meeting reflects the priorities and personalities of its time. Date Location US President Russian Leader Notable Outcome/Context January 31 to February 1, 1992 New York & Camp David, US George H.W. Bush Boris Yeltsin First summits of post-Soviet Russia-US era June 16–17, 1992 Washington, D.C., US George H.W. Bush Boris Yeltsin Early discussions on diplomacy after USSR collapse January 2–3, 1993 Moscow, Russia George H.W. Bush Boris Yeltsin Signing of START II arms reduction treaty 1993–1999 Various worldwide Bill Clinton Boris Yeltsin, Vladimir Putin Frequent meetings to solidify post-Cold War ties June 3–5, 2000 Moscow, Russia Bill Clinton Vladimir Putin First Clinton-Putin summit June 16, 2001 Ljubljana, Slovenia George W. Bush Vladimir Putin Bush: "Looked into his eyes, got a sense of his soul" moment May 24, 2002 Moscow, Russia George W. Bush Vladimir Putin Nuclear arms reduction agreements (SORT) February 24, 2005 Bratislava, Slovakia George W. Bush Vladimir Putin Cooperation on counterterrorism, nuclear security April 8, 2010 Prague, Czech Republic Barack Obama Dmitry Medvedev New START treaty signed July 16, 2018 Helsinki, Finland Donald Trump Vladimir Putin Trump-Putin summit amid US election interference allegations June 16, 2021 Geneva, Switzerland Joe Biden Vladimir Putin First Biden-Putin summit, no major agreements August 15, 2025 Anchorage, Alaska, US Donald Trump Vladimir Putin Attempt to resolve war in Ukraine Why Alaska is more than just a venue Alaska's significance goes beyond geography. Historically, it was Russian territory until 1867, when the United States purchased it for $7.2 million in what was then dismissed as 'Seward's Folly.' Today, Alaska's natural resources, strategic location, and Russian cultural influence make it a meaningful backdrop for diplomacy. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Anchorage, in particular, has previously hosted global leaders, such as Emperor Hirohito of Japan in 1971, demonstrating that even remote cities can play a role on the world stage. Holding the summit in Alaska allowed both leaders to signal not only their focus on current geopolitical issues but also a connection to historical ties and territorial significance. Geography, strategy, and global politics The location of the summit underscores the role of geography in international relations. Alaska is separated from Russia by only a few miles across the Bering Strait, making it a natural point for discussions about regional security, Arctic resources, and shipping routes. The military base hosting the summit, Joint Base Elmendorf–Richardson, is a hub for US Arctic defense, illustrating how physical locations can influence the planning and priorities of world leaders. Moreover, the Arctic itself has become an arena for strategic competition, as melting ice opens new trade routes and access to natural resources. In this context, holding the summit in Alaska was a deliberate choice with both symbolic and practical implications. Understanding the summit's broader context The Alaska meeting did not occur in isolation. Historically, US–Russia summits have addressed issues such as nuclear arms control, counterterrorism, European security, and bilateral trade. Over the years, the tone of these meetings has shifted from cooperative to cautious, reflecting growing mistrust due to events such as Russia's annexation of Crimea, its military involvement in Syria, and allegations of election interference. In this sense, the Alaska summit illustrates the ongoing challenges of diplomacy, where leaders must balance national interests, historical grievances, and global responsibilities. For students, observing these dynamics provides insight into how countries negotiate, compromise, and sometimes clash on the world stage.

Hillary Clinton says she'd nominate Trump for Nobel Peace prize — if he ends Ukraine war without territorial concessions
Hillary Clinton says she'd nominate Trump for Nobel Peace prize — if he ends Ukraine war without territorial concessions

Hans India

timean hour ago

  • Hans India

Hillary Clinton says she'd nominate Trump for Nobel Peace prize — if he ends Ukraine war without territorial concessions

New Delhi: In an unexpected twist, former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said she would nominate her longtime political rival US President Donald Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize — if he manages to end the Russia-Ukraine war without forcing Kyiv to cede any territory to Moscow. Clinton made the surprising remark just hours before Trump's high-stakes meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, a Cold War-era military installation in Anchorage, Alaska. Speaking on 'Raging Moderates' podcast, Clinton said, 'If he could bring about the end to this terrible war, if he could end it without putting Ukraine in a position where it had to concede its territory to the aggressor, could really stand up to Putin — something we haven't seen — but maybe this is the opportunity. If President Trump were the architect of that, I'd nominate him for a Nobel Peace Prize.' Clinton emphasised the geopolitical stakes, saying, 'He is not meeting a friend. He is meeting an adversary who wants to see the destruction of the US and the Western alliance.' Her comments underscored the gravity of the Alaska summit, which some observers called a potential turning point in the nearly three-year-long conflict in Eastern Europe. The Clinton-Trump rivalry dates back to the 2016 US presidential election, when Trump defeated the former First Lady in a bruising contest. During that campaign, Clinton criticised Trump's admiration for authoritarian leaders like Putin. 'He praises dictators like Vladimir Putin and picks fights with our friends,' she said. She also famously referred to some of his supporters as a 'basket of deplorables,' and called Trump 'temperamentally unfit' for office. In return, Trump repeatedly mocked Clinton on the campaign trail and later questioned her handling of foreign policy as Secretary of State. Despite their acrimonious history, Clinton's remarks suggest that even she might acknowledge a breakthrough should Trump succeed in ending the war on favorable terms for Ukraine. Trump has repeatedly pledged to end the war in Ukraine 'quickly,' although critics have questioned how he would achieve that, particularly given Russian President Vladimir Putin's insistence on Ukraine recognising Russia's territorial claims and lifting Western sanctions. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who was not invited to the summit, has firmly rejected any territorial concessions. Significantly, after the summit Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin said that they made progress in three hours of talks on Friday, moving closer to finding an end to the Ukraine War, but did not announce an immediate ceasefire. "It's not a done deal at all', he told a Fox News interviewer after Friday's summit in Alaska. "And Ukraine has to agree. President (Volodymyr) Zelensky has to agree." "We had a very good meeting today, and I think a lot of points were negotiated on behalf of Ukraine', he said. Before the summit, he said that he would not be negotiating on behalf of Ukraine and that the meeting was a sounding board aimed at facilitating a direct meeting between Presidents Putin and Zelensky. Putin called the meeting 'constructive and mutually respectful,' stating that the discussions had laid the groundwork for peace. He urged Ukraine and European leaders to engage in the process and warned against provocations that could jeopardise progress. Trump echoed the sentiment, calling the talks 'extremely productive.' He noted that multiple points of agreement had been reached, including one 'very significant' breakthrough. Still, he cautioned, 'There's no deal until there's a deal.' Trump said he would consult with Zelensky and key European allies before moving forward with any formal agreements.

Jeffrey Sachs Pulls No Punches On Donald Trump; Says US Can't Choose India's Partners
Jeffrey Sachs Pulls No Punches On Donald Trump; Says US Can't Choose India's Partners

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Jeffrey Sachs Pulls No Punches On Donald Trump; Says US Can't Choose India's Partners

Putin Issues DIRECT WARNING To Europe At Joint Presser With Trump; 'On Ukraine, Don't Torpedo...' After high-stakes talks in Alaska, Russian President Vladimir Putin said there would have been no war if Donald Trump were U.S. president. Calling the in-person meeting a 'necessity,' Putin described the discussions as 'constructive' and expressed Russia's strong interest in ending the conflict. He also noted the last four years marked the lowest point in U.S.-Russia relations since the Cold War. From Alaska, Putin also issued a pointed warning to Europe, hinting at rising geopolitical tensions if diplomacy fails. Watch 4.6K views | 3 hours ago

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store