Legal duties and risks of being a bailor
If the accused failed to show up in court, the bailor will be held responsible and stands to have the bail amount forfeited, they reminded.
Seasoned criminal law lawyer Kitson Foong said a surety's duty was to ensure that the accused appeared at all court proceedings.
'If the accused fails to show up, the court may issue a warrant of arrest (for the accused) and require the surety to explain the absence.
'If the explanation is unsatisfactory, the court can forfeit the entire bail amount, as provided under Section 404 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC).
'In such cases, the surety must attend court and may be ordered to show cause as to why the bond should not be forfeited. They may lose the full amount posted,' he said.
However, the law does provide a way out, Foong revealed, adding that a bailor who feared the accused absconding could apply to the court to be released from their bond any time under Section 393 of the CPC.
'Upon application, the court will immediately issue a warrant to bring the accused before it and direct the latter to find a new surety. If a replacement cannot be found, the accused may be taken into custody,' he explained.
Foong advised anyone considering becoming a bailor to ensure that the accused is a 'trusted person' who is unlikely to abscond – and be prepared to lose the bail amount, just in case.
They must also not accept money or any benefit in exchange for standing bail, he said.
Lawyer R. Ramesh Sivakumar said a bailor should preferably be a friend or family member of the accused.
In the event no family member or friend is willing to post bail, a third party may agree to take the risk by posting bail, he added.
'It is not necessary for the bailor to use his own money. It is also not an offence for others to help.
'While not illegal, relying on others for the security could raise questions about the surety's genuine commitment or the accused's ability to comply with bail conditions. The court may scrutinise such situations closely,' he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Act fast to recover losses, police urge scam victims
KUALA LUMPUR: While the National Scam Response Centre (NSRC) has received scam reports involving losses amounting to RM193mil between January and July, only a fraction of the funds were successfully frozen. This, according to Bukit Aman Commercial Crime Investigation Department director Comm Datuk Rusdi Mohd Isa ( pic ), was due to the calls to NSRC being made much later after the scam occurred. 'Between January and July, the NSRC received calls on scams involving RM193mil in funds. 'However, only RM12mil was successfully frozen as some of the calls were made a month, a week, even a year after the scam occurred,' he said when contacted. The funds that were successfully frozen will eventually be returned to the victims under Section 116D of the Criminal Procedure code, once the legal process is completed, Comm Rusdi said. 'Money stolen from scams can disappear within minutes as the scammers act fast. 'I urge the public to report the matter as soon as possible,' he said. With the centre operating round the clock, Comm Rusdi said it has received 10,038 calls between Aug 3 and Aug 7. 'The majority of the calls were recorded before 8pm amounting to 7,254 with the remaining 2,514 after 8pm. 'Some 51% of the calls were genuine scams while others were inquiries,' he said. Comm Rusdi urged the public to fully utilise the SemakMule portal as it was set up to enable the public to conveniently check bank account numbers, phone numbers and companies used by scammers. 'Since Jan 1, 2015, the portal has listed 272,250 bank accounts, 216,242 phone numbers and 14,160 companies. 'Between Jan 1, 2015, and Aug 7, the portal has received 35.8 million visitors,' Comm Rusdi said.
New Straits Times
12 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Armizan: Inquest into Zara Qairina's death should be considered if necessary
KUALA LUMPUR: An inquest to determine the cause of death of the late Zara Qairina Mahathir should be considered if necessary, said Papar member of parliament Datuk Armizan Mohd Ali. Armizan, who is the Domestic Trade and Cost of Living Minister, expressed hope that the police would take prompt follow-up action. He said the directive from the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) for the police to conduct further investigations — including a post-mortem via exhumation — was appropriate, and that such procedures should have been carried out from the beginning in any case involving unclear or suspicious circumstances of death. "This could have prevented the issues now surrounding this case (Zara Qairina's death). In such situations, investigating officers are duty-bound to act, as stipulated under Section 330 of the Criminal Procedure Code," he said. "Although it may still be too early to make a decision, authorities must remain open to the possibility of initiating an inquest if the circumstances warrant it," he said after officiating the Betitik competition at the 2025 Bajausama Cultural Festival held at the Bajausama Cultural Centre in Kampung Lok Batik today. Armizan said an inquest provides a legal platform to thoroughly examine all relevant aspects of a case through testimony from as many witnesses as necessary, with proceedings open to public scrutiny and access to information. "This is crucial, especially in cases that have garnered extraordinary public attention and sparked widespread speculation and misinformation. "Yes, there are parties attempting to exploit the situation for their motives, but many more Malaysians simply want the truth and justice. "Justice must be served for the late Zara, and speculation or slander must be addressed through a transparent, orderly legal process," he said, stressing that he was not interfering in the investigation, and that his remarks were made in his personal capacity.
Borneo Post
15 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Bersatu Sabah condemns police failure, calls for independent inquest
Rahimah KOTA KINABALU (Aug 9): Bersatu Sabah Women chief Rahimah Majid has issued a scathing condemnation of the police over their gross failure to professionally and impartially investigate the suspicious death of 13-year-old student, Zara Qairina Mahathir. Rahimah said the Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM) have failed the most basic test of their duty — to investigate a sudden and suspicious death thoroughly, fairly, and without delay. 'For almost three weeks after Zara's death, no meaningful investigation took place. No post-mortem was conducted. Her personal belongings, including her clothing, were returned to the family without any forensic examination. Until today, no transparent report has been released. This is an outrageous breach of duty,' she lambasted. She stressed that these glaring lapses violate Sections 329 and 300 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which clearly require a post-mortem and full investigation in any unnatural death. Rahimah also noted that the Attorney General's Chambers (AGC) recently returned the preliminary investigation report to the police for further action and completion, along with specific instructions on matters still requiring investigation. 'If the police had done their job properly from the start, the AGC would not need to send the file back. This is a clear sign that something is seriously wrong with the way this case has been handled,' she charged. Calling the failure inexcusable, Rahimah demanded that the case be immediately removed from the current police team and reassigned to an independent, professional and experienced investigative unit. She also called for immediate disciplinary and legal action against the officers responsible for what she described as a serious dereliction of duty. 'In Zara's case, the police did not just fail — they abandoned their duty. This is not a procedural oversight. It is a betrayal of public trust,' she said. Rahimah said the only way to restore public confidence and uncover the truth is through a full, independent inquest. 'An inquest will allow a transparent, impartial, and thorough examination of the facts. Without it, the truth will remain buried, justice will be denied, and public trust in our justice system will continue to erode,' she stressed. She urged the government to convene the inquest without delay, warning that continued inaction would only fuel public suspicion of a cover-up. Rahimah also questioned whether the school had effective systems to monitor bullying and whether complaints from students or parents were taken seriously and acted upon. 'The school must be held accountable for its role, or lack thereof. Immediate reforms are needed in how student welfare and discipline are managed,' she said. She urged the Ministry of Education to enact urgent, nationwide reforms, including: · Law-backed anti-bullying policies in all schools. · Continuous staff training on prevention and intervention. · A government-led framework that prioritises student voices, early intervention, and parental involvement. · A national oversight body to enforce accountability of school authority. As a mother, Rahimah also urged parents to remain vigilant and responsive to any signs of emotional distress in their children. 'Sudden withdrawal, fear of going to school, persistent sadness — these are not just phases. They are cries for help and must be taken seriously. Parents must engage with schools, file official complaints if necessary, and seek professional counselling. Early action can save lives,' she said. 'Zara's life mattered. Her death must not be swept aside by silence, incompetence, or inaction. We demand accountability from the police, the school, and all responsible parties. Justice for Zara must prevail — not just for her, but for every child at risk,' Rahimah concluded.
