Coronial inquest to examine Juliana Bonilla-Herrera murder that had a 'high degree of brutality'
Juliana Bonilla-Herrera told friends Joseph Brider was watching her and she felt threatened and unsafe.
Photo:
Supplied
A coronial inquest will examine how a convicted rapist was released on parole and managed in the community before brutally murdering a woman in her Christchurch home just 10 weeks after he was let out of prison.
Colombian national Juliana Bonilla-Herrera, 37, was attacked and stabbed to death in her Addington flat by Joseph James Brider in January 2022 after he was paroled to the flat next door.
She did not know about his criminal history of sexual violence.
Brider was sentenced to life in prison with a minimum non-parole period of 23 years and preventive detention in February 2023, meaning he would be managed by the Department of Corrections for the rest of his life.
Coroner Alexandra Cunninghame would examine more than 20 issues during the 10-day inquest beginning in Christchurch on Monday.
They included pre-release decisions, information provided to the New Zealand Parole Board, Department of Corrections checks about the suitability of Brider's accommodation, how he was managed and monitored following his release and whether the community should have been informed.
At Brider's sentencing
, Crown prosecutor Claire Boshier described the killing as a person's "worst nightmare", while Justice Jonathan Eaton said the murder involved "a high degree of brutality, cruelty, depravity and callousness".
In the weeks before she was killed, Bonilla-Herrera told friends Brider was watching her and she felt threatened and unsafe.
On the night of her murder he broke into her flat as she slept and subjected her to a prolonged and violent attack, repeatedly stabbing and beating her as she begged for her life.
Brider was granted parole and released in November 2021, three months ahead of his statutory release date.
He was assessed as being a medium-to-high risk of re-offending and paroled under 14 special conditions, including electronic monitoring.
The circumstances of Brider's release and his management were reviewed by the Department of Corrections and Parole Board following Bonilla-Herrera's murder.
An internal Department of Corrections review of Brider's management by chief probation officer Darius Fagan found the actions of staff neither caused nor could have prevented the crime.
In an independent review of the decision to release Brider commissioned by Parole Board chair Sir Ron Young, Professor Devon Polaschek concluded the board's decision to release him three months ahead of his statutory release date was reasonable.
The Parole Board had wanted to release Brider to the rehabilitation centre Salisbury Street Foundation, but said it was told there was no bed available at the time of his release.
Sir Ron said Corrections had supplied "incorrect information" when the board was deciding upon Brider's release conditions amounting to a "serious failure", but a separate independent review sought by the department rejected that allegation.
The review by Victoria Heine KC found that Corrections did not provide incorrect information to the Parole Board ahead of Brider's final hearing, although it noted the board would have benefited from being advised that Corrections had cancelled the Salisbury Street referral because of uncertainty about a bed.
Corrections later
changed its community notification policy
to include adult sex offenders following a separate independent review by Dr Gwenda Willis.
Previous guidelines determined that the community was only alerted if a parolee had offended against children.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
6 days ago
- RNZ News
Concern Mark Lundy parole board condition impinges
Mark Lundy hasn't been able to speak a word publicly since he was released from prison early last month. That's because the man twice convicted of murdering his wife and daughter in Palmerston North over 20 years ago cannot speak to the media, post on social media or even blog about his case. Given he proclaims his innocence, some experts are concerned that this Parole Board condition impinges on his right to freedom of speech. Jimmy Ellingham reports. Tags: To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
NZ Herald
7 days ago
- NZ Herald
LA unrest mirrors global protests: Government response under scrutiny
A strong government response to demonstrations that initially start peacefully, they say, often produces increasingly violent confrontations. In some instances, they add, leaders have used the prospect of civil unrest to use heavy-handed tactics or create pretexts to expand their grip on power. Here are three lessons from international protests, which experts say can help make sense of what is unfolding in Los Angeles. 1. Crackdowns shape optics, and optics shape uprisings. When states crack down on demonstrators, the images circulated online and in the news media of the resulting clashes shape the public's understanding of what is happening. Such optics, experts said, play a critical role in either bolstering or undermining the actions of a Government amid unrest. Harsh crackdowns may generate sympathy for protesters, said Omar Wasow, a political scientist at the University of California at Berkeley who studies protest movements. The 'spectacle of violence and repression,' he said, can frame states as 'bullies' unjustly squashing expression. But those images can also act like a 'double-edged sword,' Wasow said. When residents engage violently with the authorities, viral images – of burning cars or vandalised property, for example – can instead generate sympathy for the state. Because most people are not at the protests, the public's idea of the demonstrators can be coloured by the images of violence that gain the most traction, even if the events are largely peaceful. 'It's all about narrative,' said Laura Gamboa, an assistant professor of democracy and global affairs at the University of Notre Dame. To control their image in the face of state crackdown, movements need strong internal organisation, she added. But spontaneous uprisings often lack such organisation. Gamboa pointed to Honduras, where protests broke out after a disputed election in 2017. When peaceful protests turned violent, the movement struggled to 'overcome the narrative and gain the international support they needed'. Police officers control a crowd as people protest against the detention of migrants by federal law enforcement in downtown Los Angeles, June 9. Photo / Sinna Nasseri, The New York Times 2. Heavy-handed responses can lead to more violent protests. State repression inspires violence and increases the size of protests in general, said Gamboa, turning issue-based demonstrations into mass movements. 'You're being repressed; gas is thrown at you,' she said. 'It's your natural instinct to protect yourself by fighting back.' Beyond an immediate need to respond to violence, crackdowns inflame protests by broadening the cause to fight. What began, for instance, as opposition to the Colombian Government's tax overhaul in 2021 transformed into a much bigger campaign against police violence and the role of state force after a bloody crackdown on demonstrators. Aggressive state responses to protests led to as many as 300 deaths in Mozambique last year and hundreds of arrests in India in 2019 protests over a citizenship law. Sacramento police officers make an arrest during a protest against ICE raids in downtown Sacramento, California, on Monday, June 9. Photo / Andri Tambunan, The New York Times 3. Crackdowns can be stepping stones to wider power grabs. A Government's decision to exercise force, the experts said, can be an opening for authoritarians to erode democratic checks. Governments can violate norms to project power, said Andrew O'Donohue, a researcher at the Carnegie Endowment for Peace who studies democratic backsliding. They can then use the 'pushback to justify further crackdowns on institutions and protests', he added. After protesters and police continually pushed the limits of what had been accepted tactics during a year of protests in Hong Kong, the mainland Government ended the cycle of increasing violence in 2020 by stripping the semi-autonomous territory of many of its rights. The Government in Beijing justified the passage that year of the National Security Law, which handed the mainland Government broad powers to crack down on political activities, effectively outlawing pro-democracy parties and limiting free speech. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Pranav Baskar Photographs by: Mark Abramson, Sinna Nasseri, Andri Tambunan ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
NZ Herald
08-06-2025
- NZ Herald
Miguel Uribe shot in Bogota, critical condition after campaign attack
A prominent Colombian right-wing presidential candidate is in critical condition after being shot three times during a campaign event in Bogota on Saturday, authorities said. Thirty-nine-year-old Senator Miguel Uribe was speaking to supporters in the capital when a gunman shot him twice in the head and once in the knee
