
Trump imposes 25% tariffs on car imports, expecting to raise $100 billion in tax revenues
ADVERTISEMENT
"This will continue to spur growth," Trump told reporters. "We'll effectively be charging a 25% tariff."
The tariffs, which the White House expects to raise $100 billion (€93bn) in revenue annually, could be complicated as even US automakers source their components from around the world.
The tax hike starting in April means automakers could face higher costs and lower sales, though Trump argues that the tariffs will lead to more factories opening in the United States and the end of what he judges to be a "ridiculous" supply chain in which auto parts and finished vehicles are manufactured across the United States, Canada and Mexico.
To underscore his seriousness about the tariffs directive he signed, Trump said, "This is permanent."
Shares in General Motors fell roughly 3% in Wednesday trading. Ford's stock was up slightly. Shares in Stellantis, the owner of Jeep and Chrysler, dropped nearly 3.6%.
Trump has long said that tariffs against auto imports would be a defining policy of his presidency, betting that the costs created by the taxes would cause more production to relocate to the United States while helping narrow the budget deficit.
Reduced choices and higher prices
But US and foreign automakers have plants around the world to accommodate global sales while maintaining competitive prices — and it could take years for companies to design, build and open the new factories that Trump is promising.
"We're looking at much higher vehicle prices," said economist Mary Lovely, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. "We're going to see reduced choice. ... These kinds of taxes fall more heavily on the middle and working class.''
She said more households will be priced out of the new car market — where prices already average about $49,000 (€45,450)— and will have to hang on to aging vehicles.
The tariffs on autos would start being collected on 3 April, Trump said. If the taxes are fully passed onto consumers, the average auto price on an imported vehicle could jump by $12,500 (€11,595), a sum that could feed into overall inflation. Trump was voted back into the White House last year because voters believed he could bring down prices.
Reaction from trade partners
Foreign leaders were quick to criticise the tariffs, a sign that Trump could be intensifying a broader trade war that could damage growth worldwide.
"This is a very direct attack," Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said. "We will defend our workers. We will defend our companies. We will defend our country."
In Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen expressed regret at the US decision to target auto exports from Europe and vowed that the bloc would protect consumers and businesses.
"Tariffs are taxes — bad for businesses, worse for consumers equally in the US and the European Union," she said in a statement, adding that the EU's executive branch would assess the impact of the move, as well as other US tariffs planned for coming days.
As Trump announced the new tariffs, he indicated that he would like to provide a new incentive to help car buyers by allowing them to deduct from their federal income taxes the interest paid on auto loans, so long as their vehicles were made in America. That deduction would eat into some of the revenues that could be generated by the tariffs.
ADVERTISEMENT
The new tariffs would apply to both finished autos and parts used in the vehicles, according to a White House official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the taxes on a call with reporters. The tariffs would be on top of any existing taxes and were legally based on a 2019 Commerce Department investigation that occurred during Trump's first term on national security grounds.
For autos and parts under the USMCA trade pact applying to the United States, Mexico and Canada, the 25% tariffs would only apply to non-US content.
The administration is reasoning that there is excess capacity at US automakers that will enable them to ramp up production to avoid the tariffs by manufacturing more domestically, with the official noting that automakers have known since the Trump campaign that tariffs were coming.
How a
broader global trade war is
shaping up
The auto tariffs are part of a broader reshaping of global relations by Trump, who plans to impose what he calls "reciprocal" taxes on 2 April that would match the tariffs, sales taxes charged by other nations.
ADVERTISEMENT
Trump has already placed a 20% import tax on all imports from China for its role in the production of fentanyl. He similarly placed 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada, with a lower 10% tax on Canadian energy products.
Parts of the Mexico and Canada tariffs have been suspended, including the taxes on autos, after automakers objected and Trump responded by giving them a 30-day reprieve that is set to expire in April.
The president has also imposed 25% tariffs on all steel and aluminum imports, removing the exemptions from his earlier 2018 taxes on the metals. He also plans tariffs on computer chips, pharmaceutical drugs, lumber and copper.
His taxes risk igniting a broader global trade war with escalating retaliations that could crush global trade, potentially hurting economic growth while raising prices for families and businesses as some of the costs of the taxes get passed along by importers. When the European Union retaliated with plans for a 50% tariff on U.S. spirits, Trump responded by planning a 200% tax on alcoholic beverages from the EU.
ADVERTISEMENT
Trump also intends to place a 25% tariff on countries that import oil from Venezuela, even though the United States also imports oil from that nation.
Trump's aides maintain that the tariffs on Canada and Mexico are about stopping illegal immigration and drug smuggling. But the administration also wants to use the tariff revenues to lower the budget deficit and assert America's preeminence as the world's largest economy.
The president on Monday cited plans by South Korean automaker Hyundai to build a $5.8bn (€5.38bn) steel plant in Louisiana as evidence that tariffs would bring back manufacturing jobs.
Slightly more than 1 million people are employed domestically in the manufacturing of motor vehicles and parts, about 320,000 fewer than in 2000, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. An additional 2.1 million people work at auto and parts dealerships.
ADVERTISEMENT
The United States last year imported nearly 8 million cars and light trucks worth $244bn (€226bn). Mexico, Japan and South Korea were the top sources of foreign vehicles. Imports of auto parts came to more than $197bn (€183bn), led by Mexico, Canada and China, according to the Commerce Department.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
26 minutes ago
- Euronews
Elon Musk claims Donald Trump is mentioned in Epstein Files
Elon Musk has claimed that the reason the US administration has not released the Epstein Files in full is because President Donald Trump is mentioned in them. "@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public," he said in a post on Thursday night on X. He signed off his tweet with "Have a nice day, DJT!" That is a reference to the Justice Department records concerning the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who allegedly procured underage girls for sex for a string of famous names. Musk did not provide evidence for his claim or say how he had come to see the files. The Tesla and SpaceX chief was a former close advisor of Trump and headed the newly-created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) before his departure last week. DOGE, a controversial department, was tasked with shrinking the government and saw thousands of federal jobs axed. Since his departure, he has taken a swipe at Trump's tax-cut and spending bill, calling it a "disgusting abomination." In a post on Truth Social on Thursday evening, Trump said he had asked Musk to leave the administration, saying he was "wearing thin" and accusing him of going "CRAZY!" Our journalists are working on this story and will update it as soon as more information becomes available.

LeMonde
an hour ago
- LeMonde
Trump says he's 'very disappointed' in Musk, who called out the US president's 'ingratitude'
Tensions between Donald Trump and Elon Musk erupted into public view on Thursday, June 5, as the US president said he was "very disappointed" by his billionaire former aide's criticisms, and Musk hit back in real time on social media. "Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office after Musk slammed his tax and spending mega-bill as an "abomination." The world's richest man responded by live-tweeting on his X social media platform as Trump spoke on television, saying that the Republican would not have won the 2024 election without him and slamming him for "ingratitude." In an extraordinary rant as visiting German Chancellor Friedrich Merz sat mutely beside him, 78-year-old Trump unloaded on SpaceX and Tesla boss Musk in his first comments on the issue. "I'm very disappointed, because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here... All of a sudden, he had a problem," Trump said when asked about Musk. The clash comes less than a week after Trump held a grand Oval Office farewell for Musk as he wrapped up his time leading the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). South African-born Musk, 53, hit back minutes later, saying Trump's claims he had advance sight of the bill were "false." "Whatever," he added above a video of Trump saying Musk was upset about the loss of subsidies for electric vehicles. Musk then ratcheted up the public spat even further, saying the Republican would have lost the election without his support. He was the biggest donor to Trump's campaign, to the tune of nearly $300 million. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election," Musk said on X. "Such ingratitude." Tesla shares fell sharply on Wall Street, down 8%, after his comments, in a sign of the huge stakes for a falling out between the world's richest man and its most powerful. 'A little make-up?' A wistful-sounding Trump took reporters through the break-up with Musk on live television, in what at times sounded more like a therapy session than a meeting with a foreign leader. Trump talked about Musk's farewell appearance in the Oval Office on Friday, when he turned up with a black eye that he said was caused by a punch from his son. Musk at the time was also facing reports of drug use on the Trump campaign trail. "You saw a man who was very happy when he stood behind the Oval desk, and even with the black eye. I said, you want a little makeup? We'll get you a little makeup," Trump said. "But he said, 'No, I don't think so,' which is interesting and very nice. He wants to be who he is." Trump said he could understand why Musk was upset with some steps he had taken, including withdrawing a nominee to lead the NASA space agency whom the tech tycoon had backed. Through it all, the visiting German chancellor sat silently. Merz had prepared to avoid a repeat of the ambushes that Trump unleashed on the Ukrainian and South African presidents in the Oval Office – but in the end, it was Musk that the US president ambushed. At the center of the bitter row is Trump's "big, beautiful bill" on tax and spending. The centerpiece of his domestic agenda, it aims to continue tax cuts from his first term – and could define his second term and make or break Republican prospects in the 2026 midterm elections. Musk called it a "disgusting abomination" on Tuesday, on the grounds that it will increase the US deficit. A day later, the magnate called for Republicans to "kill the bill," and for an alternative plan that "doesn't massively grow the deficit."


Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Most NATO members endorse Trump demand to up defence spending
Most US allies at NATO have endorsed US President Donald Trump's demand that they invest 5% of GDP on defence and are ready to ramp up security spending, the alliance's Secretary General Mark Rutte said on Thursday. "There's broad support," Rutte told reporters after chairing a meeting of NATO defence ministers at the alliance's Brussels headquarters. "We are really close," he said, adding that he has "total confidence that we will get there" by the next NATO summit in three weeks. European allies and Canada have already been investing heavily in their armed forces, as well as on weapons and ammunition, since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. At the same time, some have balked at US demands to invest 5% of GDP on defence; 3.5% on core military spending and 1.5% on the roads, bridges, airfields and sea ports needed to deploy armies more quickly. In 2023, as Russia's war on Ukraine entered its second year, NATO leaders agreed to spend at least 2% of GDP on national defence budgets. So far, 22 of the 32 member countries have done so, and others are still struggling to meet the target. Trump and his NATO counterparts appear likely to endorse the new goal at a summit in The Hague on 24-25 June. Trump insists that US allies should spend at least 5% so America can focus on security priorities elsewhere, mostly in the Indo-Pacific and on its own borders. He has gained important leverage over other NATO countries by casting doubt over whether the United States would defend allies that spend too little. The new goal would involve a 1.5% increase over the current 2% goal for defence budgets. It means that all 32 countries would be investing the same percentage. The United States spends by far more than any other ally in dollar terms. But according to NATO's most recent figures, it was estimated to have spent 3.19% of GDP in 2024, down from 3.68% a decade ago. It's the only ally whose spending has dropped since 2014. While the two new figures do add up to 5%, factoring in improvements to civilian infrastructure so that armies can deploy more quickly significantly changes the basis on which NATO traditionally calculates defence spending. The seven-year time frame is also short by the alliance's usual standards. The far more modest 2% target, set after Russia annexed Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula in 2014, was meant to be reached over a decade. According to US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, Trump has done nothing less than save NATO. He told reporters that European allies around the table on Thursday had said: "We hear you. We all need increased capabilities. We all need to spend more. Thank you, President Trump, for reviving this alliance. It was an alliance that was sleepwalking to irrelevance." The extra spending will also be needed should the Trump administration announce a force draw down in Europe, where around 84,000 US troops are based, leaving European allies to plug any security gaps. Asked what the Pentagon's plans are, Hegseth did not explain but he said: "It would only be responsible for the United States to continually assess our force posture, which is precisely what we've done." "America can't be everywhere all the time, nor should we be and so there are reasons why we have troops in certain places," he said, offering the assurance that any review would be done "alongside our allies and partners to make sure it's the right size." During the meeting, Hegseth and his defence counterparts also approved purchasing targets for stocking up on weapons and military equipment to better defend Europe, the Arctic and the North Atlantic. The "capability targets" lay out goals for each of the 32 nations to purchase priority equipment like air defence systems, long-range missiles, artillery, ammunition, drones and "strategic enablers" such as air-to-air refuelling, heavy air transport and logistics. Each nation's plan is classified, so details are scarce. The new targets are assigned by NATO based on a blueprint agreed upon in 2023, the alliance's biggest planning shakeup since the Cold War, to defend its territory from an attack by Russia or another major adversary. Under those plans, NATO would aim to have up to 300,000 troops ready to move to its eastern flank within 30 days, although experts suggest the allies would struggle to muster those kinds of numbers.