‘Stunned and shocked': Hawaii police hunt suspect in acid attack that left man critically injured; probe underway
Hawaiian authorities are searching for a suspect who allegedly threw acid at a man's face in Honolulu on Friday night, leaving him in critical condition, reported Fox News. Honolulu police said officers responded to an assault report shortly after 10.00 pm in the city's Chinatown district.
Witnesses reported that a 30-year-old man was crossing the street when an unidentified suspect 'threw an unidentified liquid in his face, causing several burns,' as per the Honolulu police department, reports Khon 2.
Emergency responders took the victim to a hospital, where he remains in critical condition, as per an HPD official, reported Fox News.
The liquid was later identified as sulphuric acid by the Honolulu Fire Department, a highly corrosive chemical capable of causing serious burns to skin, eyes, and internal tissues.
Officials described the suspect as a man about six feet tall, wearing a blue fitted shirt and a dew rag, with a camera around his neck and carrying a red bottle.
"The preliminary investigation indicates that the victim did not know the suspect," said an HPD spokesperson, reported Fox News. "Right now, detectives are canvassing the scene to recover any surveillance video and locate any additional witnesses."
HPD classified the incident as first-degree assault, a serious felony under Hawaii law.
Detectives are yet to identify a motive, and it remains unclear whether the crime can be classified as a hate crime.
'I'm actually stunned and shocked at this point, and the reason I'm stunned and shocked is because police have actually been doing a good job at patrolling the place now,' said Ernest Carvalho, a Chinatown neighbourhood board member, reported Hawaii News Now.
Two years ago, a man in Mililani threw acid at a 20-year-old woman, leaving her in a critical condition.
Months after that, a similar incident occurred when a 25-year-old Chinese exchange teacher was also attacked with acid.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Melania Trump slaps Hunter Biden with $1 billion threat over explosive Epstein allegations - here's what he said
Melania Trump has taken legal action against Hunter Biden : After Hunter Biden made shocking comments linking Melania Trump to Jeffrey Epstein , she took strong legal action against him. The first lady's lawyers have made a formal request for an apology and retraction, saying that a lawsuit for more than $1 billion in damages could follow. The controversy has gotten a lot of people talking and started up old arguments about the power and dangers of public statements when they are in the political spotlight. Melania Trump wants Hunter Biden to take back what he said about Jeffrey Epstein introducing her to Donald Trump. Her lawyers say the claims are "false, defamatory, and extremely damaging," and they warn that she could be sued for $1 billion. Biden's inaction has worsened the public and legal battle over reputations and political stories, as per a report by Fox News. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Gold Is Surging in 2025 — Smart Traders Are Already In IC Markets Learn More Undo What did Hunter Biden say about Melania Trump? Hunter Biden talked to journalist Andrew Callaghan in early August and said that Jeffrey Epstein was the one who introduced Melania Trump to Donald Trump. Biden said that Michael Wolff, a writer known for his controversial and often disputed political writings, gave him this information. ALSO READ: Betrayal? Outrage erupts as Trump reportedly makes secret Alaska natural resource offer to Putin Live Events Biden talked about what he thought were "wide and deep" ties between the Trumps and Epstein during the interview. These comments quickly spread online, gaining traction on social media and being repeated in many news stories. Melania Trump's legal team quickly responded with anger, as per a report by The AP News. What has Melania Trump done legally? On August 6, lawyer Alejandro Brito, who was representing the first lady, sent a letter to Biden and his lawyer Abbe Lowell that was very strong. Brito asked for an immediate retraction, a public apology, and the removal of the statements from all platforms in the letter. ALSO READ: Orca attack mystery: What really happened to marine trainer Jessica Radcliffe The letter says that Biden is spreading false information that came from Wolff's reporting, which has since been retracted. Brito said that these kinds of comments have caused "overwhelming financial and reputational harm" to Mrs. Trump and warned that if they don't stop, they will be sued for more than $1 billion in damages. Earlier in August, the former first son stated in the "Hunter Biden Returns" video interview that "Epstein introduced Melania to Trump." The connections are really deep and extensive. Biden additionally stated that "Jeffrey Epstein introduced Melania, and that's how Melania and the first lady and the President met," as quoted in a report by Fox News. Brito also told Biden to keep all evidence, such as emails and records about Melania Trump, and stressed that destroying or changing materials could have serious legal consequences, as per a report by Fox News. Why is this argument getting so much attention? There are a few reasons why this legal case has gotten a lot of attention. First, it involves two well-known political families that are already under a lot of media attention. Second, the claim brings up the very controversial and sensitive subject of Jeffrey Epstein's network. ALSO READ: Microsoft eyes remote work crackdown, office return could be imminent - here's what it means for staff Sources close to Melania Trump's team say that Biden has also missed the August 7 deadline to retract. These sources say that Biden's camp leaked the demand letter to a reporter, which they see as a sign that they are worried about being held responsible. A Little Background on the Claims The statement in question comes from journalist Michael Wolff, who has made similar claims in the past. The Daily Beast published Wolff's claims, but after Melania Trump's lawyers sent them a cease-and-desist letter, they apologized to her and took down the article. After getting a legal complaint from Trump's lawyers, political strategist James Carville also apologized on the air and took down related content. What's Next? Melania Trump's team looks ready to move forward with a lawsuit because Biden has not yet met their demands. If the case goes to court, it could test the limits of U.S. law when it comes to defaming public figures, which is a very high bar. The situation is still not resolved, and it could have legal and political effects that go beyond the people involved. The first lady says that her autobiography, Melania, tells the true story of how she met Donald Trump: at a 1998 New York Fashion Week party with modeling agent Paolo Zampolli. FAQs What has Melania Trump accused Hunter Biden of? She claims Biden made false and damaging remarks about her and Jeffrey Epstein, which harmed her reputation. What action has Melania Trump threatened? Her lawyers have threatened a $1 billion lawsuit if Biden does not retract and apologize.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Powerball Winner arrested after $167 Million Jackpot win, bodycam footage reveals what happened
Newly released police body camera footage from Florida shows a recent Powerball winner being arrested after allegedly kicking a sheriff's deputy in the face, just a day after he and his mother were celebrated for winning the largest jackpot in Kentucky history. Powerball Winner: Incident at St. Pete Beach Resort The Pinellas County Sheriff's Office on Tuesday released the bodycam video of the April 29 incident at the Tradewinds Resort in St. Pete Beach, Florida. Deputies had been dispatched to the location following reports of a disturbance involving multiple guests. On arrival, deputies found two men fighting and a woman lying on the ground. The footage appears to show 50-year-old James Farthing, shirtless, in a confrontation with another man before a deputy intervenes to separate them. Moments later, Farthing can be seen allegedly swinging his leg and kicking the deputy in the face, as per a report by Fox News. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Here's The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Gutter Guards Installation HomeBuddy Click Here Undo Powerball Winner: Deputy's Account and Arrest According to the Sheriff's Office, Farthing had earlier punched another hotel guest during an argument. When the deputy attempted to break up the altercation, Farthing allegedly lashed out with a kick before attempting to run away. Deputies deployed a taser to subdue him, and he was tackled to the ground before being taken into custody. The bodycam recording also captures the injured deputy saying, 'No shirt comes over to kick him, misses and hits me right here,' pointing to his face. Live Events The other man involved in the brawl was also placed in handcuffs. Powerball Winner: Charges Filed Farthing now faces one felony count of battery on a law enforcement officer and two misdemeanor counts, simple battery and resisting an officer, as per the Fox News report. His girlfriend, Jacqueline Fightmaster, was also arrested in connection with the incident. She was charged with one misdemeanor count of disorderly intoxication after allegedly attempting to start fights with other patrons in the resort bar. Powerball Winner: From Jackpot Celebration to Jail The arrest came less than 24 hours after Farthing and his mother, Linda Grizzle, were publicly named as the winners of a $167.3 million Powerball jackpot, the largest prize ever awarded in Kentucky. Farthing had purchased the $2 winning ticket at a gas station in Georgetown, Kentucky. The ticket matched all numbers drawn, securing the record-breaking prize. Lottery officials said the mother-son duo chose to take the lump sum option, though the final after-tax amount was not disclosed at the time. 'It's going to be a good Mother's Day,' Grizzle had told Kentucky Lottery officials during the announcement. 'This is going to pay off my debt.' Powerball Winner: Criminal Background and Legal Status Farthing's rapid fall from lottery glory to a Florida jail cell is compounded by his extensive criminal history. Reports indicate he has spent a combined 30 years in prison for various offenses across nine Kentucky counties, including charges of assault, bribery, and drug trafficking. He was on parole in Kentucky at the time of the Florida incident. In June, he waived his right to a probable cause hearing and requested to serve the remainder of his sentence. He is expected to be released later this month. Powerball Jackpot Context The April win marked the largest Powerball payout in Kentucky's history and one of the most significant lottery wins in the United States in 2025. The Powerball game, operated across multiple states, often sees jackpots climb into the hundreds of millions, with winners given the choice of 30 annual instalments or a one-time cash payout. Farthing's ticket was part of a draw that attracted millions of entries, with odds of securing the jackpot at approximately 1 in 292.2 million. Powerball Winner: Public Reaction The case has attracted significant attention both in Kentucky, where the jackpot was won, and in Florida, where the arrest took place. Social media reactions ranged from disbelief at the quick reversal of fortunes to criticism over Farthing's behaviour so soon after becoming a multimillionaire. FAQs How much did James Farthing win in the Powerball jackpot? He and his mother won $167.3 million, the largest Powerball prize in Kentucky history. What charges does the Powerball winner face in Florida? Farthing faces one felony count of battery on a law enforcement officer, two misdemeanour counts of simple battery, and resisting an officer. His girlfriend faces a misdemeanour charge of disorderly intoxication.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
US embeds trackers in AI chip shipments to catch diversions to China
By Fanny Potkin, Karen Freifeld and Jun Yuan Yong SINGAPORE/NEW YORK: U.S. authorities have secretly placed location tracking devices in targeted shipments of advanced chips they see as being at high risk of illegal diversion to China , according to two people with direct knowledge of the previously unreported law enforcement tactic. The measures aim to detect AI chips being diverted to destinations which are under U.S. export restrictions, and apply only to select shipments under investigation, the people said. They show the lengths to which the U.S. has gone to enforce its chip export restrictions on China, even as the Trump administration has sought to relax some curbs on Chinese access to advanced American semiconductors. The trackers can help build cases against people and companies who profit from violating U.S. export controls, said the people who declined to be named because of the sensitivity of the issue. Location trackers are a decades-old investigative tool used by U.S. law enforcement agencies to track products subject to export restrictions, such as airplane parts. They have been used to combat the illegal diversion of semiconductors in recent years, one source said. Five other people actively involved in the AI server supply chain say they are aware of the use of the trackers in shipments of servers from manufacturers such as Dell and Super Micro , which include chips from Nvidia and AMD . Those people said the trackers are typically hidden in the packaging of the server shipments. They did not know which parties were involved in installing them and where along the shipping route they were put in. Reuters was not able to determine how often the trackers have been used in chip related investigations or when U.S. authorities started using them to investigate chip smuggling. The U.S. started restricting the sale of advanced chips by Nvidia, AMD and other manufacturers to China in 2022. In one 2024 case described by two of the people involved in the server supply chain, a shipment of Dell servers with Nvidia chips included both large trackers on the shipping boxes and smaller, more discreet devices hidden inside the packaging - and even within the servers themselves. A third person said they had seen images and videos of trackers being removed by other chip resellers from Dell and Super Micro servers. The person said some of the larger trackers were roughly the size of a smartphone. The U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security, which oversees export controls and enforcement, is typically involved, and Homeland Security Investigations and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, may take part too, said the sources. The HSI and FBI both declined to comment. The Commerce Department did not respond to requests for comment. The Chinese foreign ministry did not have immediate comment. Super Micro said in a statement that it does not disclose its "security practices and policies in place to protect our worldwide operations, partners, and customers." It declined to comment on any tracking actions by U.S. authorities. Dell said it is "not aware of a U.S. Government initiative to place trackers in its product shipments." Nvidia declined to comment, while AMD did not answer a request for comment. CHIP RESTRICTIONS The United States, which dominates the global AI chip supply chain, has sought to limit exports of chips and other technology to China in recent years to restrain its military modernization. It has also put restrictions on the sale of chips to Russia to undercut war efforts against Ukraine. The White House and both houses of Congress have proposed requiring U.S. chip firms to include location verification technology with their chips to prevent them from being diverted to countries where U.S. export regulations restrict sales. China has slammed the U.S. exports curbs as part of a campaign to suppress its rise and criticized the location tracking proposal. Last month, the country's powerful cyberspace regulator summoned Nvidia to a meeting to express its concerns over the risks of its chips containing "backdoors" that would allow remote access or control, which the company has strongly denied. In January, Reuters reported the U.S. had traced organized AI chip smuggling to China via countries such as Malaysia, Singapore, and the UAE - but it is unclear if tracking devices were involved. The use of trackers by U.S. law enforcement goes back decades. In 1985, Hughes Aircraft shipped equipment subject to U.S. export controls, according to a court decision reviewed by Reuters. Executing a search warrant, the U.S. Customs Service intercepted the crate at a Houston airport and installed a tracking device, the decision noted. U.S. export enforcement agents sometimes install trackers after getting administrative approval. Other times they get a judge to issue a warrant authorizing use of the device, one source said. With a warrant, it is easier to use the information as evidence in a criminal case. A company may be told about the tracker, if they are not a subject of the investigation, and may consent to the government's installation of the trackers, the source added. But the devices can also be installed without their knowledge. People involved in diverting export-controlled chip and server shipments to China said they were aware of the devices. Two of the supply chain sources, who are China-based resellers of export-controlled chips, said they regularly took care to inspect diverted shipments of AI chip servers for the trackers due to the risks of the devices being embedded. An affidavit filed with a U.S Department of Justice complaint regarding the arrests of two Chinese nationals charged with illegally shipping tens of millions of dollars' worth of AI chips to China earlier this month describes one co-conspirator instructing another to check for trackers on Quanta H200 servers, which contain Nvidia chips. It said the English language text was sent by a co-conspirator, whose name was redacted, to one of the defendants, Yang Shiwei. "Pay attention to see if there is a tracker on it, you must look for it carefully," said the person, who went on to call the Trump administration by an obscenity. "Who knows what they will do."
