Indiana bans sugary drinks, candy from SNAP
Once a week, a single mother and her two young children sit around a table to play a board game. Between turns, the three of them bite into a candy bar and sip a can of soda.
The mother, who is on SNAP, has a job, but has a limited income so she can't afford to take her children on vacation or to the movie theater, said her friend Stephanie Boys, an associate professor of social work and an adjunct professor of law at Indiana University.
To that mother, Boys said game night with a little treat is how she makes memories with her children.
'They eat healthy the rest of the time, it's just that's their family time,' Boys said. 'She is on such a limited budget that she doesn't know if she'll be able to afford the weekly treat.'
Her friend's son is autistic, Boys said, so he relies on structure and always looks forward to family game night, which includes their weekly sweet treat. Boys said her friend has been stressed further because her son only takes his medicine with a sip of ginger ale.
'Having that weekly night to look forward to is very important to him. It's going to be even more difficult than with a neurotypical kid to try to explain, 'we're still going to play our games, we just might not have our soda with it,'' Boys said.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins recently signed a waiver filed by Indiana officials to remove sugary soft drinks and candy from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP.
'More taxpayer-funded SNAP dollars are spent on sugary drinks and candy than on fruits and vegetables. Indiana is proud to lead the way in the Make America Healthy Again agenda by making this common sense move to return the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program to its intended purpose: nutrition,' said Indiana Mike Braun in a statement.
Braun's statement claimed purchases of sugary drinks, desserts and candy exceed the combined sales of fruits and vegetables on SNAP, but data does not bear that out. A USDA study from 2016 showed soft drinks comprise around 5% of each dollar spent in SNAP and candy amounts to 2%. The vast majority — 80% — is spent on meat, fruits, vegetables, rice, beans, eggs, dairy and prepared foods.
Children enrolled in SNAP consume 43% more sugary drinks than non-SNAP recipients with similar incomes, according to Braun's statement. Boys and Leslie Lenkowsky, professor emeritus in public affairs and philanthropic studies at Indiana University, said they haven't seen that statistic in SNAP reports and aren't sure where Braun received that information.
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was in Indianapolis in April to roll out Braun's Make Indiana Healthy Again initiative and stated that every governor should follow Braun's lead.
Lenkowsky said the U.S. has had various food stamp programs that have gone through many changes in eligibility rules and restrictions over the years. Indiana's ban on sugary drinks and candy will be hard to enforce, he said, because it will rely on merchants at stores telling customers they can't make those purchases using SNAP.
What will likely happen, Lenkowsky said, is that people on SNAP will try to re-budget to see if they can afford soda and candy another way. If not, he said what could happen is people negotiate with their friends or neighbors that they will buy them a grocery item or two on their SNAP benefits if the other person buys them soda or candy.
While the pendulum may shift on food benefits, Lenkowsky said the bottom line is that people in poverty need support.
'People may be poor and needy, but they deserve respect,' Lenkowsky said.
Boys said she wasn't surprised that Indiana was approved to remove sugary soft drinks and candy from SNAP because some U.S. Congressmen and women have proposed similar actions.
Arkansas filed a similar waiver to Indiana's by banning soft drinks and candy, Nebraska filed for a waiver to ban sugary drinks and energy drinks from SNAP, and Iowa filed a waiver to ban anything that's eligible for sales tax, which bans sugary snacks and drinks, from SNAP, Boys said.
'I think we're going to see more and more states asking for these waivers,' Boys said.
But waivers like this don't address food deserts or access to healthy foods, Boys said. People who use SNAP typically live closer to a convenience store than a grocery store, so there's more access to snacks and processed foods, she said.
While convenience stores do sell some healthy items, like apples and bananas, the cost of those foods is greatly marked up compared to a grocery store, Boys said. Government officials should work toward incentivizing healthier eating in another way, she said.
Removing sugary drinks and candy from SNAP will put more of a stigma on children who live in poverty, Boys said.
For example, Boys said at her children's school students are encouraged to bring candy on standardized test days to share with the class. Under this change, some students won't be able to participate.
'If their friends come to school with candy and they don't have that, it's hard for parents to explain why they can't buy that. Especially when you go to the grocery store and at check out there's all this candy right in front of you,' Boys said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Seven ways the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' could affect New Mexico
Jun. 2—A massive federal budget bill is winding its way through the Senate after passing the House in May. The controversial tax package would deliver on several of President Donald Trump's campaign promises and could mean big changes for New Mexicans. Democrats have criticized the bill for its cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and tax breaks for high-income earners, while some Republicans say the funding cuts don't go far enough to trim down the bloated federal budget and the ballooning deficit — the tax cuts alone would be paid for, in part, by increasing the country's deficit by $3.8 trillion over 10 years. On average, U.S. households would see an increase in resources from the government from 2026 to 2034, if the House budget bill makes it into law, according to a Congressional Budget Office (CBO) analysis. But the bottom 10% of income earners would see a loss in household resources, primarily because of changes to Medicaid and SNAP. Meanwhile those in the top 10% would see an increase in household resources, because the taxes they owe would be reduced. Though House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) accused the CBO of shoddy math, saying the agency was more than $1 trillion off. Here's a look at how the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," could affect New Mexico. 1. Medicaid The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" would cut approximately $700 billion from Medicaid spending over the next 10 years and introduce new work requirements and co-pays. With a high poverty level, New Mexico has the highest rate of Medicaid enrollment. More than 90,000 New Mexico residents could lose health care coverage because of the changes. This provision faces opposition from several GOP senators; but conversely those in the House who pushed for more Medicaid cuts would turn against the bill if these cuts are watered down or eliminated. Medicaid represents the toughest of tight rope acts in this bill to get through both chambers to final passage. 2. Potential hospital closures The Medicaid funding cuts could also put more rural hospitals at risk of closing, Democrats have argued, because Medicaid and Medicare are important revenue sources for rural hospitals. Three of 27 inpatient rural hospitals in New Mexico are already at immediate risk of closing, according to a report from the Center for Healthcare Quality & Payment Reform. Overall, seven of the state's rural hospitals are at risk of closing. In part, that's because private insurance plans do not adequately compensate some rural hospitals for the services they provide, according to the report. Rural hospitals often already lose money on uninsured and Medicaid patients, but the hospitals not at risk of closure are often making enough profit on patient services from private health plans to balance those losses. 3. Food aid More than 460,000 New Mexicans receive SNAP benefits. The House bill would cut $267 billion from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, spending over the next 10 years, in part by introducing a cost share with states. It would also introduce new work requirements to the program. The proposed changes could cost New Mexico $300 million. 4. Extending tax cuts The budget bill would extend 2017 tax cuts passed during Trump's first administration. That would prevent tax increases for 62% of taxpayers, which would happen if the tax cuts expire, according to the Tax Foundation. This would extend, or make permanent, tax cuts for most New Mexicans. Republicans have highlighted the benefits to working families, like making the child tax credit permanent. But Democrats have criticized some measures that would benefit the very wealthy, like permanently increasing the estate and gift tax exemption threshold to $15 million. 5. No tax on tips The House-passed budget bill includes no taxes on tips and overtime through 2028, fulfilling one of Trump's campaign promises. The idea of no tax on tips was appealing enough to voters that even former Vice-President Kamala Harris added it to her campaign platform. The Economic Policy Institute has criticized the idea, arguing that it helps relatively few workers, undermines pay increases for non-tipped workers and could expand the use of tipped workers, a system "rife with discrimination and worker abuse." New Mexico's restaurant industry, where tipped employees are often most visible, employs over 90,000 people in the state and generates more than $5.3 billion in annual sales, according to the New Mexico Restaurant Association. 6. Student loans and Pell Grants The budget bill would eliminate some repayment options for future federal student loan borrowers, and introduce a new, income-based repayment plan. Borrowers with loans disbursed before July 2026 could keep their current repayment plan. It would eliminate new borrowers' ability to pause loan payments during economic hardship. The bill also increases Pell Grant credit requirements and changes eligibility requirements. In the 2023-2024 academic year, there were 37,708 federal Pell Grant awards in New Mexico, according to the National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities. 7. Preventing AI regulation The House bill includes a decade-long ban on state regulations of artificial intelligence. Adopting a light regulatory style for the AI industry will allow the AI supply chain to rapidly grow in the U.S., Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said during a Senate Commerce Committee hearing. "The country that leads in AI will shape the 21st century global order," Cruz said. New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez signed onto a letter opposing the measure, along with attorneys general from 39 states and territories. A bill to penalize using AI-generated content for harassment or defamation was introduced in the state Legislature earlier this year. "Though it didn't pass, strong state-level protections are still urgently needed, and states must have the flexibility to regulate this emerging technology if Congress refuses to act," Torrez said in a statement. This provision faces an uphill battle in the Senate where even No. 2 Senate Republican John Cornyn, R-Texas, has said it could fail a Byrd Rule challenge, which says that every line in the budget must be related to the budget and not policy.
CBS News
3 hours ago
- CBS News
Pennsylvania food banks worry about SNAP cuts in federal government's proposed budget bill
Food banks fear that if the budget bill heading to the U.S. Senate gets passed, thousands of people in Pennsylvania will go hungry. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program helps nearly 2 million Pennsylvanians put food on the table. "For every meal the food bank provides, SNAP provides nine meals," said Jennifer Miller, CEO of the Westmoreland Food Bank. Leaders from the Westmoreland Food Bank and Feed Pennsylvania came together with the secretaries of the Pennsylvania Departments of Human Services and Agriculture to discuss how proposed federal changes would impact the most vulnerable in the state. They said the House-passed reconciliation bill would cut nearly $300 billion from the SNAP program through 2034. "We have existing work requirements in SNAP, but this bill would make them more strict. And as a result, we believe at least 140,000 Pennsylvanians could lose access to food assistance that helps people be healthy enough to go to work in the first place," Pennsylvania Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Val Arkoosh said. Food banks fear they will see substantially more people lining up for food. "We are not equipped to absorb the massive demand that would result from reduced access to federal nutrition programs. Food banks cannot replace the scale, the reach and the stability of the SNAP program," Miller said. "If enacted, these cuts would eliminate more meals per year distributed by the entire charitable food network in this country," said Julie Bancroft, CEO of Feeding Pennsylvania. State Agriculture Secretary Russell Redding said losing SNAP dollars would also hit farm families. "Roughly 25 cents of every grocery dollar spent goes straight back to the farm, 25 cents for every dollar for food purchased at the grocery store," Redding said. Arkoosh said the proposed cuts would cost the state over $1 billion more annually. "The result would be devastating for Pennsylvania families and for our economy," Arkoosh said. Many believe the fight is not over, though. "You all have a role in contacting your senators, your congressperson, letting them know how this impacts our commnity, our neighbors, our friends," Westmoreland County Commissioner Ted Kopas said.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
7 Gulf World Marine Park dolphins OK'd to be transferred to another facility: NOAA
The Brief Dolphins are being transferred from Gulf World Marine Park in Florida's Panhandle amid deepening welfare concerns and investigations. 7 of the 11 dolphins will be transferred to a facility in St. Augustine, Florida. Four others expected to be transferred. Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, USDA, and FWC have launched investigations or are assisting with investigations. PANAMA CITY BEACH, Fla. - Seven of the 11 dolphins at Gulf World Marine Park in Florida's Panhandle have received approval to be transferred to another facility in Florida. NOAA Fisheries confirmed to FOX 35 on Monday that it issued an emergency waiver on May 30 to transfer 7 bottlenose dolphins, and that it anticipates issuing another emergency waiver for the remaining four dolphins when a new facility is found to house them. Gulf World Marine Park has been under scrutiny over the last several weeks and months following the deaths of five dolphins and concerning inspection reports from the USDA's Animal & Plant Health Inspection Service. FOX 35 reached out to the USDA on Monday for an update. What they're saying "On May 30, NOAA Fisheries issued an emergency waiver to transport 7 bottlenose dolphins to Marineland Dolphin Adventure in Florida. A separate waiver for the remaining 4 rough-toothed dolphins will be issued as soon as Gulf World makes arrangements with a facility that can receive them," NOAA said in a statement. The seven dolphins have been cleared to be transferred to Marineland Dolphin Adventure in St. Augustine, Florida. That marine park is owned by The Dolphin Company, which owns Gulf World Marine Park and three other facilities in Florida, as well as a number of facilities in Mexico and Central America. The USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service released a new statement on Monday. "APHIS has been in regular contact with NOAA and continues to work collaboratively with state and federal partners. Facilities are required to notify NOAA regarding the movement of marine mammals." "APHIS takes its mission to ensure the humane treatment of animals covered by the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) very seriously. We continue to conduct inspections and work with facilities to ensure they are in compliance with regulations under the AWA," a spokesperson said in a previous statement. Enforcement actions by the USDA can include letters of warning, fines, animal license suspensions and/or revocations. The backstory At least five dolphins have died at Gulf World Marine Park in Palm Beach County, Florida, sparking outrage and protests about animal rights activists, and investigations by federal and state agencies, including USDA, FWC, and Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier. Federal inspection reports note several concerns found within the facility, including dolphin holding tanks filled with algae, broken water filters, lack of shade, and deteriorating facilities. One report notes that a dolphin died during a public show in March 2025, but trainers did not respond quickly due to not being able to see the dolphin at the bottom of the tank due to the level of algae. The USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service has conducted 19 inspections at Gulf World Marine Park since 2014. The most recent inspections were conducted on Jan. 8 and March 4, 2025. Those inspection reports detail a facility seemingly in disrepair: "All the dolphin pools still have an excessive amount of at least 6 inches of algae bloom along all the walls and bottom of pools and clumps of algae floating in pools" - March 4 inspection "When the APHIS inspector was standing above the main pool, looking down into the water, it was difficult to see the dolphins if they are approximately three feet below the water" - March 4 inspection "At the time of the inspection, there is no working filter for dolphin east pool which went down on November 13, 2024. According to staff, the filtration for dolphin west is only functioning at 50 percent" - Jan. 8 inspection "There is an abundance of algae growth in multiple dolphin pools with the inspector scraping algae off a step that was almost 6 inches in length" - Jan. 8 inspection "The facility has lost six maintenance employees in the past three months leaving them with two maintenance employees. Additionally the facility has lost seven animal care employees in the past three months" - Jan. 8 inspection "At the time of the inspection, the penguins had been moved to an indoor room due to colder temperatures. The room where the animals are housed appears to be an storage space with carpet, old sound equipment with cords hanging down the cabinets, paint for crafts in the area, dust and debris throughout the room" - Jan. 8 inspection "The perimeter around the dolphin stadium pool is in the early stages of disrepair with paint flaking off right at the edge of the pool" - Jan. 8 inspection "The facility still has not provided shade over the far side of dolphin east pool where dry guest interactions are done, or the over the main show stage where the dolphins station for food during training sessions with the trainers or during public guest interactions after shows" - Jan. 8 inspection "Along the far wall of the sea lion stadium pool where a seal was swimming, rust is still coming through the wall and running down the wall and into the water" - Jan. 8 inspection FOX 35 Orlando reached out to The Dolphin Company and Gulf World Marine Park on Friday for comment, but did not hear back. According to its website, The Dolphin Company operates 21 dolphin experiences and marine aquariums in the United States, Mexico, the Caribbean, and Italy. There are four in Florida: Gulf World, Panama City Marineland, St. Augustine Miami Seaquarium, Miami Dolphin Connection, Duck Key It's unclear if the state's investigation includes the other Florida facilities. USA Today reported that Mexico-based The Dolphin Company filed for bankruptcy protection earlier this year. The Source The information in this article comes from statements and/or social media posts from Attorney General James Uthmeier, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, the USDA Animal & Plant Health Inspection Service, public USDA inspection reports, local and national media reports, and a March 24 news release from the City of Panama Beach.
