Jeremy Rockliff reappointed as Tasmanian premier despite lack of majority parliament support
The premier, Jeremy Rockliff, met with the governor, Barbara Baker, on Wednesday at Government House to formally ask for his minority government to remain.
Baker accepted the request after Rockliff told her he expected to gain the confidence of the lower house, the governor said.
Rockliff said on Wednesday he would serve as premier for a full four-year term.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
'Through sensible communication, everyone working together, pragmatism, working together on policies, working together in the best interests of Tasmanians, this is a government and a parliament that will last the full term,' he told reporters after the governor confirmed his appointment.
'What we want to do, by evidenced of today, is get on with the job,.'
He said he had taken 'learnings' from the previous parliament which was cut short by a vote of no confidence.
'We want to build on the progress that was made in terms of how parliament works for the betterment of all members of parliament and, of course, that means the betterment of all Tasmanians. And move forward.'
In a statement, the governor explained why she appointed Rockliff despite his inability to demonstrate a majority backing in parliament.
'In a hung parliament, where no one clearly holds the confidence of the majority of the House of Assembly, the incumbent has the right to remain in office in order to test the numbers in the House of Assembly and for parliament to have the final say in who should be premier,' Baker said.
'I consider the convention of incumbency applies in the current circumstances.
'I shall reappoint the premier.
'It is better for confidence to be determined inside and not outside the parliament.'
Rockliff and his cabinet are set to be sworn in next week, before state parliament returns in a fortnight on 19 August.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
The governor said the detailed reasons for her decision would be published on her website later on Wednesday.
On Tuesday, Rockliff said he had not secured supply and confidence agreements with key crossbenchers but thought it was 'not necessary' in this instance.
The Labor leader, Dean Winter, was still vying for his party to form government, revealing he had stepped up negotiations with crossbenchers, independents in particular, in recent days but ruled out a deal with the Greens.
The final makeup of Tasmania's parliament is 14 Liberals, 10 Labor, five Greens, one Shooters, Fishers and Farmers MP and five independents.
The 19 July election was triggered after Rockliff lost a no-confidence motion, prompting the state's second election in 16 months.
A key sticking point in forming government is the major parties' backing of a new $1bn stadium in Hobart, which the Greens and some independents oppose.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Solomon Islands blocks US, China, Taiwan from Pacific's top political meet
SYDNEY, Aug 7 (Reuters) - Solomon Islands Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele has said that 21 donor countries, including the United States and China, will not be invited to the region's top political meeting, a move that follows pressure from Beijing to exclude Taiwan. China's biggest security ally in the Pacific Islands, the Solomon Islands is hosting the annual meeting of the 18-member bloc's forum in September. Three island states have diplomatic ties with Taiwan and not China, and they had expressed concern Taiwanese officials would be blocked from entering the country. Solomon Islands switched ties from Taiwan to China in 2019, and removed Taiwan from a list of countries eligible for concessional entry in April. Beijing, which has deepened its ties in the Pacific, claims Taiwan as its own territory. Manele told the Solomon Islands parliament on Wednesday his cabinet had decided no dialogue partners would be invited to this year's event, because a review of each country's relationship with the Pacific had not been completed. He said he had informed the forum's 18 leaders of the decision this week. The World Bank, Asia Development Bank and civil society groups would attend, he added. Opposition party politician Peter Kenilorea Jr, chairman of the parliament's foreign relations committee, said the decision was "a massive missed opportunity" for Pacific Island countries to meet global donors. "We know this issue is all about China and Taiwan," he told parliament. After forum leaders were told of the decision, Marshall Islands President Hilda Heine criticised interference in the forum's affairs in a speech to the Taiwan ally's parliament. China had "interfered" at last year's meeting in Tonga to change the language of the leaders' communique, Heine said. References to Taiwan were removed after Chinese diplomats complained. The Pacific Islands is among the world's most aid-reliant regions, and on the frontline of rising sea levels. The region has also been a focus of increasing security competition between the United States and China. While U.S. allies Australia and New Zealand are the largest forum members, neither Beijing nor Washington are part of the group. Kenilorea Jr said he feared that China, which has a strong presence in Solomon Islands, will hold bilateral meetings with Pacific leaders on the margins of the forum regardless. "This could be seen by some PIF leaders as a betrayal of the collective and could risk an even bigger rift of the group," he said in comments to Reuters. China's embassy did not respond to a request for comment. The forum's foreign ministers will meet in Fiji next week.
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
Australia worried by Trump threat to raise U.S. pharma tariffs to 250%
SYDNEY, Aug 7 (Reuters) - Australia is very concerned about U.S. President Donald Trump's latest threat to raise tariffs on pharmaceutical imports by up to 250% over the longer term, its health minister said on Thursday. Trump said this week that the United States would first impose a "small" tariff on foreign-made drugs before hiking it to 150% within 18 months and eventually to 250% in an effort to boost domestic production. Mark Butler said the plan would be a blow to producers such as CSL ( opens new tab, Australia's largest biotech company. "And that is why we are working so hard to press the case for the continuation of free trade," he told reporters. Medicines and pharmaceuticals are among Australia's top exports to the U.S, with around A$2.1 billion ($1.4 billion) in shipments last year, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. There has been some bilateral tension over drug pricing in Australia. In a January submission to the U.S. government, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America trade group said Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme was "egregious and discriminatory" and "undervalued American innovation," putting jobs and exports at risk. Butler said the national programme, which subsidises a wide range of prescription medicines for Australians, would not be changed to appease American companies and escape the threatened tariffs. "To the extent that this is motivated by big pharma companies seeking to lobby the U.S. administration to water down the protections of our PBS, it's simply not up for negotiation under our government," he said. ($1 = 1.5302 Australian dollars)
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Major update on NSW MP Gareth Ward after he was convicted of sexual assaults
A sitting politician who argued his sexual abuse convictions were not enough to expel him from state parliament has lost a court bid to halt a vote removing him as an MP. Gareth Ward, 44, remains the member for the NSW south coast seat of Kiama while he awaits sentencing for sexually assaulting an intoxicated political staffer after a midweek event in the state's parliament in 2015. The former state families minister was also found to have sexually abused a drunken 18-year-old man at his South Coast home in 2013. A Labor-led vote to expel Ward from parliament, slated for Wednesday, was delayed after a court ordered a halt at the MP's request. That injunction was dismissed by the NSW Court of Appeal on Thursday, paving the way for a parliamentary debate on Friday as to whether Ward should be removed. 'The fact that Mr Ward has file a notice of intention to appeal does not affect the power of the assembly to expel him,' Chief Justice Andrew Bell said. The chief judge ordered the sitting MP to pay the assembly's costs of the lawsuit and rebuked him for launching the legal bid without giving his opponents proper notice on Monday, saying it was not appropriate. At a hearing earlier in the day, the MP's barrister Peter King argued a letter he received from the Labor government about the planned expulsion vote only referred to the convictions and did not lay out a case for Ward's expulsion. The letter did not detail any 'unworthy conduct' - the expulsion power Labor is relying on to turf Ward - he told a panel of three Court of Appeal judges. Four MPs have been expelled from NSW parliament, the last in 1969, under the 'unworthy conduct' power. 'Are you seriously submitting that (Ward's) convictions ... are not conduct unworthy?' Chief Justice Andrew Bell asked. 'The four counts are evidence of the fact of conviction, but they're not evidence of the facts which underlie that conviction,' Mr King replied. When the barrister tried again to make the same argument, Justice Jeremy Kirk chimed in. 'There can't be any mystery about it: he was tried publicly on an indictment,' the judge said. 'He, of all people, must know what behaviour led to his conviction.' Even if he staves off the vote, Ward faces automatic expulsion under a separate power if he fails to overturn his convictions on appeal. Mr King also attacked the proposed motion to expel Ward now as unlawfully punitive by denying him a parliamentary return if he won a conviction appeal. The jailed MP could also not speak against the motion in parliament. 'In short, he is to be expelled by a kangaroo court,' Mr King said. Lawyers for parliamentary speaker Greg Piper denied the proposed expulsion was punitive. Instead, it was the lower house protecting the trust and confidence of its members as well as the community, barrister Craig Lenehan SC argued. Ward had been given 'all the procedural fairness in the world', including an offer to provide lengthy written submissions against his expulsion, in circumstances where parliament could have just moved against him without notice. Any expulsion of Ward will trigger a by-election in the electorate he has held since 2011. Initially running under the Liberal banner, he secured a 2023 poll win as an independent, despite having been charged with sexual assault and suspended from parliament. A vote to expel him is almost certain to pass with support from leaders of Labor and the coalition. 'The Opposition is ready to have Gareth Ward expelled from parliament forthwith,' Opposition Leader Mark Speakman said in a statement after Thursday's court ruling. Ward has been remanded in custody ahead of his sentence for the sexual assaults. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028
