Police investigating 3rd suspected arson in Toronto in less than a week
The incident happened in a plaza near Birchmount Road and Vauxhall Drive around 3:15 a.m., Toronto police said in a post on X.
Fire crews extinguished the fire, which did not spread, Toronto Fire said. There were no injuries, they said.
Crews remain on scene, and fire investigators have been notified.
Police said the investigation is ongoing. There is no suspect information available at this time.
Spokesperson Stephanie Miceli said she does not have information on the type of business in an email Tuesday. A reserved parking sign on the side of the building refers to it as a "Greek coffee shop."
Images from the scene Tuesday show the building's front windows were broken.
This fire follows a suspected arson at a Scarborough restaurant on Friday near Kennedy Road and Lawrence Avenue E.
Three male suspects wearing dark clothes and masks were seen leaving the area, police said at the time.
No injuries were reported, and Ontario's Office of the Fire Marshal is not investigating the incident.
Police investigators will work to determine whether the two fires are connected, Miceli said.
Another fire happened at a restaurant in Scarborough early Saturday morning near Kennedy Road and Lawrence Avenue E. Police didn't label the incident a suspected arson at the time and said they are investigating the cause.
Mayor Olivia Chow said she received a full briefing from Toronto Fire Chief Jim Jessop on Saturday and Tuesday, speaking at an unrelated city announcement Tuesday.
She declined to comment further on the incidents, saying the Ontario Fire Marshal and police are investigating.Chow told CBC Radio's Metro Morning earlier Tuesday she doesn't think people should be concerned about going to restaurants in Scarborough as the fires have happened during early hours "when the customers were not there."
"We'll keep people safe," she said.
Police are also investigating a suspected arson at a two-storey building in East York on Wednesday that sent three people to hospital for minor smoke inhalation.
The incident happened at 834 Pape Avenue at a building with a business on the main level and a residential space above, police said at the time.
Investigators are looking for three suspects who allegedly broke into the building, set fire to it and then fled. They wore dark clothing and masks, and were carrying red gas cans, police said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Magazine
14 hours ago
- Time Magazine
Canada's Pierre Poilievre Should Step Aside
Canada's Pierre Poilievre is back after an election loss for the ages. The Conservative Party leader won a by-election on Monday in Battle River-Crowfoot, a Tory electoral district in Alberta that he's never lived in. He can finally return to Parliament after the embarrassment of losing his own seat of Carleton in Ottawa during the federal election in April, which saw the Conservatives blow a more than 20-point lead to a Liberal Party led by former central banker Mark Carney. Poilievre won his by-election with 80% of the vote. A casual observer might assume there may be few demanding Poilievre quit as Tory leader with such a healthy margin, mistaking a single parliamentary district for the country—or the party. That's a fair enough mistake. Some folks, including me, were making the case only months ago for him to stay on. After all, the Conservatives had managed a strong general election performance with 41% of the vote, but were punished by first-past-the-post. Poilievre was a steady hand who just had to wait for the Liberals to implode, which they would, eventually, as all Liberals do in time. April gave way to May and June, and as summer settled in, the Liberals remained atop the polls as Carney continued to wrong-foot the Conservatives by giving them just about everything they wanted. There was something of a Greek tragedy to it, with Poilievre getting his way—the end of the unpopular carbon tax, lower taxes, lower internal trade barriers, and a government that was all-in on building big, national infrastructure projects. When Air Canada flight attendants went on strike in recent days, Carney's labor minister asked the Canada Industrial Relations Board to order them back to work, a move one might have expected from Poilievre. Critics have been asking whether, with Liberals like these, one even needs Conservatives, or ones like Poilievre, at least. Read More: Pierre Poilievre Is the Ron DeSantis of Canada In January, Poilievre faces a leadership review, and now's the time to ask if he should stay on. Increasingly, the answer is no. Of course, he won his by-election with ease. But it's one of the safest Tory seats in Canada, and was vacated by Damien Kurek, who stepped aside so his leader could waltz back into office. It was a move that undermined Poilievre's leadership even as it affirmed it, having to contest a tap-in putt of a district when months earlier he seemed a shoo-in for Prime Minister. Since April, Poilievre has been unable to make up ground against Carney's Liberals. A big problem for the Conservative leader is that when voters meet him, when they get to know him, they don't like him, which puts his party at a structural disadvantage. The Angus Reid Institute's Poilievre monitor finds the Conservative leader's unfavorability numbers persistently high. Going back to the fall of 2022, over 50% of those surveyed disliked Poilievre. That number never got better than 49%, and now sits at 57%. His numbers are particularly dismal among women and younger voters, but even among the 55+ age bracket that traditionally votes Conservative, Poilievre manages just 39% approval. What's more, during the last federal election, where leadership was a constant theme amid the unprecedented threats from President Donald Trump to make Canada the '51st state' and impose devastating tariffs, Carney outpaced Poilievre on likability and governance qualities. In July, Abacus Data found that Carney still beat Poilievre on key leadership metrics, an advantage that, should it hold, could help the Liberals eventually turn their parliamentary minority into a majority. Read More: How Canada Got Hooked on the U.S. Economy Poilievre said in July 'every election comes with lessons.' But his tone never shifted. He remained the same doctrinaire culture warrior. In August, Poilievre attacked Canada's electric vehicle mandate, calling it 'Carney's tax' in a move reminiscent of his party's 'axe the tax' battle against carbon pricing. The play comes as Trump takes on California's EV mandate. But the focus makes Poilievre look too close to Trump and risks backfiring if Carney goes ahead and once again ditches a Justin Trudeau-era policy. Perhaps the most damning thing you can say about Poilievre is he's become redundant. He's a less capable, less experienced, less likable iteration of a business Liberal committed to low taxes, a lean regulatory regime, and infrastructure and resource development. Read More: How Trump Revived Canada's Liberals The Conservatives could do with a reset—a return to the drawing board. They need a likable leader who at the very least seems like they have the capacity to touch grass from time to time. The odds are that the Liberals, now nearly 10 years in power, will do themselves in, as all governments do. But Poilievre has proven that he's unwilling or unable to adapt to a political moment that's different from the advantageous one his party enjoyed before Trump and tariffs. For that reason alone, there's good cause for the Conservatives to ditch Poilievre sooner than later. Come January, if the party hasn't managed better fortunes, some Conservatives might try to do just that.
New York Post
a day ago
- New York Post
Sorority girls say this Greek tradition gave them the best sleep of their lives — why it worked
You may want to rush to try this one out. With the new school year underway for colleges in the South and Midwest, #rushtok has taken over many a TikTok feed — and has some former sorority girls reminiscing about their unusual sleeping arrangements. While 'cold rooms' might not look like the most comfortable place to catch some Z's, several ex Kappas, Deltas and other letters of the Greek alphabet insist it's where they got some of the best sleep of their lives. So-called 'cold rooms' are common at sororities and fraternities at some universities. Filled with bunk beds, they look somewhat similar to hostels (pictured) — though they're kept super cold and dark at all times. skyNext – Cold rooms — also called cold dorms or sleeping porches — are rooms in frats or sorority houses that are filled with lots of bunk beds, similar to military barracks. According to House Beautiful, they're common at schools like Indiana University, Purdue University and the University of Washington. Designated for sleeping only, they are typically kept dark — think blackout curtains and minimal lighting — and at super low temperatures, with the AC turned way up. They can usually be found in attics, basements or enclosed porches. 'It's basically one big room that's really cold, really dark, and filled with bunk beds,' Jade, a Kappa Kappa Gamma at Perdue, explained on TikTok. 'You were assigned a bed and you made it the coziest little spot — you make it so dark and cozy that you wanna skip all of your 7:30s and if you were me, you did.' Jamie, another Kappa Kappa Gamma, said the lights were never turned on in hers. Unsurprisingly, quite a few commenters on TikTok have been unimpressed with the photos they've seen, with one comparing them to 'orphanages you would see in movies based in the early 1900s.' 'No amount of wanting to fit in could get me to sleep in there,' wrote another, while a third chimed in: 'This sounds like pure torture.' But from those who have actually slept in them, there seems to be never-ending praise, with several calling it 'the best sleep ever' and 'the best sleep of my life.' 'Cold room was the BEST! Soundest sleep I ever had. Mine was right by the window and I loved everything about it,' wrote one. 'Man, I miss the sleeping porch,' added another. 'It was so cold in there, my bed was so snuggly, quiet naps any time of day… the best.' One woman 'would do anything to have another sleeping porch nap.' So what exactly makes the sleep so good? According to Dr. Dennis Auckley, Director of Center for Sleep Medicine for MetroHealth, there are 'definitely some upsides to this type of sleeping arrangement' — especially the cold temps and darkness. Former sorority girls say they got the best sleep ever while sleeping in cold dorms. CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images 'Sleep should ideally take place in a cool environment. This is because the brain and our core body temperature need to decrease to help facilitate sleep,' he told The Post. 'Cooler environments generally enhance deep, or slow-wave, sleep, which is the most restorative state.' You also want a dark environment, he said: 'Many of these cold air dorms use blackout curtains to keep it very dark. That is good and will help facilitate sleep.' He also noted possible psychological benefits of communal sleeping, like feelings of inclusion and safety. There are, though, some downsides, like noise — from people coming and going, alarms going off, or someone snoring — or lights being turned on. 'These will fragment sleep and lead to poor overall quality of sleep, and potentially shortened sleep duration,' he said. 'In addition, if some individuals come to the cold dorm bed and stay on their phones (doing whatever), creating light distractions, this can interfere with the sleep of others. Sleep quality aside, a large number of people spending hours together in close quarters can also increase the risk of spreading respiratory infections, especially viruses like the flu. If you want to replicate the magic of a cold dorm at home — without the potential downsides — Auckley says you're in luck. These factors all contribute to a good night's sleep.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Contributor: Black people on campuses support fighting antisemitism and also wonder, 'What about us?'
Antisemitism is abhorrent. No Jewish person should ever experience it, and universities must do all they can to eradicate it on campuses. The Trump administration is pushing colleges and universities to address antisemitism by threatening, freezing and revoking federal funding and demanding millions of dollars to settle allegations — or in UCLA's case, $1 billion. These unprecedented federal penalties, which the government claims are partially for failing to address antisemitism, leave lots of Black people who either attended or worked at predominantly white institutions asking, 'What about us?' Reports of antisemitism sound familiar to Black people who have encountered anti-Black harassment in similar forms. Generations of Black collegians and employees have been called racial slurs on campuses. The N-word also has been spray-painted and nooses have been hung on Black students' dorms, on Black culture centers and on portraits and statues of influential Black people across campuses. Student body presidents who are Black, as well as other Black student organization leaders and employees, have received death threats. One social media post promised: 'I'm going to stand my ground tomorrow and shoot every black person I see.' Black people have been physically assaulted on campus grounds; been threatened and targeted by white supremacist hate groups who gain access to campuses; and been racially profiled by campus security personnel. Black campus police officers have reported experiencing 'unbearable' racism themselves. For decades, predominantly white sororities and fraternities have denied Black students membership on the basis of race. Additionally, too many Greek-letter organizations have hosted blackface parties mocking Black people, including some attendees wearing nooses around their necks and others pretending to be enslaved Africans or white enslavers. These and other encounters with anti-Black racism are long-standing, persistent and pervasive. Asking 'what about us' is not intended to diminish the severity of antisemitism or the dangers that Jewish students face. Posing this question also does not indicate that Black people are antisemitic. It comes neither from a standpoint of hatred toward nor carelessness for Jewish people. In fact, firsthand encounters with unchecked racism and harassment on campuses deepen many Black people's empathy for and outrage on behalf of anyone experiencing discrimination and hate, including Jews. And many Jewish people who are Black know such hostility all too well, having faced both antisemitism and anti-Black racism. According to FBI data published in 2024, of the 950 religiously motivated hate crimes that occurred at educational institutions between 2018 and 2022, 78.4% were targeted at Jewish people. That is terrible and unacceptably high. During those same years, the statistics also show that of the 2,624 racially motivated hate crimes on campuses, 64.4% were targeted at Black people. That also is terrible and unacceptably high. Educational institutions across the U.S. clearly have serious problems with hate crimes against both Jewish and Black people. But for some reason, the Trump administration is neglecting to hold colleges and universities financially accountable for one like it is the other. For more than two decades, I have conducted research on campus racial climates. Surveys of and interviews with millions of students, faculty and staff on hundreds of campuses turned up numerous examples of antisemitism and far more examples of anti-Black racism. Volume and frequency do not make one any more or less important than the other. Both deserve fierce institutional and governmental responses. Islamophobia, sexism, xenophobia, homophobia, weight and body-type bias, ableism, ageism and every other form of discrimination and abuse also deserve the most serious forms of accountability. But that has not happened, at least not in the manner or to the extent that it is occurring now in the name of combating antisemitism. There is shamefully abundant evidence of attacks on Jewish people on campuses. This warrants an immediate response by the federal government, by campus leaders, by state officials and anyone else who has the power to effect change. Meanwhile, Black students and employees are also continuing to experience unforgivably high levels of racial discrimination, harassment and abuse. Why is this not receiving a serious response from the Trump administration? Why has no college or university ever been required or expected to pay $1 billion (or any amount close to that) for the racial discrimination and violence that Black people endure on campuses? From today onward, what price will institutions of higher education pay for anti-Black racism? Shaun Harper is a professor of education, business and public policy at USC and the author of 'The Big Lie About Race in America's Schools.' If it's in the news right now, the L.A. Times' Opinion section covers it. Sign up for our weekly opinion newsletter. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times. Solve the daily Crossword
