Stokes and Gill call for scheduling consistency
Both teams have struggled in terms of managing player injuries and workloads, and the England captain did not hesitate in admitting that it takes a 'big toll' on every player.
'I guess maybe you could look back over five games in a series.
'Could the gaps between games be done a little bit better? You had two eight-day and nine-day gaps between Tests and then two three-day turnarounds; maybe you could look at making it four, five for every game. This way there's some consistency,' Stokes said.
'It has been tough for both teams. A lot of overs were bowled, and there was a lot of time spent out on the field. That's part of the game,' he added.
India captain Shubman Gill also agreed that playing over five days has its challenges.
'One of the most important things in the series has been that all the matches have gone up to five days. I can't remember a series where all four Test matches were played until the last moment,' Gill said.
'Three days is too little of a turnaround when both teams are playing such hard cricket'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
6 hours ago
- Mint
What the future holds for Jasprit Bumrah after India vs England Test series?
Jasprit Bumrah has played 48 Tests for India. How do you put that number in context? After all, 48 Tests isn't a huge number. On the other hand, for a bowler like Bumrah, 48 isn't that small a number either. Fast bowling is the most physically demanding of all disciplines in cricket. Your joints, muscles, bones and tissues go through immense stresses when delivering the ball. It is an explosion of violence in a few seconds - which you then have to repeat continuously. That is why fast bowlers are the most injured lot in cricket. And that's just for the pacers with 'normal' or smooth bowling actions. For Bumrah, that is amped up even more because his particular action puts even more load on his back. Considering that, it's actually quite remarkable that Bumrah has played 48 Tests in seven and a half years. And that includes more than a year out due to injuries. As a comparison, Shoaib Akhtar played only 46 Tests in his entire career, over ten years. Akhtar was similarly explosive at the crease, and had to battle injuries throughout his career. Moreover, Bumrah is a three-format player. And not just any three-format player but inarguably the best in the world, which means every team wants him in the playing XI as often as possible. Seen through that lens, Bumrah's 48 Tests are actually quite sizeable. And it's not as if he'll stop at that number either. Former India batter Mohammad Kaif raised the suggestion earlier.'If he feels he can't give 100%, he may step away. His body isn't supporting him like before. Indian fans might soon have to get used to watching Tests without Bumrah,' Kaif said in a video on social media. However, that is idle speculation. After the 2-2 result in India's five-Test series vs England, Bumrah himself put up an Instagram post that spoke of 'Looking forward to what's next'. Those don't seem to be the words of someone who has retirement from that format in mind. However, managing Bumrah's workload does require a delicate balancing act. He is unquestionably the best bowler in the world, so it makes sense to have him in the playing XI whenever possible. What Bumrah and the Indian team management need to decide is what loads to reduce, and where. For starters, Bumrah need not play in sundry T20Is. He can keep his focus on T20 World Cups, and playing the IPL every year keeps him in tune with the T20 game too. When a World Cup is approaching, he can increase his T20I load in the lead up. The same template can be followed for ODIs. Both of these work because of the kind of bowler and student of the game Bumrah is. He absorbs knowledge like a sponge, and takes the shortest time to find his rhythm and length of almost any bowler in world cricket. He also knows his own game inside out, which is why missing chunks of cricket won't have a debilitating effect on him. As for Test cricket, it's clear that Bumrah is unlikely to be able to play all Tests in all series, especially the ones having four or five matches. On balance, it would make sense for the Indian team to use him when available, even at the cost of changing XIs more during a series. If you are granted a superpower that you can only use for a limited time, it's still better to use it than lose it. In the England series, by a strange quirk of fate, India won the two Tests in which Bumrah was rested. Predictably, that meant people drew a correlation between these two events. It should be emphatically said therefore, that an Indian Test XI with Bumrah in it will always be better than one without him in it. India did win the two Tests he didn't feature in, but that's just how cricket goes sometimes: the conditions are different, other players' form is different, there might be a dose of luck that wasn't there. Wickets Average Strike Rate Economy Bumrah in Test wins 110 14.5 32.1 2.7 All Indian bowlers in Test wins 394 19.0 39.1 2.9 Bumrah in Test draws 24 21.4 44.0 2.9 All Indian bowlers in Test draws 72 35.7 62.1 3.4 Bumrah in Test defeats 85 26.2 55.9 2.8 All Indian bowlers in Test defeats 344 33.1 60.1 3.3 Even in defeats, Bumrah averages 26 with the ball, which is just astounding. He is better than the par figures in an Indian attack on every single metric across wins, draws or defeats. Looking at the batting is even more instructive. In Test match wins Bumrah has been a part of, India's collective batting average has been 33.4. In defeats, that number plummets to 21.8. And in the handful of draws, it's 43.0. The conclusion is inescapable: batting collapses have been a big part of India's defeats. The other conclusion of course, is what has always been evident - Bumrah stands alone, and India have found a diamond in him. You might want to wear your diamond to every event, but if that's not practically feasible, then you wear it when you can.
India Today
7 hours ago
- India Today
Chris Woakes sides Ben Stokes on injury replacements: You have to find a way
England seamer Chris Woakes is not very keen on having injury replacements in Test cricket. The pacer, who came out to bat on Day 5 of the Oval Test, despite dislocating his shoulder, has sided with his captain Ben Stokes on the to The Guardian after the conclusion of the Test series, Woakes has said that in case a replacement is allowed for injuries, the team would use the loopholes around the law to extract every bit of debate on injury replacements took centre stage midway through the series after Rishabh Pant fractured his foot at Lord's. Pant, after going off the field in a medical cart, returned to the field given India's precarious position with the bat. At that time, India head coach Gautam Gambhir had argued for replacements for external injuries. However, England skipper Ben Stokes had vehemently discouraged it, calling it a ridiculous words came to bite back England in the final Test of the series when the hosts were forced to bowl one seamer short due to the injury to being on the receiving end, Woakes argued that Test cricket should not have the option to bring in replacements and rather should find ways to manage the absence of a player.'I'm with Stokesy, to be honest. Having played for 18 years, the game is what it is: you lose a player and as a team you have to find a way. It makes you more resilient and the team stronger. I do understand why people might think it's needed for freak injuries like mine but there would be too many grey areas or loopholes,' Woakes told The Guardian in an interview after the about his reception as a national hero on the final day at Oval, Woakes said that he was not keen on being remembered that way.'I mean, it's not the way you want to be front-page news, you'd sooner it was for five wickets or a century. There have been a lot of ups and downs since but yeah, the love from the public has helped,' Woakes said.'It is so weird to go from the start of a Test week, thinking 'one last push', to ending up on a physio's table wondering what the future holds,' he England seamer is now focused on his recovery and will hope to attain full fitness before Ashes. Alongside Woakes, his captain Ben Stokes will also be hoping to return to full fitness after recovering from his shoulder injury, sustained during the 4th Test match in Manchester.- Ends
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
11 hours ago
- Business Standard
India A vs Australia A: Konstas, McSweeney named for four-day matches
Australia openers Sam Konstas and Nathan McSweeney were on Thursday named in the A' squad bound to India to play two four-day matches in Lucknow in September, with an eye on the Border-Gavaskar Trophy 2026-27. Konstas had replaced McSweeney during the last India-Australia series Down Under but has failed to nail his spot at the top of the order, having endured a disappointing outing in Caribbean even as his side thoroughly dominated the West Indies. The 19-year-old Konstas is the only current Test player to be named in the A' side while the other capped players include McSweeney, Cooper Connolly and spinner Todd Murphy. Murphy, who has so far featured in seven Tests, played each of the four matches of the Border-Gavaskar Trophy during their India tour in 2022-23, which Australia lost 1-2, claiming 14 wickets. Australia's chairman of selectors George Bailey was quoted as saying by The subcontinent provides many unique challenges and the opportunity to utilise different skills with bat and ball. "We hope repeated experiences in these conditions will assist players in developing an effective method and understanding of their game for future subcontinent tours." "For many of these players we remain interested in the development of their short-form cricket as well, but balancing out priorities meant we wanted them back and available for the start of the Sheffield Shield season, he added. A notable miss in the red-ball squad are Jason Sangha, who scored 202 not out against Sri Lanka A in Darwin last month, and Matthew Renshaw, who too has the experience of playing Tests in India. Sangha, however, has been named in the one-day squad for the three matches to be played in Kanpur. The two four-day matches will be played in Lucknow from September 16-19 and September 23-26, while the three one-day games will be on September 30, October 3 and 5 respectively. Squads: Four-Day matches: Xavier Bartlett, Cooper Connolly, Jack Edwards, Aaron Hardie, Campbell Kellaway, Sam Konstas, Nathan McSweeney, Lance Morris, Todd Murphy, Fergus O'Neill, Oliver Peake, Josh Phillippe, Corey Rocchiccioli, Liam Scott. One-Day squad: Cooper Connolly, Harry Dixon, Jack Edwards, Sam Elliott, Jake Fraser-McGurk, Aaron Hardie, Mackenzie Harvey, Todd Murphy, Tanveer Sangha, Liam Scott, Lachie Shaw, Tom Straker, Will Sutherland, Callum Vidler. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
