logo
How bats avoid crashing into one another

How bats avoid crashing into one another

Yahoo31-03-2025
When a colony of bats leaves their cave and takes to the skies at night to hunt, they often do so in such big groups that they almost look like one giant blob. How these winged mammals can achieve such tight densities–sometimes numbering in the hundreds of thousands of bats–yet do not crash into one another has puzzled scientists for decades.
Now, researchers believe they've figured out how bats can still hear amidst the din similar to a noisy cocktail party. They appear to change the way they echolocate in order to get a better idea of where exactly the bats closest to them are located. The findings are detailed in a study published March 31 in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Like dolphins, toothed whales, and some birds, many bat species use echolocation to perceive the world around them. They send out a call and listen for the reflected echo. This echo allows them to 'see' what is in front of them.
However, if many bats are echolocating at once—like when an entire colony comes out of a cave in only a few minutes—the noise from others should cover up the critical echoic information that bats need to get around. This loss of acoustic information is referred to as 'jamming.' Bats should collide because of the jamming, but aerial accidents outside of caves are actually quite rare.
'You're almost excited when you witness one,' Aya Goldshtein, a study co-author and a postdoctoral scholar in animal behavior at the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior in Germany, said in a statement.
Video showing the evening emergence of thousands of Greater mouse-tailed bats, as they take to the sky in search of insects. The video shows rare collisions of bats in mid-air. CREDIT: Yossi Yovel and Eran Amichai.
Scientists have deployed several techniques in the lab to try and figure out how bats can hear around all of this ambient chatter–like the noise inside of a crowded restaurant. They've studied how bats echolocate in groups, by seeing how the bats ecolocated at a slightly different frequency. In theory, this should reduce jamming, but the results from previous studies did not provide a strong enough answer as to how or why.
'No one had looked at this situation from the point of view of an individual bat during emergence. How can we understand a behavior if we don't study it in action?' Yossi Yovel, a study co-author and neuroecologist from Tel-Aviv University in Israel, said in a statement.
For this study, the team studied Greater mouse-tailed bats (Rhinopoma microphyllum) living in Israel's Hula Valley and collected data directly from wild bats emerging from a cave at dusk over two years. They tagged several bats in this colony with lightweight trackers that recorded their location every second. Some of the tags were also equipped with ultrasonic microphones that recorded the soundscape from a bat's point of view. To study this behavior, they used a new combination of high-resolution tracking, ultrasonic reporting, and sensorimotor computer modeling to observe how the bats' sense as they squeezed out of the cave opening.
However, the tagged bats were released outside the cave and into the emerging colony. meaning that that data taken from the cave opening when the density is highest was missing. To fill this gap, the team used a computational model developed by study co-author Omer Mazar, which simulated emergence. This model used data collected by the trackers and microphones to recreate the full behavioral sequence beginning with the entrance of the cave and wrapping up after the bats had flown 1.2 miles (two kilometers) through the valley.
'The simulation allows us to verify our assumptions of how bats solve this complex task during emergence,' Mazar, a Ph.D student at Tel-Aviv University, said in a statement.
The data revealed that when exiting the cave, the bats experience a cacophony of calls. Ninety-four percent of echolocations are jammed, yet the bats significantly reduced the echolocation jamming within five seconds of leaving the cave. The bats were also observed making two important behavioral changes. First, they fanned out from the dense colony core while keeping the group structure. Next, they sent out shorter and weaker calls at higher frequency.
Initially, the team suspected that the bats would reduce the jamming by quickly dispersing from the cave. Instead, they appear to change their echolocation to a higher frequency, even though in theory that should only increase the jamming and collision risk. To understand why, the team had to approach this whole scene from a bat's point of view.
[ Related: What bats and metal vocalists have in common. ]
'Imagine you're a bat flying through a cluttered space. The most important object you need to know about is the bat directly in front. So you should echolocate in such a way that gives you the most detailed information about only that bat,' explained Mazar. 'Sure, you might miss most of the information available because of jamming, but it doesn't matter because you only need enough detail to avoid crashing into that bat.'
It appears that the bats change the way they echolocate in order to gain detailed information about their neighbors nearby. This strategy ultimately appears to help them successfully maneuver and avoid bumping into one another.
According to the team, this unexpected result for how bats solve this noisy dilemma was made possible by studying bats in their natural environment.
'Theoretical and lab studies of the past have allowed us to imagine the possibilities,' said Goldshtein. 'But only by putting ourselves, as close as possible, into the shoes of an animal will we ever be able to understand the challenges they face and what they do to solve them.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The next ‘Big One' on the San Andreas fault might not be the earthquake we expect, researchers say
The next ‘Big One' on the San Andreas fault might not be the earthquake we expect, researchers say

Los Angeles Times

timea day ago

  • Los Angeles Times

The next ‘Big One' on the San Andreas fault might not be the earthquake we expect, researchers say

What could the next mega-earthquake on California's notorious San Andreas fault look like? Would it be a repeat of 1857, when an earthquake estimated at magnitude 7.7 to 7.9 ruptured the fault from Monterey County all the way through Los Angeles County? Would it be more akin to the great 1906 San Francisco earthquake, which began just offshore of the city and ruptured in two directions, toward Humboldt County and Santa Cruz County? Don't bet on an identical sequel. That's the implication of a study published Monday in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The report, coauthored by scientists at Caltech in Pasadena, studied a massive earthquake that ruptured in the southeast Asian country of Myanmar on March 28 — on a fault known for being eerily similar to the San Andreas. The earthquake ended up rupturing a much longer section of the fault than scientists expected, given the seismology of the region. The implications of this study are that 'earthquakes never come back exactly the same way,' Solene L. Antoine, a postdoctoral fellow at Caltech and the study's lead author, said in an interview. 'It came as a surprise that you could get such a long rupture,' said Jean-Philippe Avouac, a coauthor of the study and a professor of geology and mechanical and civil engineering at Caltech. March's Mandalay earthquake devastated Myanmar, killing at least 3,791 people and an additional 63 people in Thailand. High-rise buildings were damaged as far away as Ho Chi Minh City in Vietnam and homes were damaged in the Ruili area of China. Damage was estimated at $1.9 billion, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. It was the most powerful earthquake in Myanmar in at least 79 years. The magnitude 7.7 earthquake ruptured an astonishing 317 miles of the Sagaing fault, a finding based on Antoine's analysis of satellite data showing earth movement after the quake. That's the longest seismic rupture ever documented on a continent. By comparison, California's 1906 earthquake ruptured 296 miles of the San Andreas fault; and the 1857 earthquake, 225 miles. Longer seismic ruptures have been found only on subduction megathrusts deep underneath the ocean. What's clear from the study is that while California's next 'Big One' may share some characteristics of previously documented devastating quakes, it's unlikely to be an exact replay. As the recent experience in Myanmar shows, even well-documented faults can behave in surprising ways. The next step is to develop a model simulating earthquakes over many millennia for the San Andreas fault, which the authors plan to do in the future. But the San Andreas fault 'is far more complex,' Avouac said. 'It's not going to come soon, because it's quite a heavy calculation.' Still, such simulations would provide a model of 'all possible scenarios so that we have a better view of the range of possible ruptures that could happen.' For instance, maybe the San Andreas fault will rupture in smaller, separate earthquakes, Avouac said. Or it could be a much larger earthquake — rupturing the fault not just from Monterey to Los Angeles counties, but perhaps all the way into San Bernardino, Riverside and Imperial counties, which would possibly exceed magnitude 8. Such a quake would be the largest simultaneous disaster in modern California history, with huge swaths of the state wracked by powerful seismic shaking all at once. By comparison, the 1994 Northridge earthquake's footprint was relatively constrained, severely affecting only a portion of Los Angeles County, especially the San Fernando Valley — related to its relatively smaller magnitude of 6.7. But while modeling previous activity on the San Andreas fault will provide a glimpse into the wide range of possible outcomes, it will not pinpoint precisely when the next great quake will strike. 'We can't just expect the exact same thing to happen,' Antoine said. 'It is a matter of just showing what scenarios are possible, the diversity of scenarios and seeing what are the consequences of each of those scenarios.' Sometimes, Avouac said, 'it's quiet for a long time, nothing happens ... stress is building up, the fault is locked for a long time, nothing happens, and then, boom, you have a large earthquake.' 'And then you have other periods during which you have a lot of [seismic] activity, but these earthquakes are all smaller,' Avouac said. But 'smaller' earthquakes, in the minds of researchers, are still big to the layperson. In the study's simulations, there are periods where earthquakes around magnitude 7.7 are common. In other periods, earthquakes max out at magnitude 7.5 or so, but are more frequent. The entire length of the Sagaing fault — including areas that didn't rupture in the March earthquake — is 750 miles, north to south, from the Himalayas to the Andaman Sea, and helps accommodate the northward push of the Indian tectonic plate. The fact that 317 miles of the Sagaing fault ruptured in March was surprising to scientists. Only about 170 miles had been quiet seismically for more than a century, having last ruptured in 1839. Scientists call these 'seismic gaps' — particular areas of a fault that haven't recently ruptured. Generally, scientists would've expected only this long-dormant 170-mile piece of the Sagaing fault to rupture, Avouac said, but not more recently ruptured sections. That includes a 100-mile stretch that ruptured in large earthquakes in 1929 and 1930, and a 50-mile stretch that went off in a pair of quakes in 1946 and 1956. Instead, even those fault segments ruptured in the big March earthquake. So what gives? A possible explanation is the Sagaing fault's extraordinary smoothness. 'And people have observed that when the fault is very smooth, the rupture ... tends to propagate at a velocity' so fast that it results in an 'extremely elongated rupture,' Avouac said. The study also published the results of a computer model simulation looking at how earthquakes might rupture along sections of the entire 750-mile long Sagaing fault. The code, developed by study coauthor Kyungjae Im of Caltech, suggests that over a hypothetical 1,400-year period, there would be no repeatable patterns. In other words, earthquakes didn't seem to re-occur like clockwork, rupturing the same stretch of fault in a repeatable, predictable pattern. 'There is complexity here. And this is because each time you have an earthquake, it redistributes the stress on the fault, which is going to influence the next earthquake,' Avouac said. 'There's a self-induced complexity in the process, and that leads to a bit of randomness.' There is one certainty, which is bound to disappoint anyone who shares the hope that a 'Big One' simply won't ever strike California again. 'There will be an earthquake at some point,' Antoine said. 'If there is stress building up on the fault, the fault won't hold forever.' Further research and observations are essential to refine models of future possible earthquakes, including from the Sentinel satellites, which are operated by the European Space Agency, the authors said. The other coauthors of the study are Rajani Shrestha and Chris Milliner of Caltech; Chris Rollins of Earth Sciences New Zealand; Kang Wang of the Washington-based EarthScope Consortium; and Kejie Chen of the Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, China.

1,000-Foot Tall ‘Mega-Tsunami' Could Hit West Coast, Experts Warn
1,000-Foot Tall ‘Mega-Tsunami' Could Hit West Coast, Experts Warn

Yahoo

time30-07-2025

  • Yahoo

1,000-Foot Tall ‘Mega-Tsunami' Could Hit West Coast, Experts Warn

The Big One. For most residents of the world, particularly in California, the threat of a gigantic earthquake is always looming – one that would devastate communities, upend life as we know it, cause billions in damage, and take with it untold multitudes of casualties. Scary stuff. But with some earthquakes, there's also the aftermath, aka tsunamis. And scientists have been looking at one specific fault line off the west coast of North America, with regards to its imminent shifting, and the resulting, potential 'mega-tsunami.' A recent study from the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences looked at the Cascadia Subduction Zone, an offshore fault line that stretches from North Vancouver Island in Canada to Cape Mendocino in California. The team primarily looked at the flood risks, coupled with sea level rise, in relation to the Cascadia Subduction Zone. According to the study, there's a 15% chance of a rupture in the Cascadia Subduction Zone in the next 50 years, and a 29% chance by the year 2100. 'Today, and more so in 2100 as background sea levels rise, the immediate effect of earthquake-driven subsidence will be a delay in response and recovery from the earthquake due to compromised assets. Long-term effects could render many coastal communities uninhabitable,' said lead author of the study, Tina team also looked at past 'mega-tsunamis' to better evaluate the potential carnage in the Pacific Northwest. For example, by examining marine sediments, experts were able to confirm a 1,312-foot tsunami that struck the Hawaiian island of Lanai 105,000 years ago. That one was different, however, as it was created by a volcanic landslide. As for the Cascadia Subduction Zone, the last time that tectonic plate shifted was in 1700. It triggered an earthquake registering somewhere between 8.7 to 9.2 on the Richter scale. And the resulting tsunami struck both the west coast and across the Pacific in Japan. Now, researchers warn that the same zone is due for another shake. 'Given the global prevalence of subduction zones, these insights hold relevance beyond Cascadia, informing hazard assessments and mitigation strategies for tectonically active regions worldwide,' Dura added.1,000-Foot Tall 'Mega-Tsunami' Could Hit West Coast, Experts Warn first appeared on Surfer on Jul 28, 2025 Solve the daily Crossword

Climate change is making fire weather worse for world's forests
Climate change is making fire weather worse for world's forests

Miami Herald

time21-07-2025

  • Miami Herald

Climate change is making fire weather worse for world's forests

In 2023 and 2024, the hottest years on record, more than 78 million acres of forests burned around the world. The fires sent veils of smoke and several billion tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, subjecting millions of people to poor air quality. Extreme forest-fire years are becoming more common because of climate change, new research suggests. 'Climate change is loading the dice for extreme fire seasons like we've seen,' said John Abatzoglou, a climate scientist at the University of California Merced. 'There are going to be more fires like this.' The area of forest canopy lost to fire during 2023 and 2024 was at least two times greater than in the previous nearly two decades, according to a new study published Monday in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The researchers used imagery from the LANDSAT satellite network to determine how tree cover had changed from 2002 to 2024, and compared that with satellite detections of fire activity to see how much canopy loss was because of fire. Globally, the area of land burned by wildfires has decreased in recent decades, mostly because humans are transforming savannas and grasslands into less flammable landscapes. But the area of forests burned has gone up. Boreal forests lost more than two times the canopy area in 2023-24 compared with the period between 2002 and 2024, the study found. Tropical forests saw three times as much loss, and North American forests lost nearly four times as much canopy, mostly because of Canada's wildfires. Significant losses were in remote forests, far from human activities. That isolation suggests that fires are increasing primarily because of climate change, said Calum Cunningham, a fire geographer at the University of Tasmania who was not involved with the study. 'Chronic changes in climate are making these forests more conducive to burning,' Cunningham said. Climate's fingerprint on forest fires, particularly remote ones, can be obvious. That's because fires are limited either by how much there is to burn or by how wet or dry the fuel is. So, when scientists see more fires in remote forests, far from cities, infrastructure or other human activities, such as logging, they look to climate for an explanation. Specifically, they look to fire weather. Fire weather encompasses all the conditions that have to be right for a blaze to take off. Unrelenting spells of hot, dry weather and high evaporation rates let plants and soil dry out. Local wind patterns can shift, potentially pushing fires across a landscape, up and over hills and roads. Longer, hotter, drier stretches of fire weather make fires more likely. Climate change is making severe fire weather more common around the world, raising the chances of worsened forest fire seasons, a study in the journal Nature Communications found. Previous work has shown that climate change is in many places making the fire season longer. But many studies that attribute climate change to fires are regional, not global. The study assessed globally how much more likely extreme fire-weather conditions are to occur in the modern climate, compared with the preindustrial period, before greenhouse gas emissions rose significantly. The researchers used satellite observations of burned areas, along with weather data, to connect observed fire weather with actual occurrences of forest fires. The chances of seeing extreme fire weather are roughly double in today's climate compared with the preindustrial period, the researchers found. Years with extreme fire-weather conditions had more forest fires and more carbon dioxide emissions than typical years without severe fire weather. Carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas, acts as a blanket in the atmosphere, trapping the sun's heat and warming the environment. Neither study's findings were particularly surprising to the experts, because most of the regions that the studies highlighted have burned in recent years. Both studies add to a growing body of evidence that points to climate change as one of the main reasons that the planet is experiencing more frequent and more severe forest fires, often overlapping. 'It really puts to bed any debate about the role of climate change in driving these extreme fires,' Cunningham said. When more places are hit with fire weather at the same time, countries' capacities for sharing firefighting resources drop. 'You get stretched thin,' Abatzoglou said. Reduced firefighting can create a dangerous feedback loop: Bigger fires mean more emissions, which creates more fire weather and makes future fires more likely. Budget and staffing reductions at science agencies in the United States, along with policy changes, can exacerbate climate-driven changes to fire trends, said Peter Potapov, an ecologist at the World Research Institute who led the PNAS study. For instance, repealing the 'roadless rule,' which banned roads in some remote American forests, could increase human activity there, along with fire risk. Terminated satellites could degrade fire forecasting. And funding cuts to the U.S. Agency for International Development, a State Department program that has been largely dismantled by the Trump administration, ended a program that helped other countries improve their fire-monitoring capabilities. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store