SC asked to reconsider VP Sara Duterte impeachment ruling
Some of the individuals behind the first impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte on Friday has asked the Supreme Court (SC) to reconsider its ruling declaring the articles of impeachment unconstitutional.
The petitioners filed a motion for reconsideration ad cautelam.
'Naniniwala po kami na maling-mali ang naging desisyon ng ating Korte Suprema (we believe that the reasons of the SC is very wrong),' petitioners Sylvia Estrada Claudio said in an ambush interview.
To recall, three impeachment complaints were filed against Duterte in December 2024, all of which were connected with the alleged misuse of confidential funds.
It was the fourth impeachment complaint that was endorsed by over one-third of lawmakers from the House of Representatives, and was later transmitted to the Senate as the Articles of Impeachment.
In its ruling, the SC declared that the Articles of Impeachment against Duterte are barred by the one-year rule under Article XI, Section 3(5) of the Constitution.
The SC ruled that the one-year ban is reckoned from the time an impeachment complaint is dismissed or is no longer viable. It ruled that the first three complaints were deemed terminated or dismissed when the House endorsed the fourth complaint.
However, Claudio said their complaint was not initiated.
This was echoed by petitioner Teresita Quintos Deles, who said that the SC previously ruled that complaints are only initiated once deferred to the House Committee on Justice.
'By the ruling of the SC itself in an earlier case na sinabi na ang initiation ay kapag na defer lang sa Justice committee. Since hindi iyon nangyari, wala talagang prior initiation,' she said.
(By the ruling of the SC itself in an earlier case where it was stated that initiation happens when it is merely deferred in the Justice committee. Since that did not happen, there was really no prior initiation.)
The other petitioners are Akbayan Representative Percival Cendaña, Eugene Gonzales, Yvonne Jereza, Alicia Murphy, and Filomena Cinco.
Claudio called on the Senate to continue the impeachment trial.
'Naniniwala din po kami na nag overstep ng kaunti ang ating SC dahil nag simula na ang Senado. At sa amin hong pananaw ay malinaw naman ho sa Konstitusyon na ang Senado ang may karapatan, at nag simula na po sila,' she said.
(We also believe that our SC overstepped a bit because the Senate had already started. And in our view, it is clear in the Constitution that the Senate has the right, and they had already begun.)
'Sa atin pong mamamayan, nananawagan po kami na pwede naman pong i-criticize ang opinyon ng kahit sinong mataas na opisyal o institusyon, kasama na po ang SC,' she added.
(To our fellow citizens, we are calling on you that it is okay to criticize the opinion of any high-ranking official or institution, including the SC.) — BAP, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
10 hours ago
- GMA Network
DOE's Garin welcomes SC ruling on Malampaya profit share
Energy Secretary Sharon Garin welcomed the Supreme Court ruling that effectively lifted charges against private contractors of the Malampaya Natural Gas Project, as she said this would attract more investors into the country. According to Garin, she is happy that the issue has been resolved, after the High Court ruled that the Philippine government's share in profits from the project already includes the income taxes of the contractors. 'It gives stability and security to the exploration investors natin, so it will encourage more,' she said in an interview with reporters. 'Ako, happy ako na alam na nila because before kasi, hindi nila alam. Ngayon alam na nila, and I think that will bring more investors to the Philippines for exploration,' she added. (I am happy that they already know, because before, they didn't. Now they do, and I think it will bring more investors to the Philippines for exploration.) In a 19-page decision, the SC En Banc reversed and set aside a decision of the Commission on Audit (COA), and lifted the charges imposed against Shell Exploration B.V., PNOC Exploration Corporation, and Chevron Malampaya LLC. The decision, penned by Associated Justice Japar Dimaampao, was promulgated in February and made public in July. The petition stemmed from COA's finding that P53-billion worth of income taxes were deduced from the government's share in the project, and the contractors were liable for the taxes. According to the SC, the government signed a service contract for the project pursuant to Presidential Decree 87 or the Oil Exploration and Development Act, where contractors must remit 60% of the project's net proceeds to the government. The High Court said that under the Presidential Decree, the contractor is liable to pay income tax, but the contractor's income tax forms part of or is counted in the government's 60% share, and that tax assumption is not tax exemption. — RF, GMA Integrated News
_2025_08_02_18_07_56.png&w=3840&q=100)
GMA Network
a day ago
- GMA Network
Marcos transfers Sulu to Region IX following SC decision on BARMM
President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. has moved Sulu to Region IX, also known as the Zamboanga Peninsula, after the Supreme Court (SC) ruled last year that the province is not a part of the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (BARMM). Signed on July 30, Marcos' Executive Order 91 said there was an ''urgent need to effectively implement and address the impacts'' of the SC ruling, ''including the regional affiliation of the Province of Sulu, while continuing to ensure the uninterrupted governmental operations and delivery of essential government projects, programs, and activities within Sulu.'' He directed all national government agencies to include Sulu under Region IX for regional administration, development planning, investment programming and budgeting, and other relevant purposes. Marcos also established a technical working group (TWG) headed by the Secretary of the Department of Budget and Management. The TWG's functions are to oversee and monitor the implementation of the SC decision, prepare and release a transition plan, address any issues or concerns arising from the SC ruling, request assistance from relevant agencies in implementing the EO, and submit an annual report to the Office of the President. Last September, the SC upheld the constitutionality of the Bangsamoro Organic Law (BOL), but it also declared that Sulu should not have been included in the BARMM. Sulu rejected the ratification of the BOL during the plebiscite in 2019. —VBL, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
2 days ago
- GMA Network
Defying SC ruling on VP Sara's impeachment erodes legal order —IBP
The Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) on Saturday called for adherence to the Supreme Court's ruling that declared the articles of impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte as unconstitutional. In a statement, the IBP said that calls to defy the ruling of the High Court "erode the very foundations of the legal order." "Such actions disturb the equilibrium of powers and imperil the integrity of our democratic institutions, especially when appropriate legal remedies remain available within the framework of our constitutional system," the IBP said. "The Constitution does not require agreement. It demands adherence," emphasized the IBP. The IBP maintained its commitment to the constitutional order, which limits the powers of the branches of government, defining their roles and demanding their accountability. "To uphold the Constitution is to uphold each of its mandates equally-whether judicial, legislative, or executive. We therefore recognize and respect the exclusive power of the House of Representatives to initiate impeachment, just as we acknowledge the Supreme Court's solemn duty to interpret the Constitution and resolve legal uncertainties in faithful service to the Republic," said the IBP. The IBP also said that, "as the final arbiter of constitutional questions, the Supreme Court bears the solemn duty to interpret the law, determine its bounds, and clarify its implications even when it revisits past doctrines or addresses new contexts." Moving forward Retired Supreme Court Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio earlier said that there is still a possibility that the Supreme Court will reverse its decision declaring the articles of impeachment against Duterte as unconstitutional. Carpio said this, hinging on the plan of the House of Representatives to file a motion for reconsideration on the SC decision as the lower chamber argued that the ruling was based on incorrect findings that contradict official records. 'Theoretically, pwede [it's possible]. I mean, there's no rule or law, constitutional provision that say that they [cannot] correct themselves,' Carpio said in a forum. According to the former SC associate justice, there had been many instances in the past when the high court 'completely reversed itself.' Further, constitutional law expert Atty. Domingo "Egon" Cayosa said the Senate may opt to proceed with the trial of Duterte despite the Supreme Court's decision. Senate Deputy Minority Leader Risa Hontiveros had said a draft resolution is being circulated containing former justices' advice on how the Senate should proceed following the Supreme Court ruling declaring the articles of impeachment against Duterte as unconstitutional. However, Senate President Pro Tempore Jinggoy Estrada said 19 to 20 senators are likely to adhere to the decision of the SC. —VAL, GMA Integrated News
