logo
Duke's Khaman Maluach likely unable to leave, reenter U.S. after South Sudanese visas revoked

Duke's Khaman Maluach likely unable to leave, reenter U.S. after South Sudanese visas revoked

New York Times07-04-2025
By Alex Andrejev, Lindsay Schnell and Rebecca Tauber
The decision by the Trump administration to revoke visas for South Sudanese passport holders could affect the ability of Duke men's basketball player Khaman Maluach to reenter the United States if he were to leave.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the decision before the Duke Final Four game on Saturday, saying it had been made because South Sudan refused to accept citizens deported from the U.S. 'in a timely manner.'
Advertisement
South Sudan has been beset by violence, hunger and civil war due to political conflict in the past decade, with hundreds of thousands of people killed and millions more displaced. Maluach, 18, fled South Sudan at a young age with his family and settled in Uganda. After scouts recommended him for the NBA Academy Africa in Senegal, Duke recruited him for the 2025 season.
A 7-foot-2 freshman, Maluach averaged 8.6 points in 39 games this season, which ended for the Blue Devils with a loss to Houston in the Final Four on Saturday. He is considered a likely high pick if he declares for the NBA Draft, which will be held on June 25-26. The deadline for a player to declare for the draft is April 26.
'Duke University is aware of the announcement from the Department of State regarding visa holders from South Sudan,' Duke said in a statement. 'We are looking into the situation and working expeditiously to understand the implications for Duke students.'
The decision is not likely to impact players currently in the NBA, WNBA or G League, as those from South Sudan like the Wizards' JT Thor and Trail Blazers' Duop Reath hold dual citizenship.
Currently, Rubio's decision affects South Sudanese people outside the U.S. seeking visas that would allow them to enter the country. Maluach's current student status would remain valid unless the Trump administration were to issue a deportation order, which it has not done, according to Tucker Murphy, who has worked as a U.S. diplomat and with the NBA in international governmental affairs.
'If they are in the country legally and visas have been canceled, then they cannot leave the country,' said Murphy, now the CEO of Jetr Global Sports and Entertainment. 'They have to stay in status here in the United States and would not be able to leave because they would no longer have a valid visa to get back into the country.'
Advertisement
Murphy said that if Maluach were to leave Duke and get drafted by an NBA team, he could get different documents that would allow him to compete in the U.S. as an athlete, but he would still be unable to leave and reenter the country unless the Trump administration were to issue some sort of waiver.
'His best option at this point is to stay in the United States, in valid visa status,' Murphy said.
Any family members of Maluach's not in the country would be unable to come to the U.S. Maluach told The Athletic during the Final Four weekend that he has not been back home in a couple of years and that his parents have not been able to visit him. His older sister has been in the U.S. throughout the NCAA Tournament.
A State Department spokesperson said that the decision to revoke the visas would impact anyone with a U.S. visa in a South Sudanese passport and anyone with a South Sudanese passport applying for a U.S. visa. They did not comment specifically on Maluach's case, saying via email that the department would provide further information and instructions to affected visa holders and applicants as available.
The action comes amid the administration's efforts to increase immigration enforcement and restrict entry to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has detained and is attempting to deport some international students who participated in campus protests, moves which have already been challenged in court. The Trump administration is also considering implementing travel bans on potentially more than 40 countries, which could affect travel for international athletes to the U.S., though the administration has not yet released an official policy.
Rubio said the administration would be prepared to review the latest actions 'when South Sudan is in full cooperation.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Putin praises Trump's efforts to end Ukraine war ahead of Friday summit in Alaska
Putin praises Trump's efforts to end Ukraine war ahead of Friday summit in Alaska

Los Angeles Times

time15 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Putin praises Trump's efforts to end Ukraine war ahead of Friday summit in Alaska

LONDON — Russian President Vladimir Putin on Thursday praised President Trump's efforts to end the war in Ukraine, more than three years after Moscow launched its invasion, as the two leaders prepared for a pivotal U.S.–Russia summit Friday in Alaska. Following a meeting Thursday with top government officials on the summit, Putin said in a short video released by the Kremlin that the Trump administration was making 'quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the hostilities' and to 'reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved.' Putin also suggested that 'long-term conditions of peace between our countries, and in Europe, and in the world as a whole,' could be reached under an agreement with the U.S. on nuclear arms control. In Washington, Trump said there was a 25% chance that the summit would fail, but he also floated the idea that, if the meeting succeeds, he could bring Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to Alaska for a subsequent, three-way meeting. In a radio interview with Fox News, Trump also said he might be willing to stay in Alaska longer, depending on what happens with Putin. Meanwhile, Zelensky and other European leaders worked to ensure their interests are taken into account when Trump and Putin meet in Anchorage. U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer welcomed Zelensky to London on Thursday in a show of British support for Ukraine a day before the critical Trump-Putin meeting. The two embraced warmly outside Starmer's offices at 10 Downing Street without making any comments, and Zelensky departed about an hour later. Zelensky's trip to the British capital came a day after he took part in virtual meetings from Berlin with Trump and the leaders of several European countries. Those leaders said that Trump had assured them that he would make a priority of trying to achieve a ceasefire in Ukraine when he meets with Putin. Speaking after the meetings to reporters, Trump warned of 'very severe consequences' for Russia if Putin doesn't agree to stop the war against Ukraine after Friday's meeting. While some European leaders, including German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and French President Emmanuel Macron, praised Wednesday's video conference with Trump as constructive, uncertainty remained over how the U.S. leader — whose rhetoric toward both Zelensky and Putin has evolved dramatically since retaking office this year — would conduct negotiations in the absence of any other interested parties. Both Zelensky and the Europeans have worried that the bilateral U.S.-Russia summit would leave them and their interests sidelined, and that any conclusions could favor Moscow and leave Ukraine and Europe's future security in jeopardy. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov tamped down expectations for any breakthroughs from the Friday summit, saying there were no plans to sign documents and that it would be a 'big mistake' to predict the results of the negotiations, according to Russian news outlet Interfax. The Kremlin on Thursday said the meeting between Trump and Putin would begin at 11:30 a.m. local time. Putin's foreign policy adviser, Yuri Ushakov, told reporters that Trump and Putin will first sit down for a one-on-one meeting followed by a meeting between the two delegations. Then talks will continue over 'a working breakfast.' A joint news conference will follow. Trump contradicted the Kremlin, saying that no decisions have been made about holding a news conference with Putin. The uncertainty reflects just how much about the summit, including its schedule, remains unsettled. Starmer said Wednesday that the Alaska summit could be a path to a ceasefire in Ukraine, but he also alluded to European concerns that Trump may strike a deal that forces Ukraine to cede territory to Russia. He warned that Western allies must be prepared to step up pressure on Russia if necessary. During a call Wednesday among leaders of countries involved in the 'coalition of the willing' — those who are prepared to help police any future peace agreement between Moscow and Kyiv — Starmer stressed that any ceasefire deal must protect the 'territorial integrity' of Ukraine. 'International borders cannot be, and must not be changed by force,'' he said. Kyiv has long insisted that safeguards against future Russian attacks provided by its Western allies would be a precondition for achieving a durable end to the fighting. Yet many Western governments have been hesitant to commit military personnel. Countries in the coalition, which includes France and the U.K., have been trying for months to secure U.S. security backing, should it be required. Following Wednesday's virtual meetings, Macron said Trump told the assembled leaders that while NATO must not be part of future security guarantees, 'the United States and all the parties involved should take part.' 'It's a very important clarification that we have received,' Macron said. Trump did not reference any U.S. security commitments during his comments to reporters on Wednesday. With another high-level meeting on their country's future on the horizon, some Ukrainians expressed skepticism about the summit's prospects. Oleksandra Kozlova, 39, who works at a digital agency in Kyiv, told The Associated Press on Wednesday that she believes Ukrainians 'have already lost hope' that meaningful progress can be made toward ending the war. 'I don't think this round will be decisive,' she said. 'There have already been enough meetings and negotiations promising us, ordinary people, that something will be resolved, that things will get better, that the war will end. Unfortunately, this has not happened, so personally I don't see any changes coming.' Anton Vyshniak, a car salesman in Kyiv, said Ukraine's priority now should be saving the lives of its military service members, even at the expense of territorial concessions. 'At the moment, the most important thing is to preserve the lives of male and female military personnel. After all, there are not many human resources left,' he said. 'Borders are borders, but human lives are priceless.' Zelensky said Thursday that Ukraine had secured the release of 84 people from Russian captivity, including both soldiers and civilians. Those freed included people held by Russia since 2014, 2016 and 2017, as well as soldiers who had defended the now Russian-occupied Ukrainian city of Mariupol, Zelensky wrote on Telegram. The Russian Defense Ministry said Thursday that it too had received 84 soldiers as part of a prisoner exchange. In other developments, Russian strikes in Ukraine's Sumy region overnight Wednesday resulted in numerous injuries, Ukrainian regional officials said. A missile strike on a village in the Seredyna-Budska community wounded a 7-year-old girl and a 27-year-old man, according to regional governor Oleh Hryhorov. The girl was hospitalized in stable condition. In Russia, a Ukrainian drone attack damaged several apartment buildings in the southern city of Rostov-on-Don, near the border with Ukraine, where 13 civilians were wounded, according to acting governor of the region, Yuri Slyusar. Two of the wounded were hospitalized in serious condition, Slyusar said. Pylas and Spike write for the Associated Press. Spike reported from Budapest, Hungary. AP writers Lorne Cook in Brussels; Hanna Arhirova in Kyiv, Ukraine; Katie Marie Davies in Manchester, England; Dasha Litvinova in Tallinn, Estonia, and Will Weissert in Washington contributed to this report.

Noem claims 1.6M illegal immigrants have left US
Noem claims 1.6M illegal immigrants have left US

The Hill

time15 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Noem claims 1.6M illegal immigrants have left US

Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem said Thursday that the U.S. now has 1.6 million fewer illegal immigrants since the start of the Trump administration – a claim based on information from an anti-immigration group that said their own estimate may be overstated. 'In less than 200 days, 1.6 MILLION illegal immigrants have left the United States population. This is massive. This means safer streets, taxpayer savings, pressure off of schools and hospital services and better job opportunities for Americans,' Noem wrote in a tweet thanking President Trump. The claim, the Department of Homeland Security said, is based on a report from the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), which describes itself as a 'low immigration' advocate. CIS identified several 'caveats' to its estimate, which it said is based on immigrants' willingness to respond to the Current Population Survey crafted by the Census Bureau and U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, which CIS said 'does not specifically identify illegal immigrants.' 'Given the recent stepped-up enforcement efforts, it is possible that immigrants have become more reluctant to respond to the CPS,' the report states. 'If this is the case, then our estimate of illegal immigrants based on the survey may be overstating the decline in their actual numbers. Further, our estimate of legal immigrants based on administrative data through July of 2025 is incomplete, further increasing uncertainty of our estimate of illegal immigrants. All this should be kept in mind when interpreting the figures presented here.' Estimates of the number of people unlawfully living in the U.S. typically hover around 13 million. The 1.6 million estimate from DIS would also represent a sharp jump from the Department of Homeland Security's previously released figures, as it has touted both deportations and voluntary departures. The Trump administration said in April that it had deported 135,000 people, but that figure has also come under scrutiny, with the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) saying the figures were ' gross exaggerations ' and that deportation figures at the time were actually around 72,000. TRAC also said immigration judges this year have ordered just over 360,000 people deported, though it's unclear when those removals will be carried out. The Trump administration has also started new programs encouraging immigrants to leave the country, offering a $1,000 stipend to those who register to leave through the CBP Home App, a redesign of an app started under President Biden allowing migrants to request an appointment to seek asylum.

Federal judge blocks Trump administration's broad birth control mandate exemptions
Federal judge blocks Trump administration's broad birth control mandate exemptions

The Hill

time15 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Federal judge blocks Trump administration's broad birth control mandate exemptions

The Trump administration's religious and moral carve-outs to an ObamaCare requirement that all employer health plans cover contraception at no cost were blocked on Wednesday by a federal judge. District Judge Wendy Beetlestone in Philadelphia issued a summary judgment that the rules were arbitrary, capricious and an overreach of the authority of the agencies that wrote them in 2017. Under the rules, essentially any for-profit or nonprofit employer or insurer was allowed to exempt themselves from following the birth control mandate on moral and religious grounds. The rules also let publicly traded companies obtain a religious exemption, but not a moral one. The Affordable Care Act required employer health plans to cover at least one of 18 forms of birth control approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Religious groups and employers sued, and the Supreme Court in 2014 ruled 5-4 that the contraceptive mandate violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) rights of closely held corporations whose owners had religious objections. Subsequent agency actions tried to find a balance, but the Trump administration in 2017 issued a blanket exemption. The rules didn't require employers to apply for an exemption because the administration said that would be a violation of their religious rights. Pennsylvania, New Jersey and dozens of other states sued to halt that broad expansion of exemptions and accommodations. That lawsuit reached the Supreme Court in 2020, where the justices upheld the Trump rules on technical grounds but did not address the underlying merits of the case. The case was sent back to the lower court, where a religious group, Little Sisters of the Poor, joined the lawsuit alongside the federal government in asking for summary judgment. Beetlestone, an appointee of former President Obama, wrote that the Trump administration's religious rule did not accomplish what the agencies purportedly wrote it to do, which was to resolve a conflict between the contraceptive mandate and RFRA. But the rule exemptions to organizations that are 'unlikely, if ever, to be capable of maintaining a religious objection, raising further doubts as to any 'rational connection' between the Rule and remedying potential conflicts with RFRA,' Beetlestone wrote. The Little Sisters of the Poor will appeal the ruling in the coming weeks, according to the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, a nonprofit that represents the order.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store