logo
Armitage Strengthened Japan-U.S. Alliance; Late Statesman Saw Great Potential of Bilateral Ties

Armitage Strengthened Japan-U.S. Alliance; Late Statesman Saw Great Potential of Bilateral Ties

Yomiuri Shimbun4 days ago

Yomiuri Shimbun file photo
In 2018, Armitage attended the Yomiuri International Economic Society (YIES) hosted by the Yomiuri Shimbun in Tokyo. Armitage had been a contributor to The Yomiuri Shimbun's 'Insights into the World' column since 2005.
This spring, Japan and the Japan-U.S. alliance lost a pillar of support when former U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage passed away on April 13 at age 79. He was literally and figuratively a man of great stature, whose distinctive voice and warm but blunt speech were not only known and respected by Japanese politicians and diplomats, but also widely recognized by the Japanese public.
How did Armitage become so well-known in Japan? The story is closely intertwined with the history of Japan's postwar security transition, which began in earnest in the early 1990s.
During the 1991 Gulf War, the United States formed a multinational force to contain Iraq after it invaded Kuwait. Then U.S. President George H.W. Bush asked U.S. allies, including Japan, to contribute militarily to the war. However, Japan turned down Washington's request, due to the restrictions in Article 9 of its Constitution. Japan had never dispatched Self-Defense Forces troops overseas up to that point. Instead of sending troops, Japan spent $13 billion to assist the United States, but the decision was criticized by the U.S. Congress and public as 'too little, too late.' In Japan, this traumatic episode is still widely remembered.
What exactly is Article 9, and how did it become a hindrance to the Japan-U.S. alliance? Article 9 codifies the pacifism proclaimed in Japan's Constitution. The article renounces the threat of force, the use of force and 'war as a sovereign right of the nation.' It also rules out recognizing the 'right of belligerency of the state.'
This unique Constitution, which states that 'land, sea, and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be maintained,' reflects the history of World War II. Japan and the United States were once enemies fighting across the Pacific Ocean, beginning with Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor. After its defeat, Japan accepted the current Constitution, formulated under the leadership of GHQ led by U.S. Gen. Douglas MacArthur.
The reason why the Constitution restricts the use of force and does not permit the possession of armed forces is that it was intended to dismantle Japan's Imperial military, which had attacked the United States and invaded other countries during World War II, and to prevent future military re-expansion by Japan. In 1990, before the Gulf War, Maj. Gen. Henry Stackpole III, then commander of U.S. Marine Corps bases in Japan, told the U.S. media, 'No one wants a rearmed, resurgent Japan,' and referred to the U.S. military presence in Japan as 'a cap in the bottle.' Although this was Stackpole's personal view, there was a sense of caution toward Japan's military rise.
Japan's Self-Defense Forces are considered a military force under international law, even though the Constitution does not mention the existence of the Self-Defense Forces. Strong criticism from the United States opened Japan's eyes. In 1992, Japan passed the United Nations Peacekeeping Operations Cooperation Law to provide the legal basis for the deployment of the Self-Defense Forces overseas.
Akihisa Nagashima knew Armitage for three decades. Nagashima, a House of Representatives member currently serving as Special Advisor to the Prime Minister, said Armitage's most important achievement 'is that he has clearly laid out and frankly told Japan what Japan's security role should be, based on his trust in Japan.' Nagashima emphasized, 'Mr. Armitage has put an end to the 'bottle cap theory' that was based on distrust toward Japan.'
How did Armitage do it? The most well-known episode occurred after the September 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States. At the time, Armitage was a deputy secretary of state. Prior to the U.S. retaliatory attack on Afghanistan, Armitage met then Japanese Ambassador to the United States Shunji Yanai. According to a report in The Yomiuri Shimbun at the time, Armitage told Yanai that the American people were watching closely to see how their ally would cooperate with them. As a friend of Japan, he said, he felt it needed to avoid making an issue over its cooperation with the United States as it did during the Gulf War.
Armitage understood that Japan's direct contribution would be limited due to the Constitution, but he emphasized that logistical support was possible. He encouraged Japan to show willingness and make the decision voluntarily.
Precisely as Nagashima pointed out, Armitage offered clear and straightforward advice to Japan as a friend. Sept. 11 was the first direct attack on the U.S. homeland since World War II, and the tragic event reminded Americans of 1941. Armitage probably knew at the time that Japan's decision would affect the Japan-U.S. relationship.
Then Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi acted quickly on Armitage's advice. The prime minister immediately flew to Washington and met with then U.S. President George W. Bush and informed him that the Self-Defense Forces would provide logistical support for U.S. military operations. Yanai later recalled that at the beginning of the summit, Koizumi showed solidarity by telling Bush, 'We stand by you.' Koizumi and Bush established a close relationship, and the Japan-U.S. alliance deepened in their era.
Armitage also encouraged Japan to think and act independently. In 2003, the United States decided to attack Iraq. Seiji Maehara, who later served as foreign minister in a Democratic Party of Japan administration, met then Deputy Secretary of State Armitage in Washington right before the attack on Iraq. Maehara, a pragmatic politician who had a good understanding of foreign policy, expressed his opposition to the attack.
According to Maehara, Armitage came close to him and said: 'Mr. Maehara. If North Korea launches missiles at Japan while you are defense minister, how would you respond?' Japan could not counterattack due to constitutional restrictions at that time. Maehara was aware of the constraints of the Constitution and got frustrated. He replied, 'We will do what we can do, and we will ask the U.S. for assistance based on the Japan-U.S. Security Treaty.' Armitage nodded and said: 'That's right. Don't worry. We will treat any attack on Japan as an attack on us and respond.'
Recalling the encounter years later, Maehara stated, 'Unfortunately, I had to accept what he implied.' Armitage did not say much, but he made us understand what allies were supposed to do for each other. Maehara has declared, 'That is why I am striving to 'protect my country' by myself.'
'Show the flag.' 'Boots on the ground.' These are the words that Armitage was reported to have said to the Japanese side during these crises. Although these are now not believed to be his exact words, these phrases served as a wakeup call for the Japanese people to think about the future of their country.
While Armitage made many contributions to the Japan-U.S. alliance during his decades of service in the U.S. government, his most significant accomplishments may be from his time outside of government. Particularly notable was a series of six reports on strengthening the Japan-U.S. alliance that he published with Harvard University Prof. Joseph Nye from 2000 to 2024. The first report was prescient. The two giants of the Japan-U.S. alliance wrote that Japan-U.S. security cooperation would be 'closer and more efficient' if the ban on Japan's exercise of its right to collective self-defense were lifted. The 2006 report called for a change in the interpretation of collective self-defense under the Japanese Constitution.
After Shinzo Abe returned to power as prime minister in 2012, he pushed through a change in the interpretation of the Constitution regarding collective self-defense, expanding the scope of activities that Japan's Self-Defense Forces can carry out as an ally of the United States. In doing so, Abe responded to a question Armitage had provocatively raised in one of the reports, asking whether Japan would become a tier-two nation.
An expert on U.S. strategy in Asia, Zach Cooper, who worked closely with Armitage, said: 'Ambassador Armitage believed deeply that the United States should be a force for good in the world, and that we could have the most impact by working closely with key allies and partners. He approached almost every issue through the lens of honesty and directness with both friends and adversaries.
He was also a legendary hero of the Vietnam War. Armitage saved the lives of many Vietnamese refugees and adopted Vietnamese orphans as foster children. Cooper emphasized: 'My strongest impressions [of him] were his deep commitment to family and his willingness to say and do things that were unpopular because they were right. I think that it's best exemplified by his actions in the last days of the Vietnam War, in which he played a major role in saving 30,000 South Vietnamese despite not having instructions or authority to do so. It was just the right thing to do, so he did it.'
A celebration of Armitage's life was held at the United States Naval Academy in Annapolis, Md., on May 29. Former Japanese Ambassador Ryozo Kato described Armitage as 'the greatest and most skilled craftsman in the history of the U.S.-Japan alliance,' while Captain Kiem Do, a former officer in the South Vietnamese Navy who worked with Armitage to save Vietnamese lives, reflected, 'He did save us.'
Former Assistant Secretary of Defense for Indo-Pacific Security Affairs Randall Shriver, who was a close partner of Armitage, has also spoken about him. Shriver stresses, 'He believed Japan was already our most important ally, and yet he saw even more potential as the alliance modernized and benefited from greater investment in both sides.'
In the current time of turmoil caused by the America First policies of U.S. President Donald Trump, the United States may appear to some to be moving away from being the force for good in the way that Armitage believed it ought to be. Armitage believed in the power of alliances and publicly opposed Donald Trump becoming a president. It was amid the latest uncertainty created by Trump 2.0 that Armitage passed away, with Nye following in May. Alliance advocates are currently quiet in Washington.
Japan and other U.S. allies have lost a major supporter. But let's not forget that Armitage wanted us to think and act on our own, as he himself did when he launched an operation that saved many civilian lives in Vietnam. Following Armitage's passing, Japan must set its own course and navigate its own ship in this turbulent era.
Political Pulse appears every Saturday.
Yuko Mukai
Yuko Mukai is a Washington correspondent of The Yomiuri Shimbun.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Japan's Ruling, Opposition Parties to Delay Compiling Plan on Imperial Succession; General Agreement on Female Imperial Family Members Keeping Status
Japan's Ruling, Opposition Parties to Delay Compiling Plan on Imperial Succession; General Agreement on Female Imperial Family Members Keeping Status

Yomiuri Shimbun

time28 minutes ago

  • Yomiuri Shimbun

Japan's Ruling, Opposition Parties to Delay Compiling Plan on Imperial Succession; General Agreement on Female Imperial Family Members Keeping Status

The Yomiuri Shimbun Members of the Liberal Democratic Party and Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan attend a meeting on Imperial succession in April. The ruling Liberal Democratic Party and the opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan are expected to postpone compiling a plan for stable Imperial succession. The leaders and deputy leaders of the House of Representatives and the House of Councillors had hoped to have the plan be completed before the upper house election this summer, according to sources. The two parties apparently decided they needed more time for discussions, as they failed to overcome their differences after several unofficial meetings. The parties mostly discussed two issues: whether to allow female Imperial family members retain their Imperial status after marriage and whether the Imperial family should adopt male descendants of male lines of former Imperial family branches. The parties are generally in agreement on the issue of female Imperial family members retaining their status. However, the LDP opposed the idea of giving husbands and children of female Imperial family members Imperial status. The LDP said it is concerned that it might lead to an emperor from the female line. The CDPJ, on the other hand, seemed positive about the idea of having an emperor from the female line. LDP top adviser Taro Aso and CDPJ leader Yoshihiko Noda have repeatedly held unofficial negotiations, looking for common ground. Aso argued that Imperial status should only be given to the husbands and children of female Imperial family members if her husband is a descendant from the male line of one of the 11 branch families that lost their Imperial status after World War II. Noda presented a plan to have the Imperial House Council resolve the Imperial status issue. As both parties are in general agreement regarding female Imperial family members retaining their Imperial status after marriage, some said a plan should be compiled ahead of other issues. However, House of Representatives Speaker Fukushiro Nukaga took a more cautious stance and said the issue should be decided at the same time as whether to give husbands and children an Imperial status and pushed to postpone the final decisions.

How Social Media Is Reshaping Politics in Japan—for Better or Worse

time2 hours ago

How Social Media Is Reshaping Politics in Japan—for Better or Worse

Social media has rapidly become a force in Japanese politics—shaping public opinion and tipping the scales in national and local elections around Japan. What does this mean for political engagement, trust in mainstream institutions, and the future of Japanese democracy? The Internet and Political Engagement Most Japanese voters rarely observe political debates or take the time to follow policymaking directly, instead relying on the media to stay informed. For decades, that meant newspapers. National surveys by the Association for Promoting Fair Elections (APFE) showed that by the early 2000s, though, TV had overtaken newspapers as the main source of political information. Today, the Internet has surpassed both. At the same time, Ikeda Ken'ichi, an expert on voting behavior, notes that political participation in Japan remains low compared to other mature democracies. Japan's stable but stagnant political environment, dominated by entrenched political interests and personal political support groups, may dampen the motivation to vote. In an APFE survey conducted in the wake of the 2024 House of Representatives election, common reasons respondents gave for abstaining included 'no interest in elections' (24.3%), 'elections don't improve politics' (17.3%), and 'my vote doesn't matter' (11.6%). Young voter turnout in particular has hovered at about half the rate of older generations, raising serious concerns about the health of Japanese democracy. Yet the Internet, especially social media, has opened new doors for political engagement, particularly among those who feel alienated from mainstream politics. People who find traditional media coverage inadequate often turn to the Internet to explore issues on their own terms. Social platforms enable them to connect with others who share their views—or push back against those who see things differently. In a phenomenon known as 'filter bubbles,' users are increasingly exposed to content that matches their beliefs and engage with like-minded users in echo chambers, reinforcing their preexisting views. The political rise of Donald Trump in the United States has been driven by this dynamic. Social media has fueled political polarization, but it has also drawn more people into the political conversation and boosted turnout. In this way, social media acts as a double-edged sword for democracy. The Rise of Social Media Campaigns in Japan Gubernatorial elections in Tokyo and Hyōgo in 2024 showcased just how transformative social media can be. For candidates lacking traditional political capital—such as local support bases, funding, or name recognition—social media offered a vital battleground for guerrilla-style campaigning. Candidates livestreamed speeches, shared campaign events in real time, and rallied support online. These tactics brought a sense of immediacy and authenticity that resonated with many voters, especially those disillusioned with establishment politics, conventional media, or vested interests. This kind of impassioned support for political candidates was sometimes likened to oshikatsu—a term describing the enthusiasm and devotion fans show for their favorite idols. Such social-media-driven campaigns tend to center around charismatic individuals rather than 'faceless' party platforms or abstract policy debates. The Democratic Party for the People made major gains in the 2024 House of Representatives election, but analysis of the seventh Japanese Election Study political survey showed that social media users were not necessarily aligned with the policies advocated by the party or its leader, Tamaki Yūichirō. Rather, disillusioned voters active on social media appear to have been drawn to Tamaki personally, irrespective of his ideology. The flip side of social media politics is its susceptibility to manipulation. Slander, rumors, fake news, and eye-catching stunts can distort the political process. Globally, Internet-based misinformation campaigns, attacks on political opponents, and foreign interference have plagued elections since the 2010s. In Romania's 2024 presidential race, for example, support for an obscure, far-right candidate surged via social media—only to be later traced to foreign influence, leading to the annulment of the election. In Japan, concerns have arisen over possible violations of the Public Offices Election Act and the role of PR firms in manipulating social media narratives, prompting calls for clearer regulations and penalties. Long-Term Shifts in Voter Behavior Given these dynamics, can the Internet fundamentally reshape how Japanese people perceive politics or vote? In the short term, the effects are likely to vary depending on the type of election and the demographics involved. Urban areas with more young people, higher social media use, and a larger share of residents born elsewhere are fertile ground for online campaigns—especially in local, personality-driven races like the gubernatorial elections that were held in Tokyo and Hyōgo. But in rural regions with older populations and limited social media penetration, or in party-centered contests like national legislative races, the impact may be more muted. That said, recent developments—rising prices, rice shortages, geopolitical tensions, major accidents, and natural disasters—have shaken public confidence and intensified political frustration. As seen during the COVID-19 pandemic, such periods are conducive to conspiracy theories and misinformation, often spread via social media. When these conditions align, even short-term shifts in social and political awareness can occur. Meanwhile, long-term transformations are also underway. The 2024 APFE survey showed that older generations still rely on newspapers, middle-aged voters favor TV, and younger people increasingly turn to the Internet for political information. As generations shift, Internet influence is likely to grow. Another major change is the decline of traditional intermediary organizations like business associations, labor unions, and religious groups that once helped shape party-centered political identity and behavior. These groups play a key role in 'political socialization,' but as their influence wanes, individuals find fewer structured ways to understand and engage with politics. Instead, the Internet and online communities are gradually taking on that role. Over time, these changes may fundamentally reshape how Japanese voters think and act politically. Social media has proven to be a powerful tool for new political movements. But established players—with deeper pockets and greater organizational reach—could eventually learn to use it just as effectively and strategically, if not more so. Political success in a democracy hinges on effectively delivering one's message to large numbers of voters, and communication tools—social media included—are likely to continue to grow and evolve. The future of democracy will hinge on how well we navigate this evolving media environment. As AI-generated deepfakes and sophisticated misinformation campaigns become harder to detect, it will be critical for news organizations, monitoring groups, and platform companies to step up their fact-checking efforts. At the individual level, information literacy must be strengthened across all generations. This includes diversifying news sources, checking facts, and fostering critical thinking through discussion with others. Understanding political dynamics requires more than reacting to sensational headlines; it demands the ability to discern the broader structures behind them. Finally, civic education must also evolve, especially since the voting age was lowered to 18. Teaching young people how politics works and how to make informed electoral choices is crucial to sustaining a healthy democracy. (Originally published in Japanese. Banner photo: Saitō Motohiko, ousted as Hyōgo governor in a no-confidence vote, addresses a crowd of voters holding up smartphones on the final day of his reelection campaign, November 16, 2024. © Kyōdō.)

Chinese Premier Urges Japan to Stand against Trump Tariffs

time2 hours ago

Chinese Premier Urges Japan to Stand against Trump Tariffs

News from Japan World Jun 3, 2025 23:11 (JST) Beijing, June 3 (Jiji Press)--Chinese Premier Li Qiang on Tuesday urged Japan to deepen cooperation with China to stand against high U.S. tariffs. In a meeting in Beijing with a delegation from the Japanese Association for the Promotion of International Trade, Li said that the tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump's administration are a defiant challenge to nations around the world. According to sources with access to discussions at the meeting, Li said that the recent agreement between the United States and China to reduce their tariffs was based on the Chinese side's views. He also voiced hopes for expansion of Japanese companies' investments in China. Former House of Representatives Speaker Yohei Kono, who heads the delegation, said he is concerned that Japan-China relations may be rocked by outside influences. [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.] Jiji Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store