
Kennedy shouldn't decide who gets a COVID-19 vaccine
The announcement was made in the same way quack wellness influencers and dimwitted conspiracy theorists announce things: via a video posted on X, formerly known as Twitter, currently known as a fact-resistant den of looniness and hate.
"I couldn't be more pleased to announce that as of today, the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from the CDC recommended immunization schedule," Kennedy said in the clip. "Last year, the Biden administration urged healthy children to get yet another COVID shot despite the lack of any clinical data to support the repeat booster strategy in children."
RFK Jr. wants to make it harder to get COVID-19 boosters. Also, he's dumb.
Kennedy, of course, provided no evidence to support his decision. He's allergic to evidence, and I assume he treats that allergy by taking occasional dips in sewage-filled creeks like any normal person whose noggin hosts a deceased brain worm might do.
Back in the old days, when reality existed and the people in charge had actual qualifications, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention employed an independent vaccine advisory panel that used this cool old concept known as "science" to determine who should get vaccines. Now, I guess, a leathery weirdo who spent much of his life lying about vaccines being dangerous gets to decide.
Jesse Goodman, a former chief scientist at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and a Georgetown University infectious disease specialist, told the journal Science that vaccine decisions shouldn't come from administrators: "Those questions should be discussed in an advisory committee."
Because, of course, they should.
Kennedy thinks he's smarter than actual scientists, and it's going to kill us
The CDC, prior to Kennedy opening his mouth, recommended that Americans older than 6 months get an annual coronavirus vaccine. There is evidence supporting the importance of pregnant women being vaccinated against the coronavirus, there is evidence supporting kids getting the booster and there is zero credible evidence supporting Kennedy's conspiracies that the vaccines are doing more harm than good.
Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store.
Now, thanks to Kennedy's "I'm smart, science is dumb" policy, it's unclear how insurance companies will cover COVID-19 boosters for certain demographics, or whether shots will even be available to pregnant women or children without underlying conditions.
The guy in charge of America's health is a self-obsessed conspiracy nut
It's possible this will all work out fine, but it's also possible that it won't, and the key thing to remember is that Kennedy is one of the most consistently full-of-crap people on the planet.
In 2024, RFK Jr. claimed that there wasn't "a single healthy kid who died from" COVID-19. But as The New York Times reported: "A review of data on 183 pediatric (COVID-19) deaths from 2020 to 2022 found that 32 percent of children who died did not have another medical condition."
Opinion: Democrats want a liberal Joe Rogan to help them win elections. I'm right here.
So I guess those healthy kids who died don't count in Kennedy's warped and wildly inaccurate world.
Or maybe they're just collateral damage in his ongoing crusade against real science.
Whatever RFK Jr. says to do to stay healthy, you should do the opposite
When getting a vaccine, as with many decisions related to our health, it's important to look at statistical science. When it comes to the coronavirus vaccines, any potential risks are far, far lower than the risks associated with getting COVID-19.
By contrast, I'd argue this: The risk of taking anything Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says about health seriously is far, far greater than the risk of doing the exact opposite of what he recommends.
If Kennedy posted another evidence-free video on X saying the best way to avoid chronic hand pain is to NOT drive a nail through your palm, I would buy a nail gun and get down to palm-puncturing as swiftly as possible.
America's health is in the hands of a well-established fool. It's embarrassing, and it will make staying healthy harder for all of us. It will also, unquestionably, make more people sick.
Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @rexhuppke.bsky.social and on Facebook at facebook.com/RexIsAJerk
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
New Covid strain discovered in UK as doctors warn of unusual symptoms
The new NB.1.8.1 strain of Covid has been detected in Northern Ireland and, while some of its symptoms include those of previous strains, others are more unusual, such as heartburn A new strain of the virus that cause COVID has been detected. The Public Health Agency says at least seven people have been diagnosed with the NB.1.8.1 strain of coronavirus, all in Northern Ireland. It has multiple symptoms, including some which differ from the typical ones seen with other strains. "Common symptoms include sore throat, fatigue, fever, mild cough, muscle aches and nasal congestion. Gastrointestinal symptoms may also occur in some cases," Dr Lara Herrero, Associate professor and virology research leader at Griffith University in Australia said. Gastrointestinal symptoms can include abdominal pain, bloating, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation and heartburn. The Mirror has listed the full known symptoms below. NB.1.8.1 has been officially designated a "variant under monitoring" by the World Health Organisation (WHO) due to its rapid rise and the potential to evade immunity from previous infections or vaccines. The full list of symptoms are; a high temperature or shivering (chills) – a high temperature means you feel hot to touch on your chest or back (you do not need to measure your temperature) a new, continuous cough – this means coughing a lot for more than an hour, or 3 or more coughing episodes in 24 hours a loss or change to your sense of smell or taste shortness of breath feeling tired or exhausted an aching body a headache a sore throat a blocked or runny nose loss of appetite diarrhoea feeling sick or being sick READ MORE: Holidaymakers told to wear masks and get jabs as cases of 'new Covid' soar NB.1.8.1 already the dominant strain in Hong Kong and China, and has been detected in Australia, the US and across popular holiday destinations including Egypt, Thailand and the Maldives, reports Daily Star. According to WHO data, the strain has jumped from 2.5% to 10.7% of submitted global sequences in just four weeks, which has prompted growing international concern. A WHO spokesperson said: "SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve, and between January and May 2025, there were shifts in global SARS-CoV-2 variant dynamics. At the beginning of the year, the most prevalent variant tracked by WHO at the global level was XEC, followed by KP.3.1.1. "In February, circulation of XEC began to decline while that of LP.8.1 increased, with the latter becoming the most detected variant in mid-March. Since mid-April, the circulation of LP.8.1 has been slightly declining as NB.1.8.1 is increasingly being detected." Experts say NB.1.8.1 carries multiple mutations that "may infect cells more efficiently than earlier strains". Dr Lara Herrero explained: "It's possible a person infected with NB.1.8.1 may be more likely to pass the virus on to someone else, compared to earlier variants. The evidence so far suggests NB.1.8.1 may spread more easily and may partially sidestep immunity from prior infections or vaccination. These factors could explain its rise in sequencing data. "But importantly, the WHO has not yet observed any evidence it causes more severe disease compared to other variants. Reports suggest symptoms of NB.1.8.1 should align closely with other Omicron subvariants."


Daily Mirror
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Counting calories and yo-yo diets could increase risk of depression, say experts
Eating less of a bad diet is not going to boost your mental health unless you change what you eat, research suggests after a study showed men are vulnerable to negative impact of 'restrictive eating' Counting calories and yo-yo dieting could increase your risk of depression, new research suggests. Experts say eating healthy whole foods rather than processed foods might be more important than focusing only on cutting down on calories. The study of 28,500 Americans suggests men are particularly "vulnerable" to the negative effects of 'restrictive eating' due to a lack of essential nutrients. The findings, published in BMJ Nutrition Prevention and Health, contradict previous studies which found low-calorie diets improved depressive symptoms. However researchers said earlier controlled trials included tailored and balanced diet programmes that may not be the same as the calorie counting diets people realistically follow in everyday life which contain the same processed foods. Study author Dr Venkat Bhat, of the University of Toronto, Canada, said worsening depressive symptoms could be caused by a failure to lose weight or "weight cycling" - losing weight and then putting it back on. He said: 'Real-life calorie-restricted diets and obesity often result in nutritional deficiencies - particularly in protein, essential vitamins/minerals - and induce physiological stress, which can exacerbate depressive symptomatology." Canadian researchers analysed data on 28,525 people who took part in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and had completed a health questionnaire relating to depressive symptoms, which gave them a score based on severity. Some 8% of those studied had reported depressive symptoms, while 33% were overweight and 38% were obese. Most said they were not on a specific diet, while 2,206 were restricting calories. Some 859 were on a "nutrient-restrictive" diet, low in fat, sugar, salt, fibre or carbohydrate, and 631 were on diets tailored for the likes of diabetes. Questionnaire scores for depressive symptoms, such as a low mood, low energy and sleep disturbances, were higher among those restricting calories compared to those who reported not being on a diet at all. The research paper concluded: "Numerous studies have consistently focused on 'healthy' versus 'unhealthy' diets. They have shown that 'healthy' diets rich in minimally processed foods, fresh fruits and vegetables, whole grains, nuts, seeds, lean proteins and fish have been linked to a lower risk of depression. "In contrast, an 'unhealthy' diet dominated by ultra-processed foods, refined carbohydrates, saturated fats, processed meats and sweets is associated with an increased risk of depressive symptoms.' Researchers said restricting calories can lead to deficiencies in protein, vitamins and minerals which puts the body under stress. Professor Sumantra Ray, chief scientist and executive director of the NNEdPro Global Institute for Food, Nutrition and Health, which co-owns the BMJ medical journals, said: "This study adds to the emerging evidence linking dietary patterns and mental health, raising important questions about whether restrictive diets which are low in nutrients considered beneficial for cognitive health, such as omega-3 fatty acids and vitamin B12, may precipitate depressive symptoms. Scientists explained that a "healthy" diet rich in fresh fruits and vegetables, whole grains, nuts, seeds, lean proteins and fish, is generally associated with a lower risk of depression. An "unhealthy diet" - dominated by ultra-processed foods, refined carbs, saturated fats, processed meats and sweets - has been linked to a heightened risk. Prof David Curtis, honorary professor at University College London, wo was not involved in the research, said: "The reported effects are small and some are scarcely statistically significant, so may well be due to chance. Even if it is the case that people who are dieting have more depressive symptoms, I don't see why we should assume that it is the dieting which causes this. "To me it seems plausible that this observation could be accounted for by the fact that people who are more unhappy with themselves, and with their weight in particular, may be more likely to go on a diet in an attempt to change their situation."


Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
Elon Musk torches Donald Trump's signature plan as 'a disgusting abomination'
Just days after Donald Trump held an event to bid him a rosy farewell from the White House, Elon Musk has gone nuclear on the president's 'big beautiful bill'. Musk blasted Trump's signature budget bill on his X (formerly Twitter) platform on Tuesday afternoon, four days after Trump praised him in an Oval Office press conference. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' wrote Musk. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' In another post, Trump's former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) wrote that the bill 'will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt'. Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act extends tax cuts he brought in 2017 during his first term, and allocates more funding for border security and the military. Those come at the expense of assistance programs like Medicaid and the food-purchasing help program SNAP. The bill will add roughly $3.8trillion to the federal government's $36.2trillion debt over a decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO). Musk replied to an X post stating that he was right, by writing, 'Simple math.' Trump did not immediately respond to Musk's X post, but on Tuesday morning ripped Republican Senator Rand Paul for opposing the bill. 'Rand Paul has very little understanding of the BBB, especially the tremendous GROWTH that is coming,' wrote Trump on his Truth Social platform. In a subsequent post, Trump wrote that 'Rand votes NO on everything' and that 'his ideas are actually crazy (losers!).' And on Monday evening, Trump wrote that there are 'so many false statements' about the bill and claimed that 'there will be NO CUTS to Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid'. In reality, the bill proposes cutting federal spending on Medicaid by at least $600billion over a decade and decreasing enrollment by about 10.3million Americans, according to a preliminary estimate from the CBO. It is not the first time that Musk, who has returned his focus to running his businesses including SpaceX and Tesla, has criticised Trump's bill. The tech billionaire took a swipe at the domestic policy bill just before his farewell presser. 'I was disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not just decreases it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing,' Musk told CBS News' Sunday Morning. Trump at the time avoided criticising Musk and instead said that tough politics in the House, which has passed it, resulted in a higher price tag for the bill than he would like. 'I'm not happy about certain aspects of it, but I'm thrilled by other aspects of it,' the president said, adding that his administration will be negotiating it. More Trending Trump at the event on Friday said, 'Today it's about a man named Elon and he's one of the greatest business leaders and innovators the world has ever produced.' He added that Musk 'has worked tirelessly' leading DOGE, which calculated more than $160billion in savings for fiscal year 2025 to 2026. Both the president and Musk himself said that he was not leaving the White House entirely despite his time as a 'special government employee' coming to an end. But it remains to be seen if Trump, who reportedly had recent disagreements with Musk, will welcome him with the same warmth moving forward. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Haunted doll's handler says it's not responsible for local disasters as it tours country MORE: FDA tomato recall elevated to highest level due to salmonella risk MORE: Toddler found riding baggage conveyor belt after vanishing from parents at Newark Airport