Lower tariffs, cheaper labour: The Philippines hopes to draw businesses that are exiting China
Electronics giant Integrated Micro-Electronics Inc has been positioning the Philippines as a compelling low-risk alternative to China. PHOTO: INTEGRATED MICRO-ELECTRONICS INC
MANILA – The Philippines may have caught a rare break under US President Donald Trump's latest tariff impositions, and it is hoping to turn that into an edge.
Faced with a tariff rate of only 17 per cent, one of the lowest in the region, Manila is moving swiftly to reposition itself as the region's next supply chain hub, with both government officials and industry leaders pitching the country as an alternative option for manufacturers looking to spread their operations beyond China.
The Philippine Economic Zone Authority (Peza) said in an April 4 statement that the country's relatively low tariff burden – the second lowest in the region after Singapore's 10 per cent – makes it one of South-east Asia's most attractive fallback options for firms fleeing the rising costs and tensions in China.
Peza believes that if the Philippines captures even a 10th of the US$436 billion (S$571 billion) worth of goods that China exported to the US in 2024, it could double its own export volume.
'This is a welcome opportunity despite the challenges,' said Peza.
Trade envoys are racing to convert that opportunity into concrete investment. The country's Special Assistant to the President for Investment and Economic Affairs, Mr Frederick Go, is currently in Washington to explore tariff relief and even push for a free trade agreement.
Manufacturers are being lured by the Philippines' competitive tariffs, low labour costs and English-speaking workforce. Among the early movers is Integrated Micro-Electronics Inc (IMI), a home-grown electronics giant with facilities across North America, Europe and Asia, including a major hub in Laguna, south-east of Manila.
IMI is among the world's top 25 electronic manufacturing service providers, reporting US$1.1 billion in total revenue in 2024.
Its chief executive Louis Hughes told The Straits Times that IMI is already working on finalising deals with Chinese companies looking to relocate to the Philippines, including an injection moulding firm and a machining company.
He added that IMI's operations in the Philippines have two unique capabilities not found elsewhere apart from China: camera manufacturing and power module packaging, which is integral to modern electrical systems.
'It's a great place to do business,' Mr Hughes said of the Philippines.
'It's at the logistical centre of South-east Asia, China, Taiwan. It's English-speaking, fundamentally. There is great training in maintenance and processed technology, and it's got a hardworking culture and a hardworking group of people'.
In 2024, the US was the Philippines' third-largest trading partner and top export market, taking in US$12.14 billion or about 16.6 per cent of the country's total outbound trade that year, data from the Philippine Statistics Authority showed. Electronic products were the country's top export, accounting for US$39.09 billion, or 53.4 per cent of total export earnings that same year.
Optimism carried the day at an April 25 economic estates industrial summit held in Manila. The country's special economic zones are 'open and ready' to take in relocating firms, said Peza deputy director general for policy and planning Anidelle Joy Alguso.
Mr Rafael de Mesa, president and CEO of real estate developer Aboitiz Land, which operates industrial parks across the Philippines, noted that industrial land in the country remains more affordable than in Vietnam or Malaysia.
Developers believe the Philippines has a strong chance of capturing a larger slice of the 'China + 1' manufacturing shift, if it can act swiftly. This strategy refers to global firms maintaining operations in China while also diversifying to a second country to reduce risk.
'So in a world of uncertainty and volatility, I think there's going to be more movements towards the Philippines, and that's what we're starting to see over the past month – renewed and accelerated interest,' Mr de Mesa said.
But the road to becoming the region's next supply chain hub is not without potholes. A number of structural challenges plague the Philippines, whose infrastructure falls behind that of its regional counterparts.
Dr Jan Carlo Punongbayan, an economist at the University of the Philippines, told ST that the absence of a unified railway system linking the archipelago, inadequate port facilities, and high electricity costs are often considerations that stop investors from moving their operations to the country.
'I agree that there is a silver lining; we should accelerate the development of the Philippines' export sector so that we can produce higher value-added exports,' Dr Punongbayan said.
'But in order to achieve that, we need to significantly improve the business climate in the Philippines to make our economy a lot more attractive as a destination for investments in the region. But you can't do that overnight.'
And while opportunities may be emerging for companies eager to capitalise on China + 1, the agricultural sector is bracing itself for pain instead.
The US is the top destination for Philippine agricultural exports like coconut-based products, bananas, mangoes and processed fruit like pineapple.
'(The) fact remains that our products will still become 17 per cent more expensive to the American consumer, who then may decide to stop buying our products and shift to cheaper substitutes,' said Mr Leonardo Montemayor, the former agriculture secretary and current chairman of the non-governmental Federation of Free Farmers, in an April 5 statement.
Current geopolitical risks have also not abated, with investors raising questions about Manila's ongoing dispute with Beijing over the South China Sea, and whether tensions over Taiwan would affect the stability of the Philippine economy.
Mr Hughes said that some of IMI's clients have been asking that none of their electronic components be shipped from China or Taiwan, a tough request to accede to as many electronic components are made there. He added: 'I will say that the South China Sea issue is something that they're very concerned about.'
Still, Mr Hughes is optimistic that the Philippines' robust relations with the US under President Ferdinand Marcos Jr would benefit the South-east Asian nation as it negotiates with the Trump administration.
And as the Marcos government seeks short-term relief from Mr Trump's tariffs through diplomacy, the Philippines must still seek to diversify its export market, said experts.
Dr Punongbayan said Manila must not over-rely on the US, whose trade policy is proving to be more volatile.
'We already have existing ties with the rest of the South-east Asian region, as well as other countries in Asia. So, I think we should strengthen that and further deepen our relations.' Building on existing trade relations and free trade agreements would be a sound strategy, he noted.
The irony of Mr Trump's new tariffs, he added, is that they could push allies like the Philippines closer to China, which remains Manila's largest trading partner.
The tariffs could have the unintended consequence of strengthening China, Dr Punongbayan noted. 'I think you can expect that China will kind of reach out more to the Philippines in terms of boosting our trading relations with them,' he said.
In this delicate balancing act between global powers, how the Philippines navigates its relationships with both the US and China – while positioning itself as a manufacturing and export powerhouse – could well define the trajectory of its economic future.
If Manila can negotiate these complexities, it could emerge as a key player in the evolving global supply chain, capitalising on the shifting dynamics of trade and geopolitics.
Mara Cepeda is Philippines correspondent at The Straits Times.
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
10 minutes ago
- Straits Times
China vice-premier He Lifeng to meet US delegation for trade talks in London
Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng will visit the United Kingdom from June 8 to 13 at the invitation of the British government. PHOTO: REUTERS China vice-premier He Lifeng to meet US delegation for trade talks in London Beijing - Chinese Vice-Premier He Lifeng will meet a US delegation for talks next week in Britain, Beijing announced on June 7 amid a fragile truce in the trade dispute between the two powers. He will visit the United Kingdom from June 8 to 13 at the invitation of the British government, China's foreign ministry said in a statement. It said Mr He and American representatives will co-chair the first meeting of the China-US economic and trade consultation mechanism. US President Donald Trump had already announced on June 6 that a new round of trade talks with China would kick off in London beginning June 9, after he spoke by phone with Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping in a bid to end a bitter battle over tariffs. Mr Trump posted on his Truth Social platform that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer would meet the Chinese team. The discussions will mark the second round of such negotiations between the world's two biggest economies since Mr Trump launched his trade war shortly after returning to the White House in January. A first meeting, held in mid-May in Geneva, brought a pause to the US-China trade dispute. But Mr Trump then accused Beijing of not respecting the terms of the de-escalation agreement. On June 5 the Republican president finally discussed the issues with Mr Xi for the first time since the trade tensions soared, assuring that the conversation had been positive. Mr Xi for his part told Mr Trump the two should 'correct the course' of bilateral relations, according to remarks quoted by official Chinese media. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
Secret Russian intelligence document shows deep suspicion of China
In public, President Vladimir Putin of Russia says his country's growing friendship with China is unshakable – a strategic military and economic collaboration that has entered a golden era. But in the corridors of Lubyanka, the headquarters of Russia's domestic security agency, known as the FSB, a secretive intelligence unit refers to the Chinese as 'the enemy'. This unit, which has not previously been disclosed, has warned that China is a serious threat to Russian security. Its officers say that Beijing is increasingly trying to recruit Russian spies and get its hands on sensitive military technology, at times by luring disaffected Russian scientists. The intelligence officers say that China is spying on the Russian military's operations in Ukraine to learn about Western weapons and warfare. They fear that Chinese academics are laying the groundwork to make claims on Russian territory. And they have warned that Chinese intelligence agents are carrying out espionage in the Arctic using mining firms and university research centres as cover. The threats are laid out in an eight-page internal FSB planning document, obtained by The New York Times, that sets priorities for fending off Chinese espionage. The document is undated, raising the possibility that it is a draft, though it appears from context to have been written in late 2023 or early 2024. Ares Leaks, a cybercrime group, obtained the document but did not say how it did so. That makes definitive authentication impossible, but the Times shared the report with six Western intelligence agencies, all of which assessed it to be authentic. The document gives the most detailed behind-the-scenes view to date of Russian counterintelligence's thinking about China. Since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, Moscow's new bond with Beijing has shifted the global balance of power. The rapidly expanding partnership is one of the most consequential, and opaque, relationships in modern geopolitics. Russia has survived years of Western financial sanctions following the invasion, proving wrong the many politicians and experts who predicted the collapse of the country's economy. That survival is in no small part due to China. China is the largest customer for Russian oil and provides essential computer chips, software and military components. When Western companies fled Russia, Chinese brands stepped in to replace them. The two countries say they want to collaborate in a vast number of areas, including making movies and building a base on the moon. Mr Putin and Mr Xi Jinping, China's leader, are doggedly pursuing what they call a partnership with 'no limits'. But the top-secret FSB memo shows there are, in fact, limits. 'You have the political leadership, and these guys are all for rapprochement with China,' said Mr Andrei Soldatov, an expert on Russia's intelligence services who lives in exile in Britain and who reviewed the document at the request of the Times. 'You have the intelligence and security services, and they are very suspicious.' Mr Putin's spokesperson, Mr Dmitry Peskov, declined to comment. The Chinese Foreign Ministry did not respond to requests for comment on the document. The Russian document describes a 'tense and dynamically developing' intelligence battle in the shadows between the two outwardly friendly nations. Three days before Mr Putin invaded Ukraine in 2022, the FSB approved a new counterintelligence programme called 'Entente-4', the document reveals. The code name, an apparent tongue-in-cheek reference to Moscow's growing friendship with Beijing, belied the initiative's real intent: to prevent Chinese spies from undermining Russian interests. The timing almost certainly was not accidental. Russia was diverting nearly all of its military and spy resources to Ukraine, more than 6,500km from its border with China, and most likely worried that Beijing could try to capitalise on this distraction. Since then, according to the document, the FSB observed China doing just that. Chinese intelligence agents stepped up efforts to recruit Russian officials, experts, journalists and businesspeople close to power in Moscow, the document says. To counter this, the FSB instructed its officers to intercept the 'threat' and 'prevent the transfer of important strategic information to the Chinese'. Officers were ordered to conduct in-person meetings with Russian citizens who work closely with China and warn them that Beijing was trying to take advantage of Russia and obtain advanced scientific research, according to the document. The FSB ordered 'the constant accumulation of information about users' on Chinese messaging app WeChat. That included hacking phones of espionage targets and analysing the data in a special software tool held by a unit of the FSB, the document says. The possible long-term alignment of two authoritarian governments, with a combined population of nearly 1.6 billion people and armed with some 6,000 nuclear warheads, has stoked deep concern in Washington. Some members of the Trump administration believe that, through outreach to Mr Putin, Washington can begin to peel Russia away from China and avoid what Secretary of State Marco Rubio has called 'two nuclear powers aligned against the United States'. 'I'm going to have to un-unite them, and I think I can do that, too,' President Donald Trump said shortly before his election in November. 'I have to un-unite them.' Read one way, the FSB document lends credence to the theory that, with the right approach, Russia can be cleaved away from China. The document describes mistrust and suspicion on both sides of the relationship. China is conducting polygraphs on its agents as soon as they return home, tightening scrutiny of the 20,000 Russian students in China and trying to recruit Russians with Chinese spouses as potential spies, the document says. But another reading of the document leads to the opposite conclusion. The fact that Mr Putin is apparently well aware of the risks of a closer relationship with China and has decided to push ahead anyway could suggest little opportunity for the United States to get Russia to change course. 'Putin believes that he can go much deeper into this Chinese embrace, and it's not risk-free, but it is worth it,' said Mr Alexander Gabuev, the director of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Centre, who reviewed the document at the request of the Times. 'But we also see there are people within the system who are sceptical of that approach.' Mr Putin has courted Mr Xi for years, in more than 40 personal meetings, and has cemented a far deeper partnership with China since invading Ukraine. The two countries have a natural economic synergy, with Russia being one of the world's largest energy producers and China the world's largest energy consumer. That poses a delicate challenge for Russian counterintelligence agents. The document shows them trying to contain the risks posed by Chinese intelligence without causing 'negative consequences for bilateral relations'. Officers were warned to avoid any public 'mention of the Chinese intelligence services as a potential enemy'. Most likely written for circulation to FSB field offices, the directive offers a rare glimpse into the inner world of one of the most powerful parts of the Russian intelligence establishment: the FSB's Department for Counterintelligence Operations, known as the DKRO. The document was written by the DKRO's 7th Service, which is responsible for countering espionage from China and other parts of Asia. Anxiety about Russia's susceptibility to an increasingly powerful Beijing dominates the memo. But it is unclear how common those worries are across the Russian establishment, beyond the counterintelligence unit. Even allied nations regularly spy on one another. 'To go back to the old adage, there is no such thing as friendly intel services,' said Mr Paul Kolbe, a senior fellow at Harvard's Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, who served for 25 years in the CIA Directorate of Operations, including in Russia. 'You don't have to scratch very deep in any Russian military or intel official to get deep suspicion of China. In the long run, China is, in spite of the unlimited partnership and how useful they are, also a potential threat.' China targets Russia's war secrets and scientists Soon after Russian troops pushed across the border into Ukraine, officials from Chinese defence firms and institutes tied to Chinese intelligence began flooding into Russia. Their goal, according to the FSB document, was to better understand the war. China has world-class scientists, but its military has not fought a war since a month-long conflict with Vietnam in 1979. The result is anxiety in China about how its military would perform against Western weapons in a conflict over Taiwan or the South China Sea. Chinese intelligence officials are eager to understand Russia's fight against an army backed by the West. 'Of particular interest to Beijing is information about combat methods using drones, modernisation of their software and methods for countering new types of Western weapons,' the FSB document says, adding that Beijing believes the war in Ukraine will become drawn-out. The conflict has revolutionised warfare technology and tactics. China has long lagged behind Russia in its aviation expertise, and the document says that Beijing has made that a priority target. China is targeting military pilots and researchers in aerohydrodynamics, control systems and aeroelasticity. Also being sought out, according to the document, are Russian specialists who worked on the discontinued ekranoplan, a hovercraft-type warship first deployed by the Soviet Union. 'Priority recruitment is given to former employees of aircraft factories and research institutes, as well as current employees who are dissatisfied with the closure of the ekranoplan development programme by the Russian Ministry of Defense or who are experiencing financial difficulties,' the report says. It is not clear from the document whether those recruitment efforts are limited to hiring Russian specialists for Chinese ventures or also extend to recruiting them as spies. The document also shows that Russia is very concerned about how China views the war in Ukraine and is trying to feed Beijing's spies with positive information about Russian operations. And it commands Russian counterintelligence operatives to prepare a report for the Kremlin about any possible changes in Beijing's policy. Western leaders have accused China of providing Russia with essential weapons components and working to conceal it. The FSB document lends support to that claim, stating that Beijing had proposed establishing supply chains to Moscow that circumvent Western sanctions and had offered to participate in the production of drones and other unspecified high-tech military equipment. The document does not say whether those proposals were carried out, though China has supplied Russia with drones. The FSB memo also hints at Chinese interest in the Wagner mercenary group, a Russia-backed paramilitary group that propped up governments in Africa for years and fought alongside Russian troops in Ukraine. 'The Chinese plan to use the experience of Wagner fighters in their own armed forces and private military companies operating in the countries of South-east Asia, Africa and Latin America,' the directive says. The wording of the report does not indicate whether the FSB believes that China wants to recruit former Wagner fighters for its own formations or simply wants to learn from their experience. Moscow worries Beijing is trying to encroach on its territory Russia has long feared encroachment by China along their shared 4,200km border. And Chinese nationalists for years have taken issue with 19th-century treaties in which Russia annexed large portions of land, including modern-day Vladivostok. That issue is now of key concern, with Russia weakened by the war and economic sanctions and less able than ever to push back against Beijing. The FSB report raises concerns that some academics in China have been promoting territorial claims against Russia. China is searching for traces of 'ancient Chinese peoples' in the Russian Far East, possibly to influence local opinion that is favourable to Chinese claims, the document says. In 2023, China published an official map that included historical Chinese names for cities and areas within Russia. The FSB ordered officers to expose such 'revanchist' activities, as well as attempts by China to use Russian scientists and archival funds for research aimed at attaching a historical affiliation to borderlands. 'Conduct preventative work with respect to Russian citizens involved in the said activities,' the memo orders. 'Restrict entry into our country for foreigners as a measure of influence.' China is unnerving Russia in Central Asia and the Arctic The concerns about China expanding its reach are not limited to Russia's Far East borderlands. Central Asian countries answered to Moscow during the Soviet era. Today, the FSB reports, Beijing has developed a 'new strategy' to promote Chinese soft power in the region. China began rolling out that strategy in Uzbekistan, according to the document. The details of the strategy are not included in the document other than to say it involves humanitarian exchange. Uzbekistan and neighbouring countries are important to Mr Putin, who sees restoring the Soviet sphere of influence as part of his legacy. The report also highlights China's interest in Russia's vast territory in the Arctic and the Northern Sea Route, which hugs Russia's northern coast. Historically, those waters have been too icy for reliable shipping, but they are expected become increasingly busy because of climate change. The route slashes shipping time between Asia and Europe. Developing that route would make it easier for China to sell its goods. Russia historically tried to maintain strict control over Chinese activity in the Arctic. But Beijing believes that Western sanctions will force Russia to turn to China to maintain its 'aging Arctic infrastructure', according to the FSB document. Already, Russian gas giant Novatek has relied on China to salvage its Arctic liquefied natural gas project, after previously using the American oil services firm Baker Hughes. The FSB asserts that Chinese spies are active in the Arctic, as well. The report says Chinese intelligence is trying to obtain information about Russia's development of the Arctic, using institutions of higher education and mining companies in particular. But despite all of these vulnerabilities, the FSB report makes clear that jeopardising the support of China would be worse. The document squarely warns officers that they must receive approval from the highest echelons of the Russian security establishment before taking any sensitive action at all. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
CNA
4 hours ago
- CNA
US and China set for trade talks in London on Jun 9
WASHINGTON: Three of US President Donald Trump's top aides will meet with their Chinese counterparts in London on Monday (Jun 9) for talks aimed at resolving a trade dispute between the world's two largest economies that has kept global markets on edge. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer will represent the United States in the talks, Trump announced in a post on his Truth Social platform without providing further details. China's foreign ministry said on Saturday that vice premier He Lifeng will be in the United Kingdom between Jun 8 and Jun 13, adding that the first meeting of the China-US economic and trade consultation mechanism would be held during this visit. "The meeting should go very well," Trump wrote. Trump spoke to Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday in a rare leader-to-leader call amid weeks of brewing trade tensions and a dispute over critical minerals. Trump and Xi agreed to visit one another and asked their staffs to hold talks in the meantime. Both countries are under pressure to relieve tensions, with the global economy under pressure over Chinese control over the rare earth mineral exports of which it is the dominant producer and investors more broadly anxious about Trump's wider effort to impose tariffs on goods from most US trading partners. China, meanwhile, has seen its own supply of key US imports like chip-design software and nuclear plant parts curtailed. The countries struck a 90-day deal on May 12 in Geneva to roll back some of the triple-digit, tit-for-tat tariffs they had placed on each other since Trump returned to the presidency in January. That preliminary deal sparked a global relief rally in stock markets, and US indexes that had been in or near bear market levels have recouped the lion's share of their losses. The S&P 500 stock index, which at its lowest point in early April was down nearly 18 per cent after Trump unveiled his sweeping "Liberation Day" tariffs on goods from across the globe, is now only about 2 per cent below its record high from mid-February. The final third of that rally followed the US-China truce struck in Geneva. Still, that temporary deal did not address broader concerns that strain the bilateral relationship, from the illicit fentanyl trade to the status of democratically governed Taiwan and US complaints about China's state-dominated, export-driven economic model. Trump has repeatedly threatened an array of punitive measures on trading partners, only to revoke some of them at the last minute. The on-again, off-again approach has baffled world leaders and spooked business executives. China sees mineral exports as a source of leverage. Halting those exports could put domestic political pressure on the Republican US president if economic growth sags because companies cannot make mineral-powered products. In recent years, US officials have identified China as its top geopolitical rival and the only country in the world able to challenge the United States economically and militarily.
