Partisan school board bill undergoes changes in conference committee
The partisan school board bill will likely undergo some changes, but language allowing candidates to declare a political party will remain in the bill, following a Monday conference committee hearing on the bill.
Senate Bill 287, authored by Sen. Gary Byrne, R-Byrneville, Sen. Chris Garten, R-Charlestown, and Sen. Blake Doriot, R-Goshen, would change the school board election process to that of other elections, which would include a primary and general election. The school board candidates would have to declare a party.
The bill was amended in the House Elections and Apportionment committee to reflect House Bill 1230, authored by Rep. J.D. Prescott, R-Union City. Prescott's amendment removed the primary process from the bill and stated that in the general election a school board candidate can choose to be listed as a Republican, Democrat, independent or nonpartisan.
When the bill was heard by the House, it was amended further to state that if a candidate chooses to be nonpartisan, then a blank space will appear on the ballot where party affiliation would be listed.
If the board member who leaves the board was a Republican or Democrat, then a caucus should be held to replace that member. But Independent or nonpartisan candidates can be replaced by the sitting school board members, according to the bill.
In a conference committee Monday, the committee heard an amendment to include language in the vacancy procedure to match that of Senate Bill 366, Byrne said. Senate Bill 366 states that if there's a vacancy on a school board due to the death of a school board member, then all remaining school board members shall meet and pick someone to fill the vacancy.
'It's just making it's the same, so that we don't have a conflict,' Byrne said.
Sen. J.D. Ford, D-Indianapolis, said the legislature was about to pass a 'monumental' bill by allowing politics to dictate school board races. Candidates can put their political affiliation on their campaign signage, he said.
'We should scrap this and move on to something else,' Ford said. 'Once we open the door on this we can't close it.'
After briefly discussing the amendment, the committee went into recess. As of press time, the members had not reconvened for further discussion or a vote.
After the bill passed both chambers of the legislature, Indiana School Boards Association executive director Terry Spradlin issued a statement that the organization's longstanding position has been for school board races to remain nonpartisan.
'While the Indiana General Assembly has now voted to make school board elections partisan, once elected, ISBA will encourage school board members to leave politics at the board room door,' Speadlin said. 'School board members should also conduct themselves in a manner that models effective board governance practices regardless of party affiliation.'
Juanita Albright, president of the Hamilton Southeastern Schools Board of Trustees, testified when the bill was heard in the House Elections and Apportionment committee that she supports the bill because it gives voters, who don't always research candidates, more information about who is on the ballot.
'A school board is inherently political, whether we want to admit it or not,' Albright said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
The growing case for rate cuts, federal cuts won't gut health care and other commentary
Fed watch: The Growing Case for Rate Cuts 'President Trump's tariffs present the Federal Reserve with two conflicting challenges,' observes The Wall Street Journal's Greg Ip. Tariffs 'raise prices, which weakens the case for cutting interest rates' but also 'sap confidence and demand, which strengthens the case.' So far, 'the Fed has focused on the first risk, keeping its interest rate target between 4.25% and 4.5% since December. It might soon have to pivot to the second': 'Evidence is accumulating that inflation, despite tariffs, has been milder than feared, while the labor market might be deteriorating.' Unemployment 'has risen every month since January, by a quarter percentage point in all.' A 'restrictive stance' on interest rates 'make sense so long as inflation is all the Fed has to worry about. It no longer is.' Eye on NY: Federal Cuts Won't Gut Health Care 'New York's health-care industry stands to lose billions of dollars in federal funding' under the GOP federal budget bill, notes the Empire Center's Bill Hammond, yet that wouldn't 'be enough to 'decimate' or 'gut' New York's health care system,' as Gov. Hochul has claimed. 'The House budget would reduce federal health-care aid by $10.1 billion while obliging the state to spend an additional $3.3 billion,' a state Health Department analysis finds — yet federal aid 'would still be higher than it was in 2023.' Cut the state's Medicaid enrollment by 1.2 million, and New York 'would still be providing free coverage to about 36 percent of its population' — still '12 points higher than the national average.' Republican: Don't Let Judges Help China Steal Tech The Patent Trial and Appeal Board is 'effectively allowing a Chinese firm to keep stealing an American semiconductor technology,' warns Rep. Nathaniel Moran at The Hill. The judges on the board 'just sided with Innoscience, a Chinese firm' accused of 'stealing patented technology and selling knockoff chips' from Cali company Efficient Power Conversion. 'After a 16-month investigation,' the US International Trade Commission 'found that Innoscience had indeed stolen the technology.' Yet Innoscience separately the patent board to invalidate Efficient Power Conversion's patent. 'The Trump administration has the authority to overrule' the board's 'dangerous decision' and 'should do so immediately,' but also 'implement broader reforms' to stop 'rogue administrative judges from helping Chinese companies pilfer US intellectual property in the future.' Democrats: San Francisco Shows the Way 'In the most famously liberal city in America, voters are no longer satisfied with symbolism or purity tests — they want results,' cheer Nancy Tung & Eric Kingsbury at Real Clear Politics. San Francisco voters 'still support Democratic principles, but they are demanding leaders who deliver.' In elections since 2022 through the rise of 'outsider' Mayor Daniel Lurie, voters are supporting a 'New Pragmatism' that's 'reshaping' how the Democratic Party 'governs and earns trust.' In other parts of the country, when 'voters asked for outcomes,' the party 'gave them process and vibes.' To win back voters, Dems 'need to be practical, not performative.' New Pragmatism is about 'solving problems, using power, and being honest about what is broken and what can be fixed.' If Democrats 'want to win again, they should start paying attention' to what voters want. Media watch: Don't Follow the Money? The media can 'no longer be trusted to tell anything like the truth,' blasts the Issues & Insights editorial board. 'The FBI is investigating the financial ties behind' the LA riots, but 'the mainstream press could care less,' fearing the facts might 'implicate Democrats or upset the left's agenda.' The Post has reported how the 'Party for Socialism and Liberation, which has ties to the Chinese Communist Party, is said to be behind some of the protests,' but other outlets remain mute. 'If you want to uncover corruption, find out where the money is coming from and where it is going. At least it used to be. Today? Not so much.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Medicaid enrollees fear losing health coverage if Congress enacts work requirements
It took Crystal Strickland years to qualify for Medicaid, which she needs for a heart condition. Strickland, who's unable to work due to her condition, chafed when she learned that the U.S. House had passed a bill that would impose a work requirement for many able-bodied people to get health insurance coverage through the low-cost, government-run plan for lower-income people. "What sense does that make?" she asked. "What about the people who can't work but can't afford a doctor?" The measure is part of the version of President Donald Trump's "Big Beautiful" bill that cleared the House last month and is now up for consideration in the Senate. Trump is seeking to have it passed by July 4. The bill, as it stands, would cut taxes and government spending — and also upend portions of the nation's social safety net. For proponents, the ideas behind the work requirement are simple: Crack down on fraud and stand on the principle that taxpayer-provided health coverage isn't for those who can work but aren't. The measure includes exceptions for those who are under 19 or over 64, those with disabilities, pregnant women, main caregivers for young children, people recently released from prisons or jails, or during certain emergencies. It would apply only to adults who receive Medicaid through expansions that 40 states chose to undertake as part of the 2010 health insurance overhaul. Many details of how the changes would work would be developed later, leaving several unknowns and causing anxiety among recipients who worry that their illnesses might not be enough to exempt them. Advocates and sick and disabled enrollees worry, based largely on their experience, that even those who might be exempted from work requirements under the law could still lose benefits because of increased or hard-to-meet paperwork mandates. Strickland, a 44-year-old former server, cook, and construction worker who lives in Fairmont, North Carolina, said she could not afford to go to a doctor for years because she wasn't able to work. She finally received a letter this month saying she would receive Medicaid coverage, she said. "It's already kind of tough to get on Medicaid," said Strickland, who has lived in a tent and times and subsisted on nonperishable food thrown out by stores. "If they make it harder to get on, they're not going to be helping." Steve Furman is concerned that his 43-year-old son, who has autism, could lose coverage. The bill the House adopted would require Medicaid enrollees to show that they work, volunteer or go to school at least 80 hours a month to continue to qualify. A disability exception would likely apply to Furman's son, who previously worked in an eyeglasses plant in Illinois for 15 years despite behavioral issues that may have gotten him fired elsewhere. Furman said government bureaucracies are already impossible for his son to navigate, even with help. It took him a year to help get his son onto Arizona's Medicaid system when they moved to Scottsdale in 2022, and it took time to set up food benefits. But he and his wife, who are retired, say they don't have the means to support his son fully. "Should I expect the government to take care of him?" he asked. "I don't know, but I do expect them to have humanity." About 71 million adults are enrolled in Medicaid now. And most of them — around 92% — are working, caregiving, attending school or disabled. Earlier estimates of the budget bill from the Congressional Budget Office found that about 5 million people stand to lose coverage. A KFF tracking poll conducted in May found that the enrollees come from across the political spectrum. About one-fourth are Republicans; roughly one-third are Democrats. The poll found that about 7 in 10 adults are worried that federal spending reductions on Medicaid will lead to more uninsured people and would strain health care providers in their area. About half said they were worried reductions would hurt their ability or their family to get and pay for health care. Amaya Diana, an analyst at KFF, points to work requirements launched in Arkansas and Georgia as keeping people off Medicaid without increasing employment. Amber Bellazaire, a policy analyst at the Michigan League for Public Policy, said the process to verify that Medicaid enrollees meet the work requirements could be a key reason people would be denied or lose eligibility. "Massive coverage losses just due to an administrative burden rather than ineligibility is a significant concern," she said. One KFF poll respondent, Virginia Bell, a retiree in Starkville, Mississippi, said she's seen sick family members struggle to get onto Medicaid, including one who died recently without coverage. She said she doesn't mind a work requirement for those who are able, but worries about how that would be sorted out. "It's kind of hard to determine who needs it and who doesn't need it," she said. Lexy Mealing, 54 of Westbury, New York, who was first diagnosed with breast cancer in 2021 and underwent a double mastectomy and reconstruction surgeries, said she fears she may lose the medical benefits she has come to rely on, though people with "serious or complex" medical conditions could be granted exceptions. She now works about 15 hours a week in "gig" jobs but isn't sure she can work more as she deals with the physical and mental toll of the cancer. Mealing, who used to work as a medical receptionist in a pediatric neurosurgeon's office before her diagnosis and now volunteers for the American Cancer Society, went on Medicaid after going on short-term disability. "I can't even imagine going through treatments right now and surgeries and the uncertainty of just not being able to work and not having health insurance," she said. Felix White, who has Type I diabetes, first qualified for Medicaid after losing his job as a computer programmer several years ago. The Oreland, Pennsylvania, man has been looking for a job, but finds that at 61, it's hard to land one. Medicaid, meanwhile, pays for a continuous glucose monitor and insulin and funded foot surgeries last year, including one that kept him in the hospital for 12 days. "There's no way I could have afforded that," he said. "I would have lost my foot and probably died." ___ Associated Press writer Susan Haigh in Hartford, Connecticut, contributed to this article.
2 hours ago
Trump says he 'may' call Walz after Minnesota shootings, calls him 'grossly incompetent'
President Donald Trump told ABC News on Sunday that he "may" call Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz after a political assassination sent shockwaves through the state. The president, who condemned the violence, called the Democratic governor a "terrible governor" and "grossly incompetent" in an interview with ABC News' Rachel Scott. "Well, it's a terrible thing. I think he's a terrible governor. I think he's a grossly incompetent person. But I may, I may call him, I may call other people too," the president told Scott. Minnesota is reeling from two back-to-back shootings. Authorities say a masked gunman disguised as a police officer shot and killed Minnesota state Rep. Melissa Hortman, a former speaker of the state House, and her husband Mark, and wounded a state senator and his wife early Saturday. The suspected gunman, 57-year-old Vance Luther Boelter, fled on foot and remains on the run. Walz called the shootings an "act of targeted political violence." The president condemned the violence shortly after the attack. "Such horrific violence will not be tolerated in the United States of America. God Bless the great people of Minnesota, a truly great place," he said. A source close the Walz told ABC News that Walz and Vice President JD Vance spoke regarding the shootings. 'The Governor expressed appreciation for the ongoing coordination between federal law enforcement and Minnesota public safety officials," the person said. Another source familiar with the Minnesota governor told ABC News early Sunday afternoon that Trump has not called Walz. The source said that former President Joe Biden called Walz "right away." The White House said in a statement that the FBI and the attorney general's office will investigate the shootings and "will be prosecuting anyone involved to the fullest extent of the law." Police say the suspected gunman allegedly had dozens of Minnesota Democrats on a target list, which was retrieved from the his vehicle. The assassination comes amid growing concerns about political violence in the U.S. following the recent killing of two Israeli embassy staffers in Washington, the arson attack at the home of Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, and the attempted assassination of Trump last summer.
