
How Auschwitz become di centre of Nazi Holocaust
Na 80 years ago wey Soviet troops liberate di Nazi death camp for Auschwitz-Birkenau, and some of di last survivors go join some world leaders on 27 January to commemorate di 1.1 million pipo wey dem be murder for dia.
Di remaining survivors dey mostly in dia 90s now and dis fit be di last year any of dem fit attend.
In just over four-and-a-half years, Nazi Germany bin systematically murder at least 1.1 million pipo for Auschwitz, wey dem bin build for di south of occupied Poland near di town of Oswiecim.
Auschwitz bin dey for di centre of di Nazi campaign to wipe out Europe Jewish population, and almost one million of di pipo wey bin die for dia na Jews.
Among di odas wey lose dia lives na Poles, Roman and Russian prisoners of war.
By di time di Red Army bin cautiously enta Auschwitz on 27 January 1945, only about 7,000 prisoners bin remain. Tens of thousands of odas already bin dey forced to leave by trecking on "death marches" as di Nazis bin return to di west.
Italian prisoner Primo Levi bin dey lie down for camp hospital wit scarlet fever wen di Soviet liberators bin land.
Di men bin look dem "strangely wit embarrassed looks as dia body dey fail, for dia battered huts and few of us wey still dey alive", im go later write for im Holocaust memoir The Truce.
"Dem no greet us, dem no even smile; dem look oppressed not only by compassion but by... di feeling of guilt say such a crime dey exist."
"We bin see lean, tortured, impoverished pipo," na wetin soja Ivan Martynushkin tok about liberating di death camp, external. "We fit tell from dia eyes say dem bin dey happy as dem save dem from dis hell."
Wetin be di Holocaust?
Wen di Nazis bin enta power for Germany in 1933 dem start to strip Jewish pipo of all dia property, freedoms and rights under di law.
After di German invasion and occupation of Poland in 1939, di Nazis bin start to deport Jewish pipo from di Third Reich to parts of Poland, wia dem bin create ghettos to separate dem from di rest of di population.
In 1941, during di German invasion of di USSR, di Nazis start dia campaign of extermination in seriously.
Nazis bin tok about dia invasion as a race war between Germany and Jewish pipo, as well as di Slavic population and di Roma.
Groups of German sojas wey dem bin call Einsatzgruppen bin set out across newly conquered lands for Eastern Europe to massacre civilians.
By di end of 1941, dem bin kill 500,000 pipo, and by 1945 dem murder about two million - 1.3 million na Jewish pipo.
Behind di lines, Nazi commanders bin dey experiment (test) ways to kill plenti pipo at once.
Dem bin dey fear say to shoot pipo too dey stressful for dia sojas, and so, dem bin come up wit more efficient means of murder.
Dem bin use gas vans as experiment to kill mentally disabled pipo for Poland as early as 1939.
Dem pump fumes wey dey poisonous into compartments wey dem lock to suffocate di pipo inside.
By di winter of 1941, di Nazis bin construct dia first gas chamber and crematorium (wia dem dey burn deadi body) for Auschwitz.
Nazi leaders bin meet for January 1942 for di Wannsee Conference to coordinate di industrial slaughter - wetin dem bin cal a "final solution to di Jewish question" - dem kill di entire European Jewish population, 11 million pipo by extermination and forced labour.
Wetin Auschwitz be bifor?
Bifor, Auschwitz na originally one Polish army barracks for southern Poland. Nazi Germany bin invade and occupy Poland for September 1939, and by May 1940 dem turn di site into jail for political prisoners.
Di Nazi officer wey dem bin make commandant of di concentration camp, Rudolf Höss, bring di motto Arbeit Macht Frei - works sets you free - from anoda camp wia im bin work, for Dachau in Germany.
Dat infamous lie still dey for dia till now, above di entrance to di camp wey pipo kon sabi as Auschwitz I.
As di war and di Holocaust bin progress, di Nazi regime bin expand di site well-well.
Di first pipo wey dem use gas on na a group of Polish and Soviet prisoners in September 1941.
Work start on a new camp, Auschwitz II-Birkenau, di following month. Dis come becom di site of di huge gas chambers wia dem bin murder hundreds of thousands bifor November 1944, and di crematoria wia dem burn dia bodies.
Birkenau bin suppose to become di biggest of six Nazi death camps. Dem complete three odas, for Belzec, Sobibor and Treblinka, in 1942.
Di first transport of Jews to Auschwitz II-Birkenau na 999 women and girls from Slovakia in March 1942.
Sharp-sharp deportations follow from France, and later di Netherlands and Belgium. By 1944, dem bin dey murder 12,000 Jews evriday.
German chemicals company IG Farben bin build and operate one synthetic rubber factory for Auschwitz III-Monowitz.
Oda private companies like Krupp and Siemens-Schuckert bin also run factories nearby, to use di prisoners as slave labour.
Both Primo Levi and Nobel Prize winner Elie Wiesel bin survive Monowitz concentration camp.
Wen Auschwitz bin eventually get freedom, e bin get more dan 40 camps and sub camps.
How Auschwitz bin dey work?
Dem bin pack pipo from all ova Europe into cattle wagons wey no get windows, toilets, seats or food, and transport dem to Auschwitz.
Na for dia dem separate pipo wey fit work and dos wey dem go immediately kill.
Dem order di pipo wey no fit work to go naked and sent dem to showers for "delousing" - a euphemism (term) wey dem dey use describe di gas chambers.
Guards from di so-called "Hygienic Institute" go drop powerful Zyklon-B gas pellets into di sealed chambers, and wait for pipo to die.
E bin dey take about 20 minutes. Di thick walls no go fit hide di screams of di pipo wey dey suffocate inside.
Den Sonderkommandos - oda prisoners, usually Jews wey dem bin force to work for di guards or be killed - go remove artificial limbs, glasses, hair and teeth bifor dem go drag di corpses to di incinerators (wia dem burn waste materials). Dem go burty di ashes of di deadibodies or use dem as fertiliser.
Dem go later carry properties of di pipo wey dem murder thru gas and di pipo wey dem send to work for sorting for one part of di camp known as "Canada" - dem name am like dat becos dem bin see Canada as a kontri of plenty.
Who be di victims?
SS guards bin try to hide dia crimes as Soviet troops bin close in, and try to destroy dia extensive prisoner records - wey make am hard to fully quantify di number of victims.
Academic studies since agree say di total dey close to 1.3 million pipo wey land for at Auschwitz. About 1.1 million of dem died dere..
Jews from all across Nazi-controlled Europe make up di vast majority of di victims. Almost one million Jewish pipo na im dem bin murder for Auschwitz.
One specific example na Hungary Jewish population. In di space of just two months, between May and July 1944, Hungary bin transport 420,000 of di 437,000 Jewish pipo dem bin send to Auschwitz.
Dem bin send tens of thousands of Hungarian Jews to Auschwitz evri day. Dem bin kill three quarter of dem on arrival.
Di German state for di Auschwitz complex bin also kill some 75,000 Polish civilians, 15,000 Soviet prisoners of war, 25,000 Roma and Sinti, as well as Jehovah's Witnesses, homosexuals and political prisoners.
Wetin happun wen Auschwitz bin get liberation?
German authorities bin give order make dem stop di gassing and dem begin destroy di gas chambers and crematoria in late 1944, as Soviet troops begin move westward.
Dem bin ship di stockpile of stolen valuables for di Canada sector to Germany shortly afterwards.
Becos dem bin dey determined to erase di evidence of dia crimes, di Nazis bin order 56,000 prisoners wey bin dey remian to march west to oda concentration camps, like Bergen-Belsen, Dachau and Sachsenhausen.
Dem leave di ones wey dey sick, wey no fit waka behind; and anyone wey fall behind as dem dey march dey go, dem go kill am.
Soviet forces see only a few thousand survivors wen dem bin enta di camp on 27 January 1945, along wit hundreds of thousands of clothes and several tonnes of human hair.
Sojas later remember say dem bin try to convince some survivors say di Nazis done finally go.
Elie Wiesel later tok for im speech to mark di 50th anniversary of di liberation, external say di Nazi crimes for Auschwitz "bin produce a mutation on a cosmic scale, wey dey affect man dreams and endeavours".
"After Auschwitz, di human condition no longer be di same. After Auschwitz, notin go ever be di same."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump makes huge World War I blunder in fiery speech as LA riots rage
Donald Trump made a huge blunder about World War I in a fiery speech at Fort Bragg, as the U.S. continues to be rocked by riots over the President's mass deportation order US President Donald Trump delivered a speech at Fort Bragg on Tuesday, as unrest continued in Los Angeles between protesters and ICE officials over his far-reaching deportation order. Fort Bragg, situated near Fayetteville, North Carolina, is home to the military's Special Operations Command, which includes elite units such as the Green Berets and Rangers. During his address, Trump made a significant historical blunder, claiming that many countries had recently commemorated the end of World War I, while the US did not participate in the celebrations, despite asserting "we're the ones who won the war." "Without us," Trump said, "You'd all be speaking German right now." "Maybe a little Japanese thrown in. But we won the war," he added. "We're gonna celebrate on Saturday." However, Trump's claim that citizens would have been speaking Japanese is inaccurate, as Japan was an ally of the US, France, Great Britain, Russia, and Italy against the Axis powers of Germany, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria, and the Ottoman Empire, reports the Mirror US. It appears the President was actually referencing WW2, which was commemorated recently during VE celebrations. The end of WW1 is traditionally commemorated on "Armistice Day" on November 11 each year. The event at Fort Bragg was also attended by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and Army Secretary Dan Driscoll, and included both active service members and their families. The speech comes ahead of the 250th anniversary of the army and coincidentally, Trump's 79th birthday, which will be marked with a parade in Washington, D.C. The city is bracing for a massive turnout at the parade this Saturday, with officials already setting up 18 miles of "anti-scale fencing" and deploying drones, despite the usual no-fly zone rules. City representatives have told The Associated Press they're expecting an "preparing for an enormous turnout." Secret Service's Matt McCool from the Washington Field Office is preparing for "hundreds of thousands" to line the streets, while military sources estimate around 200,000 will join the celebrations. "We have a ton of magnetometers," McCool said. "If a million people show up, then we're going to have some lines." To manage the expected crowds, 175 magnetometers will be in place at security checkpoints throughout the day and for the evening parade. Metropolitan Police Department Chief Pamela Smith has warned of "major impacts to traffic" and advises attendees to consider using the Metro instead of driving. "This is a significant event with a large footprint," she stressed. "We're relying on the public to be an extra set of ears and eyes for us." The event has hit the headlines as a National Special Security Event, with security measures on par with presidential inaugurations or state funerals. This elite status is reserved for high-profile functions drawing sizeable gatherings and the likelihood of significant protests, triggering an increased security collaboration between local officials, the FBI, Capitol Police, and the National Guard, all led by the watchful Secret Service. Officials are also on high alert for possible immigration-related protests, mirroring those in Los Angeles, potentially hitting D. C. 's streets. "We're paying attention, obviously, to what is happening there. We'll be ready," affirmed McCool, underlining the extensive preparations in place to manage any civil unrest.


NBC News
5 hours ago
- NBC News
Trump warns that military parade protesters will face 'very heavy force'
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump warned Tuesday that anyone who protests at the U.S. military parade here on Saturday will be met with "very heavy force." Trump told reporters in the Oval Office that they're going to be "celebrating big on Saturday," referring to the parade that will wind its way through downtown Washington, D.C. "If there's any protester that wants to come out, they will be met with very big force," Trump said. "I haven't even heard about a protest, but you know, this is people that hate our country, but they will be met with very heavy force." The White House didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. The president also addressed the protests of the administration's immigration raids in Los Angeles."These are paid insurrectionists," he said about the demonstrators. The military parade Saturday will mark the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army and is expected to feature tanks and hundreds of other military vehicles and aircraft. It's estimated to cost about $45 million, including as much as $16 million to repair D.C. streets afterward, U.S. military officials said last month. Saturday is also Trump's 79th birthday. "We're going to have a fantastic June 14 parade, Flag Day. It's going to be an amazing day. We have tanks, we have planes, we have all sorts of things. And I think it's going to be great. We're going to celebrate our country for a change," Trump said Tuesday. Trump said that other countries celebrate the end of World War II and that the U.S. was the only country that did not. "And we're the one that won the war," said Trump, who added that if it weren't for the U.S., Americans would be speaking German or Japanese. "We won the war, and we're the only country that didn't celebrate it, and we're going to be celebrating big on Saturday," he said. Officials are expecting hundreds of thousands of attendees, Matt McCool, the U.S. Secret Service agent in charge of the Washington field office, said Monday. McCool said they plan to deploy "thousands of agents, officers and specialists from across the country." People attending the parade or a related festival will be required to go through checkpoints with magnetometers. Asked about any changes to security planning in light of the L.A. protests, McCool said, "We plan for those things ahead of time' 'We were paying attention, obviously, to what is happening there, and we'll be ready for that if it were to occur here,' he said, though he added, 'We have no intelligence of that happening here, but if it does, we have the resources to handle it." U.S. Park Police had several protest permits pending on Monday, but officials 'don't have any significant concerns," said McCool, who added that they're tracking 'about nine First Amendment activity demonstrations.' The anti-Trump group No Kings is expecting more than 1,800 rallies nationwide Saturday that organizers said were planned as "a peaceful stand against authoritarian overreach and the gross abuse of power this Administration has shown." With Trump's decision to deploy the National Guard and U.S. Marines to respond to the L.A. demonstrations, the group said in a statement: "This military escalation only confirms what we've known: this government wants to rule by force, not serve the people. From major cities to small towns, we'll rise together and say: we reject political violence. We reject fear as governance. We reject the myth that only some deserve freedom."


Spectator
20 hours ago
- Spectator
How a Luxembourg village divided Europe
I am in the most EU-ish bedroom in the EU. That is to say, I am lying in a refurbished room in the handsome 14th-century Chateau de Schengen, in the little village of Schengen, Luxembourg. From my casements, opened wide onto the sunny Saarland afternoon, I can see the exact stretch of the river Moselle where, on a boat floating between Germany, France and Luxembourg, the Schengen Agreement was signed in 1985. This was the agreement that sealed Free Movement as Europe's defining ideal – one whose consequences are still unfolding. I've been in Luxembourg for a week, on assignment, and this week has given me an insight into why the nations of the EU undertook their bold, remarkable experiment of no more borders. The first and obvious motivator was war. Luxembourg can look oddly new, or newish. Ancient-sounding villages are full of blocky 1960s houses. Supposedly medieval churches are clearly modern, lacking the rich patina of age. This is because they were all flattened in war – especially the last German offensive of the second world war, the Battle of the Bulge – which raged across snowbound Luxembourg from December 1944 to January 1945. As a result, much had to be rebuilt or heavily restored. Reviving international trust took even longer, as the war here was brutal. In little towns like Diekirch, teenage Nazi conscripts casually gunned down innocent civilians in the streets. The angered Allies felt no huge need thereafter to take German prisoners alive. The yearning to overcome this evil trauma – and reconcile – was one big driver of the EEC, which reached its frontierless, post-national apotheosis here in Schengen. But another was sheer practicality. Yesterday, my local guide, Anna, told me how she once had to show her passport every day to cross the Moselle to and from Germany. She can remember the queues and frustration. She recalls a crimped, claustrophobic Europe – like an office with too many cubicles. Nowadays the quaint old customs houses have been turned into tourist bureaux or posh chocolatiers, and everyone breezes between countries with total freedom. The other day I drove a meandering route through the rustling green winelands and must have crossed between Lux and DE half a dozen times, barely noticing. At its best, Schengen is indeed wonderful. But there's the geopolitical rub. Schengen at its Platonic best is magnificent. In practice, it may be turning into a tragic failure. A primary reason is migration – not within Europe, but without. To illustrate my point, Anna told me another story of Luxembourg. She explained how, in the 1970s, the now-prospering little Duchy required workers. As she put it, with bracing candour: 'We chose the Portuguese because they were poor and wanted the work, but also because they are European, Christian, Catholic, like us. We felt they would assimilate.' And so they have. You can see unexpectedly good selections of Douro wines in Luxembourg supermarkets. Otherwise, the 15 per cent of the population that is Portuguese is barely discernible. Schengen might, perhaps, be in much less trouble if every other country had followed those careful Luxembourg policies. But they didn't. France drew people from its old empire – Algeria, Morocco, sub-Saharan Africa. Germany imported millions of Turks, then another million Syrians under Merkel's idealistic Willkommen policy of 2015. Britain turned to the Caribbean, then Pakistan, India, Bangladesh. Combining open internal borders with sovereign external migration policies – inviting millions from far outside Europe – was, in retrospect, bound to create a problem. It's like a flat share where everyone agrees to leave their doors open and split the rent, but each person gets to invite their own guests, who then stay forever, use the bathroom, and host loud parties. Irritation is guaranteed. Some housemates will get seriously annoyed. Take, for example, the Somali migrant population in Holland. Tens of thousands of them moved to the UK under Free Movement. The UK could do nothing to stop this – as Britons duly noted. This is one example of how Free Movement, which peaked with Schengen, led quite directly to Brexit. It was perhaps sheer bad luck that Schengen coincided with one of the most ill-conceived experiments of recent times: multiculturalism plus mass immigration. Or maybe it wasn't coincidence, and they derive from the same well-meaning, liberal universalism – only this time taken too far. Frontiers are intrinsically sad – divisions within humanity made all too real Whatever the case, as I write this in my room in the Chateau de Schengen, I can also read the daily and unhappy news that springs from Europe's mass immigration experience: of riots and deaths in France following the football victory of Paris Saint-Germain; of another call for an inquiry into rape gangs in the UK; of a hard-right Polish politician becoming president, vowing to keep Poland migrant-free; of once-peaceful Sweden – now 'the bombing capital of the West'. Or I can read about de facto blasphemy laws in Britain and Denmark, introduced to placate militant Islam. And I can read of endless terror shifting across Europe untracked, leading even mainstream politicians in Germany, Austria, Italy to argue for the suspension of Schengen. Yes, of course there are multiple good, successful stories of integration and assimilation across Europe. But for many Europeans, judging by the remarkable electoral shift to the hard right, the good is now majorly outweighed by the bad. Is there any hope for that faded but shimmering Schengen ideal of a borderless Europe? I'd like to think so. Frontiers are intrinsically sad – divisions within humanity made all too real – even if Robert Frost knew what he was talking about when he said 'good fences make good neighbours'. The day is closing here in the Chateau de Schengen, and the summer sun sets lazily over the Auxerrois vines. They have a nice restaurant in the hotel, which has a classic French menu. I want to eat French food in Luxembourg while looking at Germany. It feels Schengen-y. But as the waitress brings my tranche de foie gras maison, the capricious Luxemburg weather turns. It's been in the forecast for a while – now it has arrived: a cold wind from the Ardennes is sweeping down the Moselle valley. The rain lashes the ancient gardens, and the waiters drift toward the windows, watching as the parasols surrender to the storm.