logo
NSE, BSE shares drop amid declining trading volumes, regulatory concerns

NSE, BSE shares drop amid declining trading volumes, regulatory concerns

Shares of Indian stock exchanges – BSE and National Stock Exchange (NSE) – slumped this week as regulatory scrutiny on high-frequency traders sparked concerns over drop in turnover and eventually their profitability.
Since the Securities and Exchange Board of India's (Sebi's) ban on US trading firm Jane Street on July 3 derivatives trading turnover has declined by a fifth.
BSE Ltd shares fell nearly 16 per cent from July 3 levels following the ban on US-based proprietary trader Jane Street for alleged index options manipulation. The stock closed at ₹2,376 on Friday, down 3.7 per cent over its previous day's close, reducing its market capitalisation to ₹96,650 crore.
This has reduced NSE's market value to ₹5.43 trillion. Its shares had previously rallied to ₹2,400 amid optimism over its initial public offering (IPO) as the bourse neared a settlement with regulators in a protracted legal case involving lapses at its colocation facility.
'The sharp fall in NSE and BSE shares this week is a mix of short-term noise and shifting market dynamics. The change in the derivatives' expiry dates has unsettled traders a bit. At the same time, Sebi's recent action against Jane Street has added to the caution. There is a concern that tighter rules have also raised fears that F&O turnover could shrink further,' said Trivesh D, chief operating officer at Tradejini.
On the first expiry of Nifty weekly contracts since the ban on US-based high frequency trading firm, the total turnover on the National Stock Exchange (NSE) dropped 21 per cent compared to the previous expiry day.
'The key unknown is whether this instance can lead to a knock-on impact on trading volumes, and we feel that trends over the next week on derivatives volumes will be key to watch, especially the index derivatives expiries on Tuesday and Thursday,' noted Jefferies.
The research firm added that proprietary traders and HFTs may see a manageable impact from the exit of Jane Street as manipulative factors potentially reduce. 'Hedge funds largely operate with larger positions in Single Stock Futures and their trading in options is limited,' added Jefferies, noting that the exit by Jane Street may have a limited impact on the earnings of BSE.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Export outreach widened to 50 countries to negate US tariff hit
Export outreach widened to 50 countries to negate US tariff hit

Time of India

time19 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Export outreach widened to 50 countries to negate US tariff hit

Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel India is expanding its export outreach to 50 countries including in West Asia and Africa to reduce reliance on any single market and mitigate the risks of trade disruptions amid the steep 50% tariffs imposed by the 50 countries account for about 90% of India's exports. The ministry of commerce and industry is working product by product to improve India's exports competitiveness, officials said."The idea is to tap top 50 countries and look at each product and the competitors. India must mitigate risks to improve manufacturing and export competitiveness," said an official. This exercise to explore alternative markets is being done with export promotion bodies and is crucial as India's merchandise exports in June were flat at $35.14 week, the US doubled the tariffs on its imports from India to 50% at par with Brazil and the highest on any country in a move marking an escalation of trade tensions between the two the initial 25% duty came into effect last week, the additional 25% is effective August 27. Sectors such as marine products, textiles, leather, gems and jewellery, are expected to be severely hit by the adds to the concern is that competing manufacturing hubs such as Turkey, Vietnam and Thailand face significantly lower tariffs of 15%, 20% and 19% respectively, making Indian products relatively less competitive in the US market."The Indian gem and jewellery sector, in particular, stands to be severely impacted. The US is our single largest market, accounting for over $10 billion in exports-nearly 30% of our industry's total global trade. A blanket tariff of this magnitude is severely devastating for the sector," said Kirit Bhansali, chairman, GJEPCThe government is also working on a strategy to safeguard India's exports from American tariffs. This includes offering tailor-made schemes under the proposed Export Promotion Mission for the affected sectors, diversion of goods to other geographies, and identifying products with less export orders that could be diverted to meet the domestic government was already focusing on 20 countries to increase exports but now 30 more have been included in the also said that the possibility of trade rerouting through low-tariff destinations such as Mexico, Canada, Turkey, UAE, or Oman-undermining the spirit of legitimate trade and impacting transparency, is another concern.

Venture capitalist Mike Moritz defends Intel CEO Lip Bu Tan after US President Donald Trump demands his resignation: There is no one better equipped to…
Venture capitalist Mike Moritz defends Intel CEO Lip Bu Tan after US President Donald Trump demands his resignation: There is no one better equipped to…

Time of India

time44 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Venture capitalist Mike Moritz defends Intel CEO Lip Bu Tan after US President Donald Trump demands his resignation: There is no one better equipped to…

Image credit: LinkedIn/Canva Venture capitalist and former chairman of Sequoia Capital , Mike Moritz , has publicly defended Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan after US President Donald Trump demanded his resignation last week. Moritz urged Intel to stand by its CEO, stating there is 'no one better equipped to transform Intel's fortunes." Moritz, who has known Tan for nearly four decades from his time at Sequoia Capital, described Trump's actions as a 'vindictive political sideshow' with 'no modern precedent.' He also highlighted Tan's previous experience in turning around Cadence Design Systems as a key reason for his confidence in Tan's ability to lead the US-based chipmaker. Tan may even visit the White House to address concerns about his background and discuss how Intel can collaborate with the US government. What Mike Moritz said while defending Intel's CEO Lip Bu Tan In a piece recently published in the Financial Times, Moritz wrote: 'Now the Intel board must decide whether to march to the beat of so many other corporate leaders and capitulate to the president's artless bullying or to set an example for other companies and display some backbone. Early signs of defiance are encouraging.' Moritz, who joined Sequoia Capital in 1986 and stepped down in 2023, made notable early investments in companies such as Google and PayPal during his tenure. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like If Your Ears Ring, Stop Sleeping Like This Immediately Derila Ergo Undo This comes after Trump took to the social media platform Truth Social to share a post calling for Tan's resignation, describing the 65-year-old as 'highly CONFLICTED.' Soon after, Senator Tom Cotton (R-Ark) also voiced concerns about Tan's connections to Chinese companies and the possible national security implications. In response, Tan addressed what he referred to as 'misinformation' in a letter to employees, stating that he has 'always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards.' Four former Intel board members - Charlene Barshefsky, Reed Hundt, James Plummer, and David Yoffie - have also supported Trump's criticism of Tan. They've also asked for a more radical shake-up and have even urged Intel to spin off its manufacturing arm to boost US chipmaking dominance and competitiveness. Can These AI Glasses Replace Your Phone? Ray-Ban Meta Glasses Tested AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

‘90% of India makes less than  ₹25,000…': Jay Kotak slams  ₹50,000 minimum bank balance rule
‘90% of India makes less than  ₹25,000…': Jay Kotak slams  ₹50,000 minimum bank balance rule

Mint

timean hour ago

  • Mint

‘90% of India makes less than ₹25,000…': Jay Kotak slams ₹50,000 minimum bank balance rule

ICICI Bank is facing heat after hiking its savings account minimum balance by 5 times, and this time veteran banker Uday Kotak's son Jay Kotak has spoken up against the move. In a post on X without explicitly mentioning the ICICI Bank minimum balance hike, Jay Kotak said 90 per cent of Indians make less than ₹ 25,000 a month. 'Every Indian must access our financial sector. 90% of India makes less than ₹ 25,000 a month. A ₹ 50,000 minimum balance implies a sum equal to ~94% of Indians monthly income is to be left with the bank at all times, else a fee!,' he said. Jay Kotak, who leads Kotak Mahindra Bank's digital banking arm Kotak 811, said digital first is the way to go. 'Implication: physical cost to serve may be high. Digital first is the way. If banks don't do it, fintechs will. Banking should be for all Indians.' The ICICI Bank minimum balance for savings account has been hiked from ₹ 10,000 to ₹ 50,000 for urban accounts. MAB (Minimum Account Balance) for semi-urban locations and rural locations have also been increased five times ₹ ₹ 25,000 and ₹ 10,000, respectively, according to information available on the ICICI Bank website. Non-maintenance of ICICI Bank minimum balance will attract penalty, the bank said. The lender will charge 6 per cent of the shortfall in required MAB, or ₹ 500, whichever is lower, if you stay in an urban area and cannot maintain ₹ 50,000 account balance. The changes are applicable to ICICI Bank savings accounts opened on or after August 1. The minimum balance remains ₹ 5,000 for old customers in rural and semi-urban areas. For old urban customers, the minimum account balance should be maintained at ₹ 10,000. The ICICI Bank minimum balance hike was criticised by many, with social media users calling the move discriminatory and elitist. A user wrote, 'In a country where 23 crore people live below the poverty line, ICICI thinks ₹ 50,000 is a 'minimum'. Masterstroke!' In a letter to the finance secretary, 'Bank Bachao Desh Bachao Manch' termed the private lender's decision as "unjust and regressive". 'This retrograde decision undermines the principle of inclusive banking,' the forum's joint conveners, Biswaranjan Ray and Soumya Datta, claimed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store