
EU threatens accession candidate Georgia with sanctions
Brussels
The EU is threatening Georgia, a candidate country for membership, with sanctions over violations of core European values.
Georgia's democratic backsliding will not go without consequences, EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said following a meeting of bloc foreign ministers in Brussels.
'They have certain conditions they have to comply with,' she told reporters on Tuesday.
One possible option, she said, would be to suspend visa-free travel or the current EU-Georgia partnership
agreement.
Kallas urged the Georgian government to make changes by the end of August.
These include safeguarding the freedom of assembly and expression, respecting the right to privacy, and adhering to anti-discrimination laws.
Kallas stated that the EU does not wish to harm the Georgian population but emphasised that the credibility of the European Union is also at stake.
The criticism is primarily directed at the current ruling party, Georgian Dream, which has been accused of restrictions on independent media and non-governmental organizations.
Brussels also has concerns that Georgia is being influenced by Russia.
In response to the developments, the EU had already frozen Georgia's accession process last year.
Candidate status was granted to the country of 3.7 million people at the end of 2023, after it applied for EU membership shortly after Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
17 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Iran to hold nuclear talks with 3 European powers on Friday
Iran, France, Germany and the United Kingdom will hold nuclear talks in Istanbul following warnings by the three European countries that failure to resume negotiations would lead to international sanctions being reimposed on Tehran. The talks scheduled for Friday come after foreign ministers of the E3 nations, as those European countries are known, as well as the European Union's foreign policy chief, held their first call on Thursday with Iranian Minister of Foreign Affairs Abbas Araghchi since Israel and the United States attacked Iranian nuclear facilities a month ago. The three European countries, along with China and Russia, are the remaining parties to a 2015 nuclear deal reached with Iran, from which the US withdrew in 2018, that had lifted sanctions on the Middle Eastern country in return for restrictions on its nuclear programme. 'The meeting between Iran, Britain, France and Germany will take place at the deputy foreign minister level,' Iran's Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman, Esmaeil Baghaei, was quoted by Iranian state media as saying. The E3 have said they would restore United Nations sanctions on Tehran by the end of August if nuclear talks that were ongoing between Iran and the US, before Israel launched a surprise attack, do not resume or fail to produce concrete results. Iran has accused the US of complicity in the Israeli attack, which killed top Iranian military officials, nuclear scientists and hundreds of civilians. The US also launched strikes on three major Iranian nuclear sites, claiming to have 'obliterated' them. A ceasefire took effect on June 24. 'If EU/E3 want to have a role, they should act responsibly, and put aside the worn-out policies of threat and pressure, including the 'snap-back' for which they lack absolutely moral and legal ground,' Araghchi said last week. Before the Israel-Iran war, Tehran and Washington held five rounds of nuclear talks mediated by Oman but faced major stumbling blocks such as uranium enrichment in Iran, which Western powers want to bring down to zero to minimise any risk of weaponisation. Tehran maintains that its nuclear programme is solely meant for civilian purposes. Middle East assessments Also on Sunday, Russian President Vladimir Putin held a surprise meeting in the Kremlin with Ali Larijani, the top adviser to Iran's supreme leader on nuclear issues. Larijani 'conveyed assessments of the escalating situation in the Middle East and around the Iranian nuclear programme', Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said of the unannounced meeting. Putin expressed Russia's 'well-known positions on how to stabilise the situation in the region and on the political settlement of the Iranian nuclear programme', he added. Moscow has a cordial relationship with Iran's clerical leadership and provides crucial backing for Tehran, but it did not swing forcefully behind its partner even after the US joined Israel's bombing campaign.


Qatar Tribune
18 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
As US and Europe cut aid budgets, China's star is on the rise in Southeast Asia: Report
Agencies China's role as Southeast Asia's largest infrastructure financier is increasing its regional influence at a time when the United States and the European Union are slashing their foreign aid budgets, a new report by an Australian think tank said. With the Trump administration in the United States scrapping about US$60 billion in aid and European countries pulling back more than US$25 billion, 'the centre of gravity' in Southeast Asia's development finance landscape 'looks set to drift East, notably to Beijing, but also Tokyo and Seoul', the Lowy Institute report, which was released today, said. 'China is the single largest partner on infrastructure financing in Southeast Asia, but traditional donors combined still outspend it,' the report's lead authors, Alexandre Dayant, Grace Stanhope and Roland Rajah, wrote. 'As Western aid declines and China recalibrates its strategy, Beijing is well positioned to regain dominance.' Southeast Asia's traditional partners include countries such as the US and Australia, and international organisations such as the United Nations, the Asian Development Bank and the World Bank. With the US expected to cut its foreign assistance by 83 per cent this year, the retrenchment of funds from Europe and tariff uncertainties undermining trade ties between the US and other countries, China is enhancing its influence in the region through infrastructure connections. Recent examples include work on high-speed railway links with Vietnam and Thailand. China International Development Cooperation Agency spokesman Li Ming told a news conference in March that China's 'principles related to foreign aid, including non-interference in internal affairs, no political strings attached and no empty promises made, will not change'.'A major country should act like a major country by shouldering its due international obligations and fulfilling its responsibilities, rather than renege on its promises, be mercenary or bullying,' he Lowy Institute report said that in 2023, China had 'ramped up' non-concessional loan disbursements by almost 50 per cent compared to 2022, accelerating major infrastructure projects such as the Jakarta-Bandung High-Speed Railway in Indonesia and the East Coast Rail Link in Malaysia. 'Even as the infrastructure race slows, China's relative importance as a development actor in the region will rise as Western development support recedes,' the report said. 'Beijing retains a substantial pipeline of infrastructure projects and has shown continued appetite to take on major projects.' Lower-middle-income economies such as the Philippines and Vietnam would engage with China when doing so aligned with their domestic priorities, the report said, while poorer economies such as Cambodia, Laos and Myanmar – which had limited access to alternative financing – remained 'heavily reliant' on China and had 'much less room to negotiate'. There was a fourfold increase in Chinese infrastructure project commitments from a low of US$2.5 billion in 2022 to almost US$10 billion in 2023 due to the revival of the Kyaukphyu Deep Sea Port project in Myanmar, the report said. It said the European Union and the governments of seven European countries – France, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Austria and Italy – had announced plans last year to implement US$17.2 billion in foreign aid cuts between this year and 2029, while the United Kingdom was cutting around US$7.6 billion a year. Total development finance to Southeast Asia could decline by 8 per cent, or more than US$2 billion, to US$26.5 billion next year, according to Lowy Institute estimates based on budget documents, public announcements and calculations by other researchers.


Qatar Tribune
18 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Uncertainty grips global economy in first 6 months of Donald Trump 2.0
Agencies Six months into his second term, one of the defining features of U.S. President Donald Trump's time in office appears to be his continued use of tariffs as a key policy tool. From China to Mexico to the European Union, Trump has reignited trade tensions with a barrage of new levies, fulfilling campaign promises but causing great uncertainty in financial markets and global supply chains. Trump's renewed focus on his protectionist economic policy has sparked sharp reactions in global markets, commodity prices, precious metals and oil. Trump first introduced his 'reciprocal' tariffs in April, imposing tariffs ranging from 10% to 50% on most countries. He suspended those tariffs for 90 days, except for China, on April 9. After a back-and-forth tariff standoff with China, Washington agreed to a trade deal following a meeting in London last month, as the two sides agreed to roll back some punitive tariffs and other restrictive measures. Meanwhile, many countries have been attempting to negotiate a more favorable trade agreement, which includes lower tariff rates than those introduced in April by the U.S. Other countries with which the U.S. has announced trade deals are the U.K., Vietnam and Indonesia. Additionally, the U.S. president has sent letters to numerous countries, informing them of the tariff rate they will be paying as of Aug. 1. They include the EU and Mexico at 30% and Canada at 35%. Trump also introduced new sectoral tariffs, which included a 25% tariff rate for all automotive imports in April. He also introduced 50% levies on copper imports starting Aug. 1 and a 200% rate on pharma products coming into the U.S. During the first four months of Trump's second term, the New York Stock Exchange experienced significant turbulence, frequently plunging into the red and wiping away substantial gains from the previous year. The Dow, a key indicator of the performance of America's largest corporations, experienced a notable decline of approximately 11.5% over four months. Following the trade agreements and the easing of uncertainty, the index recovered, settling at around 44,340 points as of late July, with a 0.72% rise in the last six months. Similarly, the S&P 500, another key indicator of U.S. economic health, had declined by approximately 18% over the preceding four months. It had briefly fallen below the psychologically significant 5,000-point mark, illustrating the breadth of market uncertainty. As of late July, the index stood at approximately 6,296 points, up around 4% over the previous six months, reaching record levels in early July. The technology-heavy Nasdaq had borne the brunt of market anxieties, experiencing the largest decline of the major indices. It plummeted 24% to 15,270 points, demonstrating investors' growing apprehension about technology firms and their global supply chains. However, over the last six months, the Nasdaq rose 5.76% to record levels of 20,895, with chip company Nvidia leading the gains. The VIX volatility index, often referred to as Wall Street's 'fear' gauge, had surged dramatically. It rose an alarming 66.6% to 25, spiking briefly beyond 52 points – a record in recent years. The fear index settled around 16.4 as of late July, as tariff fears eased following the uncertainty. Alongside equity markets, currency markets also saw volatility. The U.S. dollar index, which measures the dollar's strength against major global currencies, fell 10%, declining to around 98.50. Conversely, the euro surged significantly, climbing approximately 13% against the dollar, settling at $1.16, compared to $1.04 six months earlier. With greater initial uncertainty, investors rushed toward safer investment havens, most notably gold. Gold prices soared dramatically as uncertainty spread throughout financial markets. During Trump's first six months in office, the price surged 24%, jumping from around $2,700 per ounce in late January to $3,350 by late July. In late April, gold reached a historic high, surpassing $3,500, reflecting growing concerns about global economic turmoil. Conversely, oil markets faced downward pressure. Brent crude, the global benchmark, fell approximately 14.3%, dropping from nearly $80.2 per barrel in late January to around $68.60 by late July. Market analysts attribute the slump partly to concerns that Trump's tariffs would dampen global trade activity, reducing oil demand worldwide. On the other hand, oil experienced a short-lived spike in June, after Israel and the U.S. attacked Iranian nuclear capabilities. Bitcoin, another asset closely watched due to Trump's past enthusiasm for cryptocurrency, also witnessed initial volatility before reaching all-time highs. Initially buoyed by Trump's campaign pledge to make the U.S. the global crypto capital, bitcoin had sharply declined by around 8.5% during Trump's first three months in office. However, following the easing of uncertainty after trade deal announcements and regulatory optimism, the world's largest cryptocurrency exceeded the $120,000 threshold in July. Perhaps most notably affected by market uncertainty were shares of technology and innovation-driven companies, often collectively referred to as the 'Magnificent Seven.' Electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer Tesla, whose CEO, Elon Musk, was one of Trump's staunchest financial supporters, contributing more than $130 million to the president's election campaign, suffered the sharpest losses in the group. Tesla's shares fell dramatically, plummeting 20% over the past six months. Although Trump's initial election victory had provided a substantial boost to Tesla shares due to his enthusiasm for tech innovation, the realities of global economic uncertainty and reduced investor confidence took their toll on the company's valuation. Especially after Musk parted ways with the U.S. president, Tesla's shares declined by around 10% in less than a month. Over the last six months, the EV giant's shares have plummeted by more than 22%. Following Tesla in losses was Apple, which experienced a 5.1% decline since Jan. 20. Google's parent company, Alphabet, also suffered a 6.8% decline. E-commerce and tech giant Amazon also saw a decline of around 2% in the same period. The losses were significantly lower than they were just two months ago, as announcements of trade agreements and suspensions alleviated fears and uncertainty in the markets. Conversely, Nvidia saw a 22.4% climb in its stock price within six months as the demand for artificial intelligence technologies continues to grow. It also became the first publicly traded company to reach a $4 trillion market value. Microsoft shares rose 19% and Meta shares increased 14.2% over the same period.