logo
Bracing for budget crisis, Metra agreed to pay lobbyist as much as $4.65M for work on transit fiscal cliff

Bracing for budget crisis, Metra agreed to pay lobbyist as much as $4.65M for work on transit fiscal cliff

Yahoo20-03-2025
Metra agreed to pay its lobbyist as much as $4.65 million in part for work related to a looming transit budget crisis, even as agency leaders brace for a potential shortage of cash caused by the same crisis.
The five-year lobbying contract is in effect as the the region's four transit agencies, including Metra, stare down a $771 million budget gap when federal COVID-19 relief funding runs out next year. Agency heads and advocates have warned that steep service cuts and fare hikes are at stake unless transit gets additional state money.
Yet last year alone, Metra spent more than $602,000 on lobbyists for help with the budget cliff, along with work on Metra's transition to a less commuter-focused service and advancing other Metra interests at the federal, state and regional level, according to public expense data and a copy of the lobbying contract, which took effect about a year ago.
Such spending on lobbyists is, perhaps, expected, but fails to follow the best interests of taxpayers and riders, said Justin Marlowe, director of the Center for Municipal Finance at the University of Chicago. The spending also makes the case for reform of the way transit is overseen, he said, as two proposals are debated in Springfield that call for either consolidating the region's four transit agencies or boosting coordination among them.
'What you have is an intergovernance structure where it is, in effect, a free-for-all,' Marlowe said. 'You have money being spent on lobbying to go advance the interests of one agency that may be completely at odds with other agencies.'
The spending was OK'd as part of Metra's latest agreement with Washington, D.C.-based Tai Ginsberg and Associates, a five-year contract that began in April 2024. One of the firm's principals, Jason Tai, is a former Illinois Department of Transportation official and U.S. House Transportation Committee staffer who worked for former Illinois congressmen William and Dan Lipinski, a father and son who were instrumental in bringing infrastructure funding for transportation back to Chicago. William Lipinski later turned to a career in transportation lobbying.
Working with Tai Ginsberg is lobbying firm Raucci and Sullivan, headed by former Republican state senator Dave Sullivan.
For their work, Tai Ginsberg bills a monthly retainer of $45,000, plus another $10,000 a month for Raucci and Sullivan. The firm can bill up to another $22,500 a month if specialty Black and Hispanic caucus advocacy firms or public affairs firms are used.
For those prices, the transit fiscal cliff has become a focus of the lobbyists.
'The looming fiscal cliff will take a major effort at both the federal and state levels in order to be solved,' the firm's contract with Metra noted, adding that it would work to 'engage groups to form a consensus around addressing the transit fiscal cliff with a focus toward Metra.'
Metra spokesman Michael Gillis said despite the most recent contract, Metra had scaled back its lobbying. The rail agency used to rely on several firms and now has one contract, and also scaled back its internal legislative affairs staff, he said.
In 2017, for example, Metra renewed contracts with six politically connected lobbying firms, including a previous firm Tai worked with, the Tribune reported at the time. The total for all the firms came to nearly $2.7 million — less than Tai Ginsberg's 2024 contract.
Since April, Gillis said, Tai Ginsberg has billed only the monthly retainer and not charged extra for specialty firms.
'Set aside whether the fiscal cliff is going on, we still think we need federal and state lobbyists,' Gillis said. 'And obviously the fiscal cliff is the biggest thing probably facing us since that contract started, so it shouldn't be too surprising that we'd want them to assist us with that.'
Discussions about the fiscal cliff and future of Chicago-area transit have gained steam in Springfield this year, as transit agencies push to boost funding and lawmakers focus on the way transit is overseen. The Regional Transportation Authority has warned that failure to fill the budget gap could lead to a 40% cut in service across the CTA, Metra and Pace, which would mean a Metra line that once had 90 trains per day would be down to 54.
'Unless the legislature solves the fiscal cliff that's looming in our 2026 budget, we may look back on the 2025 version as the calm before the storm,' Metra CEO Jim Derwinski said in a statement in October as he unveiled Metra's 2025 budget.
With much of the discussion in Springfield so far focusing on oversight of transit, Marlowe, from the University of Chicago, said the fact that Metra feels it needs to spend so much money on lobbying makes a strong case for reform.
Spending to convey Metra's message makes sense, given the current setup that has multiple transit agencies vying for resources. But a more effective option would be for all of the transit agencies to make a unified case in Springfield, he said.
'Right now, in the absence of a coherent strategy and so many different incentives and people working at cross purposes, that's exactly what you'd expect is for Metra to spend (about) $5 million lobbying Springfield on behalf of its own interests,' he said.
Gillis said Metra has unique challenges, such as issues involving freight railroads that share tracks and sometimes operations with Metra, so it is helpful to have its own lobbyists.
'We are still a separate agency, and we do have concerns that do not involve the CTA, RTA or Pace,' he said.
Keeping lawmakers informed about Metra needs and maintaining communication with D.C. and Springfield helped Metra secure $105.8 million in competitive grants in 2024, Gillis said, describing the lobbyists' work on those fronts as 'contributing factors.'
Tai said the lobbyists spend a 'significant portion of time' on the transit fiscal cliff, but it isn't the only issue they work on. His firm and Raucci and Sullivan coordinate approaches at the federal and state level, he said.
Tai Ginsberg is also working on advocating for Metra funding in a major federal transportation bill up for reauthorization in 2026, he said. The lobbyists work on quick responses to federal funding decisions or changes being made by the Trump administration, and Tai highlighted federal competitive grants that have been awarded to Metra.
Much of the fiscal cliff work is focused on Springfield lawmakers, he said, pointing to a recent visit by several state legislators to a Metra facility to learn about the agency and issues relating to the budget gap. But, although it will likely be an uphill battle, his firm is continuing to work on the budget gap issue at the federal level.
'All the so-called wins, they're really the result of the leadership, the people at Metra, the congressional delegation,' he said. 'We're here to just kind of advise and navigate the sometimes not-that-exciting policies that go behind this.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Edwin Feulner, ‘Heritage Foundation's George Washington,' dies at 83
Edwin Feulner, ‘Heritage Foundation's George Washington,' dies at 83

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

Edwin Feulner, ‘Heritage Foundation's George Washington,' dies at 83

Weyrich went on to found several other conservative groups. Dr. Feulner ran Heritage from 1977 to 2013, and he became interim head again for a brief period in 2017. Two years ago, during a 50th anniversary celebration at Mount Vernon, the organization's current president, Kevin Roberts, called Dr. Feulner 'the Heritage Foundation's George Washington.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up As Dr. Feulner described it, the foundational principles of Heritage included 'free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional values and a strong national defense,' The New York Times reported in 2018. Advertisement The group was in the news during the last presidential election, when Kamala Harris and other Democrats argued that a Heritage document called Project 2025 would become a shadow agenda for Donald Trump's second term. Trump strenuously sought to dissociate himself from the nearly 900-page list of policies, which included doctrinaire right-wing positions on such politically delicate subjects as abortion. Advertisement What rarely came up during the public debate is how Project 2025 belonged to a long tradition of striking success that Heritage has enjoyed in shaping Republican presidential administrations. The document was the latest iteration of the Mandate for Leadership, a wish list for new presidents that Heritage has habitually issued around election cycles since Ronald Reagan took power in 1981. Dr. Feulner explained how the tradition got started in Project 2025's afterword, which he wrote, titled 'Onward!' In the fall of 1979, senior officials of the Nixon and Ford administrations, William E. Simon and Jack Eckerd, told Dr. Feulner that, upon assuming office, they had received no practical guidance on how to institute conservative policies on issues such as free markets, government size, and national security. They added that their briefings came from liberal predecessors or career civil servants who favored the status quo. Dr. Feulner and others at Heritage were early supporters of Reagan's. Long before Reagan beat Jimmy Carter in the 1980 election, Heritage decided to spend $250,000 to put together a guidebook for a Reagan presidency. The result, weighing in at 1,093 pages, was distributed by Reagan at his first Cabinet meeting, Ed Meese, later Reagan's attorney general, told the Times in 2018. Dr. Feulner described the document to The Washington Post in 1983 as 'the nuts and bolts of how you make the kind of changes that philosophers and academics have been talking about.' Heritage soon reported that about 60 percent of its suggestions had been acted on by the new administration in its first year in power. The foundation was generally a booster of Republicans, but it also saw its mandate as condemning Republicans when they failed to live up to principle. Advertisement In 1987, after Reagan signed an arms control agreement with the Soviet Union and praised reforms undertaken by Mikhail Gorbachev, Dr. Feulner told the Times that conservatives felt 'Ronald Reagan walked away from them in the end.' He was harsher still on George H.W. Bush, whose tax increases constituted a cardinal sin. Meese discovered what inducements were possible by staying loyal to the cause. After Reagan's second term, Meese joined Heritage as a fellow making an annual salary of $400,000. Soon after George W. Bush assumed office, Dr. Feulner dispensed the ultimate praise. 'More Reaganite than the Reagan administration,' he told the Times. He added that he and Karl Rove, Bush's top political adviser, spoke a couple times a week. A new measure of the power of the Heritage Foundation came in 2013, when Jim DeMint, a Republican senator from South Carolina, resigned in order to succeed Dr. Feulner. 'There's no question in my mind that I have more influence now on public policy than I did as an individual senator,' he told National Public Radio in 2013. DeMint was associated with the Tea Party, which Heritage had helped to finance and organize. During the 2016 presidential campaign, as other members of the Republican establishment turned against Trump, DeMint pursued a collaborative relationship with the campaign. When Trump won, Dr. Feulner became head of domestic policy for the incoming president's transition team. Heritage was ready with a database of thousands of loyal conservatives to appoint to political offices. 'By betting long odds on Trump, he succeeded,' Daniel Drezner, then a columnist at The Washington Post, wrote of DeMint. 'Heritage has easily been the most influential think tank in the Trump era.' Advertisement In 2017, during a White House dinner for grassroots leaders of the conservative movement, Dr. Feulner was the only think tank official invited — and he sat next to Trump. 'In some respects, Trump the nonpolitician has an incredible advantage, even over Ronald Reagan,' Dr. Feulner told the Times in 2018. Reagan 'knew there were certain things government couldn't do,' he added. Trump, on the other hand, has had a different mentality: 'Hell, why can't we do that? Let's try it.' Edwin John Feulner Jr. was born in Chicago on Aug. 12, 1941. His father was a self-made success in real estate, getting a college degree in night school and later helping to develop downtown Chicago. His mother, Helen (Franzen) Feulner, doted on Eddie, the eldest son, as her favorite, his three younger sisters later told Lee Edwards, author of 'Leading the Way: The Story of Ed Feulner and the Heritage Foundation,' a biography. He grew up saying grace before meals and serving as an altar boy at a local Catholic church. In 1963, he earned a bachelor's degree in English and business from Regis University, a Jesuit institution in Denver. While there, he experienced an ideological awakening while reading Russell Kirk's book 'The Conservative Mind' and Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn's 'Liberty or Equality.' In his spare time in Washington, he studied by correspondence for a doctorate in political science from the University of Edinburgh. He earned the degree in 1981. As a young man, he was an aide to two Republican members of the House of Representatives: Melvin Laird, from Wisconsin, and Philip Crane, from Illinois. Advertisement The Heritage Foundation was launched by a $260,000 donation from beer baron Joseph Coors. His seed money for Heritage was 'arguably the most consequential that's ever been spent in the world of public policy,' John J. Miller wrote in a remembrance for The Wall Street Journal in 2003. Richard Mellon Scaife, a banking and oil scion, became another major early donor. But wary of charges that Heritage was a tool of a few rich men, Dr. Feulner built a substantial membership list with the help of Richard Viguerie, a conservative marketer. By 1984, The Washington Post described Heritage's annual budget of over $10 million as 'the biggest of any think tank in Washington, left or right.' In 2023, its revenue was $101 million. The Times reported that Dr. Feulner's 2010 salary was $1,098,612. In 2005, The Washington Post found that Heritage swerved from criticizing the government of Malaysia to praising it around the time that a Hong Kong consulting firm cofounded by Dr. Feulner and advised by his wife, Linda, began representing Malaysian companies. In a statement, the Heritage Foundation denied that its reports were influenced by Feulner family business interests or any other external factor. Dr. Feulner's survivors include his wife; his children, Edwin III and Emily V. Lown; and several grandchildren. Flush with power in 1984, Dr. Feulner told the Times about the value of political irrelevance. 'The years in the wilderness gave us the time to work out challenges to the prevailing orthodoxy,' he said. He saw 'intellectual ferment' happening on the left — new ideas, new institutional energy. 'Now we are in the mainstream,' he cautioned, 'and we will suffer for that like the liberals before us.' Advertisement This article originally appeared in

The progressive Texas congresswoman thinks Republicans' obeisance to Trump's whims looks awfully like the unquestioning fealty of Nazi officials to the Führer himself.
The progressive Texas congresswoman thinks Republicans' obeisance to Trump's whims looks awfully like the unquestioning fealty of Nazi officials to the Führer himself.

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

The progressive Texas congresswoman thinks Republicans' obeisance to Trump's whims looks awfully like the unquestioning fealty of Nazi officials to the Führer himself.

Texas Democrat Jasmine Crockett has torn into her Republican counterparts for falling in goosestep with Donald Trump's every whim. 'They want to show they're loyal to this, you know, I don't even know what to call him,' the Congresswoman told MSNBC. 'I've called him so many things, but wannabe Hitler for sure.' Crockett said that the extent of obedience to Trump among Republican ranks had been underscored by the furor surrounding his administration's handling of recent developments in the Jeffrey Epstein case.

Prince William County supervisor Bob Weir dies at 62
Prince William County supervisor Bob Weir dies at 62

Washington Post

timean hour ago

  • Washington Post

Prince William County supervisor Bob Weir dies at 62

Bob Weir, a Republican who was the supervisor of the Gainesville District in Virginia's Prince William County, died Sunday, according to a statement from his office posted to Facebook. He was 62. The cause was metastatic colon cancer, the statement said. 'Bob was certainly a character — underneath his tough facade was a heart of pure gold who cared deeply about our community,' the Prince William Board of County Supervisors said in a statement. 'He was not only a respected leader but also a neighbor, a mentor, and a friend to many.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store