Singapore Luxury Condos' Early Struggle Shows Boom's Limits
The W Residences Marina View condominium began pre-sales last Saturday, and buyers booked only two of its 683 units over the weekend, according to people familiar with the matter who asked not to be identified sharing private information. The complex is located in the heart of the country's central business district, a short walk from skyscrapers that house global financial institutions and multinational companies.
The units' preview prices started from about S$3,200 ($2,491) per square foot, which means the cheapest one-bedroom units were advertised for S$1.8 million. Five-bedroom units were priced at S$11.6 million and up, according to marketing materials seen by Bloomberg News.
The project's weak debut shows how property developers face an uphill challenge trying to attract wealthy home-buyers to luxury towers in Singapore's iconic business district, which lines its downtown waterfront. The government in 2023 doubled already hefty taxes on foreigners' property purchases, while locals have gravitated to suburban private homes that are closer to schools and other amenities.
Last weekend, LyndenWoods, a mass-market condominium project about 9 kilometers (5.6 miles) from the downtown luxury residence, sold over 94% of its 343 units in a single day, despite new curbs that were added in early July. Average pricing was about S$2,450 per square foot.
Overall private home prices in Singapore have climbed roughly 40% over the past five years. However, apartment prices within the so-called core central region — which covers the CBD and other high-end neighborhoods — have lagged behind, with a smaller increase of about 19%.
The W Residences Marina View is being built by IOI Properties Group Bhd, a Malaysian developer that paid S$1.5 billion in 2021 for the site. The project will be managed by Marriott International. A spokesperson for the developer said there was 'strong interest' from individuals who were invited to its private previews, and 'it's natural that buyers are taking a measured approach amid a wave of new launches' in the area.
The 99-year leasehold development has yet to be built, and buyers could pull out in the early stages of a sale if they pay a fee.
'Developers are likely to be more cautious and recalibrate their land acquisition plans following the poor demand' for properties in the prime city center, said Nicholas Mak, chief research officer at property portal Mogul.sg. 'They will avoid a price war at all costs.'
A nearby high-end residential project called Skywaters Residences, which is part of a broader development backed by Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and local developer Perennial Holdings Pte, has sold just two of its 190 units since it launched more than a year ago.
One 7,761-square-foot apartment sold for S$47.3 million, while the other smaller unit went for S$30.9 million. Such prices are comparable with mansions in land-scarce Singapore.
Local property giant City Developments Ltd., which is building another 'ultra-luxury development' in the business district, hasn't set a launch date for its Newport Residences project, which will feature serviced apartments and 246 residential units.
Developers have largely refrained from offering major discounts, betting that they can still attract wealthy locals and foreigners who have residency in Singapore, granting them lower property levies.
--With assistance from Gabrielle Ng.
(Updates with analyst comment in ninth paragraph.)
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Committed to fair, balanced deal, says India after Trump announces 25% tariffs
India remains intensely engaged with the US to clinch the comprehensive bilateral trade agreement by autumn 2025 despite President Donald Trump's announcement of 25% tariffs plus penalties starting August 1, people aware of the matter said on Wednesday. Piyush Goyal, India's commerce and industry minister, during a Bloomberg Television interview in London, UK, on Thursday, July 24, 2025. (Bloomberg) In a brief statement, the commerce ministry said it had 'taken note' of Trump's statement and was studying its implications while reaffirming India's commitment to a 'fair, balanced and mutually beneficial' trade deal that protects farmers, entrepreneurs and small businesses. 'The government attaches the utmost importance to protecting and promoting the welfare of our farmers, entrepreneurs, and MSMEs,' the ministry said, adding that it 'will take all steps necessary to secure our national interest, as has been the case with other trade agreements including the latest Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement with the UK.' Indian officials and experts pushed back against Trump's characterisation of excessive trade barriers, arguing that his focus on goods trade deficit ignores the broader economic relationship where the US earns tens of billions more annually from services, education, and defence deals, and cited New Delhi's recent free trade agreements with developed economies such as Australia and the UK to demonstrate India's willingness to open up its market with protections for its vulnerable populations . People familiar with the negotiations said New Delhi expects Washington to follow Trump's announcement with a formal letter that would be analysed and responded to appropriately. The Indian negotiating team – which has held five rounds of in-person discussions with its American counterparts -- will in the meantime continue talks for a balanced deal, they added. One of the people aware of the matter pushed back against Trump's characterisation of India as maintaining excessive trade barriers, citing the recently signed free trade agreements with other developed economies including Australia and the United Kingdom where tariffs on most items were slashed. 'Hence, President Trump's generalisation that Indian tariffs are far too high, is not correct,' the person said. 'FTAs are win-win, and not one-sided.' The person highlighted Trump's focus on goods trade surplus while ignoring broader economic ties, saying: 'President Trump has said in a post on Truth Social – 'We have a massive trade deficit with India!!!' – which is just one side of the picture. Bilateral economic relationship is not only goods trade, it also includes trade in services, investments and other significant contributions to the US economy made by Indians.' According to government data, India had a $41.18 billion trade surplus with the US in 2024-25, exporting goods worth $86.51 billion and importing $45.33 billion of American merchandise. However, the people cited above argued this represented only a part of the bilateral relationship. The US gains significant revenue from financial, digital and e-commerce services, fees from students studying in America and defence deals, a second person explained. 'Such cooperation in services and contributions of Indians in American businesses have immense potential for further growth through BTA and other strategic cooperation, provided the US is not fixated with tariffs, and particularly with India's sensitive sectors, which are vital for the survival of millions of Indian subsistence farmers,' the person added. Ajay Srivastava, founder of Global Trade Research Initiative, said the US 'quietly rakes in $80-85 billion every year from India through education, digital services, financial operations, intellectual property royalties, and arms sales.' 'These massive earnings don't show up in the narrow goods trade statistics. When you factor them in, the US isn't running a deficit with India at all, it's sitting on a $35-40 billion surplus,' Srivastava added. The second person aware of the matter said India was negotiating a comprehensive bilateral trade agreement that included not just goods but 'other key sectors such as services, investments, non-tariff barriers, IPRs and customs facilitation.' 'We hope that a successful deal would help in balancing bilateral economic cooperation and prompt the Trump administration to remove reciprocal and punitive tariffs,' the person said. Industry leaders expressed concern about the tariff announcement's timing amid ongoing negotiations. Medical Technology Association of India chairman Pavan Choudary called Trump's move 'economically shortsighted and strategically misguided.' 'As a sovereign nation, India makes independent choices in defence and energy based on national interest and long-term strategic priorities. Attempting to punish these decisions through coercive trade measures is not only inappropriate but also counterproductive,' Choudary said. Agneshwar Sen, trade policy leader at EY India, warned the 25% tariff could directly affect key sectors including marine products, pharmaceuticals, textiles, leather and automobiles where bilateral trade had been 'especially robust.' However, Sen remained optimistic about ongoing negotiations, noting both countries were 'positively engaged' with the US team expected in India on August 24 for the sixth round of talks. 'I am confident that, considering our shared interests and history of cooperation, the two sides will be able to address these contentious issues constructively,' he said. Opposition slams Modi government Opposition parties criticised the government over the developments . Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh said Prime Minister Modi should 'take inspiration from former prime minister Indira Gandhi and stand up to the president of the United States.' 'All that 'taarif' between him and 'Howdy Modi' has meant little,' Ramesh said, referring to Modi's 2019 rally with Trump in Houston. 'Mr Modi thought that if he kept quiet on the insults that the US President has hurled on India... India would get special treatment at the hands of President Trump. Clearly that has NOT happened.' Rashtriya Janata Dal MP Manoj Jha said his party was 'not very happy that it has happened under the rule of Prime Minister Modi,' while Communist Party of India MP P Sandosh Kumar described the tariffs as 'another insult to India.' DMK leader Tiruchi Siva demanded the prime minister answer questions about the tariffs in Parliament, saying lawmakers had 'not been taken into confidence.'
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump confirms 25% tariff, penalty for India from Aug 1
US President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that India will face a 25% tariff on all exports to America plus an unspecified additional penalty for purchasing Russian energy, dealing a setback to negotiations just days before an August 1 deadline for additional levies that New Delhi has been attempting to stave off. US President Donald Trump speaks during a bill signing ceremony in the Roosevelt Room of the White House in Washington, DC, US, on Wednesday. (Bloomberg) The move, which some US officials described as a negotiating tactic, could, if the tariffs last, put India at a disadvantage when compared to Asian countries such as Indonesia and Vietnam. In a combative post on Truth Social, Trump criticised India for maintaining the world's highest tariffs and 'obnoxious' trade barriers while continuing to buy Russian military equipment and energy during the Ukraine war. 'Remember, while India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their Tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the World, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any Country,' Trump wrote. 'Also, they have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to Stop the killing in Ukraine,' he added. 'India will therefore be paying a tariff of 25%, plus a penalty for the above, starting on August first.' The penalty would be what Trump calls a 'secondary tariff'. India's ministry of commerce and industry said on Wednesday it had 'taken note' of Trump's statement and was 'studying its implications.' The ministry said India remained 'committed' to concluding a 'fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement' while protecting 'the welfare of our farmers, entrepreneurs, and MSMEs'. 'The government will take all steps necessary to secure our national interest, as has been the case with other trade agreements including the latest Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement with the UK,' the statement added. White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett, in comments made shortly after Trump's post, suggested the announcement was intended as a negotiating tactic , telling reporters that Trump was frustrated with state of negotiations. 'I think President Trump is frustrated with the progress we've made with India but feels that a 25% tariff will address and remedy the situation in a way that's good for the American people,' Hassett said, adding: 'India might reconsider their practices'. Hassett described a potential deal with India as 'an absolute game changer for the global economy' and said the White House remained 'hopeful that India will open up its markets.' He added that Trump and US trade representative Jamieson Greer would provide more information 'shortly' on the additional penalty announced earlier. On Wednesday, Trump separately confirmed the August 1 deadline would not be extended. The announcement comes seven months after Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Trump launched 'Mission 500'—a goal to increase bilateral trade from $200 billion to $500 billion by 2030. The leaders announced plans to negotiate a first-phase Bilateral Trade Agreement by autumn 2025. Five rounds of negotiations took place between March and July, with technical teams largely concluding the framework by late June. However, talks remained deadlocked over three core issues: agricultural market access, tariff reciprocity, and ongoing WTO disputes. In recent days, Trump has sought to pressure President Vladimir Putin towards a peace deal to end the Ukraine war through expanded trade measures rather than traditional sanctions. India was originally slated to be slapped with duties of 26%, including a 10% baseline that Trump announced as part of his 'liberation day' trade policy. New Delhi and Washington have since stepped up negotiations. A team of Indian negotiators led by Special Secretary Rajesh Agrawal concluded talks in Washington from July 14-17 without reaching a first-phase agreement, even though India avoided receiving a formal 'trade threat' letter earlier this month—which had seemed to indicate a deal was close. Trade talks foundered on American demands for greater market access, particularly in agriculture where US officials sought 'politically-impossible' concessions from India, according to Rick Rossow, Chair on India and Emerging Asia Economics at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. US trade representative Jamieson Greer and commerce secretary Howard Lutnick have publicly stated that Trump personally demanded 'completely open markets' from India—a condition New Delhi found unacceptable given its need to protect domestic livelihoods. The tariffs will disadvantage India compared to other manufacturing hubs as American businesses pursue 'China+1' supply chain strategies. Trump has recently struck more favourable trade deals with the European Union (15% tariffs), Japan (15%), Indonesia (19%) and Vietnam (20%). 'As the United States and India increasingly focus economic ties on economic security and supply chain diversification, a 25% reciprocal tariff with the threat of additional penalties puts India at a disadvantage,' said Aman Thakker, vice president at the Asia Group. Electronics manufacturing, where India has attracted investments from companies like Apple, could face particular pressure from the higher tariff rate compared to alternative locations. 'India will do whatever it can to strengthen commercial relations with the US but not at the cost of making fuel or electricity unaffordable for millions of its citizens,' said Prerna Bountra, deputy director at the Ananta Aspen Institute. She noted the irony of American pressure given continued US imports of Russian uranium, adding: 'An American administration voted in by an electorate frustrated by the price of eggs and gas shouldn't be too surprised when India picks keeping its prices low over making nice.' The tariffs affect India's $86.5 billion worth of goods exports to America, making the US India's largest trading partner despite the escalating trade tensions. While both economies are primarily services-driven, limiting direct impact on most jobs, experts warn of broader relationship damage. 'The larger impact will be a further loss of trust in the relationship,' Rossow said, cautioning that such policy shifts could constrain cooperation in defence and other strategic areas. 'Despite the unpredictable policy making of the US, the market was expecting a tariff deal to work out as longer-term US-India strategic interests are aligned,' said Nilesh Shah, MD of Kotak Mahindra AMC. 'Markets will hope for a 'TACO' trade if better senses prevail,' Shah added, referring to a global trade trend where markets have risen despite Trump's threats, a defiance dubbed as 'Trump will always chicken out', or TACO. Madhavi Arora, economist, Emkay Global, added: 'We see it more from the lens of geopolitics than purely economics and see both sides striving to get the deal done, even as the power equations may change a bit in US favour.'
Economic Times
4 hours ago
- Economic Times
Donald Trump's Palm Beach becomes battleground for titans richer than US President
The most famous part-time resident is President Donald Trump. Yet he is far from the wealthiest. Bloomberg has pegged the net worth of the Palm Beach homeowner Julia Flesher Koch and her family, for instance, at more than $80 billion. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Real Estate Hub Palm Beach Donald Trump is not wealthiest in Palm Beach Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs US President Donald Trump 's Palm Beach has become a playground for the world's ultrarich. In Palm Beach, Florida, power players are vying to outspend and outbuild one another in a real-life video game of one-upmanship. Lately, a series of unusual deals have dominated the local chatter. It started with the sale of two oceanfront parcels at 1063 and 1071 North Ocean Boulevard, on the north end of Palm Beach, to an unknown side-by-side lots -- a combined 2.3 acres, with 360 feet of oceanfront access -- lay empty for years, with little between them and the Atlantic but a cyclone fence and a poetic stand of transplanted palms. Until recently, they belonged to the billionaire cosmetics heir William P. Lauder. He bought the first lot in 2020 for more than $25 million, public records show. The next year, he acquired an adjacent property in a private transaction. At the time of those deals, grand houses stood on the two pieces of land. Lauder demolished both, as per NYT News Service would someone acquire a pair of oceanfront mansions only to tear them down and let the land lie fallow?"This is not slowing down any time soon," said Elizabeth DeWoody, a local real estate agent with Compass. "Buyers want what they want and can get what they want," DeWoody said. "And sometimes what people want might change," DeWoody years ago, Lauder listed the two properties for $178 million. In February, they were sold off market for an undisclosed sum. The buyer was not named in public many in Palm Beach are curious about the identity of their deep-pocketed new neighbor, Ryan Serhant, the real estate agent who represented the buyer in the deal, declined to say who his client was, citing a nondisclosure agreement, NYT News Service real estate mystery deepened in June, when two more estates on North Ocean Boulevard -- directly inland from the lots previously owned by Lauder -- were sold to an unknown buyer, perhaps the same first of these, at 1066 North Ocean Boulevard, was a Mediterranean-style villa owned by the lawyer Thomas E. Harvey and his wife, the former Hearst executive Cathleen P. Black. It sold for a reported $18 million to Creekshore LLC, a Delaware-based limited liability company registered to Greyson Blue, a lawyer in Seattle who has worked closely with Microsoft co-founder Bill sale of the second property, a 5,800-square-foot house on a half-acre lot at 1072 North Ocean Boulevard, quickly followed. It went for $30 million to Mango Leaf LLC, another Delaware limited liability company with ties to again, Serhant, who appeared in nine seasons of the Bravo series "Million Dollar Listing New York," was the agent on the buyer's side of the deals; once again, he declined to shed light on his mystery client (or clients). Gates was not the buyer of the two inland properties, according to a spokesperson. Blue did not respond to requests for of the small island, along with local brokers and journalists at South Florida real estate trade publications and The Wall Street Journal, have raised the possibility that one of Gates' former Microsoft associates may have been behind the spate of acquisitions, naming the billionaires Steve Ballmer and Charles Simonyi as likely possibilities. Neither Ballmer nor Simonyi responded to requests for comment for this much remains obscure, what is clear is that, while global markets remain uneasy, the market in Palm Beach real estate continues to be, as the broker DeWoody noted, "bulletproof."Surely, the most famous part-time resident is President Donald Trump. Yet he is far from the wealthiest. Bloomberg has pegged the net worth of the Palm Beach homeowner Julia Flesher Koch and her family, for instance, at more than $80 billion. Other multibillionaires in that economic stratum and the same neighborhood include the brokerage magnate Thomas Peterffy and the Blackstone Group chief executive Stephen A. envisioned as a haven for moneyed Northerners, Palm Beach benefits from the geographic advantages that inspired its original developer, the Standard Oil magnate Henry Flagler, to characterize it as a "veritable paradise." And its physical isolation makes it ideally suited to an increasingly insulated elite. Accessible only by way of three drawbridges, the town has its own Police Department, Fire Department and, since the 2016 election, Secret Service security zone.A1. President of USA is Donald Trump.A2. US President Donald Trump has a house in Palm beach.
