logo
Medicaid, SNAP cuts could create a massive hole in Missouri budget, cost thousands of jobs

Medicaid, SNAP cuts could create a massive hole in Missouri budget, cost thousands of jobs

Yahoo26-03-2025

Medicaid cuts could result in 21,600 jobs lost, with SNAP cuts costing another 2,400 jobs, according to a report released Tuesday from the Commonwealth Fund and George Washington University ().
Proposed federal cuts to Medicaid and food assistance could blow a $2 billion hole in Missouri's budget and cost the state more than 20,000 jobs and hundreds of millions in tax revenue, according to a pair of reports released this week.
Congressional Republicans approved a budget resolution last month to reduce federal spending by $2 trillion as they seek $4.5 trillion in tax cuts. The resolution tasks the committee overseeing Medicaid to cut at least $880 billion over 10 years and the committee overseeing the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program to cut at least $230 billion.
Medicaid cuts could result in 21,600 jobs lost, with SNAP cuts costing another 2,400 jobs, according to a report released Tuesday from the Commonwealth Fund and George Washington University. Those would include jobs in health care and food-related industries.
Federal Medicaid cuts could leave Missouri with huge budget shortfall
In addition to job losses, the report estimates Missouri in 2026 could lose over $1.6 billion in federal Medicaid funding and $356 million in federal SNAP funding.
'The ripple effect will hit the entire health care system and impact everyone — not just those with Medicaid,' said Joseph Betancourt, president of the Commonwealth Fund, in a statement, 'driving more people to emergency rooms and further straining an already overburdened system.'
The budget reductions, job losses and ripple effects could result in $4 billion in lost economic output for the state, the report estimates, and over $500 million in reduced tax revenue.
'Cuts of this magnitude will not be harmless,' said Leighton Ku, lead author of the report and director of the Center for Health Policy Research and professor of health policy and management at George Washington University's Milken Institute School of Public Health, in a statement.
'In fact, such drastic reductions would harm millions of families and also trigger widespread economic instability and major job losses,' Ku said.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Another report out this week, by the health policy organization KFF, focuses on the potential magnitude of Medicaid cuts on state budgets.
If the $880 billion in cuts were distributed evenly across states over 10 years, that would represent a cut of 39%, as a share of state Medicaid spending per Missouri resident, according to KFF.
The impact of those cuts would be felt more acutely in rural areas of Missouri.
Timothy McBride, co-director of the Center for Health Economics and Policy at the Institute for Public Health at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, said during a briefing on Medicaid in mid-March that financial margins for rural hospitals are 'razor-thin.'
'Even in the urban hospitals, they're probably just a few percentage points, but in rural hospitals, they can be just a percentage point or 2 or negative,' McBride said. 'So if you take away the Medicaid dollars, they're certainly going to go negative. And if you wonder why rural hospitals close, that's why.'
Medicaid cuts rippling through rural America could bring hospital closures, job losses
States' options would be to increase taxes, cut other spending programs, cut benefits or pay providers less, according to KFF. Missouri expanded Medicaid to low-income adults in an initiative petition, enshrining eligibility in the constitution, and significant tax increases must be placed on the ballot, meaning either option would require a statewide vote.
Congress hasn't yet decided on specific proposals to achieve the proposed cuts.
Some Republicans have opposed cuts to Medicaid, citing the effect on their constituents. That includes U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley, who told reporters earlier this month: '… I'm not going to vote for something that ends up cutting benefits for people who are working and who qualify for Medicaid.'
According to a KFF survey last year, roughly 70% of Americans want Medicaid to continue as it is today.
Last month, the director of the state Medicaid program told lawmakers the changes could 'present a challenge' for the state budget.
One in every five Missourians is enrolled in Medicaid, or over 1.2 million people.
Nearly 40% of all Missouri children are covered by Medicaid, which also pays for two-thirds of all nursing home care and 38% of all births.
Medicaid pays for two-thirds of all nursing home care in the state and 38% of all births.
There are 321,003 families receiving SNAP benefits as of January.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NC governor vetoes permit-less concealed carry, ICE cooperation
NC governor vetoes permit-less concealed carry, ICE cooperation

UPI

time23 minutes ago

  • UPI

NC governor vetoes permit-less concealed carry, ICE cooperation

1 of 2 | Immigration and Customs Enforcement makes an arrest in Californa. North Carolina Gov. Josh Stein voted legislation that would have required law enforcement to coordinate operations with immigration officers. Photo by ICE/Flickr June 21 (UPI) -- North Carolina Gov. Josh Stein vetoed a bill to require state law enforcement to work more closely with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in addition to another that would allow permit-less concealed carry of firearms. The Democratic governor on Friday announced vetoes of the legislation, which had been approved by both legislative chambers. Stein said the state is already stretched to assist federal officers. "My oath of office requires that I uphold the Constitution of the United States," Stein said. "Therefore, I cannot sign this bill because it would require sheriffs to unconstitutionally detain people for up to 48 hours after they would otherwise be released. He noted the federeal Fourth Circuit "is clear that local law enforcement officers cannot keep people in custody solely based on a suspected immigration violation." Stein said he also wants offenders to be held accountable. "Let me be clear, anyone who commits a serious crime in North Carolina must be prosecuted and held accountable regardless of their immigration status." He said he supports the bills' efforts to require sheriffs to contact federal immigration authorities about people in their custody charged with dangerous crimes, including sexual battery, armed robbery, arson, assault on public officials and court personnel. The vetoes were supported by Guilford County Sheriff Danny Rogers, Forsyth County Sheriff Bobby Kimbrough and Mecklenburg County Sheriff Gary McFadden. Republicans blasted the decision by the governor, who was elected in November. "Gov. Stein proved where his allegiances are," state Senate Leader Phil Berger posted on X. "He'd rather prioritize his far-left donors and their dangerous open-border policies over the citizens of North Carolina who are desperately pleading for us to put an end to the illegal immigration crisis. I look forward to the Senate overriding his veto." Stein also vetoed a bill that would have allowed permitless concealed carry in North Carolina. "This bill makes North Carolinians less safe and undermines responsible gun ownership," Stein said. "The bill eliminates training requirements associated with concealed carry permits and reduces the age to carry a concealed weapon from 21 to 18 years old. "We can and should protect the right to bear arms without recklessly endangering law enforcement officers and our people." Berger criticized the veto of this bill. "Law-abiding North Carolinians shouldn't have to jump through hoops to effectively exercise their Second Amendment rights," the Senate leader said. "It's past time for us to join the majority of states that recognize Constitutional Carry. I look forward to the Senate overriding Gov. Stein's veto." To override a veto, three-fifths of the House and Senate must approve the bills. In the latest election, Democrats broke the Republican supermajority in the House by gaining one seat. The GOP has a one-vote supermajority in the Senate.

Senate GOP's plan to push food aid costs onto states axed from megabill
Senate GOP's plan to push food aid costs onto states axed from megabill

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Senate GOP's plan to push food aid costs onto states axed from megabill

Senate Republicans' plan to force states to share the cost of the country's largest nutrition program to pay for their policy megabill has been halted by the chamber's rules. The Senate parliamentarian determined that the cost-sharing plan would violate the so-called Byrd Rule, which limits what can be included in the reconciliation process, and would be subject to a 60-vote filibuster threshold, according to an advisory sent out Friday night by Senate Budget Committee Democrats. That means Republicans will need to head back to the drawing board after months of heated debate about how to slash spending on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. The advisory comes after Senate Agriculture Committee staff met with Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough on Thursday to discuss their piece of the reconciliation bill text. The cost-sharing plan, which was first put forward by House Republicans, sparked backlash from state officials and concerns within the caucus. The bill would make states pay for SNAP benefits for the first time using a sliding scale based on their payment error rates. The Senate Agriculture Committee introduced a scaled-back version of the House GOP's cost-sharing plan earlier this month. Without it, Senate Republicans will struggle to find enough cuts to pay for their policy priorities and the $67 billion farm bill package they included — all with an ambitious timeline of delivering the megabill to President Donald Trump's desk by July 4. Although the committee's bill hadn't received a final cost saving estimate from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, committee staff predicted it would save around $211 billion in agriculture spending, with the cost-share plan making up a large portion of those trims. MacDonough also struck measures that would remove SNAP eligibility for immigrants who are not lawful permanent residents and extend a farm bill provision that allows federal officials to update farm payment programs.

Senate parliamentarian strikes key SNAP spending cuts from GOP megabill
Senate parliamentarian strikes key SNAP spending cuts from GOP megabill

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Senate parliamentarian strikes key SNAP spending cuts from GOP megabill

The Senate parliamentarian on Friday ruled against several more Republican provisions in President Trump's megabill, including language to bar immigrants who are not citizens or lawful permanent residents from receiving food assistance under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, also ruled against a key Republican pay-for in the bill, a proposal requiring states to pay for a certain percentage of food assistance under SNAP depending on those states' error rates in delivering aid. The proposal to shift SNAP costs onto the states was a sticking point with Republican Sens. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Susan Collins (Maine). The parliamentarian's ruling could make it easier for Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) to pick up Murkowski's and Collins's support as the SNAP-related pay-for will now need to be stripped from the legislation. The Senate bill as drafted would have required states to pay between 5 and 15 percent of food benefits in 2028 on their rate of error in paying out food benefits. Almost every state in the country has had error rates of 6 percent or higher, which would have shifted a significant percentage of the cost for delivering food assistance onto the states. The Center for Budget and Policy Priorities estimated that the Senate language would have cost North Carolina, for example, to pay up to $438 million for food aid in 2028. MacDonough struck another blow against the GOP leadership's agenda by ruling against a section to extend the suspension of permanent price support authority, something that traditionally has been part of the farm bill. Congress passed a one-year extension of the farm bill in December after Democrats and Republicans failed to reach a deal on a multi-year extension of the law due to disagreements over SNAP funding. Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), the ranking member on the Senate Budget Committee, applauded the parliamentarian's decision on Friday. 'The Senate parliamentarian has begun providing guidance that certain provisions in the Republicans' One Big, Beautiful Betrayal will be subject to the Byrd Rule — ultimately meaning they will need to be stripped from the bill or altered to comply with the rules of reconciliation,' Merkley said in a statement. 'As much as Senate Republicans would prefer to throw out the rule book at advance their conservative families lose and billionaires win agenda, this process has rules and Democrats are making sure those rules are enforced,' he added. 'We will be fighting this bill every single day until Republicans bring it to the floor.' Provisions of the reconciliation package that the parliamentarian decides violate the Senate's Byrd Rule are not eligible to pass with a simple-majority vote. If Thune and Senate Budget Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) don't remove provisions found to be in violation of the Byrd Rule, the Republican package would need to muster 60 votes to advance. The parliamentarian ruled against several provisions of the bill under the Commerce Committee's jurisdiction, including a section that appropriated $250 million to Coast Guard stations on South Padre Island, Texas, damaged by fire in 2025. She also ruled that language allocating $85 million to transfer the space shuttle on display at the Smithsonian Air & Space Museum to a non-profit group in Texas would not be eligible for the budget reconciliation fast track. Provisions found not to comply with the Byrd Rule would need at least 60 votes to overcome a point-of-order objection. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store