In first, Marine, Air Force pilots fight as joint force at Navy JSE
Marine F-35 and Air Force F-22 pilots operated for the first time last month as a joint fighting force in a digital training simulation that is soon expected to become standard for Marine, Navy and Air Force fighters, according to a release from the Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division.
As part of the exercise, F-35 aviators assigned to Marine Fighter Attack Squadrons 122, 225 and 311 partnered with four F-22 Raptor crews at the division's Joint Simulation Environment, or JSE, in Patuxent River, Maryland.
The March 24-27 exercise saw aviators practice fifth generation fighting in 17 simulated combat missions comprising advanced warfighting scenarios, according to division commander Rear Adm. John Dougherty IV. Lessons learned after each mission were assessed via post-training evaluations of cockpit video and audio recordings reviewed by the pilots.
'This milestone is a game-changer that ushers in a new era of interoperability for aviation's combat community and served as a pivotal exercise getting NAWCAD ready to make this joint training standard for Navy and Air Force fighters,' Dougherty said.
Integrated into the Navy's TOPGUN program, the JSE is one of the most technologically sophisticated training environments the Defense Department has to offer. It includes 'domed simulators with actual defense hardware, software, and adversary aircraft' that allow pilots to sharpen skills in a realistic threat environment, according to the release.
The Defense Department is seeking to expand JSE capabilities and training, meanwhile, across additional warfighter programs, according to NAWCAD.
Current expectations are that the JSE will soon welcome the E-2D Advanced Hawkeye, an all-weather, carrier-capable tactical airborne early warning (AEW) aircraft designed to detect incoming airborne threats, such as missiles and enemy aircraft, and conduct ground and maritime surveillance.
Next year, the JSE plans to add the F/A-18 Super Hornet strike fighter and the EA-18G Growler, the release said.
'At the end of the day, it's going to be the people that win our nation's wars,' VMFA-225 pilot Maj. Patrick Kaufer said in the release. 'Having those person-to-person connections between the Air Force, the Navy and the Marine Corps [in the JSE] is the most important part and biggest objective that we're able to achieve.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pentagon Wants To Shift Funds From Navy F/A-XX To USAF F-47: Report
The U.S. Navy's F/A-XX sixth-generation fighter program looks to have hit another snag, with the Pentagon reportedly prioritizing the Air Force's F-47 stealth fighter, amid concerns about how to run the two efforts simultaneously. Already, the F/A-XX was in limbo, with a U.S. official telling TWZ last month that the future of the program was still being reviewed. This came after reports that a contract award for the Navy's new combat jet could be delayed by as much as three years. Navy officials, meanwhile, continue to stress the importance of the F/A-XX to their plans. 'There's certainly a strong requirement for a sixth-gen fighter still,' Dr. Brett A. Seidle, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development, and Acquisition (RD&A), said yesterday. 'I know there's a lot of discussion about [F/A-XX] right now, but the Navy position on that is there's a requirement that's necessary.' Seidle was speaking at a House Armed Services Committee hearing on Seapower and Projection Forces. His comments came in response to questions from U.S. Rep. Joseph David Courtney, the Democrat representative for Connecticut's 2nd congressional district. You can see that exchange in the video below, starting at the 35.25 mark: The hearing followed a Pentagon request last month to the House and Senate defense policy committees, which was seen by Bloomberg News, warning that 'Simultaneously pursuing two sixth-generation fighters risks under-delivery on both.' 'Given the schedule delays and cost growth across numerous airframes, DoD recommends a focus on the F-47, giving the Navy's F/A-XX program time for technical maturity and development,' the Pentagon request added. 'Phasing the F/A-XX after the Air Force's initial F-47 development will alleviate capacity concerns in the industrial base.' Exactly why there should be concerns about industrial capacity is somewhat unclear, although that could be a factor were Boeing to win the F/A-XX contract on top of the F-47. On the other hand, with Northrop Grumman busy with the B-21 stealth bomber, which still needs to get through flight testing, adding a few years to the F/A-XX timeline could mitigate risk there, were this contractor to walk away with F/A-XX. Reportedly, the U.S. Department of Defense requested that Congress shift $500 million from F/A-XX to the F-47, the contract for which was awarded to Boeing in March. Previously, these funds were allocated for the 'accelerated development' of the Navy fighter. There is now something of a battle between the Pentagon Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and the House Armed Services Committee (HASC). On the one hand, the F-47 is considered by the Pentagon to have 'full presidential support,' making it a priority for the $500 million that the House Armed Services Committee had added to the F/A-XX program under President Donald Trump's sweeping $3.9-trillion tax breaks package. While we previously reported on Pentagon recommendations to withhold $500 million from the F/A-XX program, it wasn't previously understood that it wanted to redirect this to the Air Force's equivalent effort, the F-47. The House Armed Services Committee is now seeking to block the funds from being redirected to the F-47, arguing that the Pentagon hasn't provided an adequate reason for this. Heather Vaughan, a committee spokesperson, told Bloomberg News that the Pentagon 'has yet to brief the committee on any changes for its plans to develop and procure' the Navy's new stealth jet. 'Absent any new information from the Navy concerning revision to defined capability gaps and shortfalls, mission requirements, cost, or acquisition strategy for F/A-XX, the committee continues to support the development of this critical platform,' Vaughan added. Earlier this week, the Senate Armed Services Committee released its defense section of the tax breaks package, which includes $750 million to 'accelerate the F/A-XX aircraft.' Originally, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and Northrop Grumman were all in the running to develop the F/A-XX. However, Lockheed Martin was reportedly eliminated from the competition in March because its proposal 'did not satisfy the service's criteria,' according to Breaking Defense, whose story cited an unnamed source with knowledge of the program. Any holdups to the F/A-XX program will be a worry for the Navy. The service considers a sixth-generation combat aircraft as a prerequisite for the future carrier air wing, especially in terms of a potential confrontation with China in the Indo-Pacific theater. 'The sixth-gen fighter has some capabilities that we need to counter the PRC,' Navy Adm. James W. Kilby, acting Chief of Naval Operations, said of the F/A-XX last month. 'Those are signatures, those are range, those are different engines. Those are all the things that will make it survivable. The Air Force and Navy have different missions, but we're going against the same threat.' Last month, a U.S. official, speaking to TWZ on condition of anonymity, denied reports that the F/A-XX program contract award could be delayed by as much as three years. 'Nothing is being delayed,' the official stated. 'A decision hasn't been made yet. That decision is still being determined by [the Pentagon] and service leaders, with conversations among Congress as well. It's a big program. Obviously, these things don't get settled on by one individual. Leaders are making a decision on whether to invest. It's all part of the process.' The Navy had planned for the F/A-XX aircraft to enter service in the 2030s and thereafter to replace F/A-18E/F Super Hornet strike fighters and EA-18G Growler electronic attack jets. According to a 2025 Naval Aviation Playbook, the F/A-XX 'is expected to feature superior range, speed, and sensor capabilities, with an emphasis on integrating manned and unmanned systems. This includes collaboration with autonomous drones serving as force multipliers and electronic warfare assets.' In regards to the range, it emerged earlier this year that the F/A-XX may offer just a 25 percent increase in this respect over the existing tactical combat jets in its carrier air wings. That disclosure is surprising, given that the service consistently makes it clear that extending the reach of its carrier strike groups and thus enhancing their survivability is a critical priority, as the range of expected threats also continues to grow. Regardless, the continued funding dispute may well still derail the current timeline for F/A-XX. In a report last month, Reuters wrote that the Pentagon's main issue about the F/A-XX program was 'concerns about engineering and production capacity,' but didn't elaborate further. If the F/A-XX does end up being delayed, the Navy might well have to look again at its tactical fighter fleet to avoid shortfalls. One immediate result would be the service relying longer than expected on its aging fleets of Super Hornets and Growlers. At one stage, the Super Hornet production line was expected to be shut down this year. However, in March of last year, the Navy issued Boeing a $1.3-billion contract for 17 new Super Hornets with a final delivery planned for spring 2027 at the latest. Buying more Super Hornets could be an option, but such a move would have to be made before the line is closed. An alternative would be to push more resources toward the F-35C stealth fighter, which the Navy has introduced to replace the last of its 'legacy' Hornets. As well as the baseline F-35C, Lockheed Martin is increasingly looking at the potential of further advanced developments of the Joint Strike Fighter, something the company has previously described as a 'Ferrari' or 'NASCAR upgrade' to the F-35's core 'chassis.' This could include a substantial fuselage redesign. With a future Pacific fight very much on its mind, neither of these options would be ideal for the Navy, and the current uncertainty around the F/A-XX program is very much bad news for the service. It's also worth considering the Navy's approach for the fleets of carrier-capable drone wingmen that it wants to accompany crewed combat aircraft in the future. As it now stands, the service wants its Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) designs to cost no more than $15 million to buy and have zero long-term sustainment costs. At the same time, there are signs the Navy may not be moving as quickly on CCAs as the Air Force, as you can read about here. Meanwhile, if the Pentagon gets its way and is able to inject another $500 million into the F-47, that will only help realize its goal to have the next-generation Air Force combat jet flying before the end of the current Trump administration. Contact the author: thomas@
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Tech transfer pledge steers Thailand to pick Sweden's Gripen warplane
CHRISTCHURCH, New Zealand — The Swedish government's offset package has proved decisive in Thailand's decision to purchase 12 Gripen E/F fighters in three phases. The economic and technology garnishes helped Saab's Gripen offer defeat its American F-16 Block 70/72 competitor. On June 4, the Royal Thai Air Force – or RTAF – held a press conference to announce it was buying more Gripens, with the deal accompanied by a generous package of technical support and offsets. When final offers were submitted last August, Saab had vowed, 'The Swedish proposal will ensure the best return on investment for Thailand that will exceed the contract value through a well-structured, long-term plan that covers key areas of critical technologies and national capabilities for Thailand.' Saab's offset package – equating to around 155% of the project's value – has proved especially appealing to a nation keen to boost its aerospace industry and self-sufficiency. 'The offset committee conducted negotiations with Saab concerning the defense offset proposal with the aims of maximizing benefits and complying with the policies of the government and the minister of defense,' the Thai air service said in a statement: A key element in Sweden's proposal is Thailand's unique, Saab-developed Link-T data link. Currently, only a handful of Thai aircraft and several warships are equipped with it. Bangkok now gains intellectual property rights for Link-T's unrestricted use and expansion. 'Saab will transfer Link-T development capabilities to the RTAF and local defense industry,' reads the service's statement. Link-T will enhance Thailand's ability to perform multi-domain operations. With the U.S. keeping tight control over its data links, Lockheed Martin's F-16 offer could not compete in this regard. Thailand's two Saab 340 airborne early warning aircraft will be upgraded, too, with Thai participation. Additionally, a local Gripen maintenance, repair and overhaul hub will be established. Furthermore, Thai companies will join the Gripen supply chain with opportunities to make components like tires, bearings, clamps and airframe parts. Training support covers 26 personnel, made up of six pilots, 18 maintainers and two support staff. From 2025-29, Saab will provide a mission support system for network-centric flight planning and training, plus a maintenance ground support system for logistics management and maintenance. Saab welcomed its selection, stating: 'In addition to Gripen E/F fighter aircraft and associated equipment, Saab's offer includes a long-term offset package. This will benefit the national security and strategic independence of Thailand, while also bringing new jobs and investments to a range of Thai society sectors.' Thai Gripen E/Fs will come with a Raven ES-05 radar, SkyWard infrared search and track, Arexis electronic warfare suite, a targeting pod and standoff weapon capability, Link-T, Meteor and IRIS-T missiles, and Targo helmet-mounted display. The initial batch comprises three single-seat Gripen Es and a twin-seat F, to be procured for 19.5 billion baht (nearly US$600 million) from FY2025-2029. Eight more Gripen E/Fs will be delivered through FY2034, replacing aging F-16A/B fighters in 102 Squadron. Thailand's aircraft choice followed a decision publicized on Aug. 27, 2024 that the Gripen had been nominated. Now with the selection approved, the air force said the procurement contract would be signed in August.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
UiPath's AI Pivot Is Underway. Time to Buy the Stock?
UiPath is looking toward artificial intelligence to help reinvigorate its growth. The robotic automation specialist says its AI solutions have been gaining momentum. The stock is cheap, but the company needs to speed up growth to jumpstart its stock. 10 stocks we like better than UiPath › With the advent of artificial intelligence (AI), UiPath (NYSE: PATH) has had to make a significant technological pivot. But this isn't the first time the company has undertaken a major technological shift. It began by outsourcing software services and transitioned into a leading robotic process automation (RPA) company. RPA uses software bots to handle repetitive human tasks, and thus is used to help automate processes such as invoice and payroll processing and data entry. Today, the company is looking to become an end-to-end automation platform that integrates AI agents and robots into a single unified platform. It wasn't long ago that UiPath was growing rapidly, posting a 31% revenue increase for the quarter that ended Jan. 31, 2024. Today, the company is still growing, just at a much more modest pace, with revenue rising 6% in its fiscal 2026 first quarter to $357 million. Its annual recurring revenue (ARR) climbed 12% year over year to $1.7 billion. ARR measures yearly billed amounts from subscription licenses as well as maintenance and support obligations, and it's an important metric for predicting revenue growth. It doesn't include perpetual licenses or professional services. It saw new net ARR of $27 million in the quarter. The company has seen strength in the public sector, particularly with the federal government. This included a significant win with the Air Force to support its digital transformation efforts. Dollar-based net retention was 108% on a trailing-12-month basis, down slightly from 110% last quarter. Numbers above 100% show spending growth by existing clients after churn. Customers with $100,000 or more in ARR increased 13% to 2,365, and those with $1 million or more rose 10% to 316. UiPath finished the quarter with $1.6 billion in cash and marketable securities and no debt. It generated $116 million in operating cash flow and bought back 21.9 million shares in the quarter. On its earnings call, management called its agentic automation platform the most successful product introduction in its history. While still early, both its agentic orchestration platform, called Maestro, and its Agent Builder, which helps users develop and deploy AI agents, have seen strong early adoption. It plans to implement a new consumption-based pricing model for its agentic solutions. It said its first deal since its AI products became generally available was with a Fortune 15 global health company that signed a multi-year, multimillion-dollar expansion for UiPath's Maestro and Agent Builder. Despite the early success, the company does not expect its AI solutions to be material contributors to revenue this fiscal year. However, it is looking for them to set the stage for meaningful new revenue streams in fiscal 2027 and beyond. The company has forecast fiscal second-quarter revenue in the range of $345 million to $350 million. It guided for ARR to be between $1.715 billion and $1.72 billion. For its full fiscal year, management forecasts revenue to be between $1.549 billion and $1.554 billion, up from a prior outlook of $1.525 billion to $1.53 billion. It projects ARR to be between $1.82 billion and $1.825 billion, up from its previous outlook for $1.816 billion to $1.821 billion. Shares trade at a forward price-to-sales ratio of 4.3 based on this year's analyst estimates, but after taking out its $1.6 billion in net cash, it trades at a ratio of enterprise value to forward sales of only 3.3. That's very cheap for a profitable software company with a high gross margin (85% last quarter) and solid cash flow. That said, tech investors tend to be all about growth, so value names in tech often struggle to gain traction. UiPath's new AI solutions will really need to reinvigorate revenue growth for the stock to work from here. Agentic AI -- systems capable of autonomous decision-making and actions -- is a big opportunity, and the company's ability to use both RPA and AI agents depending on the situation could be a differentiator. Still, a lot of companies are currently pursuing agentic AI, so this is likely to be a competitive field. Given UiPath's valuation and the company's proven ability to transform its business previously, I think the stock looks attractive at current levels. However, I would still consider it a bit more speculative in nature, given that its AI strategy has yet to be proven, and a lot is riding on it. Before you buy stock in UiPath, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and UiPath wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,538!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $869,841!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 789% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Geoffrey Seiler has positions in UiPath. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends UiPath. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. UiPath's AI Pivot Is Underway. Time to Buy the Stock? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
