Lumumba rejects water rate increase proposal, questions JXN Water's spending, collection efforts
Shaking his head when asked, Jackson Mayor Chokwe Antar Lumumba flatly said he was against increasing water rates for Jackson residents ― a move that Ted Henifin, the third-party water manager overseeing JXN Water, recently said is necessary as federal funds for the city's water system are expected to run out by summer.
Lumumba, speaking during a Monday press conference at Jackson City Hall, lobbed additional critiques at JXN Water and Henifin. The mayor again questioned the accuracy of JXN Water's bill collection rates and criticized Henifin for his handling of the water utility's advertising costs and what Lumumba sees as a lack of a competitive bidding process.
JXN Water did not immediately return calls seeking comment for this story
In late February, Henifin, who was appointed to oversee the water system's repairs at the end of 2022, released JXN Water's "Financial Management Plan." The report noted that monthly expenses are exceeding revenues, creating an operating deficit. The revenue shortfall is currently being covered by the $600 million in federal funds Jackson received from the U.S. Congress in December 2022. However, those funds are quickly running out.
Given the critical cash-flow challenges, the report states that additional revenue increases are necessary to maintain the system's sustainability. One way to increase revenue is by raising water rates, which would raise the average monthly residential bill by about $9, or roughly 12%. JXN Water plans to seek a rate increase this spring, according to the report.
"I am not in favor of that (increasing water rates), not only because we just recently raised the access costs for residents less than a year ago and I think that there are few things that we have to be aware and cognizant of. One, what are our rates of collection? Because we've had some of the poorer rates of collection through the course of time that they've (JXN Water) been there," Lumumba said, but he didn't provide a number for JXN Water's exact collection rate.
The mayor's questioning of JXN Water's bill collection rates has been an ongoing saga between Lumumba and Henifin for nearly a year now. Lumumba has repeatedly said JXN Water's collection rate is lower than when the city managed the water system. In April 2024, the two clashed over the collection rate for garbage bills, which appear on residents' water bills.
Each time, Henifin has denied Lumumba's claims.
Jackson water system repairs: How much water is Jackson's system losing nearly 2 years after takeover? Henifin gives update
According to the most recent quarterly report, released at the end of January, JXN Water's collection rates are "nearly 70 percent." It also notes that more than 14,000 accounts are receiving services but not paying their bills. Those accounts will be targeted for increased collection efforts in 2025.
"Revenues continue to increase through the significant efforts of the JXN Water billing staff," the report states. "Severance (the process to disconnect customers for non-payment) started in March 2024. The percentage of billed revenue collected moved from approximately 56 percent in January 2024 to nearly 70 percent at the end of the year."
Lumumba's comments are part of an ongoing, tense relationship with Henifin, with whom Lumumba has said he has little rapport. The two have clashed multiple times since JXN Water took over in 2023 over issues such as bill collections, water safety and the leadership of Jackson's water system once Henifin's receivership ends.
Water rates increased in Jackson within the last year after Henifin unveiled JXN Water's new billing system in November 2023. At the time, Henifin said a majority of water customers would see an increase of about $9 per month in their water bills, while also introducing the "water availability charge." The Jackson City Council abstained from voting on the water-rate increase in December 2023.
However, the council's vote was largely symbolic. According to the 2022 court order that put Henifin in charge of the water system, he must consult with Lumumba before raising rates. Lumumba must then present a resolution to the council for consideration. Ultimately, Henifin and JXN Water need only the approval of U.S. District Judge Henry Wingate to implement rate increases.
During Monday's press conference, Lumumba also criticized JXN Water's procurement process, which he said has driven up operating costs.
"We have to make sure we are holding them accountable and one of those things that is very evident is that there is no competitive procurement process," Lumumba said. "What Mr. Henifin would say to you is that we were in an emergency two, almost three years ago at this point, and he needed to avoid the procurement requirements in order to respond and act quickly. But we're not perpetually in an emergency … And the reason you have procurement practices is to get the lowest and best bid."
Lumumba also went after JXN Water spending nearly $1 million on advertising. With a firm face, the mayor repeated, "I know they spend a lot of money for advertising" three consecutive times while looking around the room during the press conference.
A total of $878,997.82 has been spent on "communications" as of March 17, according to JXN Water's website. The price tags and companies who have received payment include:
HDR Engineering, Inc.: $552,284.83
TV Station WLBT: $144,510.66
Gray Media Group, Inc.: $46,027.70
1 Vision: $111,170.60.
Art Mekanics: $15,000
Studio54Multimedia: $9,000
Alliance Business Service Inc.: $1,004.03
Asked what he would do if he were in Henifin's shoes — running out of money — and the water system was still in the city's hands, Lumumba said it was an unfair comparison.
Artificial intelligence: After repeal of a 2020 ban, JPD will start using a controversial AI technology to fight crime
"We didn't have the benefit of $600 million that we went to Congress and got," Lumumba said. "So, the city was operating without money for many, many, many, many years … it's not a fair comparison. I think anyone would readily admit if we had the benefit of $600 million, then things should improve. The question really becomes, have you had a $600 million improvement to take place."
Lumumba said that raising rates isn't inherently a bad idea, but proper collection and competitive procurement should be prioritized first.
"I'm not saying that the notion of raising (water) rates isn't a reasonable one," Lumumba said. "What I am saying is that you first need to make sure you are collecting appropriately. Secondly, you need to make sure that you're doing competitive procurement … So it's a balance, it's a balance of not only making the tough decisions of when rates need to be increased and doing that in a systematic and structured way. But it's also making sure that we are being good stewards of the money we have."
This article originally appeared on Mississippi Clarion Ledger: Jackson MS mayor rejects water rate increase, cites poor bill collection
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
04-06-2025
- Yahoo
Mayor Lumumba addresses council's hiring freeze, says recent hires were about serving residents
Jackson Mayor Chokwe Antar Lumumba defended two recent hires made during the final weeks of his second term — decisions that prompted the Jackson City Council to pass an ordinance implementing a hiring freeze on most city positions through the end of June. Lumumba recently appointed Tariq Abdul-Tawwab as deputy director of the Public Works Department and former Hinds County Supervisor David Archie as a staff assistant in the mayor's office. Abdul-Tawwab previously served as 'chief experience officer' at JXN Water in 2023 but left later that year. His wife, Candace Abdul-Tawwab, is a director at the People's Advocacy Institute, a nonprofit founded by the mayor's sister, Rukia Lumumba. Archie, who ran against Lumumba in the April 1 primary, endorsed the mayor ahead of the April 22 runoff, according to a Facebook post shared by Lumumba on April 18. Council President and Ward 7 Councilwoman Virgi Lindsay, who introduced the hiring freeze ordinance on May 20, previously confirmed the two appointments influenced her decision to bring the legislation forward. Speaking after the council's Tuesday meeting, Lumumba initially declined to comment, saying, 'I don't have any thoughts,' when asked about the council's hiring freeze. But he later defended the hires, saying both positions were vacant and essential to city operations. "Both of those positions were vacant and they both serve the community and our responsibility is to serve the community until the end," Lumumba said. "One vacancy deals directly with constituent complaints every day, so if people are in need of water at senior centers, if people need somebody to come check out their pothole — I would imagine that the residents don't want me to leave them with 60 days of not responding to those issues." Lumumba also pushed back on criticism that the hires were politically motivated. "It's not a political thing. It's a responding thing. So both of those positions are about responding to residents needs," Lumumba said. Before Lumumba addressed the hiring freeze, the council approved an amendment to the original ordinance during its regular meeting to allow for additional hires. The original ordinance, obtained by the Clarion Ledger, freezes all vacant positions — and those expected to become vacant — within the executive branch, except for roles specifically assigned to the Jackson Police Department and Jackson Fire Department. Lindsay introduced the amendment to allow JPD to hire critical positions, such as 911 dispatchers. It also permits the hiring of seasonal workers in the Department of Parks and Recreation, including an educational specialist and three zookeepers at the Jackson Zoo, two lifeguards and park maintenance staff. The amendment further allows the city to hire CDL drivers for the Division of Solid Waste and two employees in the Department of Finance and Administration, positions Chief Financial Officer Fidelis Malembeka said he is prepared to fill. The council passed the amended ordinance in a 6-0 vote. Ward 3 Councilman Kenneth Stokes was not in attendance when the vote was called. The hiring freeze remains until June 30. This article originally appeared on Mississippi Clarion Ledger: Jackson MS mayor Lumumba defends hires as council tweaks city hiring freeze
Yahoo
03-06-2025
- Yahoo
Are you ready to vote on the most important measure in Michigan's 2026 midterms?
Every federal, state or local elected or appointed official swears an oath to the constitutions of the United States, their state and their local government. Given the abuse federal and state politicos are currently shoveling onto constitutions, it's a wonder the constitutions don't swear back at them. Which leads to the most boring but ultimately critical question you will face in Michigan's 2026 election: How will you vote on the ballot proposal to call a new state Constitutional Convention? There will no shortage of headlines about the 2026 election. It's the first time there has been both an open gubernatorial and U.S. Senate seat in the same election. Whatever major disasters or stunning (and surprising) miracles President Donald Trump concocts will guide how voters decide the makeups of the U.S. Congress and our Legislature. There will be specific ballot issues. All these candidates and issues will be hyped with massive buckets-'o-bucks, ads, flyers, calls, door knocking, social media harangues … leaving us overwhelmed. But in this upcoming election, one ballot issue is already designated as Proposal 1 ― so ordered under Article XII, Section 3 of the Michigan Constitution ― and whether Michiganders vote "yes" or "no" could completely change our governmental and legal structure, affecting every aspect of life in this state: How your business runs, your kids are educated, how prisoners are punished, our natural resources managed, what taxes we pay and what the taxes pay for, who will govern us; everything we know now about Michigan rules and regulation could be turned inside out, depending on how we vote on holding a Constitutional Convention. The Michigan Constitution (last revised in 1963) requires voters be asked every 16 years if a new Con-Con (short for 'Constitutional Convention,' natch) should be called. In 1978, 1994 and 2010, voters overwhelmingly said no. Next year, voters will be asked this question again. So, start thinking about it. Time also to acquaint yourself with Michigan's Constitution, if you know nothing about it. Pay attention to this very boring subject, which, like most boring subjects, is really damn important. More Trump's crypto, the Qatar jet ― will supporters finally admit something's wrong? Constitutions are our supreme laws, guiding everything that governs and affects our lives. In some respects, the U.S. Constitution, Michigan's Constitution and your local city charter dictate how you act daily more than more than whatever scripture you follow (or ignore). Officials from the president to members of local municipal commissions (ask my wife, Cindy, who spent years on Huntington Woods' beautification commission) swear to follow and defend those supreme laws. Or they are supposed to. We have expected, experienced and enjoyed such compliance with the rules for most of this nation's nearly 250 years. What is happening now? Trump swore to 'preserve, protect and defend' the Constitution (didn't have his hand on the Bible, but still …) yet he questions if he has to 'uphold' the Constitution. How can you 'preserve, protect and defend' the Constitution if you do not 'uphold' it? His administration has ignored, thus violating, judicial rulings. He has tried to alter whole sections of the Constitution through Executive Orders, which is not permitted. He has accepted foreign gifts in violation of the Constitution. In open defiance of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, the administration is shredding the rule of law. Now there is talk the administration may suspend habeas corpus, an essential right guaranteed in the Magna Carta. (That's a governing document agreed to in 1215 by King John of England, under pressure from rebel barons.) Suspending habeas corpus is allowable only under extreme circumstances defined by the Constitution. Those circumstances do not exist. When asked to define habeas corpus, Homeland Security Security Kristi Noem gave the baffling response that it guaranteed Trump's right to remove people from the country. Nope, not even close. More Democrats better hope Michigan Gov. Whitmer changes her mind about presidential run In Michigan, our constitutional worries are less extreme, but still concerning. State House Speaker Matt Hall, R-Richland, has refused to submit bills passed in the previous session to Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, though Michigan's Constitution specifically says that must be done (the argument wasn't helped by a goofy Court of Claims ruling that the bills should be presented, but the court didn't want to interfere in the spat.) Hall has also recently suggested passing a budget isn't required by the state constitution (granted, the constitution doesn't set requirements on enacting a budget, but refers to a budget. A little thing called state law requires when a budget be passed). And earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal brought by 11 Republican legislators challenging the citizens' right to amend the state constitution on certain election issues. Lower federal courts already told the legislators to stuff it, though in nicer legal terms. Approaching the 2026 Con-Con vote, we face a populace and political establishment arguably more badly divided than in any period since maybe the Civil War. Many are driven by fear, anger and even hatred towards their fellow citizens, and unsympathetic to our constitutional principles. Michigan is under its fourth constitution (tidbit: Michigan's Archives will soon transport the first 1835 Constitution ― drafted two years before we became a state ― to Boston specialists for a bit of fixup before it enters a new display in Lansing). After the 1835 Constitution ― which specified only white men could vote ― we had constitutions written in 1850 and 1908. Our current constitution was drafted at the 1961-62 Con-Con, which launched a number of major political careers. Primary among them: George Romney, one of Michigan's greater governors, and longtime Detroit Mayor Coleman Young. Including Michigan, 11 states are on their fourth constitution. Another 20 states use their original constitutions, with Massachusetts' Constitution adopted in 1780. Louisiana is on its 11th constitution, and Georgia's 10th constitution is the most recent, adopted in 1983. Because state constitutions deal with more minutia involving state and local operations, they are longer than the 4,500 or so words in the U.S. Constitution. Michigan's comes in around 31,200 words; a breezy read compared to Alabama's 7th constitution, at nearly 403,000 words. State constitutions are also amended more frequently. In 237 years, the U.S. Constitution has been amended 27 times. Michigan's voters have amended our constitution 39 times, with 85 proposed amendments since it took effect in 1963. The state constitution, and its amendments, state essential Michigan principles. The constitution bans capital punishment, and establishes our court system, principles of education and which schools get state funding ― through our tax dollars ― and guarantees our state colleges and universities are free from political and legislative interference. It prohibits a graduated income tax. It guarantees ― through a recently adopted amendment ― reproductive rights for women. It also sets rules on overall state finance, on how old you must be to go boozing, it determines that we elect 148 total legislators and not hundreds more, and that we have a Senate and House and not a unicameral legislature. The current constitution was written to simplify and modernize Michigan government to face more current realities. The state endured serious recessions in the 1950s, and simply ran out of money. Neither the 1908 Constitution nor lawmakers were able to resolve the problems. Lots more officials were elected ― including the state treasurer and highway commissioner ― and every official served for two-year terms, exhausting voters. That 1960s Con-Con reflected new social and economic realities. It was the first to include women and Black delegates. Labor with business and agricultural interests played a major role. And in those post World War II years, the state and nation had a more positive outlook. There were tensions, of course, with the Cold War, changing roles of women, the Civil Rights movement; but most Americans were optimistic to the future. The chief issue dividing support for the 1963 constitution was that it did not did not recognize the principle of one man-one vote (that issue was resolved eventually by the U.S. Supreme Court). The last three times they were asked, voters declined to call a new Con-Con. But, in each election opposition has declined. In 1978 nearly 77% said no; by 2010, it was nearly 67%. Still a landslide, but what drives the increased support for a new Con-Con? An actual call for change ― either for more progressive government or more conservative ― or just a 'yeah, whatever' mood too many people seem to currently embrace? Or, given our current discontent with one another, do some voters see a new constitution as a way of imposing greater control over those they dislike? The question cannot be ignored. You, the voters, will answer these questions soon enough. Make sure you know why you are answering them the way you do. Free Press contributing columnist John Lindstrom has covered Michigan politics for 50 years. He retired as publisher of Gongwer, a Lansing news service, in 2019. Submit a letter to the editor at and we may publish it online and in print. Like what you're reading? Please consider supporting local journalism and getting unlimited digital access with a Detroit Free Press subscription. We depend on readers like you. This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Will Michigan say yes to Constitutional Convention in 2026? | Opinion
Yahoo
03-06-2025
- Yahoo
Seattle Socialist Kshama Sawant announces bid against WA Rep. Adam Smith
The Brief Kshama Sawant, former Seattle City Councilmember, announced her run for U.S. Congress against 30-year incumbent Adam Smith in Washington's 9th District. Sawant criticizes Smith's support for military actions, labeling him a "warmonger," and highlights her advocacy for progressive policies like Seattle's $15 minimum wage. The election is scheduled for November 3, 2026. SEATTLE - Former socialist Seattle City Councilmember Kshama Sawant announced Monday she is running for U.S. Congress against 30-year incumbent Adam Smith. Sawant held a press conference Monday announcing her bid for Washington's 9th Congressional District, looking to unseat Adam Smith, who has represented the district in Congress since 1997. Smith has comfortably beaten every challenger in his last 15 elections, often by close to 100,000 votes. Kshama Sawant is a socialist and served on the Seattle City Council from 2013 to 2023. Before that, she unsuccessfully ran for the Washington State House of Representatives in 2012 against Frank Chopp. Sawant helped push through Seattle's minimum wage hike, which went up to $15 an hour in 2015. She also pushed for rent control, a "millionaires tax" and expanding public transit. After announcing she would not seek reelection in 2023, Sawant turned her attention to the labor group Workers Strike Back, which she co-founded, with the goal of turning it into a national labor movement. Adam Smith is the incumbent representative for Washington's 9th Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives. Before then, Smith won two terms as a Washington State Senator in 1990 and 1994. Smith is a Democrat and is a ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee. Sawant is running against Smith, characterizing him as a "warmonger," and claims he "has never met a war that he didn't like." Sawant points to his vote in favor of the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq, as well as military operations in Kosovo, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Yemen and Ukraine, and his enthusiastic support for Israel's multi-year retaliatory bombing campaign in Gaza after Hamas' 2023 invasion. What they're saying "We should not be surprised. Both Democrats and Republicans have been purveyors of endless brutal wars throughout their history," said Sawant at her press conference Monday. "The Democrats and Republicans in the U.S. Congress spent more than $14 trillion on war since 9/11. A third to one half of this money is pocketed by military contractors, who in turn fund the campaigns of their favorite Democrats and Republicans." The next election will be held on Nov. 3, 2026. The Source Information in this story comes from Kshama Sawant's office and previous coverage from FOX 13 Seattle. Homicide investigation underway after 5-year-old dies in Federal Way, WA Alaska man pinned by 700-pound boulder for 3 hours walks away unharmed Why hasn't anyone been charged in Seattle clash arrests? What we know Mandatory driver's education to expand under new Washington law To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily FOX Seattle Newsletter. Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national news.
