CNN guest's interview interrupted by his son in hilarious moment
But just as he spoke against a calm, neutral blue backdrop, a tiny face suddenly popped into the frame - his five-year-old son making an unexpected crash appearance. Just after 7pm, the pair were deep in a live discussion about the president's demand that the NFL reverse the Washington Commanders' 2020 decision to drop the name 'Redskins' in favor of a more politically correct alternative.
Stelter acknowledged that much of what Trump does can be dismissed as 'labeled distractions,' but emphasized that when the leader of the US weighs in, 'it matters.' He explained that Trump's latest moves are less about political power and more about reclaiming cultural influence in a potential second term - marking a dramatic shift from his first.
Dean, host of the primetime weekend edition of the network's Newsroom, steered the conversation toward the disgraced Epstein - a topic she noted has been discussed extensively over time. But just as she asked Stelter how he feels about the current state of affairs - especially Trump's apparent inability to 'quite yet move past it' - the calm blue frame behind him was suddenly obstructed by a small, grinning face. It turned out to be none other than Stelter's five-year-old son, creeping into the frame with a mischievous smile - seemingly aware that his sudden pop-in had caught their attention.
As Dean was mid-question about where Stelter believes the Epstein saga stands today, she briefly choked on her words, struggling to hold back a smile as she noticed the small child creeping in from the right. Stelter also seemed fully aware as his expression tightened into a straight line, maintaining his focus on the camera while subtly brushing his son away. His son apparently got the message and disappeared from view just moments later -though not without earning a lighthearted mention at the end of the interview.
As the conversation wrapped up, Dean thanked Stelter for his time and insight - then added with a smile, 'And I think you had a little helper with you, so give our thanks to him too. I apologize for my five year old,' he responded. 'It's bedtime here at the Stelter house.' Dean quickly reassured him not to apologize, cheerfully saying, 'We're a family show - it's always nice to have some extra hands.' Despite the kindergartener's brief on-screen hiccup, the pair swiftly returned to business as usual, diving back into the seemingly endless wave of Epstein headlines.
Stelter went on to explain why he believes the Epstein story continues to grip both the American public and Donald Trump - and why it is refusing to fade from the national conversation. In his own words, 'it will continue to be a topic for as long as MAGA media influencers feel betrayed.' Stelter pointed to the social media posts he's been following, noting that many people clearly believe there's much more hidden beneath the surface of the Epstein story - and they're determined to uncover it. 'This will always exist to some degree,' he said during the conversation. 'Even if it's mostly, you know, percolating beneath the surface. It's always going to exist there because the conspiracy theories are always going to remain,' he added. 'The conspiracy theories are always going to linger.'
The conversation came just days after Trump followed through on his promise to sue the Wall Street Journal and its owner, Rupert Murdoch, for $10billion. The filing, obtained by the Daily Mail, showed the libel suit filed in the Southern District of Florida against WSJ, Dow Jones, Rupert Murdoch and the paper's reporters who published the story in what Trump called a 'powerhouse' suit on Truth Social. Trump is requesting a jury trial and is suing 'for damages, punitive damages, court costs, and such other relief as the Court deems just and proper, not to be less than $10 billion dollars.'
A bombshell report in the WSJ on Thursday claimed Trump wrote a 'bawdy' 50th birthday card to Epstein which concluded: 'Happy Birthday - and may every day be another wonderful secret.' The newspaper said it had reviewed a typewritten letter bearing Trump´s signature, framed by the seemingly hand-drawn outline of a unclothed woman, that Ghislaine Maxwell included in a 2003 birthday album. In the text, the paper claimed Trump wrote: 'We have certain things in common, Jeffrey' and that both of them know that 'there must be more to life than having everything'. Trump has denied writing the letter or drawing the picture, calling it 'false, malicious, and defamatory.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
25 minutes ago
- Reuters
Crude finishes with 1% gain on supply concerns and US crude draws
HOUSTON, July 24 (Reuters) - Oil prices rose 1% on Thursday as U.S. crude draws and expected cuts to Russian gasoline exports overwhelmed news that oil major Chevron (CVX.N), opens new tab will gain U.S. approval to renew production in Venezuela. Brent crude futures settled at $69.18 a barrel, up 67 cents or 0.98%. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures finished at $66.03 a barrel, up 78 cents, or 1.20%. Crude fell in early afternoon trade on news that U.S. President Donald Trump's administration was preparing to allow limited oil operations in sanctioned OPEC nation Venezuela. Earlier in the session, WTI had been up more than a dollar and Brent crude came near that level. "The news about Chevron being able to go back into Venezuela and get oil going again just took the knees out of the market," said John Kilduff, partner at Again Capital LLC. Even so, Kilduff said the market did not expect the Trump administration would open up Venezuela to other U.S. oil companies. "This is a unique one-off," he added. Oil rebounded late in the session on news Russia was planning to cut gasoline exports to all but a few allies and nations like Mongolia, with which it has supply agreements. "Russia looking to cut off gasoline exports gave the market a boost," said Phil Flynn, senior analyst with Price Futures Group. "The market was looking for a reason to go higher." Also lifting futures was the previous day's report of a U.S. crude inventory draw and hopes for a trade deal between the U.S. and the European Union that would lower tariffs. U.S. Energy Information Administration data showed crude inventories fell last week by 3.2 million barrels to 419 million barrels, far exceeding analysts' expectations in a Reuters poll for a 1.6 million-barrel draw. "The U.S. crude inventory draw and the trade efforts are adding some support to prices," said Janiv Shah, an analyst at Rystad. On Wednesday, two European diplomats said the EU and the U.S. were moving toward a trade deal that could include a 15% U.S. baseline tariff on EU imports and possible exemptions. That could pave the way for another major trade agreement following a deal with Japan.
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Grim new Social Security outlook revealed as checks set to shrink by huge sums
Social Security's retirement fund is set to run short in just seven years — which could end up slashing benefits for millions of Americans by thousands of dollars a year. According to latest projections, retirees could face automatic 24 percent benefit cuts as early as the end of 2032. This means a couple who both worked would receive $18,100 less each year if they retire at the start of 2033. The new forecast from the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB), released Thursday, moves up the insolvency date for both Social Security and Medicare trust funds. A projection just last month had funds lasting until 2033, but that has already been revised. A major factor is the impact of President Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill ', which experts warned would speed up the use of funds. Social Security relies on its trust fund to provide monthly benefit checks to around 70 million Americans. Once the reserves are exhausted, federal law requires that benefits be cut to match incoming revenues. This means payments will continue, but at reduced levels. The cuts would also grow over time as scheduled benefits continue to outpace dedicated revenues, the CRFB said. By 2099, the size of the benefit cut would grow to well over 30 percent, the nonpartisan committee said. Depending on a couple's age, marital status and work history, the actual size of the benefit cut would vary. For example, the average single-earner couple would face a $13,600 cut in late 2032, while a dual-earner low-income couple would face an $11,000 annual cut. High-income couples could see a cut of closer to $24,000. While the absolute size of the cut would be smaller for a typical low-income couple than for a high-income couple, it would represent a larger share of their income and their past earnings, the CRFB said. The depletion of Social Security's trust funds would also be compounded by the insolvency of a Medicare trust fund. The hospital insurance trust fund, which is also known as Part A of Medicare, finances health care services related to hospital stays and skilled nursing facilities for eligible beneficiaries, which is mostly those aged 65 and over. This fund is also projected to be exhausted in late 2032, cutting payments by 11 percent. The forecast predicts that a dual-earning couple who retire at the start of 2033 would receive $18,100 less a year in vital benefits The latest CRFB estimates of potential benefit cuts are somewhat larger than those put forward in the most recent Trustees' report from June. The committee blamed changes brought in by the Trump administration's 'Big, Beautiful Bill.' Despite facing bipartisan criticism, the bill was signed into law earlier this month. It extends most of the tax cuts Trump signed into law in 2017, including slashing rates on estates and for corporations. Deductions for state and local taxes, as well as business owners, are included. The CRFB said the tax rate cuts and the increase in the senior standard deduction from the bill would reduce Social Security's revenue from the income taxation of benefits, increasing the required cut by about a percentage point upon insolvency. It warned if the senior standard deduction and other temporary measures are made permanent, the benefit cut would grow larger, hurting millions of Americans. 'Policymakers pledging not to touch Social Security are implicitly endorsing these deep benefit cuts for 62 million retirees in 2032 and beyond,' the committee added. 'It is time for policymakers to tell the truth about the program's finances and to pursue trust fund solutions to head off insolvency and improve the program for current and future generations.'
The Guardian
29 minutes ago
- The Guardian
National Science Foundation staff decry Trump's ‘politically motivated' cuts
Almost 150 workers from the National Science Foundation (NSF) have lambasted Donald Trump's cuts to the agency as 'politically motivated and legally questionable', joining colleagues at three other federal research agencies in warning that the administration is destroying innovation and sacrificing the US's position as a global scientific leader. The three-page dissent states the actions of the administration 'collectively amount to the systemic dismantling of a world-renowned scientific agency' and that they have been compelled to act because 'NSF employees are bound by their oath to uphold the Constitution.' The document condemns the decision as 'illegally' withholding $2.2bn of the $9bn budget appropriated by Congress for 2025 and the 'unlawful termination and threatened mass reductions' in the workforce, which has already seen more than 10% of the agency's staff dismissed. They also point to the termination of more than 1,600 active NSF grants 'using undisclosed criteria devised by the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge)' – the quasi-government agency set up by Trump's billionaire donor Elon Musk. Earlier this month, the Guardian reported on the unprecedented political interference being wielded by Doge which, together with the chaotic cuts, has already undermined the gold standard review process used by the NSF to support cutting-edge science, and was jeopardizing the future of US industries and economic growth. 'A covert and ideologically driven secondary review process by unqualified political appointees is now interfering with the scientific merit-based review system,' the letter states. The NSF was created 75 years ago and until Trump took office for his second term had enjoyed bipartisan support. It is the only federal agency that funds fundamental research across all fields of science and engineering, and which over the years has contributed to major breakthroughs in organ transplants, gene technology, AI, smartphones, extreme weather warning systems, American sign language, cybersecurity and even the language app Duolingo. Trump's budget proposal calls for a 56% cut to the NSF budget for 2026, which if enacted 'would undermine US leadership in science, eliminate funding for over 250,000 researchers and students, and break bipartisan commitments made under the CHIPS and Science Act', the letter states. The NSF statement follows similar unprecedented dissent by hundreds of scientists and other staff at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and most recently the Voyager Declaration from almost 300 current and former Nasa scientists including four astronauts. All have warned about the devastating impact of the administration's arbitrary and chaotic cuts to staff and research funds on the lives of Americans – now and in the future – in order to pay for tax cuts for the wealthy including Trump's billionaire donors. The NSF dissent is addressed to California member of Congress Zoe Lofgren, the top Democrat on the House science committee, who has repeatedly condemned Trump's assault on science. Only one employee, Jesus Soriano, president of the local chapter of the American Federation of Government Employees which represents two thirds of the NSF's unionized bargaining unit, included his name; 148 of the 149 signatories are anonymous due to fear of reprisals. The fear is well founded given that around 140 named signatories of the EPA 'declaration of dissent' were put on administrative leave, and Lee Zeldin, the climate change denier and EPA secretary, warned that there was a 'zero-tolerance policy for career bureaucrats unlawfully undermining, sabotaging, and undercutting' the current administration. It ends with a stark warning: 'NSF employees are committed to serving the American people through research, education, and innovation. But they cannot do so under fear, censorship, and institutional sabotage. Without immediate oversight and corrective action from Congress, one of our nation's greatest engines for scientific and technological advancement faces irreversible long-term damage. Put simply, America will forfeit its scientific leadership position to China and other rival nations.'
