Bengaluru Stampede Case: HC permits Govt to submit status report in sealed cover, posts hearing to June 12
The
Karnataka High Court
on Tuesday permitted the state government to submit a status report into the June 4 stampede outside Chinnaswamy stadium in Bengaluru in a sealed cover accepting a request from the government that making its content public might influence judicial enquiry as well as the ongoing hearing on the bail petitions.
A division bench of acting chief justice V Kameshwar Rao and Justice CM Joshi will now hear the case on June 12, Thursday. The HC has taken up suo motu cognizance of the ghastly stampede caused during the RCB's victory celebrations after winning the 2025 IPL final that led to an unprecedented stampede killing 11 people and injuring scores of others. Quite a few public-spirited people have moved the high court seeking justice in the case.
AG Shashi Kiran Shetty, appearing for the government, mentioned the likelihood of the persons arrested in connection with the case using the status report in the bail petitions, and its influence on the judicial enquiry.
BAIL PETITION
Justice SR Krishna Kumar at the high court posted for Wednesday the bail petition from RCB's marketing head Nikhil Sosale in connection with the stampede case.
His counsel questioned why his client, and three others associated with the DNA Entertainment Network, had been singled out in the case. The police, on June 6, arrested DNA Vice president Sunil Mathew, operations manager Kiran Kumar S and another employee Shamant NP Mavinakere along with Sosale. They have also challenged their arrest.
Live Events
Sosale's counsel said the arrests were made only because
Chief Minister Siddaramaiah
ordered the arrests and not because the investigations required their arrest. Advocate General Shashi Kiran Shetty urged the court to hear the matter on Wednesday as he needed time to come back with a response.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Allow FYJC aspirants to edit college choices: Principals after court stay
Mumbai: The school education department may have to allow students from socially and economically backward classes to change their preferences on the FYJC admission portal following Bombay high court's stay on the controversial clause in the May 6 govt resolution (GR) that introduced social reservations in the 50% non-minority seats in minority institutions, said principals of city colleges. This, they added, may delay the admission process further. While department officials said that necessary steps will be taken for the welfare of students, no decision was made on providing the editing option on the portal until Thursday night. Many students belonging to the socially and economically backward classes would have chosen minority institutions on the admission portal, said a principal. "There is a possibility that all their 10 choices are for minority institutions or even if they selected two or three, their order of preferences will be affected. Now, with the HC decision, these students will have to be given a fair chance to edit their options and to apply to the same colleges under the open category too, based on their merit. Or maybe to choose other colleges too. If they are not allowed to change now, there could be confusion after the allotment," added the principal. The allotment list for the first round is set to be released on June 26. Another principal pointed out that govt did not issue clear guidelines prior to the commencement of admissions. "The May 6 GR talks only about admissions to vacant minority seats. There was no application of mind behind bringing such a regulation. If govt was clear about its intention, institutions would have moved court before. Now, we just hope the change does not impact the admission schedule much," said the principal, pointing out that SSC results were out over a month ago. A govt official confirmed that no decision has been made yet. "We will study the HC order copy and then take appropriate action for the larger benefit of students. We will make necessary changes, if needed," said the official, adding that this is the first time that students have access to thousands of colleges across the state by just filling one form for Rs 100. Meanwhile, admissions to in-house, minority, and management quotas commenced Thursday. Of the over 1.1 lakh students who applied under these quotas, 9,087 have secured admissions. Mumbai: The school education department may have to allow students from socially and economically backward classes to change their preferences on the FYJC admission portal following Bombay high court's stay on the controversial clause in the May 6 govt resolution (GR) that introduced social reservations in the 50% non-minority seats in minority institutions, said principals of city colleges. This, they added, may delay the admission process further. While department officials said that necessary steps will be taken for the welfare of students, no decision was made on providing the editing option on the portal until Thursday night. Many students belonging to the socially and economically backward classes would have chosen minority institutions on the admission portal, said a principal. "There is a possibility that all their 10 choices are for minority institutions or even if they selected two or three, their order of preferences will be affected. Now, with the HC decision, these students will have to be given a fair chance to edit their options and to apply to the same colleges under the open category too, based on their merit. Or maybe to choose other colleges too. If they are not allowed to change now, there could be confusion after the allotment," added the principal. The allotment list for the first round is set to be released on June 26. Another principal pointed out that govt did not issue clear guidelines prior to the commencement of admissions. "The May 6 GR talks only about admissions to vacant minority seats. There was no application of mind behind bringing such a regulation. If govt was clear about its intention, institutions would have moved court before. Now, we just hope the change does not impact the admission schedule much," said the principal, pointing out that SSC results were out over a month ago. A govt official confirmed that no decision has been made yet. "We will study the HC order copy and then take appropriate action for the larger benefit of students. We will make necessary changes, if needed," said the official, adding that this is the first time that students have access to thousands of colleges across the state by just filling one form for Rs 100. Meanwhile, admissions to in-house, minority, and management quotas commenced Thursday. Of the over 1.1 lakh students who applied under these quotas, 9,087 have secured admissions. Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Bengaluru stampede: Deeming arrests unlawful, high court grants bail to 4 executives
Bengaluru: Karnataka high court Thursday granted conditional interim bail to RCB marketing executive Nikhil Sosale and three executives from event organisers DNA Networks, holding that the arrests lacked strong legal ground and are 'vitiated'. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The court instructed immediate release of the four individuals -- DNA Entertainment Networks' Sunil Mathew, Kiran Kumar Sand Shamant NP Mavinakere, besides Sosale -- upon receipt of the bail order. After their arrest last week, the accused had said the FIR contained only the names of their companies. The bail conditions include restrictions on witness tampering, cooperation with probes, execution of personal bonds worth Rs 1 lakh with sureties, and submission of passports within two weeks. Justice Krishna Kumar said a perusal of FIRs containing alleged offences will, prima facie, indicate that the petitioners cannot be charged with voluntarily causing hurt, unlawful assembly and using criminal force to deter a public servant from discharging duties under BNS. The court further said offences like culpable homicide and endangering life or liberty are bailable and carry a maximum punishment of three years or a fine or with both. It held the view that the grounds of arrest – no material to support charges and the petitioners are not named in FIRs -- were not justified "without any investigation prior to their arrest". At the time of petitioners' arrest, the investigating officer did not furnish checklist/documents in accordance with guidelines mandated in Arnesh Kumar and DK Basu cases. The court said the arrest of the petitioners is vitiated. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The judge said that material on record will, prima facie, indicate that the petitioners were deprived of their personal liberty by the CCB police, who directly took petitioners to the Cubbon Park police station immediately thereafter. The court said the grounds of arrest are also vitiated by the arrests carried out by CCB, which did not have jurisdiction or authority to secure arrests.
United News of India
2 hours ago
- United News of India
Ashoka writes to NHRC over Chinnaswamy stampede
Bengaluru, Jun 12 (UNI) Karnataka Leader of the Opposition R. Ashoka on Thursday urged the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) to take suo motu cognisance of the June 4 stampede outside M. Chinnaswamy Stadium here, which left 11 people dead and 75 injured during the IPL victory celebrations of Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB). In a letter addressed to NHRC Chairperson, Ashoka alleged gross negligence and administrative failure on the part of the state government, police, and event organisers. He described the incident as a 'grave human rights violation' and called for a comprehensive investigation to fix accountability. 'This is not merely an unfortunate accident—it reflects a systemic failure and blatant disregard for public safety. The fundamental right to life of the victims was violated,' Ashoka stated. The stampede occurred when thousands of people gathered near the stadium following social media messages and reports that entry to the celebration would be free. The turnout reportedly far exceeded the crowd-handling capacity of the area. Ashoka outlined five major lapses that he believes led to the tragic stampede outside M. Chinnaswamy Stadium on June 4. He pointed to overcrowding caused by misleading announcements and overselling of the event, which resulted in lakhs of people arriving at a venue meant to accommodate only 35,000. This, he alleged, was exacerbated by inadequate police deployment and a lack of basic crowd control measures. Ashoka further highlighted the absence of emergency services at the scene, with eyewitnesses reporting shortages of ambulances, medical aid, and even water. He accused RCB, the event management firm DNA, and the Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA) of failing to coordinate and implement essential safety protocols. The state government's delayed and inadequate response—despite registering FIRs and announcing a probe—was also criticised as insufficient and reactive. Calling the incident a grave human rights violation, Ashoka appealed to the NHRC to take suo motu cognisance of the tragedy. He sought a thorough investigation into the roles of all responsible parties, legal action against those found negligent, formulation of national guidelines for large public events, and active monitoring of the inquiry to ensure accountability and justice for the victims. 'This tragedy has shaken public confidence. It is imperative that justice be delivered and preventive steps be taken to ensure no family has to suffer such a loss again,' he wrote. The state government has not yet responded to the allegations made in the letter. The NHRC is yet to make a statement on whether it will take up the matter. UNI BDN SSP
