logo
Undercover police inquiry set to be most expensive in history

Undercover police inquiry set to be most expensive in history

Telegraph2 days ago

The public inquiry into undercover policing is on course to become the most expensive in British legal history.
Official figures obtained by The Telegraph have established that the cost of the decade-old inquiry could exceed £200 million.
The figure would overtake the cost of the Bloody Sunday inquiry, which reached £191 million and would be more than five times the amount spent on the inquiry into the Manchester Arena terror attack.
One policing chief described the time taken and spiralling costs as a 'national embarrassment'.
Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary and a former policing minister, said the costs were 'out of control' and called for the inquiry to be rapidly wound up.
One political source added: 'It has turned into a gravy train for lawyers.'
The inquiry, which began on July 17 2015, has cost £102 million to date, while a further £68.6 million has been spent on dozens of experienced detectives, uniformed constables and staff.
The 74 police officers and staff, which include a detective superintendent, detective chief inspectors, inspectors sergeants and constables, have been diverted to investigate the activities of undercover officers as far back as 1968, figures obtained under freedom of information laws reveal.
The £68 million total police bill is the equivalent to employing 1,000 constables or policing a town the size of Bournemouth 24/7, according to this newspaper's analysis.
With at least another two years to run, The Telegraph understands that the Home Office anticipates the costs of the inquiry are likely to hit between £130 million and £150 million on top of the £68.6 million for police investigators.
The revelations come ahead of Rachel Reeves's spending review on Wednesday.
Police chiefs have warned it could force them to deprioritise the investigation of other crimes if she fails to plug a £1.3 billion hole in their budgets.
The inquiry was launched by Theresa May, the then home secretary, after a series of 'spy cop' scandals where undercover officers slept with women without disclosing their true identities, failed to reveal their roles in court cases and were involved in criminal acts.
Martyn Underhill, a former Met detective and Dorset's first police and crime commissioner, said he had backed the need for an inquiry into activities that were a 'stain on policing', but he added: 'The time taken, and the spiralling costs, are now becoming a national embarrassment, akin to the Bloody Sunday inquiry.
'What is clear here is that the remit of the inquiry is too broad, and should have been limited to undercover cops establishing relationships on and off duty with targets, not a remit of all undercover policing.
'By the time the inquiry has reported to the Government, many of its findings will be out of date. This issue is now completely out of control, and UK Policing PLC has to carry some of that blame.'
Mr Philp said: 'This public inquiry is totally out of control. It should not be taking more than 10 years and cost over £200 million. It is a total waste of money.
'It is also dragging police officers who served over 50 years ago through a legal process. It should be brought to a very rapid conclusion before any more time and money is wasted.'
Endless legal tactics
It is believed the Home Office originally envisaged the inquiry would last three years.
It has had two judicial chairmen, Sir Christopher Pitchford, who stepped down as a result of ill health, followed by Sir John Mitting.
Last week, Sir John announced that he will be stepping down next year after the publication of the second interim report. It is likely to cause further delays beyond the projected 2027 end date as a successor will have to be found.
It is understood that ministers in the last government were told by the inquiry it could last until 2032, five years longer than the 12 years that it took the Bloody Sunday inquiry to complete its work.
There are 249 core participants, all entitled to have reasonable legal costs paid.
The issue of protecting the identities of undercover operatives has caused long delays and legal issues. The inquiry has released the cover names of 70 undercover officers from the Metropolitan Police's undercover unit the Special Demonstration Squad (SDS).
The £170.6 million cost of the inquiry to date has put it on a par with the Grenfell Tower public inquiry, which cost £173.2 million.
It is more than five times the Manchester Arena inquiry (£35.6 million), and 13 times the Chilcot inquiry into the Iraq war (£13.1 million). The independent inquiry into child sexual abuse (IICSA) cost £192.7 million.
Those involved with campaigners targeted by undercover operatives said police must shoulder some of the blame for the lengthy delays and costs.
They tried to 'keep things out of the public domain' for up to five years, said one, through 'endless' legal tactics and applications to the court to prevent officers being identified.
Another insider questioned the decision to set up a public inquiry in the first place, pointing out that changes to police undercover practices were already underway and said the terms of reference and period of investigation for the inquiry had been set too wide.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Britons could be stopped from entering Gibraltar by Spanish police, Lammy admits
Britons could be stopped from entering Gibraltar by Spanish police, Lammy admits

Telegraph

time14 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Britons could be stopped from entering Gibraltar by Spanish police, Lammy admits

Spanish border guards will be able to stop Britons entering Gibraltar because of the new Brexit deal for the Rock, the Government has admitted. Fabian Picardo, Gibraltar's chief minister, furiously denied surrendering any sovereignty to Spain or the EU after The Telegraph reported details of the deal on Wednesday. But David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, was forced to concede in the House of Commons on Thursday that Spanish guards working for the European Union would have control over who entered Gibraltar. Under questioning, Mr Lammy told MPs that a British person stopped by Spanish guards at Gibraltar airport would have a choice: they could either voluntarily go over to Spain for questioning, or be returned to the Gibraltarian authorities and return to the UK. 'It is clear from the Foreign Secretary's answer that Spanish border officials can prevent a UK citizen from entering one part of the UK from another part of the UK,' Richard Tice, the Reform UK deputy leader, said. 'This appears to be a significant sovereignty compromise,' he told The Telegraph. The deal ensures Gibraltar's border with Spain remains open after Brexit, and means the 15,000 people who cross it every day will not have to have their passports stamped. Border checks will be moved to Gibraltar's nearby airport after the Rock effectively becomes part of the EU's Schengen zone of passport-free movement. People flying into Gibraltar from the UK will face one check from Gibraltarian officials and another by the Spanish on behalf of the EU. Mr Lammy said: 'For those arriving by air into Gibraltar's airport, there will be a dual border control check, in a model similar to French police operating in London St Pancras station.' Dame Harriett Baldwin, a former Conservative minister, asked: 'Can a British citizen flying from the UK to Gibraltar now be stopped by a Spanish official as they land?' Mr Lammy replied: 'There will be a second line queue, as there is in St Pancras, and there will be Spanish border guards and police situated in that second line. 'And of course, if there was an alert, then at that point, not on their own, but at that point, there would be a hand-back facility with the Gibraltar police, so they are working alongside that Spanish team. 'And if there was an alert, then the individual would have a right to legal advice. They would either be able to return to their country of origin, let's say the UK, or they would be able to voluntarily go over to Spain to face the questions they are facing.' Mr Tice asked whether Spanish border officials 'have an effective veto on the entry of a British citizen from the United Kingdom landing on British sovereign territory in Gibraltar'. Mr Lammy said if Mr Tice flew to Gibraltar and there was an alert in the Schengen system, 'he would be handed back to the Gibraltarians, where he might feel more comfortable' before returning to the UK. 'No doubt the Spanish would seek to extradite him, and many in this House would be rather pleased,' he added. Mr Lammy said he had insisted on a 'sovereignty clause' in the treaty and added that immigration, policing and justice remained the responsibilities of Gibraltar's authorities.

1989 police probe into murder of John Devine ‘seriously defective'
1989 police probe into murder of John Devine ‘seriously defective'

BreakingNews.ie

time17 minutes ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

1989 police probe into murder of John Devine ‘seriously defective'

The 1989 police investigation into the murder of John Devine was 'seriously defective', Northern Ireland's Police Ombudsman has found. The 37-year-old was murdered by loyalists on Fallswater Street in west Belfast on July 23rd, 1989. Advertisement The father-of-three died after armed men entered his home and shot him a number of times at close range. Police Ombudsman Marie Anderson has highlighted a 'series of failures' in the investigation. These include that a man prosecuted for Mr Devine's murder almost three decades later should have been arrested and interviewed as a suspect at the time. Mrs Anderson's report is also critical of the then police force, the RUC's wider suspect and arrest strategy, which she found resulted in police taking action against only two people on a list of 36 persons of interest, despite intelligence and other information which linked individuals to the murder. Advertisement The report identifies that house-to-house and witness inquiries were not adequately pursued and led to missed opportunities to gather evidence which may have assisted police to identify suspects or open up lines of inquiry, and that all available forensic opportunities were not fully exploited. The investigation also found no evidence that the RUC alerted Mr Devine to the fact that his date of birth had been linked to the name John Devine, in a document found in two separate loyalist paramilitary intelligence caches. Although the document contained a different address and photo, the police did not consider the potential risk presented to Mr Devine, including whether a 'threat to life' warning was appropriate. Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland Marie Anderson said she believed the family of John Devine had been 'failed' by police (Liam McBurney/PA) 'Given the available evidence and other information gathered during my investigation, I consider the original RUC investigation to be seriously defective, and not capable of leading to the identification of those responsible,' she said. Advertisement Ms Anderson acknowledged that the RUC investigation of the murder was conducted at a time when policing resources in Troubles-related incidents were stretched and under significant pressure in a year when 81 people died. She also found that there was no specific intelligence available to police that, if acted upon, could have prevented the murder of Mr Devine. The Ombudsman concluded that Mr Devine was the victim of a campaign of sectarian violence mounted against the nationalist community. 'Loyalist paramilitaries alone were responsible for his murder,' she said. Advertisement 'Given the significant failings in the RUC investigation, I believe that Mr Devine's family were failed by police in their search for the truth regarding the perpetration of his murder.' Solicitor Padraig O Muirigh (Rebecca Black/PA) Solicitor Padraig O Muirigh, who acts for Mr Devine's family, said they welcome the findings of the Ombudsmans' report. 'Mrs Anderson has concluded that the failings in the RUC investigation of Mr Devine's murder were so fundamental that the murder investigation was 'incapable of detecting potential offenders and supporting a prosecution',' he said. 'There were a litany of serious deficiencies identified in the Police Ombudsman investigation including a failure of RUC Special Branch to disseminate intelligence to the police investigation team, the failure to arrest and interview key suspects and multiple forensic shortcomings. Advertisement 'These findings are a damning indictment of the RUC investigation into John Devine's murder. 'The breadth and nature of these failings cannot be explained by mere incompetence. 'The Devine family have a long-held view that those involved in the murder were protected from prosecution by the RUC and that the security forces colluded with loyalist paramilitaries. 'That view has been reinforced by these findings. The Devine family commend Mrs Anderson and her staff for the diligent investigation they have conducted.'

Driver charged after American woman killed in crash
Driver charged after American woman killed in crash

BreakingNews.ie

time17 minutes ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Driver charged after American woman killed in crash

A 66-year-old woman has been charged with causing death by careless driving after an American woman was killed in a crash. Police said that pedestrian Allison Eichner, aged in her 40s and from Connecticut, died after a single-vehicle collision in the Causeway Road area of Bushmills on Wednesday. Advertisement Energency services responded to the incident shortly before 12.30pm. Ms Eichner, a pedestrian at the time of the crash, was taken to hospital but died from her injuries. Officers from the collision investigation unit have charged a 66-year-old woman with causing death by careless driving. She is due to appear at Coleraine Magistrates' Court on Friday. Advertisement All charges will be reviewed by the Public Prosecution Service.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store