logo
Chandrababu Naidu interview: Hindi can be taught along with English and mother tongue

Chandrababu Naidu interview: Hindi can be taught along with English and mother tongue

The Hindua day ago

N. Chandrababu Naidu has completed one year in his current term as Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh. He spoke on a wide range of issues in an exclusive interview. Edited excerpts:
How do you see your first year of this term as CM?
Power is not new to me. But I had not expected the kind of challenges that I inherited — the damage that was inflicted on Brand Andhra Pradesh, collapse of the economy. And today, I cannot run away from these difficulties because people have put their trust in me. It's a huge responsibility, and we need to recover slowly.
Is public finance the biggest challenge?
No, it is not just public finance. The State's credibility was destroyed (by the previous government). There is massive debt. And they started pledging government properties for more borrowing. They diverted the money granted for 98 Central schemes, which came to a halt. Schemes such as Jal Jeevan Mission were stopped. I have given six guarantees — Super Six —(schemes such as cooking gas refill, free bus ride for women, and so on) to the people. My agenda is welfare, development, empowerment of people.
In your first term, you were a darling of the market, and you had famously said, 'There is no free lunch.' How have your views changed over the years?
At one time, we thought economic reforms would create wealth, and people would get more facilities, but now with an experience of 34 years, we understand that market creates wealth but the government, through public policy, has to empower people. That is where expenditure in welfare comes in. Disparities between the 'haves' and 'have-nots' are increasing rapidly, which should to be bridged quickly. Otherwise, there will be huge backlash. This is why I am creating the P4 model — public, private, people partnership.
You have revived the Amaravati city project. How is the progress after one year?
The previous regime had worked against the wishes and interest of the State and people. Amaravati was a self-financing project. It would have created wealth and additional revenues for the State. But my successor halted the project, playing destructive politics. Now, I have revived it and many other projects.
So all these big projects need a lot of money and you do not have it...
These are all futuristic projects. We can go for new revenue models. Thirty years back nobody could visualise the kind of roads we have today. People are paying toll, and it is a win-win situation for everyone. Power, telecommunication, etc., are the rising sectors, and we can have different revenue models.
In Andhra Pradesh, the hostility between the ruling party and the Opposition is now extreme — prosecutions and investigations. Why?
For 50 years, I have been in politics. I have seen several Congress Chief Ministers until Rajasekhara Reddy, and our fights have been only political. Things changed when a criminal floated a regional party. I don't believe in victimisation. At the same time, if we let economic terrorists scot-free that would lead to a disaster, which Andhra Pradesh is going through right now. This is a different type of politics. You see, his uncle Vivekananda Reddy was murdered, they killed him... this leads to a dangerous trend. There can be no leniency... nobody can commit crimes under political cover-up, everyone has to respect the laws of the land.
You mentioned the Central schemes. The State government funds these projects in good measure, but they are projected as Central schemes. Do you find any problem in that?
No, this is a continuous process, and now we are part of NDA and are working together. We are a double-engine sarkar. They (the Centre) are providing grants, and we too bear some expenses. We are working and campaigning together. We did not have much differences regarding this even in 2014. There should be uniform policy to develop at a fast pace, but there should not be an over-centralisation of power, as it is harmful for the nation.
Regional parties are facing a crisis, aren't they? What future do you see for the Telugu Desam Party?
Post Independence, new parties have emerged and collapsed. It's a cycle, because ultimately, for any political party to survive, they have to maintain people's trust in them. And that's what TDP is doing. Through all the ups and downs we faced, including the separation of Telangana from Andhra Pradesh, and many other challenges, our foremost duty is to serve people efficiently.
You are confident that the TDP will be around for a long time?
Absolutely. You can go through history, and you will find that among all the regional parties, TDP is the only party that has played a positive and constructive role at the national level. Never have we disappointed the nation's trust or interest. Our fundamental principle has always been — first the nation, then the State, and then the party. We were once the main Opposition party in Lok Sabha. We were key constituents in the National Front and the United Front governments. We supported the NDA governments as a crucial partner, but we never created trouble or blackmailed them.
So you've been part of several political alliances in Delhi. Do you see any changes in the way coalition is run today?
No, it is a continuous process, and it mostly depends upon the leader. In West Bengal, Jyoti Basu ran a coalition government for 25 years with Left parties, without any hindrance. It is important to know how to lead as a leader — Vajpayeeji at one time, and UPA too have run coalition governments. Narendra Modiji is running a coalition without any problems. It is because of the credibility that we have established as one entity.
What difference do you see between Vajpayeeji and Prime Minister Narendra Modi?
Different leaders, different approaches. Today, it's a fortunate and inspiring time, I believe India and Indians will have a bright future in the coming years. The PM has a long-term vision, a good grasp of the economy, and capability to take people along. I am confident that India will grow under his leadership. Vajpayeeji had brought good reforms during his tenure, in which I had a part too. That helped the nation to move forward, but today we are moving to the next level. PM is doing justice and promoting development. In protection of the nation, there is no compromise. After the Pahalgam attack, how he acted promptly... through Operation Sindoor, which satisfied the nation and demonstrated his capability in responding, handling such things.
Moving on, do you see any danger of communalism in our society?
Some parties with vested interest try to create instability... Within country, and outside the country, which is to derail our progress. We have to work on these issues consciously. It's the only way for the nation to prosper. Everybody's free to offer prayers... but they should not quarrel and must respect each other to move forward.
Your plans for the new phase of industrialisation in Andhra Pradesh, and also a proposal for a defence corridor. Can you explain?
In defence, we are trying to develop our own indigenous capacity. Aerospace is a booming sector. We are working on drones and space industry too. I believe the high-tech industry is the future for defence and commercial applications. Andhra Pradesh has a lot of land available for setting up these facilities. Defence corridor is part of these plans.
In the run-up to Telugu Desam's Mahanadu conference recently, there was lot of anticipation that your son, Lokesh, would be assuming role that makes him your successor. It did not happen. Will it happen, and when will it happen?
It will happen in its due time. Public interest is the main factor. It is a continuous journey, and our party is full of youngsters.
There is a lot of concern among non-Hindi States, including Maharashtra, about the three-language policy. Do you have any such fears?
No, in this age of technology and artificial intelligence, according to me, language is not an issue at all. People are unnecessarily sticking to their old traditions. Hindi can be taught along with English and mother tongue. For example, people from Hyderabad have a better advantage in Delhi as they speak Hindi and Urdu than people from Tamil Nadu or Karnataka. Learning more languages help individuals communicate and get things done more easily. If youngsters are willing to learn they should be allowed to learn, just like one learns English to communicate and become a citizen at international level, without needing any translators. In the same way, learning Hindi will give you an advantage at national level. I want to introduce many languages as an option in universities, so that those who are interested can learn.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump signs measure blocking California's ban on gas-powered car sales
Trump signs measure blocking California's ban on gas-powered car sales

Business Standard

timean hour ago

  • Business Standard

Trump signs measure blocking California's ban on gas-powered car sales

It comes as the Republican president is mired in a clash with California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, over Trump's move to deploy troops to Los Angeles in response to immigration protests AP Washington President Donald Trump signed a resolution on Thursday that blocks California's first-in-the-nation rule banning the sale of new gas-powered cars by 2035. The state quickly announced it was challenging the move in court, with California's attorney general holding a news conference to discuss the lawsuit before Trump's signing ceremony ended at the White House. The resolution was approved by Congress last month and aims to quash the country's most aggressive attempt to phase out gas-powered cars. Trump also signed measures to overturn state policies curbing tailpipe emissions in certain vehicles and smog-forming nitrogen oxide pollution from trucks. Trump called California's regulations crazy at a White House ceremony where he signed the resolutions. It's been a disaster for this country, he said. It comes as the Republican president is mired in a clash with California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, over Trump's move to deploy troops to Los Angeles in response to immigration protests. It's the latest in an ongoing battle between the Trump administration and heavily Democratic California over issues including tariffs, the rights of LGBTQ+ youth and funding for electric vehicle chargers. The state is already involved in more than two-dozen lawsuits challenging Trump administration actions, and the state's Democratic Attorney General Rob Bonta announced the latest one at a news conference in California. Ten other states, all with Democratic attorneys general, joined the lawsuit filed Thursday. The federal government's actions are not only unlawful; they're irrational and wildly partisan, Bonta said. They come at the direct expense of the health and the well-being of our people. The three resolutions Trump signed will block California's rule phasing out gas-powered cars and end the sale of new ones by 2035. They will also kill rules that phase out the sale of medium- and heavy-duty diesel vehicles and cut tailpipe emissions from trucks. In his remarks at the White House, Trump expressed doubts about the performance and reliability of electric vehicles, though he had some notably positive comments about the company owned by Elon Musk, despite their fractured relationship. I like Tesla, Trump said. In remarks that often meandered away from the subject at hand, Trump used the East Room ceremony to also muse on windmills, which he claimed are killing our country, the prospect of getting electrocuted by an electric-powered boat if it sank and whether he'd risk a shark attack by jumping as the boat went down. I'll take electrocution every single day," the president said. When it comes to cars, Trump said he likes combustion engines but for those that prefer otherwise, If you want to buy electric, you can buy electric. What this does is it gives us freedom, said Bill Kent, the owner of Kent Kwik convenience stores. Kent, speaking at the White House, said that the California rules would have forced him to install infrastructure that frankly, is extremely expensive and doesn't give you any return. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which represents major car makers, applauded Trump's action. Everyone agreed these EV sales mandates were never achievable and wildly unrealistic, John Bozzella, the group's president and CEO, said in a statement. Newsom, who is considered a likely 2028 Democratic presidential candidate, and California officials contend that what the federal government is doing is illegal and said the state plans to sue. Newsom said Trump's action was a continuation of his all-out assault on California. And this time he's destroying our clean air and America's global competitiveness in the process, Newsom said in a statement. We are suing to stop this latest illegal action by a President who is a wholly-owned subsidiary of big polluters. The signings come as Trump has pledged to revive American auto manufacturing and boost oil and gas drilling. The move follows other steps the Trump administration has taken to roll back rules that aim to protect air and water and reduce emissions that cause climate change. The Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday proposed repealing rules that limit greenhouse gas emissions from power plants fueled by coal and natural gas. Dan Becker with the Centre for Biological Diversity, said the signing of the resolutions was Trump's latest betrayal of democracy. Signing this bill is a flagrant abuse of the law to reward Big Oil and Big Auto corporations at the expense of everyday people's health and their wallets, Becker said in a statement. California, which has some of the nation's worst air pollution, has been able to seek waivers for decades from the EPA, allowing it to adopt stricter emissions standards than the federal government. In his first term, Trump revoked California's ability to enforce its standards, but Democratic President Joe Biden reinstated it in 2022. Trump has not yet sought to revoke it again. Republicans have long criticised those waivers and earlier this year opted to use the Congressional Review Act, a law aimed at improving congressional oversight of actions by federal agencies, to try to block the rules. That's despite a finding from the US Government Accountability Office, a nonpartisan congressional watchdog, that California's standards cannot legally be blocked using the Congressional Review Act. The Senate parliamentarian agreed with that finding. California, which makes up roughly 11% of the US car market, has significant power to sway trends in the auto industry. About a dozen states signed on to adopt California's rule phasing out the sale of new gas-powered cars. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

US lawmakers approves Musk's $9 billion budget cut; NPR, PBS, USAID and more to be affected
US lawmakers approves Musk's $9 billion budget cut; NPR, PBS, USAID and more to be affected

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

US lawmakers approves Musk's $9 billion budget cut; NPR, PBS, USAID and more to be affected

US lawmakers on Thursday approved a White House request to claw back $9.4 billion from funding already allocated by Congress in a victory for President Donald Trump as he pushes to lock in spending cuts spearheaded by tech billionaire Elon Musk. The vote in the Republican-led US House of Representatives was seen as the first test of how easily Congress could usher into law savings sought by Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) -- just days after his acrimonious exit from the government. Also Read: Donald Trump accepts Elon Musk's apology: 'Very nice that he did that' But the saved funds -- targeting public broadcasting and foreign aid -- were unpopular in some sections of both parties, and Republicans in the House of Representatives shoehorned the bill through a razor-thin 214-212 vote. "Under President Trump's leadership, your taxpayer dollars are no longer being wasted," House Speaker Mike Johnson said in a statement. "Instead, they are being directed toward priorities that truly benefit the American people." Also Read: Elon Musk expresses 'regret' over last week's X posts on Donald Trump after feud: 'Went too far' Legislation to grab back money already approved by Congress -- known as a "rescissions package" -- is extremely rare and no such measure had passed in decades. The vote was the first in what Johnson has touted as a potential series of packages codifying the cuts made by DOGE. Musk was tasked by Trump with leading the task force after spending $290 million helping the Republican get elected. Also Read: '…dangerous place': Donald Trump as US to pull some personnel from Middle East amid tensions with Iran The SpaceX boss boasted that he would be able to save $2 trillion in federal spending -- but left the White House under a cloud earlier this month as he feuded with Trump over deficits and spending. DOGE acknowledges that it has saved taxpayers just $180 billion -- and fact checkers even see that claim as dubious, given previous inaccuracies in its accounting. The recissions package slashes $8.3 billion in foreign aid, with much of that approved for humanitarian organization USAID, one of DOGE's first targets. The text also eliminates $400 million in funding allocated to health programs including the lifesaving PEPFAR global AIDS program, created by then-president George W. Bush. The package also targets $1.1 billion to be taken back from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which helps fund National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), as well as more than 1,500 local radio and television stations. Conservatives often accuse PBS and NPR of bias, and Trump signed an executive order in May to cease federal funding for both networks. "For decades, Republicans have promised to cut NPR, but have never done it, until now," Trump said on Truth Social as the vote got underway. "NPR and PBS are a Radical Left Disaster, and 1000% against the Republican Party!" Democrat Dan Goldman and Republican Mark Amodei, co-chairs of the congressional public broadcasting caucus, said cutting the funding will not meaningfully reduce the deficit, but instead dismantle "a trusted source of information for millions of Americans." The package now moves to the Republican-led Senate, where it needs the support of only a simple majority -- 51 members -- rather than the 60 votes usually required.

Ex-min accuses CM of colluding with BJP in LS polls
Ex-min accuses CM of colluding with BJP in LS polls

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Ex-min accuses CM of colluding with BJP in LS polls

1 2 Hyderabad: Former minister Vemula Prashanth Reddy on Thursday launched a scathing attack on both the Congress and BJP, alleging a covert alliance between the two parties in Telangana . He went a step further, accusing chief minister A Revanth Reddy of directly aiding the BJP's victory in eight Lok Sabha seats during the 2024 elections. Speaking at a press conference at Telangana Bhavan, Prashanth Reddy dismissed the CM's claims that both Union minister G Kishan Reddy and BRS chief K Chandrasekhar Rao were obstructing the state's development. Instead, he alleged that it was Revanth himself who was undermining the Congress and facilitating the BJP's rise. "Even the BJP is protecting Revanth. Not a single ED or IT raid has been conducted against Congress leaders in Telangana," he remarked. Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store