Yomiuri Reporters Win Award for Analysis of China Military; Praised for Contributing to Important Policy Decisions
Led by Hirotaka Kuriyama of The Yomiuri Shimbun's Political News Department, the Yomiuri staff writers reported on security issues including the activities of the Chinese military around Japan and a Maritime Self-Defense Force destroyer sailing through the Taiwan Strait.
This year marked the second round of journalism awards for excellent reporting, columns and journalistic activities given out by The International House of Japan, which is a public interest incorporated foundation.
Kaori Hayashi, executive vice president of the University of Tokyo, serves as the head of the selection committee for the awards. The Yomiuri's series of stories 'accurately reported the tensions in the international situation and contributed to policy decisions that could influence Japan's future,' Hayashi said.
The Yomiuri Shimbun reported that the Chinese military has the capability to land its ground forces in Taiwan within as little as one week at the earliest, according to a Japanese government analysis of Chinese military exercises conducted around the summer of 2023. It also sounded the alarm about the Chinese military simulating a very short military operation that would exploit the period before the U.S. military and other forces could respond to an invasion of Taiwan.
In addition, The Yomiuri Shimbun immediately reported that the MSDF Sazanami destroyer had sailed through the Taiwan Strait for the first time since the Self-Defense Forces were formed, as a measure against the activities of the Chinese military, such as its military aircraft entering Japanese airspace.
It also visualized the activities of the Chinese military, reporting them based on data from satellite images.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SoraNews24
2 hours ago
- SoraNews24
Foreign population in Japan hits record high as Japanese population falls to record low
The face of Japanese society is rapidly changing. The Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications just announced the results of its annual demographic survey in Japan, and its key findings reveal some interesting insights. Firstly, it showed that, as of 1 January this year, the Japanese population stood at 120,653,227 — a sizeable decrease of 908,000 people, or 0.75 percent, from the previous year. Both the number and rate of decline were the largest since the survey began in 1968, with declines occurring in 46 out of 47 prefectures, and Tokyo being the only exception. The survey, based on the Basic Resident Register, showed that Japan's population has been declining for 16 consecutive years, with the number of deaths reaching a record high of approximately 1.59 million and the number of births reaching a record low of approximately 680,000. At this rate, the Japanese population is likely to fall below 120 million by 2026. By prefecture, only Tokyo saw an increase in the number of Japanese people (up 0.13 percent), while Akita saw the largest decrease of 1.91 percent. ▼ Akita Prefecture Conversely, the number of foreigners in Japan increased by approximately 354,000 (10.65 percent) to 3,677,463, the highest number since the survey began in 2013, with increases recorded in all prefectures for the third year running. This means that foreigners now make up about 2.96 percent of all residents, compared to 2.66 percent last year. Among foreigners, 22,738 births and 9,073 deaths were recorded — again, record figures for both. Foreign residents also gained in both city and rural areas, with 94 percent in cities and wards and 6 percent in towns or villages, indicating that some are making the move to smaller communities. As you might expect, Tokyo recorded the largest concentration of foreigners, with 721,223 foreign residents in the metropolis (5.15 percent of Tokyo's total population), followed by high numbers in Osaka and Yokohama. Interestingly, some small towns are said to have a foreign population ratio far above the average, like Oizumi-machi in Gunma Prefecture, where foreigners make up about 20 percent of its roughly 42,000 population. The increase for foreigners was especially high in Hokkaido, which recorded a gain of 19.37, percent, and small towns like Akaiwa Village in Gunma Prefecture, with a gain of 10.86 percent. ▼ Akaiwa Village Foreigners are overwhelmingly of working age: 85.77 percent of foreign residents are 15–64 years old, compared to just 59.04 percent for Japanese residents. Only 6.08 percent of foreigners are aged 65 and over, compared to 29.58 percent of Japanese residents. These results indicate foreign nationals are disproportionately younger and more likely to be in the workforce, and national data shows Japan has over 2.3 million foreign workers, an uptick of 12.4 percent from the previous year. With Japanese nationals decreasing year-upon-year, it's projected that Japan may need up to 7 million foreign workers by 2040. The influx of foreigners is currently counterbalancing the steep drop in Japanese births and working-age people, proving their presence is rapidly becoming essential for Japan's local communities, as well as its labor market. The upward trend in the number of foreign residents shows no signs of stopping, so we'll be interested to see how these numbers change by the time the next survey is revealed in 2026. Source: Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (1, 2) via Hachima Kikou Top image: Pakutaso ● Want to hear about SoraNews24's latest articles as soon as they're published? Follow us on Facebook and Twitter!
2 hours ago
Japan's Population Falls Again in 2024
Japan Data The number of Japanese citizens fell by 910,000 in 2024, and is set to drop below 120 million in 2025. Japan's population was 124,330,690, as of January 1, 2025, after a 0.44% year-on-year decrease, according to a demographic survey published by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. The number of Japanese citizens was 120,653,227, down 908,574 or 0.75% year on year. Since 2009, the number of Japanese citizens has fallen for 16 consecutive years. While the Japanese population in Tokyo rose by 16,825 or 0.13%, it fell in all 46 other prefectures. The largest decreases were mainly in the north of Tōhoku: 1.91% in Akita, 1.72% in Aomori, and 1.69% in Iwate. There was also a 1.71% drop in the Shikoku prefecture of Kōchi. Japan had 687,689 births in 2024, marking the ninth consecutive record low year and the first time for the figure to fall below 700,000. The natural population decline, calculated by subtracting births from deaths, increased to 912,161, rising for the seventeenth straight year. Meanwhile, there were 3,677,463 non-Japanese residents, a year-on-year increase of 354,089 or 10.7%, due to factors including the greater ease of movement to Japan since the 2023 relaxation of the entry restrictions that had been in place during the COVID-19 pandemic. This was the highest total since statistics were first compiled in 2013. As a result, the overall population fell by some 550,000 in 2024. The prefecture with the highest population (including Japanese and non-Japanese) was Tokyo with 14,002,534 residents, followed by Kanagawa at 9,202,559, and Osaka at 8,771,961. The least populated prefecture was Tottori, with just 534,003 residents. The total population of the three major metropolitan areas centered on Tokyo, Osaka, and Nagoya was 66,008,727, declining for the fifth consecutive year, but still representing 53.1% of the total population. The concentration of foreign residents in metropolitan areas is even more pronounced, with 68.6% of the total population living there. Prefectures with the Highest and Lowest Populations (All Residents) Tokyo 14,002,534 Tottori 534,003 Kanagawa 9,202,559 Shimane 642,590 Osaka 8,771,961 Kōchi 664,863 Aichi 7,483,755 Tokushima 700,409 Saitama 7,374,294 Fukui 746,690 Chiba 6,311,579 Saga 794,252 Hyōgo 5,393,607 Yamanashi 801,056 Fukuoka 5,086,957 Wakayama 901,193 Hokkaidō 5,044,825 Akita 907,593 Shizuoka 3,575,704 Kagawa 939,965 Created by based on data from the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. Prefectures with the Highest and Lowest Populations (Non-Japanese) Tokyo 721,223 Akita 5,753 Osaka 328,128 Tottori 6,005 Aichi 321,905 Kōchi 6,661 Kanagawa 284,889 Aomori 8,415 Saitama 257,656 Tokushima 8,769 Chiba 227,013 Wakayama 10,032 Hyōgo 140,102 Yamagata 10,318 Shizuoka 120,111 Shimane 10,455 Fukuoka 111,461 Iwate 11,163 Ibaraki 100,188 Saga 11,175 Created by based on data from the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. Data Sources Demographic survey (Japanese) from the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (Translated from Japanese. Banner photo © Pixta.)
The Diplomat
2 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Censored Thai Exhibition Undermined ‘Core Interests,' China Claims
A detail from the poster advertising the 'Constellation of Complicity' exhibition, which opened on July 24 at the Bangkok Art and Culture Center in Bangkok, Thailand. China's government has accused the organizers of an exhibition in Thailand of undermining its 'core interests,' after the publication of a report that the show's co-curator removed and altered artworks at the request of the Chinese embassy in Bangkok. The Reuters news agency reported last week that the Bangkok Art and Culture Center (BACC) had removed materials about China's treatment of ethnic minorities in Tibet and Xinjiang and its policy toward Hong Kong from an exhibition featuring artists from authoritarian nations. In a written response to Reuters yesterday, the Chinese Foreign Ministry stated that the exhibition 'promoted the fallacies of so-called 'Tibetan independence', 'the East Turkestan Islamic Movement' and 'Hong Kong independence',' distorted China's policies and 'undermined China's core interests and political dignity.' The exhibit, titled 'Constellation of Complicity: Visualizing the Global Machinery of Authoritarian Solidarity,' opened at the BACC on July 24. According to the center's website, it features artworks from Myanmar, Iran, Russia, Syria, the diaspora community, and 'regions with cultural and autonomy demands.' It said that the exhibition sought to interrogate the 'formal and informal alignments between authoritarian states through the lens of artists who have lived through – or in exile from – their consequences.' Reuters' report quoted Sai, an artist from Myanmar who has co-curated the exhibition, as saying that three days after the show opened, Chinese embassy staff, accompanied by Bangkok city officials, 'entered the exhibition and demanded its shutdown.' The news agency also quoted an email dated July 30 in which BACC said: 'Due to pressure from the Chinese Embassy – transmitted through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and particularly the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, our main supporter – we have been warned that the exhibition may risk creating diplomatic tensions between Thailand and China.' The email said the gallery had 'no choice but to make certain adjustments.' According to a report by Khaosod English, China was originally included in the list of repressive countries, but the word had been covered with black tape, 'both in the Thai and English descriptions of the exhibition.' It quoted Sai as saying that the names and regional affiliations of three artists, from Hong Kong, Tibet, and the Uyghur diaspora, had been 'covered with black tape,' while the Tibetan and Uyghur flags in one installation were removed. 'Later, all of Tibetan artist Tenzin Mingyur Paldron's video works were taken down, and postcards referencing Xi Jinping and a book were removed,' he added. 'It is tragically ironic that an exhibition on authoritarian cooperation has been censored under authoritarian pressure,' Sai told Reuters. 'Thailand has long been a refuge for dissidents. This is a chilling signal to all exiled artists and activists in the region.' Sai reportedly fled abroad after Thai police sought to find him. The censorship of the exhibition is a sign of Beijing's willingness to leverage its diplomatic clout to prevent the expression of criticism of Chinese policies, whether by Chinese nationals or foreigners. Indeed, it is just the latest in a line of Chinese attempts to shut down film screenings, exhibitions, and other cultural events abroad. In 2009, Beijing demanded that the Palm Springs International Film Festival withdraw two China-related films; the same year, Chinese hackers attacked the website of the Melbourne International Film Festival over its decision to screen a documentary about the exiled Uyghur leader Rebiya Kadeer. In both cases, the organizers refused, after which Chinese films were subsequently pulled from the festival line-ups, apparently under Chinese government pressure. Similarly, in July of this year, Chinese officials sought to halt the initial screening of the Philippine film 'Food Delivery: Fresh From The West Philippine Sea,' which details the experiences of Filipino troops and fishermen facing Chinese pressure in the South China Sea. According to its makers, the film was quietly dropped from the roster of the PureGold CinePanalo Film Festival due to what its organizers described as 'external factors.' (The filmmakers later moved to an alternative venue.) Chinese diplomats also attempted – unsuccessfully – to have 'Food Delivery' removed from a film festival in New Zealand. According to correspondence seen by the New Zealand press, the Chinese Consulate in Auckland said that the documentary 'is rife with disinformation and false propaganda, serving as a political tool for Philippines to pursue illegitimate claims in the South China Sea. Its screening would severely mislead the public and send the wrong message internationally.' In many of these past cases, festival organizers and gallery owners have refused to accede to Chinese requests to withdraw films or censor artworks. According to Sai, BACC also 'never wanted to censor' the 'Constellation of Complicity' exhibition and 'showed remarkable courage and professionalism in resisting repeated demands from the Chinese Embassy.' But the reported participation of the Bangkok Metropolitan Authority in the enforcement of the exhibition's censorship sends a worrying sign of Thailand's shrinking commitment to freedom of expression – and raises fears that close Thailand-China relations will exact a cost on the Thai creative community.
