Carrying chickens by legs causes them pain, Green Party leader warns
But Green Party co-leader Mr Ramsay has called for animal welfare standards to be 'improved, not stripped back', as he urged ministers to halt their plans.
He has tabled a 'prayer motion', calling for the Welfare of Animals (Transport) (Amendment) Regulations 2025 to be 'annulled' before they come into force next week.
The regulations set out that farmers will be able to catch and carry turkeys weighing 5kg or less and chickens by both legs, but not by one leg.
Adrian Ramsay has called for animal welfare standards to be 'improved, not stripped back' (PA)
The existing ban 'does not reflect long-standing policy on appropriate methods of 'catching' chickens set out in GB statutory guidance', according to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra).
Ministers' decision to change the law followed a consultation throughout Great Britain, which found 40% of respondents supported two-leg catching.
The majority of these were 'poultry industry stakeholders' who 'did not consider two-leg catching to be directly detrimental to bird welfare'.
Some industry stakeholders also 'confirmed that young turkeys (weighing 5kg or less) are routinely caught by two legs, while older heavier turkeys (weighing more than 5kg) are routinely caught upright, by a range of different methods'.
But Mr Ramsay told the PA news agency: 'The Government's attempt to quietly weaken animal welfare standards for poultry is deeply troubling.
'After Defra cited this practice in its guidance, ministers are now attempting to restore outdated industry practices in law.
'Allowing chickens to be carried upside down by their legs causes injury, pain and unnecessary distress.
'I want our animal protection laws to be improved, not stripped back further.
'If handling methods widely used on farms don't meet welfare standards, then they need to be improved, not made legal because enforcement has failed.'
His motion has received cross-party backing, including from Conservative MP for Brigg and Immingham Martin Vickers, his running mate in this year's Green Party leadership election Ellie Chowns, and Labour MP for North Ayrshire and Arran Irene Campbell.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
UK braces for disaster: A fifth of Brits say war 'likely' in next two years while half expect power cuts chaos and deep freezes... so are YOU ready?
Brits are bracing for disaster with half expecting long power cuts in the next two years - and a fifth saying war is likely. The extent of public concern has been laid bare in government research, with the overwhelming majority worried the threat to the country is rising on a variety of fronts. There are also doubts about readiness for crises, with 51 per cent saying the UK was 'not at all' or only 'slightly' prepared. Nearly three-quarters were not confident that if power and water were lost their household could last out more than three days without outside help and supplies. Some 51 per cent admitted making no basic preparations in the past 12 months, such as having conversations with family about what they would do in case of an emergency More than 10,000 people took part in the Risk Perception, Resilience and Preparedness Survey, with the results weighted to represent the wider population. It was commissioned by the Cabinet Office and Department for Environment. Two thirds expect the number of emergencies to increase at little or a lot over the next decade. Some 55 per cent thought that it was 'likely' or 'very likely' that a storm severe enough to cause major disruption would affect their area in the next two years. Extreme cold weather was anticipated by 48 per cent over the same period, while 42 per cent thought a heatwave would cause trouble. A power cut that lasts for more than 12 hours was considered likely by 47 per cent - and 39 per cent said the same thing about a cyber attack that affected critical infrastructure. A water outage lasting for over 12 hours was anticipated by 35 per cent. War was seen as 'likely' in the next two years by 14 per cent, amid rising tensions with states such as Russia and China. A further 6 per cent said it was 'very likely'. That was roughly the same level as fear about terrorist attacks and wildfire in local areas. A third thought another human pandemic was on the cards, and a similar proportion said it was likely they would need to be evacuated due to flooding. Rioting and looting was mentioned as 'likely' by a quarter - amid warnings that the country is facing a repeat of last summer's unrest in the coming weeks. Despite the high level of concern about potential disasters, there was not a strong sense that the country was in a resilient position. Just 15 per cent thought the UK was 'totally' or 'largely' prepared for what could come, according to the research carried out between March and April. Some 51 per cent admitted they had made no basic preparations in the past year, such as having conversations with family about what they would do in case of an emergency. In case of power, gas and water being shut off 14 per cent thought they would last less than a day without outside help and supplies. Just 8 per cent were confident they could last a week or more. A Government spokesman said: 'This survey will inform our work with households, communities and first responders to keep the country safe. 'Last month we published a Resilience Action Plan, that sets out all the steps we're taking to build resilience, from investing £4.2billion in flood defences, to raising awareness of lifesaving advice on and testing the emergency alerts system across the country on September 7 2025.'
The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Rachel Reeves to pledge £66m for key Scottish transport projects
Rachel Reeves will announce £66 million of funding for transport projects in Scotland – with the Chancellor insisting the cash shows the Labour Government is 'investing in Britain's renewal' after a 'decade of decline' under the Conservatives. Scottish Secretary Ian Murray meanwhile said the money would make a 'real difference to people's daily lives'. The money will go towards projects linked to new investment zones and advanced manufacturing sites supported by the UK Government in Scotland. Three key transport schemes are to benefit, with plans to create direct links between these new economic hubs and local towns in the west of the Scotland. The largest chunk of cash – some £38.7 million – will go to Renfrewshire Council to help link Paisley town centre with both Glasgow Airport and the nearby Advanced Manufacturing Innovation District Scotland (AMIDS). As part of this new walking, cycling, bus and car links will be built, allowing local people to benefit from the growth of high value manufacturing in Renfrewshire. Another £23.7 million will go to North Ayrshire Council to upgrade the B714 road, allowing faster travel between the towns of Ardrossan, Saltcoats and Stevenston and Glasgow, and cutting traffic in Kilwinning. It comes after the Chancellor pledged to find the cash for this work in last month's spending review. In addition the Scottish Government is being given an extra £3.45 million to suggest ways in which the A75 in Dumfries and Galloway can be upgraded. The road there links the port in Cairnryan – where ferries sail to Northern Ireland – with the rest of the UK, and as a result is seen as being vital for both transport connections and the economy. Ms Reeves, who is due to visit Paisley on Friday, said the UK Government was 'pledging billions to back Scottish jobs, industry and renewal'. She added: 'That's why we're investing in the major transport projects, including exploring upgrades to the A75, that local communities have been calling for. 'Whilst previous governments oversaw over a decade of decline of our transport infrastructure, we're investing in Britain's renewal. 'This £66 million investment is exactly what our Plan for Change is about, investing in what matters to you in the places that you live.' Welcoming the cash Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said: 'This £66 million investment in Scotland's roads demonstrates the UK Government's commitment to improving infrastructure and driving economic growth in all parts of the UK as part of our Plan for Change. 'This investment will make a real difference to people's daily lives and to the local economies of the south of Scotland, Ayrshire and Renfrewshire.' Mr Murray continued: 'New road links will connect Paisley town centre with Glasgow Airport and the new advanced manufacturing innovation district, to boost high value manufacturing in Renfrewshire. 'The upgrade to the B714 will speed up journeys between Glasgow and the three towns of Ardrossan, Saltcoats and Stevenston, as well as cutting traffic in Kilwinning. 'And the A75 is strategically important just not within but beyond Scotland. Its upgrading is long overdue. I am pleased that the UK Government has stepped up to fund the delivery of the A75 feasibility study in full.' Mr Murray said: 'This investment is yet another example of how the UK Government is building the foundations for a stronger, more prosperous future that benefits communities right across Scotland.' However SNP MSP Kevin Stewart said Ms Reeves should take the opportunity to apologise to Scots during her visit. Hitting out at the Chancellor, Mr Stewart said: 'On the week it was confirmed that Scottish energy bills will rise to pay for an English nuclear power plant, the Chancellor has some cheek to pass off old spending commitments as her own. 'Labour think Scotland should be grateful for receiving a share of money we pay to Westminster in taxes. 'Folk need real action on the cost of living under Labour – not reheated commitments that Westminster has already announced. 'Labour promised that everyone's energy bills would be cut by £300 when they came to power. That was a lie. 'Ms Reeves should apologise on behalf of her party for this lie during her trip to Scotland.'
The Herald Scotland
26 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Chancellor refuses comment on rape clause fairness
The two-child benefit cap, which came into effect in 2017, prevents households claiming child tax credit or universal credit from receiving support for a third or subsequent child born after 6 April that year. The so-called rape clause is the exemption within it for families in which the third child was conceived non-consensually. To claim that exemption, mothers must demonstrate eligibility by securing certification from approved third-party professionals such as health and social care practitioners. The Scottish Government has already announced it will put an end to the cap in March 2026 - weeks before the Holyrood election. The Chancellor of the Exchequer was quizzed on the policy during a visit to Rolls Royce in Inchinnan today. Asked by The Herald if she will do anything to tackle questions of fairness around the rape clause, the Chancellor said: 'We are going to be publishing the Child Poverty Strategy in the Autumn and so I'm not going to comment on what we might do in the budget later this year. 'Everyone can see that the financial position that we face is a challenging one with the trade uncertainty around the world, the higher costs of government borrowing.' READ MORE: Two-child benefit cap to end in Scotland from March 2026 The so-called rape clause is unworkable — here's the proof Pushed on whether or not she believed the policy was fair, Ms Reeves said: 'We will set out our policy around child poverty in the Autumn but we are already taking action. "Free school meals being rolled out to primary schools in England and Wales and then that feeding through to the Barnett Settlement in Scotland, the biggest settlement since devolution.' As part of a series in child poverty, The Herald heard from Children's charity Aberlour who warned that poverty levels will become unbearable if the cap is maintained. A recent study from University of Edinburgh's Dr Rebecca Hewer found health professionals tasked with approving the 'non-consensual conception' exemption lacked the training, clarity and confidence required. This has left survivors having to navigate a potentially traumatising and inconsistent system with little support, the report finds. The report concluded that the rape clause is unworkable and calls for its urgent repeal.
