Retirees face $9,000 tax hit due to overlooked superannuation move: ‘Big missing piece'
Hundreds of thousands of Aussie retirees could be paying more tax than they should be because they haven't made one superannuation move. When you reach retirement age, you can transfer your superannuation from the 'accumulation phase' to the 'retirement phase'.
New research from the Super Members Council found around 700,000 Aussies aged over 65 who were not working full-time still had super in an accumulation account. The accumulation phase is when you are building up your super and comes with a 15 per cent tax on your earnings.
That's compared to the retirement or pension phase, where retirees can draw an income from their super fund or withdraw their funds as a lump sum. When you transfer super into a retirement phase account, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) notes that investment earnings are not taxed.
RELATED
Surprising superannuation amount needed for Aussies to retire revealed: 'Closer than they think'
Rare $2 coloured coins worth up to $500: 'Go the distance'
Major superannuation change for Aussies as $4.1 trillion industry comes under scrutiny
By sticking with an accumulation account, the research found retirees could be paying an extra $650 in taxes each year. For someone with an average retirement balance of $200,000 in an accumulation account, this could add up to an extra $9,000 in super taxes over their retirement.
While some people may be strategically holding back on moving their funds, the super advocacy group found many people weren't acting because they didn't know what to do or they were simply disengaged with their super.Super Members CEO Misha Schubert said financial advice reforms would be crucial to helping retirees access quality financial advice at an affordable cost, with many retirees not receiving basic advice to switch their super to the retirement phase.
'Not knowing enough about super can lead to poor decisions, like leaving accounts inactive or withdrawing funds without proper planning,' Schubert said.
"Making simple information and advice available to more Australians is a big missing piece of the retirement puzzle. The coming financial advice reforms will help make advice more affordable."
In December, the federal government announced reforms to help ensure Aussies can access quality and affordable financial advice through their super fund.
The laws will be changed to create a new category of financial adviser to give safe and simple advice to more Australians, such as choosing an insurance policy or basic questions about retirement.
Other changes include allowing super funds to provide helpful 'nudges' to consumers at stages of their life when they may need more advice, such as retirement.
ASFA research found one in two Aussies had never accessed advice on preparing for retirement.
The government has also announced plans to introduce mandatory service standards for super funds, as super funds come under scrutiny for the slow payment death and disability payments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Aussie billionaires slam $3 million superannuation tax change: 'Fundamentally abhorrent'
Australian billionaires have hit back at the government's $3 million superannuation tax change, with the country's richest woman warning it could force the rich to move their assets out of the country. Wealthy Aussies have already begun 'panic' selling to avoid the change due to come into effect from July 1. The superannuation tax change will double the existing tax rate from 15 to 30 per cent on earnings on super balances above $3 million, including unrealised capital gains. The government estimates the changes will only impact 80,000 people, or 0.5 per cent of the population, but some in this small minority aren't happy about it. Gina Rinehart, the mining magnate worth $38.1 billion, said the new tax could be seen as a positive in 'some circles' but warned taxing unrealised wealth had led the rich to abandon assets in other countries. RELATED $3 million superannuation tax change sparks property warning as 'panic' selling begins $1,831 Centrelink payment change coming within weeks: 'You'll get more' Australia's most in-demand jobs revealed with $125,000 salaries up for grabs: 'Short supply' 'Will the money stay in their super fund to be so extra taxed? Similar tax schemes in Norway and France led to billions in capital fleeing those economies,' Rinehart told The Australian Financial Review. 'This doesn't seem a very well-thought-out scheme, to get more tax revenue, to me.' Jack Cowin, the fast-food mogul behind Hungry Jack's and majority shareholder of Domino's Pizza, worth $4.7 billion, said he was worried the tax could extend beyond superannuation. 'The biggest danger for a high-spending government is the threat that this practice gets extended on to other investments and could even include housing, in search of funding,' he told the publication. One of the controversial aspects of the tax change is that it would apply to unrealised capital gains. This refers to the growth in the value of an asset or investment that investors have but haven't cashed in yet, so it is a paper gain. Nick Wakim, the Phoenix Lithium founder worth $1.2 billion, labelled taxing unrealised gains as 'fundamentally abhorrent', while Sam Beck, the managing director of Beck Property Group, called it 'ludicrous'. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has stood by the tax, which was first announced by the government at the beginning of 2023. Speaking on a podcast with Michelle Grattan this week, Chalmers said it was a 'modest change' and said it would help fund priorities, including Medicare and tax cuts. He said the inclusion of unreleased gains was 'the best, simplest way to go about it', according to Treasury advice. Chalmers said it was incorrect to assume the $3 million threshold wouldn't ever change, with some calling for it to be indexed so it doesn't capture more and more taxpayers over time. 'I understand the argument. There are so many instances in the tax system where thresholds aren't indexed, and from time to time governments take decisions to raise those thresholds," he said. "I'm anticipating that that is what would happen here." It comes as Gina Rinehart tops the AFR Rich List for the sixth year in a row, despite a 6 per cent drop in her fortune due to lower iron ore prices. Australia now has 161 billionaires, up from 150 in 2024. The country's wealthiest 10 people control $202 billion among them, dropping 9.2 per cent from $222 billion last year. Here are the top 10 richest people: Gina Rinehart $38.1 billion Harry Triguboff $29.7 billion Anthony Pratt and family $25.9 billion Scott Farquhar $21.4 billion Clive Palmer $20.1 billion Melanie Perkins and Cliff Obrecht $14.1 billion Michael Dorrell $13.9 billion Ivan Glasenberg $13.3 billion Nicola Forrest $12.8 billion Kerry Stokes $12.7 billionErreur lors de la récupération des données Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille Erreur lors de la récupération des données
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Millionaire's major superannuation warning for young Aussies: 'Should be worried'
Mark Bouris has sounded another alarm for young Australians about their superannuation. The financial expert previously cautioned that people in their early 20s today will likely have to work well into their 70s or even 80s because they won't be able to squirrel enough away to retire. But now the Yellow Brick Road executive chairman has warned this issue will only be made worse by Labor's plan to tax super balances over $3 million. Bouris said those entering the workforce now will get a rude shock when they get into their 60s. "Every young person in the country should be worried about this," he said on his podcast. Mark Bouris issues blunt retirement message for young Australians Centrelink cash boost coming from July 1 for millions of Aussies Aussie teen's job paying $300 per hour without a uni degree The government wants to double the existing tax rate from 15 to 30 per cent on earnings on super balances above $3 million, including unrealised capital gains. Balances up to $3 million would be taxed at 15 per cent, and anything over that would get hit with the new 30 per cent rate. Labor believes this will only affect around 80,000 people today and is designed to target the ultra-wealthy. According to the ATO, the average person with more than $3 million in superannuation right now is earning roughly $381,000 per year. Deloitte figures from June last year showed the average super balances for Aussies aged 60 to 64 was $401,600 for men and $300,300 for of the biggest criticisms of the proposal is that, at the moment, the $3 million benchmark won't be indexed. Treasurer Jim Chalmers indicated it could be indexed in the future, but many are worried about what will happen if it doesn't. "Every old person in the country has experienced building their superannuation up with only 15 per cent tax rate from day one for the last 30 to 40 years," Bouris said. "All of us had this fantastic low-tax situation with the money we earn for super fund. "Young people who accumulate more than $3 million worth of assets, they will not have the same benefits that everyone else has had since [Paul] Keating introduced this legislation." Former Prime Minister Keating reportedly fears Labor's proposal could "damage confidence" in the near $4 trillion nest egg system he created. Having $3 million in your super account might seem like a pipe dream for many young Australians right now. But that could soon be the norm in the next few decades. AMP Capital deputy chief economist Diana Mousina discovered that at least half of Gen Z workers would hit that mark by the time they neared retirement in about 40 years due to wage inflation and compound interest. 'An average 22-year-old today earning average wages for the rest of their life will breach the $3 million limit unless the government indexes the threshold," she said. 'This is also not taking into account any additional contributions into super and forward estimates for returns are also conservative.' Bouris fears the plan could put more pressure on government services because people aren't able to retire due to their balances being taxed at a much higher level. While some of Australia's billionaires have hit out at the proposal, policy thinktanks have backed it. Australian Institute economist Greg Jericho disputed Mousina's figures and came up with a different result. He suggested an 18-year-old who got a job today at the average full-time wage of $106,277 per year, who received a 3.7 per cent wage rise every single year for their life, without a single break in their working life until they hit 67, would end up with roughly $2.1 million in their super account. "The fear about not indexing the $3 million threshold is just a scare campaign designed to make people think they will be hit, even though they are only 30 years old now, because maybe they might one day have that much super," he said. The Grattan Institute, meanwhile, said the plan "should be just the first step to reining in excessively generous tax breaks" in the superannuation system. It echoed Jericho in saying fears that millions of young Aussies could be affected "are simply nonsense". "Rather than being the biggest losers from the lack of indexation, younger Australians are the biggest beneficiaries," it said. "It means more older, wealthier Australians will in time shoulder some of the burden of budget repair and an ageing population that younger generations will otherwise bear alone." Mintwell financial adviser Josef Jindra told Yahoo Finance the "vast majority" of people won't be affected by the plan and there's "no cause for alarm" at the moment. But he admitted that would change over the years, and it's worth getting ready for that eventuality. 'It's about being proactive and exploring ways to manage their retirement savings effectively,' he said. 'This may include planning withdrawal strategies to stay below the threshold, diversifying investment holdings outside of superannuation to enhance flexibility, and reducing exposure to the higher tax rate. 'Estate planning has also become increasingly important to ensure assets are structured in a tax-effective way for future beneficiaries. "For some clients—particularly those seeking greater control—we're also considering Self-Managed Super Funds (SMSFs) and the strategic opportunities they present.'Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Powerful' superannuation trick to save $150,000 in tax: 'Don't know until it's too late'
If you inherit your parents' superannuation fund, there's a good chance you'll lose a big chunk of it to the ATO in tax. In some cases, this tax can be up to 30 per cent of their hard-earned retirement savings, which can have a big impact on how much is left over for your family. This is a tax that most people don't understand, or even know exists, until it's too late. The rules are a little technical and complicated, but this tax is completely avoidable if you get the right strategies in place early. If you're a parent wanting to leave money to your family, or someone likely to receive an inheritance that doesn't want to donate more to the ATO unnecessarily, the super inheritance tax rules are something you should be aware of. $1 million superannuation retirement myth busted Major RBA interest rate call set to give homeowners $250 per month win $400 cash boost available for thousands of Aussies in new energy rebate In Australia, super inheritance payments don't automatically pass to your family tax-free. There's often a hidden tax that's applied when your super money is passed down to a 'non-dependent', which includes most adult children. Under the laws that apply to super death benefit payments, a 'dependent' includes your spouse or partner, children under the age of 18, or someone who is financially dependent on you. The good news here is that a dependent can inherit super tax-free. Non-dependents include adult children, parents, siblings, or anyone else who isn't financially dependent on you. This is where the super death benefits tax of up to 30 per cent kicks in, and when the ATO will come knocking for their slice of your gets a little complicated, but essentially your super fund is made up of different 'components' based on how the money has come into your super fund. These components are referred to as 'taxable (untaxed)', 'taxable (taxed)', and 'tax-free', and each different component is treated slightly differently when it comes to super death benefits tax: Taxable (untaxed) is taxed at 30 per cent when paid to a non-dependent Taxable (taxed) is taxed at a rate of 15 per cent when paid to a non-dependent Tax-free is able to be received tax free, even by non-dependents The biggest component of most people's super funds is the 'taxable (taxed)' element, because this component is made up of any compulsory employer super contributions, salary sacrifice or tax deductible contributions, and all of the growth and earnings on these funds inside your super fund. This means if you inherit a $1 million super benefit, you're likely to pay tax of around $150,000 - money that could have stayed in your family. The good news here is that this tax can be significantly reduced, or eliminated altogether with a simple strategy. It's called the 'withdrawal and recontribution' strategy, and it's one of the most powerful (and underrated) strategies in Australian financial planning. This strategy will give some tax benefits to your parents while they're drawing an income from their super, but also goes a long way to cutting out the super death benefits tax. This strategy works once your parent is over the age of 60, and has met a condition of release (like retirement) they can withdraw part of all of their super, completely tax-free. To put this strategy into place, you withdraw super money and then put the same money back into your super fund as an after tax, 'non-concessional' contribution. When the non-concessional contribution goes back into your super fund, no tax applies on the way into the super fund - but more importantly, the money goes into the 'tax free' component of your super. This means that when the money is eventually inherited, no super death benefits tax applies. In this case it's essentially a simple swap. You take taxable money out of super, and put tax-free money back in. The key here is doing this while your parents are still around and while they're eligible to be making super contributions. It's worth noting that the rules around withdrawing and contributing to your super fund, as well as how much you can put in and when are complicated. If you're thinking about putting this strategy into place, it's crucial you get some quality advice from a professional. Over the next two decades, Australia is going to see the biggest intergenerational wealth transfer in our history, with billions of dollars moving from one generation to the next. Most of this money will be transferred via superannuation and property assets. Without the right strategies in place, a bigger piece of your inheritance pie will be taken up with tax. And while this is important at some level, if you want to maximise the wealth that's actually retained within your family, you don't want the tax to be any bigger than it needs to be. If your parents have super and they're planning on passing this on to adult children or other non-dependents, don't wait until it's too late to understand this tax and how to manage it. If you don't, you could be looking at a six-figure hit to your inheritance, and worse - knowing it could have all been avoided through some conversations and smart planning. Ben Nash is a finance expert commentator, podcaster, financial adviser and founder of Pivot Wealth. Ben's new book, Virgin Millionaire; the step-by-step guide to your first million and beyond is out now on Amazon | Audiobook. If you want some help with your money and investing, you can book a call with Pivot Wealth here. Disclaimer: The information contained in this article is general in nature and does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Therefore, you should consider whether the information is appropriate to your circumstances before acting on it, and where appropriate, seek professional advice from a finance in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data
