logo
New Ohio law eliminates some debt-related driver's license suspensions

New Ohio law eliminates some debt-related driver's license suspensions

Yahoo16-04-2025

Apr. 16—A new law now in effect eliminates some debt-related driver's license suspensions to make it easier for Ohioans to get back on the road legally.
Courts have until May 9 to notify the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles whether a suspension should be lifted due to House Bill 29, which Gov. Mike DeWine signed into law in January. It removes license suspensions for failure to pay a court fine or fee, without reinstatement fees.
According to the American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio, about one million drivers (just over 10%) have a suspended driver's license. Of those, about 60% are for reasons other than dangerous driving,
"House Bill 29 is smart, practical policy that will enable Ohioans to reinstate their licenses, drive to work, take their children to school and participate more fully in their communities," said Patrick Higgins, policy counsel for the ACLU of Ohio. "A person's ability to pay should not determine whether they are free to drive."
Clerk of Courts Marty Gehres of Dayton Municipal Court called the bill a "great first start" but cautioned: "What this bill doesn't do is release people of their obligation of their fine and court costs."
The BMV was tasked with sending tens of thousands of suspensions to court jurisdictions across the state.
Gehres and Rob Scott, clerk of courts for Kettering Municipal Court, both said their courts do not do forfeiture suspensions for people with unpaid fines and fees. Instead, they offer payment plans and have had amnesty programs and driver's license clinics to help people get back on the road legally.
"We're very flexible working with people, trying to work with them making them valid," Scott said.
The suspensions their offices reviewed were older, from cases in the 1990s and 2000s, they said.
"We had roughly about 500 license forfeitures for us to check," Gehres said.
Kettering court staff had a little over 200 to check on the list, Scott said.
Both clerks said they already have forwarded the information to the BMV.
Individuals will be notified by mail if the BMV removed a failure-to-pay suspension. If a person is eligible to reinstate their license, the letter will include information on what steps to take, said Lindsey Bohrer, assistant director of communications for the Ohio Department of Public Safety and BMV spokeswoman.
Those with questions about whether a suspension was lifted should contact the court where it was ordered.
People can view their reinstatement requirements online at any time, but until courts communicate which suspensions will be removed, the BMV will not be able to provide eligibility information in accordance with HB 29, Bohrer said.
Even if a debt-related suspension is lifted, there may be other roadblocks to getting reinstated.
"It's not a solution to every issue people are experiencing with license suspensions in Ohio," Gehres said.
For example, if someone whose license was suspended for a debt-related reason was pulled over while driving to work, to the doctor's office or taking children to school, the resulting citation for driving on a suspended license would still stand under the new law.
"We just want to do everything we can here to break that cycle," Scott said.
The new law says those whose licenses were suspended for not paying child support can file a motion with the court for limited driving privileges.
For the last three years, Montgomery County suspended more residents' licenses for failing to pay child support than any other county in Ohio.
The Montgomery County Department of Job and Family Services last year issued 1,961 of the state's 15,841 license suspensions for child support defaults, according to Ohio JFS data obtained by the Dayton Daily News. That's over 12% of the state's suspensions from a county that makes up 4.5% of the state's population.
In Ohio, county JFS agencies are responsible for collecting child support payments.
Those in default on their payments are able to present evidence that a suspension effectively prevents them from getting current. This new law, however, doesn't require JFS departments to act on that information.
Reba Chenoweth, public information officer for Montgomery County Human Services, previously told the Dayton Daily News that driver's license suspension is a discretionary remedy used as leverage to encourage compliance with a child support order for a parent who is not paying at least 50% of their support. Parents have multiple options, such as a short-term payment plan, making a payment of at least 50% of what was owed over the last three months or reporting new employment.
HB 29 also eliminates driver's license suspensions for some drug-abuse offenses and school truancy, and reduces the look-back period from five years to one year for those caught driving without insurance.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP Files Securities Class Action Against Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC (OTC: RBGLY)
Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP Files Securities Class Action Against Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC (OTC: RBGLY)

Business Wire

time25 minutes ago

  • Business Wire

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP Files Securities Class Action Against Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC (OTC: RBGLY)

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP ('Scott+Scott'), an international shareholder and consumer rights litigation firm, has filed a securities class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC ('Reckitt' or the 'Company') (OTC: RBGLY), and certain of its former and current officers and/or directors (collectively, 'Defendants'). The Class Action asserts claims under §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78j(b) and 78t(a)) and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder (17 C.F.R. §240.10b‑5) on behalf of all persons other than Defendants who purchased or otherwise acquired Reckitt American Depositary Shares ('ADSs') between January 13, 2021, and July 28, 2024, inclusive (the 'Class Period'), and were damaged thereby (the 'Class'). The Class Action filed by Scott+Scott is captioned: Elevator Constructors Union Local No. 1 Annuity & 401(K) Fund v. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-4708. Reckitt is a United Kingdom-based, global consumer goods company. To date, over 500 state and federal products liability lawsuits have been filed against Reckitt and its competitor, Abbott Laboratories ('Abbott'), claiming that they failed to adequately warn that premature infants consuming cow milk-based formulas, such as Reckitt's Enfamil and Abbott's Similac, have an increased risk of developing necrotizing enterocolitis ('NEC'), a life-threatening intestinal disease that affects premature or low birth weight infants. The Class Action alleges that, during the Class Period, Defendants made misleading statements and omissions regarding the Company's business, financial condition, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to warn investors and consumers: (1) that preterm infants were at an increased risk of developing NEC by consuming Reckitt's cow's milk-based formula, Enfamil; (2) of the attendant impact on Reckitt's sales of Enfamil and Reckitt's exposure to legal claims; and (3) as a result of the above, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. The market began to learn the truth on March 15, 2024, when, in the case captioned Watson vs. Mead Johnson Co., Case No. 21-L-1032 (Ill. Cir. Ct. Oct. 28, 2021), a jury in St. Clair County, Illinois, returned a $60 million verdict in the first NEC lawsuit to be tried to a verdict. The jury found that Mead Johnson was negligent and failed to warn the decedent's mother of the increased risk her preterm infant could develop NEC by consuming cow's milk-based formula. On this news, the price of the Company's ADSs fell $1.87, or nearly 14%, from a closing price of $13.31 per share on March 14, 2024, to a closing price of $11.44 per share on March 15, 2024. Then, on July 29, 2024, the market continued to learn the truth when, in the case captioned Gill v. Abbot Laboratories, Inc., Case No. 2322-CC1251 (Mo. Circ. Ct. Jun. 23, 2023), a jury in St. Louis, Missouri, concluded that Abbott's specialized formula for premature babies led to a baby developing NEC and awarded the plaintiff $495 million. On this news, the price of the Company's ADSs fell $1.02, or nearly 9%, from a closing price of $11.66 per share on July 28, 2024, to a closing price of $10.64 per share on July 29, 2024. LEAD PLAINTIFF DEADLINE ON AUGUST 4, 2025 If you purchased Reckitt ADSs during the Class Period and were damaged thereby, you are a member of the 'Class' and may be able to seek appointment as lead plaintiff. If you wish to apply to be lead plaintiff, a motion on your behalf must be filed with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York no later than August 4, 2025. The lead plaintiff is a court-appointed representative for absent class members of the Class. You do not need to seek appointment as lead plaintiff to share in any Class recovery in the Class Action. If you are a Class member and there is a recovery for the Class, you can share in that recovery as an absent Class member. If you wish to apply to be lead plaintiff, please contact attorney Nicholas Bruno at (888) 398-9312 or at nbruno@ What Can You Do? You may contact an attorney to discuss your rights regarding the appointment of lead plaintiff or your interest in the Class Action. You may retain counsel of your choice to represent you in the Class Action. About Scott+Scott Scott+Scott is an international law firm known for its expertise in representing corporate clients, institutional investors, businesses, and individuals harmed by anticompetitive conduct or other forms of wrongdoing, including securities law and shareholder violations. With more than 100 attorneys in eight offices in the United States, as well as three offices in Europe, our advocacy has resulted in significant monetary settlements on behalf of our clients, along with other forms of relief. Our highly experienced attorneys have been recognized for being among the top financial lawyers in 2024 by Lawdragon, WWL: Commercial Litigation 2024, and Legal 500 in Antitrust Civil Litigation, and have received top Chambers 2024 rankings. In addition, we have been repeatedly recognized by the American Antitrust Institute for the successful litigation of high-stakes anticompetitive claims in the United States. To learn more about Scott+Scott, our attorneys, or complex case resolution, please visit This may be considered Attorney Advertising.

Ohio House Minority Leader Allison Russo stepping down from leadership role at the end of June
Ohio House Minority Leader Allison Russo stepping down from leadership role at the end of June

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ohio House Minority Leader Allison Russo stepping down from leadership role at the end of June

Ohio House Minority Leader Allison Russo. (Photo by Nick Evans, Ohio Capital Journal.) Ohio House Minority Leader Allison Russo, D-Upper Arlington, is stepping down from her leadership role at the end of the month. Russo has served as minority leader since January 2022 and she will continue to serve as state representative until her term ends on Dec. 31, 2026. She made the announcement to her caucus Thursday morning. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX 'Serving as the Ohio House Minority leader for the last three and a half years has been an incredible honor,' she said in a statement. 'It has been one of the most challenging yet rewarding positions I've had the privilege to hold.' Russo was first elected as state representative in November 2018, flipping a previously held Republican seat. She worked in health policy for more than 20 years before entering politics. Russo ran for Congress in 2021, but lost to U.S. Rep. Mike Carey 58% to 42%. 'Every strong leader knows the importance of a thoughtful transition,' she said in a statement. 'At the beginning of this session, I communicated to members that I wanted to remain in leadership through the important state operating budget negotiations.' Heading into the legislative summer break and the rest of the General Assembly session, however, she said it 'is important that I give the next leadership team ample time to thoughtfully and carefully plan how to navigate our caucus priorities after this budget cycle and to continue building our effort to pick up more seats for Democrats in the Ohio House in 2026.' Russo also said she wants to focus on her family, policy work and serving her district. 'My son just graduated high school, and I look forward to spending the summer with him and my family preparing to send him off to college,' said Russo, who has three children. 'Any decisions regarding my political future, will come at a later time.' Russo is term-limited in the House and has been tight-lipped about her future plans. During her time as minority leader, Russo has been forced to navigate a Republican supermajority. 'Over the last few years, my colleagues and I have stood strong in the face of attacks on our most basic rights and values, and despite tough odds we were successful in standing up for all Ohioans,' Russo said. Ohio Democrats secured a couple of major victories in 2023 — voting down an effort that would have made it harder to pass constitutional amendments, and voting to enshrine abortion and reproductive rights in the state's constitution. Russo's announcement comes the same month Ohio Democratic Party Chair Liz Walters announced her plan to step down. So far, Dr. Amy Acton is the only Democratic candidate who has announced they are running for governor in 2026. Republican Vivek Ramaswamy is running for governor and Ohio Lieutenant Governor Jim Tressel is considering running. Ohio Supreme Court Judge Jennifer Brunner is the only Democrat in statewide office in Ohio. Follow Capital Journal Reporter Megan Henry on Bluesky. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

DOGE revokes $23 million grant intended to help Ohioans without internet access
DOGE revokes $23 million grant intended to help Ohioans without internet access

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

DOGE revokes $23 million grant intended to help Ohioans without internet access

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Despite ongoing efforts from state leaders, approximately one million Ohioans lack access to high-speed internet. DOGE canceled $23 million intended to help them. In November 2024, Ohio was awarded a $23,291,992 federal grant to increase digital equity. None of the funds had been paid to the state when DOGE canceled the grant on May 9. According to a federal announcement — which is no longer publicly available on federal websites — Ohio intended to use the funds to create a statewide device internship, offer digital skills education for incarcerated Ohioans, and create a Digital Inclusion Grant Program. Department of Development spokesperson Mason Waldvogel said Ohio was no longer moving forward with these programs as a result of the grant cancellation, although BroadbandOhio will continue to expand access through other programs. The funds were allocated under former President Joe Biden but had not yet been paid, so there were plans for the money, but the state does not have to pay anything back to the government. A rare COVID-19 strain disappeared overnight. We still don't know which Ohioan had it Broadband refers to high-speed internet, or the ability to access the internet without interruptions or outages. In Ohio, high-speed internet access is defined as 100 mbps download and 20 mbps upload speed. That speed covers a household of two to four people using the internet casually, or one to two people if they use the internet for streaming, telehealth or work from home. According to state data, one in five Ohioans reported they do not believe they have sufficient device access to meet household needs. BroadbandOhio said this is largely due to a lack of availability or barriers in digital literacy and affordability. The state agency said some parts of Ohio have little or no access due to a lack of digital infrastructure, and the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for adequate connectivity. In Franklin County, 26% of households are considered digitally underserved by the state. This only increases in rural areas; for example, 59% of Licking County households qualify as underserved. The state grants were going to give special emphasis – but not exclusive access – to low-income households, elderly people, veterans, people with disabilities, people with language barriers, racial and ethnic minorities, rural residents and justice-involved people. The National Digital Inclusion Alliance found 77.8% of Ohioans would have qualified under at least one of those groups. How much Columbus home prices have risen since 2019 Ohio had already accepted grant applications by the time the Department of Commerce alerted the state it no longer had the funding, and had hoped to get federal approval for select organizations by mid-June. Broadband equity has been a priority for Gov. Mike DeWine, who said high-speed internet has become a 'critical necessity' rather than a luxury, used from schooling to healthcare. However, DeWine's office declined to comment on the grant cancellation. Sen. Jon Husted worked to expand broadband during his time as lieutenant governor, but his office also did not have comment on this grant. See previous coverage of Husted's broadband advocacy in the video player above. The funds had been part of the Digital Equity Act, which passed in 2021 with bipartisan support. The act was cosponsored by then-Ohio Sen. Rob Portman, a Republican who initially backed Trump's claim that he won the 2020 election and voted against impeaching the former president in 2021. Portman's office said he could not comment on the grant cancellation at this time. Although funding was canceled in May, President Donald Trump publicly spoke against the act in March. Trump took to Truth Social and announced his intention to end the Digital Equity Act, calling it 'RACIST' and an 'ILLEGAL $2.5 BILLION DOLLAR giveaway,' although the total funding was $2.75 billion. Ohio lawmakers call for 2026 ballot measure to overturn same-sex marriage ban Before receiving the federal funding, Ohio had a pilot program for the grants. Through these grants, rural Ohioans gained access to tech support, Columbus residents could purchase donated and refurbished quality devices at lower costs, and seniors received tech help. Despite having $23 million fewer dollars to support efforts, Waldvogel said Ohio still intends to improve digital access. 'BroadbandOhio remains fully committed to its mission of expanding access to high-speed internet across Ohio — and our work to close the digital divide continues through other initiatives and partnerships aimed at connecting unserved and underserved communities,' Waldvogel said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store