New bag rule set to come for anyone flying to Spain, Portugal or Greece
The European Union is planning a change in the rules on carry-on bags on flights, which would cover planes flying between the UK and countries including Spain, Portugal, Greece, France and Italy. At the minute, some airlines charge passengers for each item they want to take aboard.
Different airlines have different rules - meaning the size of the bag you can take aboard and how much it will cost you - is different each time. The new EU rule would set a specific size of bag you would be allowed to take on flights operated by companies like easyJet, Ryanair and Wizz Air.
And the rule would stipulate that the take-on bag would be free, the airline would not be able to charge you extra to take a bag aboard the plane.
The rule would change the confusion that see people being charged extra when they get to the airport for bags deemed too big, or too heavy. And people being charged for a bag by one airline but allowed to take it without additional fees by another.
EU transport ministers this week proposed standardised sizing for free underseat baggage on EU airlines. It will become law if it is accepted by the European Parliament. The new rule would mean passengers are guaranteed one free personal item, measuring up to 40x30x15cm (including wheels and handles) - or which could reasonably fit under a plane seat.
The rules would apply to EU-based airlines, including when they are carrying passengers from a non-EU country like the UK to an EU country and vice-versa.
11 years ago, an EU court ruled that hand baggage should not be subject to an additional fee so long as it is a reasonable size. But the ruling did not define 'reasonable'.
Currently, Ryanair allows a free carry-on bag of 40x20x25cm, while easyJet's rules for a free bag are 45x36x20 cm, including wheels and handles. The new rule would cover under-seat bags, but does not currently mention bags you put in overhead lockers.
In November, five airlines in Spain were fined £150million for 'abusive practices', including charging for hand luggage. Spain's Consumer Rights Ministry said it planned to ban charging extra for carry-on luggage.
Ryanair told the BBC it fully complied with EU law. A spokesman said: "If airlines were forced to include additional carry-on bags as part of the basic fare, it would reduce choice and drive up air fares for all passengers, which would harm consumers."
Industry group Airlines For Europe said charging different amounts depending on baggage "allows passengers to choose the exact services that best suits their needs".
Travel consumer expert Jane Hawkes, told the BBC: "A one-size-fits-all kind of approach would make it a lot simpler for passengers."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
17 minutes ago
- Times
Radical legal case could let players terminate their own contracts for free
New legal action that could lead to law changes allowing players to terminate their contracts with clubs without paying huge compensation has been launched across Europe. A class action by a group called Justice For Players is seeking compensation potentially totalling billions of pounds for alleged loss of income due to restrictive transfer rules. The action has been launched against Fifa and the FAs of France, Germany, Belgium, Denmark and the Netherlands. But the Dutch-based group said any of the estimated 100,000 male or female players who have played for a club in the EU or the UK since 2002 are eligible to join the claim. The English FA is not facing a legal claim at present but has been sent a copy of the legal action by the group. It follows a Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) ruling in October 2024 in a case brought by the former Chelsea, Arsenal and Real Madrid midfielder Lassana Diarra, who was ordered to pay €10million (£8.7million) by Fifa for leaving the Russian club Lokomotiv Moscow one year into a four-year deal. The CJEU said some of Fifa's rules on player transfers went against EU laws and freedom of movement principles, which led to Fifa adopting an 'interim framework' on transfer rules while it looked at the legal implications of the ruling. Under Fifa's rules, players have in effect been prevented from leaving their clubs unilaterally in the middle of their contract and agreeing a free transfer elsewhere due to the threat of being forced to pay huge compensation. The CJEU ruling means any transfer fee paid for the player cannot form part of the compensation, and the new legal action claims that people in any other profession are allowed to leave their jobs in the middle of a contract. The argument in favour of the existing transfer system is that it benefits smaller clubs who earn income from selling players, and that complete freedom of movement would lead to the richest clubs paying enormous salaries to sign the best players without compensating the clubs who developed them. Franco Baldini, the England assistant manager under Fabio Capello, is one of the board members of Justice For Players. He said: 'As a former professional footballer, agent and someone who has worked in football in various managerial capacities, I have had first-hand experience of how much control and power Fifa has over the players. 'So I am very proud to be part of Justice For Players and to be part of something that could help change the existing system and make football more inclusive and more sustainable.' Justice For Players said it would be advised by the law firm Dupont-Hissel, founded by Jean-Louis Dupont, the Belgian lawyer who won the Bosman ruling in 1995 that cleared the way for players in the EU to move to other clubs at the end of contracts without a transfer fee being paid. The players' union Fifpro Europe said the action was an 'anticipated practical response to the CJEU's Diarra judgment, effectively centralising advocacy for affected players' interests that have broad implications for the football industry'. Justice For Players said its consultancy firm Compass Lexecon had estimated that damages could run into billions of euros.
Reuters
17 minutes ago
- Reuters
German minister: EU must become stronger in Trump tariff talks
WASHINGTON, Aug 4 (Reuters) - German Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil said the European Union had been too weak during trade negotiations with the United States and it should become stronger, as much still needed to be clarified on the deal the two sides struck last month. "Overall, as Europeans, we must become stronger," Klingbeil said in Washington ahead of a meeting with U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. "Then we can also stand up to the U.S. with more self-confidence. Not against the U.S., but in dialogue with the U.S." Klingbeil said there needed to be a quick solution to the trade conflict with the U.S. as companies needed planning certainty. "Even though I am not the one negotiating today — that is the task of the European Commission — a close line of communication between me and Scott Bessent can help clarify things," he said, emphasizing the importance of the Transatlantic relationship. Apart from tariffs, Klingbeil and Bessent will discuss how to deal with cheap Chinese goods that are flooding the markets in both the U.S. and Europe, as well as the G20 presidency that the U.S. will take at the end of the year. "I believe it is important that we, from the German side, keep sending a clear signal: We want to work closely with the American government, we seek dialogue, we do not shy away from difficult topics and are looking at how we can solve problems together," Klingbeil said. The EU's trade deal with Trump in July was greeted with a mix of relief and anger, with tariffs set at 15% for most products but negotiations continuing for certain sectors, including steel and aluminium, which carry tariffs of 50%. Klingbeil would advocate for a quota system on steel exports to be included in the trade deal, he told reporters.
The National
42 minutes ago
- The National
Inverness Airport-bound EasyJet flight forced to U-turn amid Storm Floris
Flight EZY621 was due to arrive at Inverness Airport at around 11.25am on Monday morning after it took off from London Luton at about at 9.55am. However, easyJet confirmed the flight could not land at Inverness Airport due to severe weather conditions and was forced to turn back. The airline said the flight's passengers have been provided options to rebook their flight or receive a refund, with customers having hotel accommodation and meals provided for those who require them. READ MORE: Scottish ministers overrule advice and green-light hotel development in national park It comes after a yellow weather warning for strong winds was issued for the whole of the country for Monday – which is due to last until 6am on Tuesday. Central and northern Scotland are also covered by a more serious amber warning from 10am to 10pm on Monday, with gusts of 50 to 70 mph expected for many parts of the country and some regions facing winds up to 90 mph. An easyJet spokesperson said the safety and well-being of their customers and crew is their highest priority and have apologised for the flight having to turn back. They said: 'Due to strong winds at Inverness today, EZY621 from London Luton to Inverness this morning was unable to operate. 'We are doing all we can to minimise the impact of the weather for our customers, providing options to rebooking or a refund, as well as hotel accommodation and meals for those who require them. 'The safety and wellbeing of our customers and crew is our highest priority and while this was outside of our control, we are sorry for the inconvenience caused by the weather.'
