Reading Truck customizes service vehicle for Reading Fire Department
The Reading Fire Department added a newly customized mechanics vehicle to its fleet thanks to a city company.
Reading Truck, 825 E. Wyomissing Blvd., a leading manufacturer and distributor of work-truck bodies, custom built an aluminum service body for a 2022 Ford F-350 truck owned by the fire department.
The labor and materials for the customization valued at about $30,580 were provided at no cost to the city.
This represents a significant cost savings for the department and enhances the efficiency of fire apparatus maintenance, the city said in a release.
'As far as the estimated value, I'm waiting for a number from Reading Truck,' Stoudt said.
Mayor Eddie Moran said the partnership with Reading Truck demonstrates the power of local businesses giving back to their community.
'Their generosity provides a direct benefit to our fire department and ultimately to the residents of Reading,' Moran said.
The new mechanics vehicle donated to the city by Reading Truck. (Courtesy of Reading)
The mayor thanked Deputy Chief Mike Glore and Josiah Fegley, the department's mechanic and emergency vehicle technician, who collaborated closely with the company to make sure the vehicle satisfied the department's particular operational requirements.
The new service truck will be used to transport tools, equipment and parts needed to perform repairs and maintenance on other vehicles. It will allow for improved on-site maintenance and repair capabilities, ensuring the department's fleet remains in top condition to serve the community, the city said.
Nate Goodnow, president and COO of Reading Truck, emphasized the company's appreciation for first responders and noted this was an extraordinary project.
The new mechanics vehicle donated to the city by Reading Truck. (Courtesy of Reading)
'As a national manufacturer and distributor of work truck bodies and equipment, as well as a proud member of the Reading community, we welcomed the opportunity to support our hometown fire department in a meaningful way,' Goodnow said. 'It will be an honor to see the Reading tailgate proudly displayed on the back of the Reading Fire Department vehicle.'
The generous and unique contribution reinforces the strong relationship between local businesses and public safety services, the mayor said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
10 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Motormouth: Break-in period?
Q: I recently purchased a new PHEV, which provided instructions regarding the 1,000-mile break-in period. This has been my experience for many, if not all, cars purchased over the years. I intend to comply. However, I'm curious as to exactly what is happening to the engine during the break-in period. Also, is there any break-in required for the motor and battery? R.R., Lisle, Illinois A: There's probably nothing in the owner's manual about an engine break-in, yet I believe it is worthwhile. Having owned several motorcycles, I have learned the drill. Here are the steps: 1. Avoid constant engine speed for long periods. Vary the engine speed between 2,000 and 4,000 RPMs. 2. Avoid hard, jackrabbit starts. Accelerate gently. 3. Start the engine but don't let the engine idle longer than 3-4 minutes at a time. 4. Check the oil level. New engines may use a bit more than broken-in engines. During break-in, the moving parts get friendly with the other stuff. Electric motors on the other hand, need no break-in. Q: I have a 2023 Ford F-150 Ecoboost. I "accelerate" at times (why waste 400hp?). Friends have suggested that I change my oil every 500 miles instead of factory recommendations. They say that my driving habits cause it to run a little hot. I love the performance, but do want to protect the engine. S.G., Antioch, Illinois A: Do your friends work for an oil company? Your engine will run at the same temperature (about 200 degrees Fahrenheit) whether you are cruising or mashing on the gas. Your oil company friends should be pleased with your frivolous use of fuel. Q: I'm the original owner of a 2011 Kia Sorento EX with a 3.5-liter V-6 engine and 133,000 miles on the odometer. I have maintained the car to the best of my ability and have for years changed the oil myself every 2,500 to 3,500 miles, and still do, even at the age of 94. In the past six months or so, I have noticed a slight metallic "chi, chi, chi" staccato rattle sound coming from the engine, which I suspect to be the timing chain or valve lifters. I'm concerned the chain will break and cause complete failure of the engine. There have been no dash warning signals of any kind. In one of your columns, you said the chain should last the life of the car, but I'm not sure what that might be. Your expert opinion please. J.G., Huntley, Illinois A: There are two possibilities. Chances are you don't need a timing chain although the chain is a component in the camshaft operation. The variable cam timing system actuators may be the first problem. The second culprit may be the fuel pump. Unlike most vehicles today that have electric fuel pumps in the gas tank, Kia has a mechanical pump driven by the camshaft that is easily replaced. Q: Took my 2024 Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid in for first service at 5,000 miles (as reminded repeatedly and irritatingly via text). Expected an oil change. Instead, I was told "only a tire rotation now." Oil changes will happen every 10,000 miles but tire rotations are required every 5,000 per dealer and "Toyota recommendations." Overkill? T.S., McHenry, Illinois A: Your question harkens back to one I got a couple weeks ago. Tires, fresh from the factory, do not last as long as replacement tires. Additionally, the weight of hybrids and electrics is hard on the tires. Your dealer may be trying to make them last as long as possible. You may choose to ignore the overkill, but tire demise may occur prematurely. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Miami Herald
18 hours ago
- Miami Herald
3 Things That Prove Car Buyers Don't Want EVs to Be Weird
The first mass-market electric vehicle (EV) was the Nissan LEAF, introduced in 2010, and it seems Nissan's goal was to separate the LEAF from gas-powered models by looking strange. The solid proboscis front fascia, the amorphous headlights that crept up to the A-pillars, the odd round rear haunches, and the protruding butt all made for an almost alien-like craft. And that was just the exterior. For more than a decade, automakers have tried to make electric vehicles stand out by making them… well, weird. Early EVs often looked and felt like they were from another planet. It was all part of a strategy: If you're going to drive the car of the future, shouldn't it look futuristic? But a funny thing happened on the way to mass EV adoption: car buyers balked. Turns out, most people don't want to drive a pod on wheels or relearn how to operate a vehicle just because it's electric. What consumers really want are EVs that fit seamlessly into their lives, not ones that scream, "I'm different!" Here are three things that prove car buyers want EVs to be familiar, rather than looking like weird rolling spacecraft. In the early EV days, standing out was the name of the game. It wasn't just the LEAF that worked too hard to be noticed. The BMW i3 was easily the brand's least fetching model with some of the worst bodywork we've ever laid eyes on. Sure, it looked like nothing else on the road, but that's not always a good thing. The original Toyota Prius-while not an EV but a hybrid pioneer-looked like Paul Bunyan was insulted by its environmental efforts and stepped on the nose of a once normal-looking subcompact sedan. But as more buyers entered the EV market, especially mainstream consumers who weren't early adopters or tech nerds, it became clear that outlandish designs were a turnoff. Today, many of the best-selling EVs are the ones that look like regular cars. They prove you can ditch the gas without ditching good taste. Take the Ford F-150 Lightning, for example. It looks nearly identical to the gas-powered F-150, the best-selling vehicle in America for decades. The typical bystander can't distinguish between the two, and that's no accident. Ford specifically chose to preserve the familiar shape and utility of the truck because it knows its customers don't want to drive a spaceship; they want to haul lumber, go camping, and tow boats, just like a gas truck owner. The Hyundai Ioniq 6 may look sleek and futuristic, but the Ioniq 5 and Kia EV6-both of which sell well-strike a balance between distinctive and practical, without being too radical. Even Tesla, a brand known for innovation, has stuck with relatively minimalist, subdued exterior styling on its most successful models, the Model 3 and Model Y. They're clean and modern, yes, but not weird. Okay, so there's the Cybertruck, but we all know how that's going. Then there's the 3rd-generation Nissan LEAF, a conventional-looking modern crossover that shed all of its old weirdness. If that's not enough proof, consider the new crop of EVs: the Honda Prologue, the restyled Toyota bZ, the Chevy Blazer EV, the Hummer EV, and the Hyundai Ioniq 5. These are EVs meant to look like real cars, and that's the hot trend now. If you think that some of the cabins in EVs were annoying and strange, you're not alone. One of the more frustrating trends in early EVs was the push to reinvent the wheel-literally and figuratively-when it came to controls. Carmakers, perhaps trying to emphasize that EVs were different, often went overboard with gimmicky interfaces. The first Nissan LEAF's bizarre interior looked like it came out of a '90s B sci-fi flick with its doughy white steering wheel and the orb-like shifter. It's the kind of stuff that makes the ovular 1996 Ford Taurus cabin look conventional. It also seems that numerous EV manufacturers thought their vehicles should have a tablet-sized center screen that controlled everything from the radio to the air vents. How about when Tesla eliminated stalks and buttons altogether in favor of a touch-and-swipe interface? For a while, EV cabins felt more like iPads on wheels than traditional cars. The result for drivers was often frustration with the unfamiliarity and the steep learning curve. Minimalism isn't always a good thing, tantamount to eyeglass frames that clamp on the nose with no temples to grab. Even Tesla's controversial decision to remove traditional turn signal stalks in the updated Model S and Model X has drawn widespread criticism. Many drivers are simply not ready to rewire their muscle memory every time they drive. Now, there appear to be more EVs that utilize physical controls, relatively standard shift knobs, and ergonomics that contribute to intuitive operation. The Chevy Blazer EV is one of them. It has big screens, yes, but switchgear to complement it. Hyundai and Kia have smartly kept a mix of physical and digital controls, allowing for a user experience that feels both modern and comfortable. The interior of the Honda Prologue is about as conventional as they get. If you were to get inside without knowing it's an EV, you'd never guess by looking at the dash, center stack, and center console. It has a normal-looking steering wheel, big stalk controls, and plenty of buttons and knobs for audio and climate. The lesson here is simple: car buyers might be open to new powertrains, but they don't want to relearn how to drive. Familiarity builds comfort, and comfort builds sales. Another clue that buyers want familiarity in their EVs is the transition away from names that were meant to set EVs apart from gas models. The Mercedes-Benz EQS and the Volkswagen ID series stand out the most. Both naming conventions seemed to have backfired. The EQS sedan and SUV don't carry the same panache as the S-Class or GLS-Class, as much as the electric versions try to follow in the footsteps of their gas-powered stablemates. VW's ID series is just plain awkward, especially when paired with non-words like and ID.2all. Even Toyota misfired with its hard-to-remember bZ4X name. Once you could finally memorize the name, you realized you didn't know which letters were uppercase or lowercase. Nobody should have to think about that. Now, it's just called bZ, and Toyota might do away with that shortly. Smarter name choices by manufacturers included the Ford Mustang Mach-E, Hyundai Kona Electric, and the Chevrolet Blazer EV, all recognized model names with electric labels attached to them. It's not just ditching what's strange, it's capitalizing on what has already worked. In the EV race, it has taken only a little over a decade for automakers to figure out that departing too much from what's familiar is bad and that radical reinvention isn't always the way to win hearts or wallets. As EVs begin to feel more like the cars people already love-visually, ergonomically, and functionally-they're proof that making the kind of improvements people care about results in better sales. Of course, EV buyers don't want their vehicles to be boring. They just don't want them to be weird. Give them something familiar, with all the benefits of electric driving and none of the alienation, and they're on board. Onlookers might say, "That's electric?" because they can't tell the difference, and that just might be the best kind of compliment. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Column: Full-size electric pickups are failed product planning experiment and industry disaster
There is a statistic in my colleague Laurence Iliff's story on the failure of full-size electric pickups that, pardon the pun, shocked me. The combustion and hybrid Toyota Tundra had more new-vehicle registrations during the first quarter than the entire industry's collection of full-size electric pickups — by a lot. That statistic is in no way a brag on the Tundra, which remains a distant No. 5 in what is now a five-horse segment since the death of the even slower-selling Nissan Titan. According to S&P Global Mobility, the Tundra recorded a meager 36,895 new registrations in the U.S. in the first quarter, while the Ford F-150 Lightning, Tesla Cybertruck, Chevrolet Silverado EV, GMC Hummer, Rivian R1T and GMC Sierra EV collectively posted about 22,000 registrations. By comparison, combustion-powered pickups from Ford, Chevrolet, GMC and Ram reached 478,823 registrations in the first quarter, S&P said. Were it not for investments and expectations that rival the size of the immense front fascias on virtually all of the aforementioned full-size behemoths, this failed experiment would already be over. The score: Newtonian Physics ∞, Hype & Hope 0. Sign up for Automotive Views, Automotive News' weekly showcase of opinions, insights, ideas and thought leadership. I can't begin to fathom how many tens of billions of dollars were spent by automakers and their suppliers developing and building those full-size electric pickups over the last decade. You can, however, get some sense of how bad the miss was when you look at the sales/production volumes auto executives anticipated, including Elon Musk's quarter- to half-million annual sales estimate for the Cybertruck, or Ford's initial F-150 Lightning estimate of up to 150,000 sales annually. So why did full-size electric pickups fail so badly? I would argue that it wasn't just physics — though the need for a bigger, more expensive battery to push these bigger vehicles farther as long as they are not towing anything shouldn't be minimized. But I think a share of the responsibility for this collective flop also lies with the companies' product planning departments. While all vehicles are compromised in some form or fashion by the time they reach consumers, full-size electric pickups lack a fundamental quality that has made their combustion-powered counterparts the U.S. sales champs for decades: Uncompromised utility. The legacy pickups are renowned for accomplishing whatever task their owners set them to. That unstoppable capability is what gave rise to the 'lifestyle' pickup in the first place, as consumers desired at least a taste of that confidence, even if they rarely, if ever, actually needed that power. Product planners and their auto executive bosses failed to account in their sales projections for just how much compromise an electric-pickup owner would face in everyday life. Sure, the trucks have some excellent features, including loads and loads of torque, but so do their combustion counterparts. And while it may cost extra fuel to tow a trailer with those combustion-powered vehicles, a heavy trailer sucks up a battery pack's juice quickly — and recharging is not nearly as quick and convenient as a gas station fill-up. It's the same reason that battery-electric semis are probably doomed to failure: It's just the wrong technology for that use case. Sorry. In a world ruled by logic and not emotion, society would consign new technologies to the areas where they have the greatest advantage. Battery-electric powertrains make the greatest sense in vehicles with limited mass and with limited demands, while hydrogen (and diesel) is more efficient in larger, demand-dependent vehicles where towing capability is paramount. We don't live in that world, unfortunately, which is why full-size electric pickups are failing. Have an opinion about this story? Tell us about it and we may publish it in print. Click here to submit a letter to the editor. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
