New Weca mayor takes office after election win
The new mayor for the West of England Combined Authority (Weca) has been sworn in.
Labour's Helen Godwin retained the seat for the party with 25% of the vote - Reform's Arron Banks came second with 22% and Mary Page of the Green Party came in third with approximately 20%.
Ms Godwin has now been sworn in alongside the leaders of the councils that make up the authority - Bristol, Bathe and North East Somerset and South Gloucestershire.
"It's quite surreal but we worked really hard to be here and I think we're going to get a lot done," she said.
"I really want to deliver for people and we've campaigned really hard over the last six months and I've learned a lot about the region that I didn't know and I want to bring all that knowledge into the role," she added.
ADVERTISEMENT
Ms Godwin has announced that the position of deputy mayor will be a rotating one during her tenure.
The Weca mayor is responsible for allocating funding to areas such as transport, housing and job opportunities.
Transport in particular will be a key issue for the new mayor - with much of the region relying on buses to get around.
Ongoing transport issues
"All the way through the campaign we talked about buses and people spoke to me about buses," said Ms Godwin.
"Whether they're in the centre of Bristol, the centre of Bath or the surrounding towns and villages - people are dissatisfied with the reliability and accessibility of the service.
"My priority is to unpick all of that and figure out what we can deliver quickly and over the medium term so people feel the difference," she added.
ADVERTISEMENT
The new mayor will have to work with three councils to organise new transport routes - including Bristol where discussions around a mass transit system have been ongoing for years.
"Transport and connectivity is a key challenge," said Green councillor Tony Dyer, leader of Bristol City Council.
"It's kind of a chicken-and-egg situation that in order to get a better transport system we need to improve public transport, and at the same time we need to remove some of the space currently available for cars," he added.
Ms Godwin takes over the position of Weca mayor from Dan Norris, who was arrested on suspicion of rape and child sex offences in April.
Follow BBC Bristol on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to us on email or via WhatsApp on 0800 313 4630.
Related internet links
Related Internet links
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
2 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Going online in Russia can be frustrating, complicated and even dangerous
TALLINN, Estonia — YouTube videos that won't load. A visit to a popular independent media website that produces only a blank page. Cellphone internet connections that are down for hours or days. Going online in Russia can be frustrating, complicated and even dangerous. It's not a network glitch but a deliberate, multipronged and long-term effort by authorities to bring the internet under the Kremlin's full control. Authorities adopted restrictive laws and banned websites and platforms that won't comply. Technology has been perfected to monitor and manipulate online traffic. While it's still possible to circumvent restrictions by using virtual private network apps, those are routinely blocked, too. Authorities further restricted internet access this summer with widespread shutdowns of cellphone internet connections and adopting a law punishing users for searching for content they deem illicit. They also are threatening to go after the popular WhatsApp platform while rolling out a new 'national' messaging app that's widely expected to be heavily monitored. President Vladimir Putin urged the government to 'stifle' foreign internet services and ordered officials to assemble a list of platforms from 'unfriendly' states that should be restricted. Experts and rights advocates told The Associated Press that the scale and effectiveness of the restrictions are alarming. Authorities seem more adept at it now, compared with previous, largely futile efforts to restrict online activities, and they're edging closer to isolating the internet in Russia. Human Rights Watch researcher Anastasiia Kruope describes Moscow's approach to reining in the internet as 'death by a thousand cuts.' 'Bit by bit, you're trying to come to a point where everything is controlled.' Kremlin efforts to control what Russians do, read or say online dates to 2011-12, when the internet was used to challenge authority. Independent media outlets bloomed, and anti-government demonstrations that were coordinated online erupted after disputed parliamentary elections and Putin's decision to run again for president. Russia began adopting regulations tightening internet controls. Some blocked websites; others required providers to store call records and messages, sharing it with security services if needed, and install equipment allowing authorities to control and cut off traffic. Companies like Google or Facebook were pressured to store user data on Russian servers, to no avail, and plans were announced for a 'sovereign internet' that could be cut off from the rest of the world. Russia's popular Facebook-like social media platform VK, founded by Pavel Durov long before he launched the Telegram messaging app, came under the control of Kremlin-friendly companies. Russia tried to block Telegram between 2018-20 but failed. Prosecutions for social media posts and comments became common, showing that authorities were closely watching the online space. Still, experts had dismissed Kremlin efforts to rein in the internet as futile, arguing Russia was far from building something akin to China's 'Great Firewall,' which Beijing uses to block foreign websites. After Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the government blocked major social media like Twitter, Facebook and Instagram, as well as Signal and a few other messaging apps. VPNs also were targeted, making it harder to reach restricted websites. YouTube access was disrupted last summer in what experts called deliberate throttling by authorities. The Kremlin blamed YouTube owner Google for not maintaining its hardware in Russia. The platform has been wildly popular in Russia, both for entertainment and for voices critical of the Kremlin, like the late opposition leader Alexei Navalny. Cloudflare, an internet infrastructure provider, said in June that websites using its services were being throttled in Russia. Independent news site Mediazona reported that several other popular Western hosting providers also are being inhibited. Cyber lawyer Sarkis Darbinyan, founder of Russian internet freedom group Roskomsvoboda, said authorities have been trying to push businesses to migrate to Russian hosting providers that can be controlled. He estimates about half of all Russian websites are powered by foreign hosting and infrastructure providers, many offering better quality and price than domestic equivalents. A 'huge number' of global websites and platforms use those providers, he said, so cutting them off means those websites 'automatically become inaccessible' in Russia too. Another concerning trend is the consolidation of Russia's internet providers and companies that manage IP addresses, according to a July 30 Human Rights Watch report. Last year, authorities raised the cost of obtaining an internet provider license from 7,500 rubles (about $90) to 1 million rubles (over $12,300), and state data shows that more than half of all IP addresses in Russia are managed by seven large companies, with Rostelecom, Russia's state telephone and internet giant, accounting for 25%. The Kremlin is striving 'to control the internet space in Russia, and to censor things, to manipulate the traffic,' said HRW's Kruope. A new Russian law criminalized online searches for broadly defined 'extremist' materials. That could include LGBTQ+ content, opposition groups, some songs by performers critical of the Kremlin — and Navalny's memoir, which was designated as extremist last week. Right advocates say it's a step toward punishing consumers — not just providers — like in Belarus, where people are routinely fined or jailed for reading or following certain independent media outlets. Stanislav Seleznev, cyber security expert and lawyer with the Net Freedom rights group, doesn't expect ubiquitous prosecutions, since tracking individual online searches in a country of 146 million remains a tall order. But even a limited number of cases could scare many from restricted content, he said. Another major step could be blocking WhatsApp, which monitoring service Mediascope said had over 97 million monthly users in April. WhatsApp 'should prepare to leave the Russian market,' said lawmaker Anton Gorelkin, and a new 'national' messenger, MAX, developed by social media company VK, would take its place. Telegram probably won't be restricted, he said. MAX, promoted as a one-stop shop for messaging, online government services, making payments and more, was rolled out for beta tests but has yet to attract a wide following. Over 2 million people registered by July, the Tass news agency reported. Its terms and conditions say it will share user data with authorities upon request, and a new law stipulates its preinstallation in all smartphones sold in Russia. State institutions, officials and businesses are actively encouraged to move communications and blogs to MAX. Anastasiya Zhyrmont of the Access Now digital rights group said both Telegram and WhatsApp were disrupted in Russia in July in what could be a test of how potential blockages would affect internet infrastructure. It wouldn't be uncommon. In recent years, authorities regularly tested cutting off the internet from the rest of the world, sometimes resulting in outages in some regions. Darbinyan believes the only way to make people use MAX is to 'shut down, stifle' every Western alternative. 'But again, habits ... do not change in a year or two. And these habits acquired over decades, when the internet was fast and free,' he said. Government media and internet regulator Roskomnadzor uses more sophisticated methods, analyzing all web traffic and identifying what it can block or choke off, Darbinyan said. It's been helped by 'years of perfecting the technology, years of taking over and understanding the architecture of the internet and the players,' as well as Western sanctions and companies leaving the Russian market since 2022, said Kruope of Human Rights Watch. Russia is 'not there yet' in isolating its internet from the rest of the world, Darbinyan said, but Kremlin efforts are 'bringing it closer.' Litvinova writes for the Associated Press.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Hamilton County may switch to vote centers for midterm elections. What the major change means
Hamilton County election officials want to eliminate precinct assignments in favor of vote centers during elections, saving the county money and increasing flexibility for voters. Sixty-seven of Indiana's 92 counties, including Marion County, have switched to the centers, which reduce the number of polling places and often require voters to travel farther to cast a ballot — but also allows them to vote at any center. 'It really increases options for people who work and weren't able to get to the precinct in the morning or later,' County Elections Administrator Beth Sheller said. Under the proposal, voters could cast their ballot at any of 52 vote centers across the county beginning during the May primary eleciton in 2026. Sheller that's nearly twice as required by Indiana law, which would be 28 for Hamilton County, or one for each 10,000 registered voters. There are currently 220 precincts in Hamilton County, and residents can only vote in their own precinct. Sheller said her office has chosen the locations for the voter centers, which all currently serve as precincts. 'We picked some of the larger sites with more parking and easy access to major roads,' she said. Officials also made sure the centers were spaced so voters didn't have to travel far. For the change to be made all three members of the Hamilton County Election Board must vote in favor of it. Residents can voice opinions on the proposal beginning with a public meeting of the Hamilton County Election Board at 1:00 p.m. Aug. 13 in the Hamilton County Commissioner's Courtroom on the first floor of the Hamilton County Government and Judicial Building in Noblesville. Residents will have 30 days to submit written comments, which the election board will consider. Hamilton County Clerk Kathy Kreag Williams said the centers could reduce the cost of elections. 'With the county's rapid growth, we are constantly adding new precincts to comply with state law,' Williams, a member of the election board, said in a news release. 'That means more inspectors, clerks, judges, polling places, meals, and voting machines. Vote Centers could give us the access our voters need while also reducing the long-term costs of running elections.' Call IndyStar reporter John Tuohy at 317-444-6418. Email at and follow on Twitter and Facebook. This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Hamilton County could switch to vote centers for midterm elections Solve the daily Crossword
UPI
12 hours ago
- UPI
IDF says slain reporter was Hamas; journalist groups condemn killing
The Israel Defense Forces said Sunday that it killed an Al Jazeera reporter it accused of being a Hamas militant. File Photo by Jim Hollander/UPI | License Photo Aug. 11 (UPI) -- The Israeli military said it struck and killed Al Jazeera reporter Anas al-Sharif, accusing him of being a Hamas militant, which attracted condemnation from journalist organizations. The Israel Defense Forces made the announcement Sunday on X, saying al-Sharif "was the head of a Hamas terrorist cell and advanced rocket attacks on Israeli civilians and IDF troops." "A press badge isn't a shield for terrorism," the IDF said on X. Al Jazeera reported that al-Sharif was one of four colleagues killed in a targeted Israeli attack on a tent housing journalists in Gaza City, one of the few areas in the Palestinian enclave not under Israeli military control. Seven people were killed in the strike, the Qatar-based news organization said. In a statement, Al Jazeera Media Network condemned what it called the "targeted assassination" of its correspondent, along with photographers Ibrahim Al Thaher and Mohamed Nofal. "As Al Jazeera Media Network bids farewell to yet another group of its finest journalists, who boldly and courageously documented the plight of Gaza and its people since the onset of the war, it holds the Israeli occupation forces and government responsible for deliberately targeting and assassinating its journalists," Al Jazeera Media Network said, adding that al-Sharif's death follows calls from Israeli officials to target him and his colleagues. The IDF has repeatedly criticized Al Jazeera and has accused several of its reporters in Gaza of being Hamas or Islamic Jihad militants. Late last month, IDF spokesman Avichay Adraee accused al-Sharif in a video posted to Facebook of being a member of Hamas' military wing since 2013. Following al-Sharif's death, Adraee continued to post videos and photos to his Facebook account repeating his claims that the journalist was a militant. In its statement Sunday, the IDF cited Israeli intelligence and Gaza documents as proof that al-Sharif "was a Hamas operative integrated into Al Jazeera." Israel has killed at least 178 Palestinian journalists during its nearly two-year-old war in Gaza, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists, which said Israel has "a longstanding, documented pattern of accusing journalists of being terrorists without providing any credible proof." "Israel's pattern of labeling journalists as militants without providing credible evidence raises serious questions about its intent and respect of press freedom," CPJ Regional Director Sara Qudah said in a statement in response to al-Shari's death. "Journalists are civilians and must never be targeted. Those responsible for these killings must be held accountable."
