Should the drink-driving limit be reduced? Vote in our poll
The Government is considering lowering the drink-driving limit in what has been called the "biggest shake-up to our driving laws for decades" - and we want to hear your thoughts on the proposal.
It comes as the number of people killed in drink-driving incidents has risen over the past decade, reaching a 13-year high in 2022. Under the road safety strategy, which is set to be published in the autumn, the drink-drive limit in England and Wales will reportedly be reduced from 35 micrograms of alcohol per 100 millilitres of breath to 22 micrograms - the current level for Scotland, according to The Times.
Speaking about the plans to overhaul road safety laws, justice minister Alex Davies-Jones told BBC Breakfast: "This is the biggest shake-up to our driving laws for decades, and that's because this is what the public have been telling us that they want, they want us to be taking action, they feel like the time is right for us to review these laws." It comes after thousands of Brits are to get a shock letter from HMRC after a drastic new tax rule comes into force.
She added: "We are looking at maybe reducing the drink-driving limit, which, again, we know that that [the younger] age demographic is those most likely to be caught under the influence of drink-driving." The road shake-up could also see Brits get points on their licence for not wearing a seatbelt or tougher punishments for driving without insurance, while over 70s could be banned from driving if they fail compulsory eye tests.
The news has been welcomed by motoring groups, with many describing the changes as "a step in the right direction". Edmund King, AA president, said: "This strategy is much overdue as road deaths have plateaued over the last decade. We believe these new measures will not only modernise our approach to saving lives but also provide renewed momentum in making our roads safer for everyone."
IAM RoadSmart director of policy and standards Nicholas Lyes added: "Given progress on reducing fatal and serious collisions has stalled in recent years, we welcome the UK Government's ambition to publish an updated road safety strategy with the reported measures being a step in the right direction."
Meanwhile, a Labour source said: "At the end of the last Labour government, the number of people killed and seriously injured on our roads was at a record low, but numbers have remained stubbornly high under successive Conservative governments. In no other circumstance would we accept 1,600 people dying, with thousands more seriously injured, costing the NHS more than £2billion per year."
As the Government considers the major diving overhaul, we want to know if you think the drink-driving limit should be reduced. Vote in our poll HERE to have your say.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Minority Report-style map of Britain that aims to stop criminals before they strike by identifying local areas most at risk is being developed by experts
Experts are creating an AI-driven crime map of England and Wales that aims to stop criminals before they strike. The Government today announced a £4million investment in the futuristic project, which will use official data to identify local areas that are likely to see criminal activity, such as knife offences and anti-social behaviour. Police will then target these locations with extra resources, including patrols and visits to the homes of convicted criminals, in the hope of intervening before any offences take place. Peter Kyle, Science and Technology Secretary, said the project would draw on data from police, councils and social services, including criminal records, previous offence reports and the behavioural patterns of known offenders. The Concentrations of Crime Data Challenge will see experts from universities and businesses tasked with creating the model with the aim of making it operational across England and Wales by 2030. 'We want to identify areas that have a higher probability of experiencing crime,' Mr Kyle told the Daily Mail during a visit to the Met's central communications command centre. 'That means police can ensure officers are in the area and are able to prevent these crimes happening in the first place or respond before they escalate. 'The Met and other forces have an enormous amount of data on historic and emerging crime. By using that - and incorporating data from other authorities such as local councils - the model can become more accurate as time passes.' AI can identify patterns and links in evidence and sift through data more quickly than humans. Civil liberties campaigners have previously raised ethical concerns about the use of algorithms to try to predict crimes in advance. But Mr Kyle said the government's crime map would only use official data and not information from private sources, such as social media. He insisted any interventions police make based on the map's findings would be subject to 'human oversight' and insisted the system was merely an extension of traditional policing methods. 'Police forces throughout history have always looked at individuals who are committing crime and patterns of behaviour that indicate they will commit crime again - this is not new,' he said. 'But in an era where we are able to use digital technology and data to assist in that process we can't ignore the power of that technology to keep us all safe. 'This will be one tool alongside many others that crime fighters use. Human oversight and respect for the experience of senior officers will always remain at the forefront. 'We will not be using digital technology to blindly identify individuals on a vague probability. That is not what we are talking about.' The initial £4m investment aims to deliver a series of initial prototypes by April 2026. My Kyle spoke to the Daily Mail on a visit to the Met's Central Command Communications Centre in Lambeth, where he also viewed other tech innovations including 'first responder' drones. The gadgets, which will be deployed in London in October, can be sent to the scene of emergency incidents in minutes to give officers an overview of the situation and gather evidence. The Mail also saw a demonstration of a smaller device that can be used to search buildings for hazards, such as improvised explosive devices (IEDs), before they are raided by armed police. Mr Kyle also viewed a van fitted with facial recognition cameras, which are already used in London and are now being rolled out across seven police forces – Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire, Bedfordshire, Surrey, Sussex, Thames Valley and Hampshire. According to officials, the technology has already been used to make 580 arrests in London over the last year, including 52 registered sex offenders. Campaign group Big Brother Watch claimed the move 'represents a significant expansion of the surveillance state.' But the government maintains the technology will only be used to catch 'high–harm' offenders with rules to ensure 'safeguards and oversight'. 'What we are doing is ensuring that those people who are known perpetrators of crime are found, identified and brought to justice so they can't commit more crimes,' said Mr Kyle. 'People should be reassured that we keep people's digital information safe and secure and always act appropriately. Anyone who is not identified by these cameras has their data immediately and permanently deleted. 'There are criminals out there using data and digital technology to commit crimes. It would be absurd to suggest we don't use this technology to keep people safe.' This week, the Home Office said every community across England and Wales had now been assigned a 'named, contactable' officer to handle reports of crimes such as anti-social behaviour. Their details will be made available for residents on their local force's website, it is understood. The pledge was made as part of the Government's previously announced Neighbourhood Policing Guarantee, under which forces have committed to respond to neighbourhood queries within 72 hours.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Nearly half of voters fear the Government will not be able to 'smash the gangs' after migrant count hits 50,000
Nearly half of voters think the Government can't control migrants arriving on small boats. While the poll applies to British governments in general, it indicates a lack of faith in Sir Keir Starmer 's 'smash the gangs' policy to control the boats. The survey came as the number of illegal migrants who have crossed the Channel since Labour was elected just over a year ago reached 50,000 – a figure reached more quickly under Sir Keir than previous prime ministers. His first act upon winning the election was to scrap the Rwanda deterrent scheme that the Tories had banked on to get the boat crossings down. The Government's 'returns deal' with France appears to have done little to deter those determined to get to Britain, with more than 2,000 arrivals in the seven days since the 'one in, one out' scheme launched. The YouGov poll, which sampled 8,731 adults, revealed that 48 per cent thought British governments did not have the ability to control the number of arrivals. Just 44 per cent had faith that ministers would be able to restrict the number of small boats, while eight per cent didn't know. Respondents were asked: 'Thinking about the powers and abilities of British governments in general, rather than specific governments, how much do you think a British government has the ability to control the number of migrants coming to the UK on small boats?' Of the five responses – ranging from 'a great deal' to 'none at all' – the most cited category was 'not very much' when it came to controlling numbers. Ministers attempted to dodge the blame after figures confirmed the number of small-boat arrivals had passed 50,000 under Labour even though the milestone – equivalent to one migrant arriving every 11 minutes – was passed seven months earlier than under Sir Keir's Conservative predecessor, Rishi Sunak. Hundreds more arrived at Dover on Sunday with official figures released on Monday Former Labour home secretary Jacqui Smith blamed the Tories, saying: 'What is happening is the result of the last Government.' She told BBC Breakfast: 'It is an unacceptable number of people. It demonstrates the way over the last six or seven years that the criminal gangs have got an absolute foothold in the tragic trafficking of people across the Channel.' But Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp dismissed Baroness Smith's claims, saying Labour had 'surrendered our borders'. Small-boat numbers are soaring, with 27,029 arrivals this year, up by 47 per cent on the same point last year and 67 per cent on 2023. Since the start of the crisis in 2018, 178,167 migrants have reached Britain, with only about four per cent of them removed. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch this week vowed to stop all small-boat migrants. Asked if the Conservatives could reduce the number of crossings from five figures to zero, Mrs Badenoch replied: 'I think that we can.'
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Green Party leadership hopefuls' bold plan to secure votes from Labour
Green leadership hopefuls have vowed to take their party into a fight against Labour, as the two camps enter the final fortnight of their campaigns. The party's incumbent co-leader Adrian Ramsay, who is running jointly with North Herefordshire MP Ellie Chowns, called for a 'bold and practical' strategy which puts the Greens ' 'wilderness years' behind them. Challenging them, Mr Ramsay's current deputy Zack Polanski claimed 'bold messaging at the national level' had been 'missing' from his party's high offices. Green Party members began voting on August 1 and are halfway through the process, with polls closing on August 30. ' One of our top priorities, absolutely, is winning over support from people who are utterly disillusioned with Labour,' Mr Ramsay told the PA news agency. 'But there will also be people from other parts of the political spectrum who are also feeling politically homeless, deeply care about the environment, want to see our services restored. 'And in the era of politics that we're now in, there are so many people who don't think about politics in old left-right terms, and we need to be the ones that are showing what Greens stand for – for social justice and for a liveable future for people and planet.' Mr Ramsay, the Waveney Valley MP, said the Greens under his leadership would move to tackle 'inequality and poverty, the decline of our public services, the degradation of our natural environment and the threat of climate breakdown'. Mr Polanski said his party was 'here ultimately to replace the Labour government'. The London City Hall member said: 'In the same way that Reform have really made the Tories collapse, I think there's a huge space for the Green left in this country to galvanise and to take votes away, and to say that we don't have to take second-best and actually you can have a party that's unapologetic about its values – that will stand up for migration, that will stand up for the poorest communities, and will take the fight to wealth and power.' He added: 'Alongside the Labour government, of course, Reform are a huge issue for the entire country. 'But I think the problem is a Labour Party pretending to be that antidote to Reform whereas they're just mimicking them. 'And if people want Reform-lite policies, then they'll just vote Reform.' Under Mr Ramsay's co-leadership with Carla Denyer, with Mr Polanski as their deputy, the party gained 241 council seats in 2023, and picked up a further 74 last year. The Green Party also secured four seats at the general election. Mr Polanski pledged to 'continue' with existing efforts but added: 'What has been missing, though, is the bold messaging at the national level, and we need to make sure that before we've even knocked on a door or someone's picked up a leaflet, they already know that the Green Party stand for so much more than the environment. 'Now, the environment is really important to us, it will remain really important to us, but this is about lowering bills, rent controls, making sure that we're funding our public services and taxing the super-wealthy, all measures that are increasingly popular.' Mr Ramsay warned that Mr Polanski's language was aimed at 'the 'progressive activist' section of the public', who were already convinced by the party's messaging. He added: 'Having that credibility alongside the distinctive Green policies that we're putting forward is so crucial and it's what's taken us out of the wilderness years that the Green Party was in in my early time in the party. 'I've been in the party 27 years. People used to say, 'Well, I like what you stand for but can you really win? Can you really take on these positions and make a real impact? 'We've demonstrated that now and we've got to continue that route of continuing to build our impact and continuing to build on a record-breaking success and a record-breaking strategy.' Mr Ramsay said he was 'concerned about the Green Party going down a populist route, given that populism relies on polarising and divisiveness'. Mr Polanski said: 'The idea that eco-populism is divisive is a fundamental misunderstanding of what it is I'm talking about, which is the 99% versus the 1%. 'Now that 1% are corporations who are destroying our environment, destroying our democracy and destroying our communities, so if it's divisive, it's where the division already is, which is between the super-rich and then everyone else who is working hard with their hands and their brain.' Ms Denyer, the Bristol Central MP, is not standing for a leadership role.
