Xi makes inspection trip to Henan province
Xi makes inspection trip to Henan province
President Xi Jinping visits Luoyang Bearing Group. Photo: Xinhua
President Xi Jinping has underscored unwavering confidence in boosting high-quality development and enhancing governance efficiency, while urging Henan province to write a new chapter in advancing Chinese modernisation.
Xi made the remarks during his inspection tour of the cities of Luoyang and Zhengzhou in Henan on Monday and Tuesday.
The president emphasised that the province should focus on building a modern industrial system and strengthening its agricultural capacity, improving people's well-being and social governance, enhancing ecological and environmental protection, and promoting cultural prosperity.
On Monday afternoon, Xi visited Luoyang Bearing Group Co., Ltd.
It is imperative to maintain a robust and reasonable share of the manufacturing, a key pillar of the national economy, in the process of advancing Chinese modernisation, he said.
"Modern manufacturing relies on sci-tech empowerment," Xi said, while calling for greater efforts in the quest for core technological breakthroughs and pursuit of a path of independent innovation.
The president then visited the White Horse Temple, where he learned about the adaptation of Buddhism to the Chinese context and local efforts to preserve cultural relics.
At the Longmen Grottoes, an over 1,500-year-old Unesco World Heritage site which also represents the pinnacle of Chinese stone carving art, Xi underlined the importance of preserving, inheriting and promoting these treasures of Chinese culture.
The integration of culture and tourism holds great potential, the president said, requiring efforts to promote the high-quality development of the sector and turn it into a pillar industry that benefits the people and enriches their lives. (Reporting by Xinhua)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTHK
an hour ago
- RTHK
Xi urges strategic linkup in call to S Korea's Lee
Xi urges strategic linkup in call to S Korea's Lee Xi Jinping told Lee Jae-myung that their two countries should inject more certainty into the regional and international situations. File photos: Reuters President Xi Jinping said on Tuesday that China and South Korea should promote their strategic cooperative partnership to a higher level. He made the call over the phone with South Korean President Lee Jae-myung. China and South Korea should inject more certainty into the regional and international landscapes, Xi said, adding that the two countries should jointly safeguard multilateralism and free trade and ensure stable global and regional industrial and supply chains. "A healthy, stable and continuously deepening China-South Korea relationship aligns with the trend of the times," the president said. Xi added Beijing and Seoul should respect each other's core interests and concerns, and the two countries should deepen people-to-people and cultural exchanges. The call came after South Korea's new centre-left leader was elected in a landslide last week after winning a snap election triggered by his predecessor's disastrous martial law declaration. Seoul has long trod a fine line between top trading partner China and defence guarantor the United States. Relations with Beijing suffered under Lee's predecessor Yoon Suk-yeol, who cleaved close to the United States and sought to improve ties with former colonial master Japan. But both countries' export-driven economies have now found themselves in the crosshairs of US President Donald Trump's tariff blitz. (Xinhua/AFP)
Asia Times
2 hours ago
- Asia Times
Thai-Cambodia clash through a US vs China lens
BANGKOK – A deadly border feud between Thailand's US-trained military and Cambodia's Chinese-assisted troops has resulted in a surprise agreement with Phnom Penh retreating and abandoning a freshly dug trench after one Cambodian soldier was killed and both sides reinforced their armies in the disputed Emerald Triangle jungle. The face-to-face gunfight at the border also sparked questions about Bangkok's fragile civilian-led coalition government and its ability to control Thailand's politicized military which has, when displeased, unleashed government-toppling coups. While villagers hurriedly dug schoolyard bunkers, and thousands of travelers were left stranded due to temporary checkpoint closures, Thailand announced on Sunday (June 8) that Cambodian troops agreed to withdraw to their pre-confrontation positions and make other concessions. 'Cambodia agreed to fill in the trenches, to restore the area to its natural state,' the Bangkok Post reported on Monday (June 9). The Thai Army displayed photos of what it said showed a 650-meter trench dug by Cambodian troops in the disputed zone. Two pictures showed a freshly dug trench on May 18 and May 28. Two other photos displayed the site restored and filled with dirt on Sunday (June 8). In Cambodia, details about the agreement were sketchy. 'The Ministry of National Defense of Cambodia announced today that military commanders from Cambodia and Thailand have agreed to adjust the positions of their troops along certain areas of the border to reduce tensions and avoid confrontation,' the Khmer Times reported on June 9. 'I ask the public to trust that the government is working to solve this through peaceful means, which is the only way to avoid violence and maintain good relations with our neighboring country,' Cambodia's influential former prime minister Hun Sen said. Cambodia blames Thai forces for allegedly shooting dead a Cambodian soldier on May 28 during a brief firefight in the Emerald Triangle, where eastern Thailand, northern Cambodia, and southern Laos meet. The jungle and scrubland include a no man's zone that is not officially demarcated, attracting human and wildlife traffickers, illegal loggers, smugglers, fugitives, and other criminals. The disputed zone also boasts the ruins of ancient Hindu temples, including Ta Moan Thom, Ta Moan Toch, and Ta Kro Bei. The latest deadly confrontation began when the two nations' armed forces opened fire at each other at Chong Bok pass on the Thai-Cambodian border. The Cambodians were allegedly digging a trench along the rugged, porous frontier, drawn 100 years ago by French colonialists. According to the Thai army, Cambodia's troops 'encroached' and shot first when the Thais approached to talk. Cambodian troops 'misunderstood the situation and started using weapons, so Thai forces retaliated,' a Thai army spokesman said. In an official letter to Thailand's embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia's Foreign Ministry officially demanded an investigation and trial for Thailand's troops who 'without provocation' allegedly killed the Cambodian. The Cambodian soldier's death created increased public support for authoritarian Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet. 'The reaction of the Cambodian public to this situation has surprised me, in how it has caused a large upswell in patriotic sentiment and pro-government support, even from a lot of people I know to be very skeptical of the government,' Craig Etcheson, an author and researcher about Cambodia, said in an interview. 'In that sense, it has been very good for the CPP,' Etcheson said, referring to the long-ruling, monopolistic Cambodian Peoples' Party. Coincidentally, miles away, China was concluding its two-week-long Golden Dragon military exercises with Cambodia, which included 2,000 combined personnel, fearsome galloping 'robot combat dogs' with assault rifles mounted on their backs, plus helicopters, vehicle-mounted rockets, mortars, and other weaponry. The Golden Dragon drills do not 'threaten or harm any country,' said Cambodia's Defense Ministry spokesman General Chhum Socheat. China is Cambodia's biggest source of weapons and other military needs, including Chinese tanks, armed vehicles and air defense training, but there was no indication of any Chinese involvement in the border confrontation. China's President Xi Jinping boosted Phnom Penh's faith in more aid and investment from Beijing during his April visit to Cambodia. In May, US Assistant Secretary of Defense for Indo-Pacific Security Affairs John Noh met Cambodia's Defense Minister and Secretary of State Lieutenant General Rath Dararoth to discuss security and military relations. 'Both leaders look forward to a US Navy ship visit, and maritime training, to occur at Ream Naval Base later this year, as well as travel by Secretary Hegseth to visit the US ship while in port at Ream,' the US Defense Department said on May 31. American officials hope a US ship will be able to dock, for the first time, near Sihanoukville in Cambodia's Ream Naval Base which is undergoing massive upgrades by China as part of Beijing's Belt and Road Initiative. Thailand conducts large-scale military exercises with the Pentagon each year and allows the US Navy docking facilities, including the US 7th Fleet's nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, along its shallow Gulf of Thailand coast, bolstering the US Pacific Fleet in the Indo-Pacific region. The Thai-Cambodian border clash meanwhile exposed cracks between Thailand's elected, civilian-led government and its cautious relationship with the military. Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra said she wants a peaceful, behind-the-scenes, negotiated settlement between Bangkok and Phnom Penh, but has not announced its terms. Thailand's military is perceived as bristling against Cambodia. 'The Thai army would prefer a hawkish response,' Paul Chambers, a visiting fellow at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies in Singapore, said in an interview before the border agreement was reached. 'As tensions have risen, alarm has grown. Such alarm could intensify to an extent that it affects Thai civil-military relations,' he said. The mood among the public has risen 'from apathetic to increasingly alarmed in both countries,' Chambers added. Others said the differences between Thailand's government and military were not destabilizing, yet. 'Currently, the Thai military and the civilian government under Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra appear to be aligned in their approach to the border dispute,' Sophal Ear, an associate professor of Southeast Asian and other international relations at Phoenix's Arizona State University, said in an interview. 'Both have expressed a preference for peaceful resolution through existing bilateral mechanisms. However, the military has indicated readiness for a 'high-level operation' if necessary, reflecting a cautious stance amid increased Cambodian military activity near the border,' Sophal Ear said. Paetongtarn expressed her relationship with the army when she said, 'The military understands precisely what is happening on the ground. It is the military's responsibility to evaluate whether the situation has reached a point where confrontation is necessary. 'If not, then engaging prematurely could result in great harm.' Thailand and Cambodia, meanwhile, cooperate on several vital issues, including trade and security, which may help temper their feud. Their relations are so tight, for example, that they are jointly accused of helping each other crush political dissidents, according to New York-based Human Rights Watch (HRW). 'The Cambodian and Thai governments have engaged in transnational repression – government efforts to silence dissent by committing human rights abuses against their own nationals outside their own territory — through reciprocal arrangements targeting dissidents and opposition figures, colloquially known as a 'swap mart',' HRW said. 'Both governments have facilitated assaults, abductions, enforced disappearances, and the forced return of people to their home countries where their lives or freedom are at risk,' the rights group said in April. Thailand and Phnom Penh deny violating the law when it comes to deporting people back to each other's country, despite pleas that fleeing political activists be spared. In 1999, Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet was a cadet at the US Military Academy at West Point. It is unknown if that will temper or give confidence to his military dealings with Thailand. Paetongtarn's father, former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, had close fraternal ties with Cambodia's previous prime minister and former Khmer Rouge regiment commander Hun Sen, the father of Prime Minister Hun Manet. Those generational links were especially valuable after Thaksin was overthrown in a military coup in 2006, leading to 15 years as a self-exiled fugitive from prison sentences for corruption and other financial crimes. Those enmeshed personal relationships had recently been blamed by some Thais for weakening Bangkok's negotiating stance in an ongoing dispute with Cambodia over mapping their shared Gulf of Thailand which hosts oil and natural gas extraction platforms. 'Right-wing opponents of the Shinawatras, in particular, are using the issue of Thai-Cambodian border issues to attack the Paetongtarn government,' Chambers said. 'This issue could become increasingly productive for the right-wing opposition.' Sophal Ear said: 'Opposition groups in Thailand have criticized the Shinawatra-led government for its handling of the border dispute, accusing it of being too conciliatory towards Cambodia. 'This strategy taps into nationalist sentiments, but risks being counterproductive if perceived as undermining efforts for a peaceful resolution. The [Thai] government's emphasis on diplomacy may appeal to moderates who prioritize stability over confrontation. 'In Cambodia, there is a sense of nationalistic fervor, with support for the government's decision to seek ICJ intervention. 'In Thailand, the public is more divided, some express concern over national sovereignty, while others prioritize economic and political stability,' Sophal Ear said. Thailand and Cambodia will engage in talks at a June 14 meeting of the Joint Boundary Committee, said Thai Defense Minister Phumtham Wechayachai. 'The government has made preparations, both the legal aspects and negotiations through mechanisms, along with military preparations on the frontline if that proves necessary,' said the defense minister, who is also a deputy prime minister. 'For those who stir up nationalist sentiments, they should understand that war is best avoided,' Phumtham said. 'Don't stir it, or problems will follow.' Richard S Ehrlich is a Bangkok-based American foreign correspondent reporting from Asia since 1978, and winner of Columbia University's Foreign Correspondents' Award. Excerpts from his two new nonfiction books, 'Rituals. Killers. Wars. & Sex. — Tibet, India, Nepal, Laos, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka & New York' and 'Apocalyptic Tribes, Smugglers & Freaks' are available here.
Asia Times
4 hours ago
- Asia Times
US-China: what's really at stake in London
A high-stakes showdown is unfolding this week in London—far from the manufacturing plants of Shenzhen or the trading floors of Wall Street, yet central to the global economic order. Senior US and Chinese officials will hold a second day of talks today (Tuesday) aimed at de-escalating the most consequential economic rivalry of our time. After Monday's first day of talks, US President Donald Trump said, 'We are doing well with China. China's not easy…I'm only getting good reports.' China is negotiating for looser US tech controls while the US wants China to ease limits on rare earth mineral exports. But for investors watching from Singapore to Silicon Valley, these meetings aren't just about tariffs. They're about who writes the rules of the 21st-century global economy. Both sides are seeking to revive the Geneva framework established last month—an agreement that temporarily eased a volatile tariff standoff by rolling back US import duties on Chinese goods from 145% to 30%, and slashing Chinese tariffs from 125% to 10%. The compromise was a ceasefire, not a peace treaty. Since then, fiery accusations of non-compliance have resumed. Washington says Beijing is dragging its feet on critical mineral exports. Beijing accuses the US of doubling down on tech restrictions, particularly on semiconductors and AI. The talks in London are significant because the stakes have never been higher. China and the US are no longer just competing powers—they are operating two fundamentally divergent systems, each trying to shape the global economic architecture in its own image. This is a full-spectrum competition that spans data flows, digital currencies, energy policy, national security, and ideology. Investors ignore this at their peril. To understand the gravity of this week's negotiations, you have to look beyond the tariff tables and see the wider trajectory. Under Trump, the US is doubling down on strategic protectionism. The re-imposition of sweeping 'Liberation Day' tariffs in April was not an isolated action—it was the next phase in a broader effort to reshape American economic exposure. China, under President Xi Jinping, is responding in kind by accelerating self-reliance campaigns, boosting its military-industrial complex and tightening control over capital flows and foreign technology. The two economic giants are hurtling toward a split system of parallel supply chains, competing standards, rival digital currencies and mutually exclusive rules for artificial intelligence. The old model—interdependence through globalization—is unraveling in real time. From a market perspective, this fracturing introduces volatility but also extraordinary opportunity. Strategic sectors are being rapidly repriced. Defense tech, AI, cybersecurity, semiconductor manufacturing and rare earths have all emerged as proxies in this economic power contest. Recent capital flows tell the story: US and European investors are ramping up exposure to domestic chip production, while China is injecting vast state funding into its own tech champions and weaponizing industrial policy. Just last week, China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology announced a new 500 billion yuan (US$69 billion) investment initiative focused on dual-use technologies—those with both civilian and military applications. Simultaneously, the US Commerce Department expanded its export restrictions to cover quantum computing components and AI training data sets. The message from both sides is unmistakable: dominance in tomorrow's tech is national security today. The London talks, then, a theater where the future is being negotiated—or not. With US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer facing off against China's Vice Premier He Lifeng, these are the most senior discussions since the Geneva reset. Both capitals know what's at stake, and neither wants to look like it's blinking. Investors are caught in a strange double bind: exposed to the risks of fragmentation, but positioned to benefit from the rush to secure the commanding heights of the future economy. That's why the London talks are being watched as closely in corporate boardrooms as in diplomatic circles. If the talks succeed in holding the Geneva line, it could stabilize sentiment and breathe life into cross-border dealmaking that's been paralyzed by policy uncertainty. If they fail—and signs point to fundamental misalignments in trust and expectation—then the decoupling will accelerate. Supply chains shift faster, capital reallocates at scale and inflation risks in key inputs like semiconductors and rare earths will spike again. Investors will need to think in terms of dual portfolios: one optimized for the Western bloc, the other for the Chinese sphere of influence. However, there is another, deeper implication that should not be overlooked. The current rivalry is not just about GDP or tech leadership; it's about two economic visions vying for legitimacy. One is anchored in democratic capitalism, now reasserting control over trade and industrial policy after decades of liberalization. The other is a centralized, state-driven model that promises order, speed and resilience. This isn't the Cold War redux, it's something newer, more fluid—and potentially longer-lasting. That's why framing these talks purely as tariff negotiations misses the point. This is about system design and every conversation about chips, data or critical minerals is, in reality, a conversation about who gets to define economic power in the coming decades. Some investors have already begun adjusting to this reality. Sovereign wealth funds are shifting long-term allocations away from passive indices and toward strategic sectors. Venture capital is increasingly split along ideological lines. Private equity is retreating from cross-border deals in politically sensitive industries. The smart capital knows this is the macro megatrend. What London offers this week is a readout not just of policy positions but of political will. Are the world's two largest economies capable of coexisting with guardrails, or are we headed toward a fully bipolar economic order? Markets have always priced in risk. But this is something more fundamental. This is about pricing in rival worldviews. And the London talks are where the next chapter begins.
