logo
Halfords makes loss after restructuring and higher labour costs

Halfords makes loss after restructuring and higher labour costs

Times7 hours ago

Halfords fell into the red after it was hit by restructuring costs and forced to write down the value of its retail business, which it blamed on rising UK gilt yields and increased labour costs.
The troubled car parts and cycling retailer swung to a statutory pre-tax loss of £30 million in the 52 weeks to March 28 after booking a £49.1 million non-cash impairment predominantly relating to its retail segment.
The company said the writedown resulted from a higher discount rate applied to its five-year cash flow forecasts, which reflected elevated UK-wide borrowing costs as well as anticipated increases to the national living wage and national insurance contributions.
Henry Birch, the new Halfords chief executive, said: 'The main factor is essentially out of our control. Our discount rate has gone from 8.5 per cent to 9.5 per cent, but that change is driven by the change in UK gilts over the last year.'
• Business live: the latest news on companies, markets and the economy
He said the impact of increased labour costs over the forecast period, estimated at about £23 million annually, had also been factored in, but denied the writedown reflected under-performance in the retail business itself, despite a post-pandemic slowdown in bicycle sales.
Shares in the business rose 0.35 per cent to 172p on Wednesday as investors focused on the company's underlying pre-tax profit, which rose 6.4 per cent to £38.4 million, ahead of analyst expectations and up from £36.1 million the previous year. Group revenue was marginally higher at £1.71 billion.
The company said it would close under-performing garages and stores as part of a review of its physical estate, although it declined to specify how many sites and jobs would be affected. It also blamed the closures on increased labour costs introduced in Rachel Reeves's October budget.
Closure costs of £14.9 million were booked during the year, the majority of which related to a strategic review of garage locations deemed 'sub-scale' or unsuited to future investment.
Halfords said many of the sites earmarked for closure were located near existing branches being redeveloped as 'Fusion' garages: expanded locations that combine retail and repair services. 'These closures will be immediately accretive to earnings accretive,' the company said.
The company also took a £1.5 million restructuring charge linked to the continuing replacement of its warehouse management systems. It acknowledged deployment issues at its Coventry distribution centre and warned the disruption would continue to affect profits in the present financial year.
Birch said that while its Washford warehouse in Worcestershire had transitioned smoothly, the Coventry rollout had experienced 'teething problems', requiring additional staffing to maintain output levels. The final phase of the rollout, at its Crick site in Northamptonshire, is not due to be complete until 2027.
Although Halfords' motoring segment, which includes garages, parts and maintenance, is in 'very good shape', according to Birch, the retail division continued to face headwinds. Sales of bicycles, which surged during the pandemic, have slowed. The group's tyre sales, a key part of its motoring offer, were described by its boss as 'muted'.
Birch, who joined in April, said he had no plans to retreat from cycling: 'A lot of people recognise the Halfords brand as being a cycling brand. Half of all bicycles that get sold in the UK are sold by Halfords. It's an incredible category leader, but actually 80 per cent of our revenues come from motoring products. So, we really are first and foremost a kind of motoring and automotive focused business, but we also happen to be the cycling leader in the UK. I don't see us dropping cycling or moving away from it.'
He said he had no plans to take the business private despite a sharp fall in its share price since the pandemic. 'I haven't had any chats, nor approaches,' he said. 'And obviously, as a Plc, we're a public company. I'm not out there looking to have those chats.'
Despite cost pressures and operational disruptions, Birch said Halfords' performance in its core motoring categories and the resilience of non-discretionary demand for repairs and maintenance gave him confidence in the business's outlook. ' Clearly, the last few years have been quite difficult, I think, for all retailers, but I'm really confident about where we can take the business.'
Birch, who succeesed Graham Stapleton, was formerly the chief executive of Very Group, the online retailer, and William Hill Online, the betting group.
Asked why he took on the top job at Halfords, he said: 'It's got an incredibly strong brand. It's got a fantastic network of retail stores, garages, mobile vans, and [has] a strong digital element to it. We are category leaders in a sector, which is […] needs-based. If your car won't start, you need a new battery. I think we're in a really strong position.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer's pointless globetrotting proves how irrelevant he is
Starmer's pointless globetrotting proves how irrelevant he is

Telegraph

time16 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Starmer's pointless globetrotting proves how irrelevant he is

Sir Keir Starmer clearly finds burnishing his credentials as a statesman on the world stage far more to his liking than dealing with pesky domestic concerns, such as cutting disability benefits and the winter fuel allowance. British prime ministers usually seek solace in endless overseas jamborees once they have first served a lengthy apprenticeship in Downing Street. Tony Blair was well into his third term before taking refuge in foreign junkets as his domestic popularity waned. By contrast, Starmer, who now has the unenviable honour of the lowest net favourability rating on record, has developed the taste for travelling abroad remarkably early in his premiership. Rather than investing effort in rallying support for policies, 'Never-Here Keir' prefers to spend his time hobnobbing with other world leaders. Last week our Prime Minister was missing in action, attending the increasingly irrelevant meeting of G7 leaders in Canada. It was memorable solely for Donald Trump's sensible decision to head for the exit early to attend to the deepening Iran-Israel conflict. Starmer was in The Hague attending the annual get-together of Nato leaders, where he desperately sought to persuade an increasingly sceptical Trump administration that his Government really was committed to spending 5 per cent of GDP on defence by 2035. By that date, Starmer's undistinguished term in office will be a distant memory. And the defence of the realm will not have been improved a jot by the investment in rural broadband and national roadworks that Starmer now claims is a vital part of his plan to increase overall defence spending. A more detailed examination of the Government's defence plans – one that our allies in the Pentagon will be studying closely – is that there will be no new money to increase the number of troops available to fight the wars of the future. Starmer's boast at the Nato summit that the UK would meet the alliance's new spending target of 5 per cent of GDP 'to deepen our commitment to Nato' is nothing more than an elaborate Treasury 'smoke and mirrors' exercise. Even the highly publicised decision to buy 12 F-35A stealth fighters, which can carry tactical nuclear weapons, has been taken at the expense of buying more of the F-35B variant used by the Royal Navy's two 65,000-ton aircraft carriers, thereby severely diminishing their war-fighting capabilities. Nor does Starmer's endless globetrotting appear to have had any noticeable bearing on his ability to influence key events, as was evident during the Trump administration's decision to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities. While Starmer has an unerring habit of making sure he is photographed next to Trump whenever there is a summit photo op, his ability to bring any influence to bear on the Trump administration's decision-making process is negligible. The first Starmer knew that Trump had given the go-ahead for the bombing raid was when he received a telephone call from the US leader at Chequers, after the B-2 stealth bombers were already in the air. It was merely a courtesy call from Trump, not a consultation with a key ally. The fact that Starmer was completely blindsided by Trump's decision to attack Iran is hardly surprising given that David Lammy, his hapless Foreign Secretary, had returned from meeting Trump administration officials earlier that week insisting there was still a 'window of opportunity' to de-escalate the conflict. The bitter truth is that, for all Starmer attempts to ingratiate himself with world leaders, no one is taking him seriously as a statesman. And this is no wonder given his default response when faced with an international crisis is to indulge in legalistic sophistry and equivocation. Starmer's inability to formulate a clear and coherent response when faced with a global crisis was clearly evident from his handling of the Gaza conflict, when he supported Israel's right to defend itself while at the same time backing the imposition of punitive measures against key members of the Israeli government. The prime minister's leadership failings were again in evidence in the aftermath of the US raid on Iran's infrastructure. While insisting that the UK remained opposed to the ayatollahs acquiring nuclear weapons, Starmer could not bring himself to issue a public declaration of support for Trump's decisive action, which has destroyed any hope the Iranians may have entertained of developing nuclear warheads in the near future. The result is that, for all Starmer's grandstanding at global summits, no one is going to take a politician seriously who is quite content to deceive the outside world about the UK's defence commitments, while at the same time being temperamentally incapable of making his mind up on international issues. Starmer may like to project the image of a global statesman, but the brutal truth is that few world leaders, least of all in Washington, have much interest in hearing the views – or lack of them – of Starmer and his Government.

Bumble sacks hundreds of staff as Gen Z dumps dating apps
Bumble sacks hundreds of staff as Gen Z dumps dating apps

Telegraph

time16 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Bumble sacks hundreds of staff as Gen Z dumps dating apps

Young people across the UK may be hoping for their own summer of love. Yet, it turns out, few of them will be using dating apps to find a partner. Matchmaking service Bumble has revealed plans to cut a third of its staff as Gen Z embraces old-school ways of scoring a date. The company behind the UK's third most-popular dating app warned that the industry was at an 'inflection point', weeks after revealing falling sales. Bumble, which is headquartered in Texas and has offices in London, told investors it would axe 240 jobs with the hope of saving $40m (£29.4m) a year. It said the restructure would cost it up to $18m this year. It comes amid growing dating app fatigue. The apps, which include Tinder and Hinge, peaked during the pandemic as people turned to smartphones as a way to escape isolation. Over five years, Bumble's share price has plunged 92pc, while Match Group, the owner of Tinder, has fallen 68pc. Whitney Wolfe Herd, the Bumble chief executive who also co-founded Tinder, told staff on Wednesday: 'The reality is, we need to take decisive action to restructure to build a company that's resilient, intentional and ready for the next decade. 'We've reset our strategy, and are going back to a start-up mentality – rooted in an ownership mindset and team structures designed for faster, more meaningful execution.' 'Novelty wearing off' Bumble's announcement follows a warning from market leader Tinder, which said that Gen Z were seeking a 'more authentic way to find connections'. Last November, Ofcom revealed that use of most popular dating apps in the UK had fallen last year, with Bumble losing 368,000 users, a dip of 2.3pc. The watchdog said: 'Some analysts speculate that for younger people, particularly Gen Z, the novelty of dating apps is wearing off.' Research from Ipsos found that 63pc of men and 66pc of women between the ages of 16 to 24 prefer meeting potential partners in real life rather than through an app. Just 10pc of those men and 7pc of those women prefer dating apps. Use of dating apps is skewed away from women, who account for just 35pc of users, according to Ofcom. Some women avoid the apps amid concerns over safety and repeated unwanted contact from men. Meanwhile, apps are struggling to keep users engaged, with researchers suggesting that young people are becoming more traditional by choosing potential dates through sports clubs and mutual friends. However, there has also been a rise in dating with people met through online gaming. Hobby apps such as Strava, which has social networking features for runners, are also being used to find partners. Research from Virgin Media found that 70pc of Britons dislike dating apps, and that 51pc would prefer to meet a partner through multiplayer computer games. Luke Brunning, a specialist in the philosophy of romantic life at the University Leeds, told The Guardian: 'There is a growing romanticisation of in-person meeting and interaction. Very few [young people] are turning to the apps as an exclusive means of setting up an in-person meeting. It's much more fluid now.'

Shell denies reports of potential move to take over BP
Shell denies reports of potential move to take over BP

The Independent

time24 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Shell denies reports of potential move to take over BP

Reports that Shell is in talks with its rival BP over a possible takeover is just 'market speculation', the oil and gas giant has said. The Wall Street Journal reported that discussions between the two UK-based energy firms were under way. But on Wednesday, Shell denied talks are taking place with a view to taking over BP. 'As we have said many times before we are sharply focused on capturing the value in Shell through continuing to focus on performance, discipline and simplification,' a spokesperson added. In a call with the Financial Times earlier this year, Shell's chief executive said he would rather buy back more of his company's own shares than launch a takeover bid for BP. 'We will always look at these things, but you are also looking to see what is the alternative,' Wael Sawan said. 'Right now, buying back Shell (shares) for us continues to be absolutely the right alternative to go for.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store