logo
‘Anti-woke' Florida state in legal crosshairs: Civil Rights complaint says 32 scholarships play race and gender favourites; what's actually happening?

‘Anti-woke' Florida state in legal crosshairs: Civil Rights complaint says 32 scholarships play race and gender favourites; what's actually happening?

Time of India2 days ago
Florida State University (FSU) is currently under legal scrutiny after a civil rights complaint was filed alleging that 32 scholarships offered by the institution discriminate on the basis of race and gender.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The complaint, filed by the Equal Protection Project (EPP) with the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights, claims that several scholarships at FSU contain language that favors certain racial or gender groups, raising concerns over potential violations of federal civil rights laws.
What are the allegations against FSU scholarships?
The Equal Protection Project expressed surprise at the scope of the alleged discriminatory scholarships, especially within a state that has recently emphasised anti-'woke' policies. 'We did not expect to find such a large number of discriminatory scholarships at a major state university in the anti-woke Free State of Florida,' the organisation stated, reports
The College Fix
.
Several scholarships under examination include explicit donor preferences for recipients of particular racial or gender identities. For example, the Crossman Career Builders Scholarship states 'it is the preference of the donor that the recipient be a female who is Black/African American, Hispanic, or a member of the Seminole Tribe.' Other scholarships named in the complaint include the Crockett Family Fund for Excellence and the Dr.
Hulon and Dinah Crayton Endowed Scholarship, which similarly grant preferences based on race or gender. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Book Stipend's description notes, 'Any student may apply to be considered for the award; however, it is the preference of the donor that the recipient be an African American student.' All scholarship descriptions contain donor-imposed conditions that EPP alleges violate civil rights laws, including preferences for 'female,' 'African American male,' or specific racial or ethnic group membership, as detailed by
Campus Reform
.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Legal grounds for the complaint
The complaint alleges that these scholarship criteria violate key federal statutes. Specifically, it cites Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits racial discrimination in programs receiving federal funds; Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which bans sex-based discrimination in educational settings; and the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause, which guards against discriminatory legislation targeting specific groups.
Florida State University's response
In response, FSU has defended its scholarship practices. Amy Farnum-Patronis, senior director of the Office of University Communications at FSU, told
The College Fix
that all students are eligible to apply for and receive these scholarships regardless of race or gender. She emphasised that the scholarships are fully funded through private donations, not university funds, ensuring that the scholarships do not impact the institution's budget.
Broader context and impact
The Equal Protection Project's complaint is part of a broader campaign to address discriminatory practices in higher education. According to the organisation, it has filed more than 70 complaints with the Office for Civil Rights, underscoring the widespread nature of such concerns across American universities.
Leigh Ann O'Neill, senior legal strategy attorney at the America First Policy Institute, told
The College Fix
that legal action remains crucial to eliminating discriminatory practices on campuses nationwide.
'Legal actions like this one are the only way to rid our higher education system of them once and for all. Every last dollar of federal funding must be threatened,' she said. O'Neill also noted that discriminatory diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices are not limited to elite universities but are prevalent across many institutions.
At present, the Office for Civil Rights is reviewing the complaint against Florida State University. The outcome could have significant implications for scholarship funding policies, university obligations under civil rights laws, and the role of donor preferences in educational equity.
TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Will Centre pay 18 months' DA arrears to employees, pensioners frozen during Covid? Finance Ministry gives MAJOR update
Will Centre pay 18 months' DA arrears to employees, pensioners frozen during Covid? Finance Ministry gives MAJOR update

Mint

time6 hours ago

  • Mint

Will Centre pay 18 months' DA arrears to employees, pensioners frozen during Covid? Finance Ministry gives MAJOR update

The government has responded to a question on whether or not central government employees and pensioners will get their three instalments of Dearness Allowance (DA) and arrears frozen during Covid-19, saying that it was 'not feasible'. Answering a question at the Lok Sabha on August 11 regarding the roll out of three instalments of arrears that were frozen during Covid-19, Member of Parliament Anand Bhaduria cited economic disruption during that time and said that the arrears were frozen due to that reason. The government pays DA and arrears a cost-of-living adjustment to its employees and pensioners to offset the impact of inflation. DA is usually given twice a year to employees, while DR or Dearness Relief is paid to pensioners. The arrears are credited on a pro-rated basis. However, during Covid-19, the government had frozen these arrears for a period of 18 months, which comes down to three instalments. Here is a breakdown of the questions asked at the Lok Sabha and the government's answers on August 11. Answer: The decision to freeze three instalments of Dearness Allowance (DA) / Dearness Relief (DR) to Central Government employees / pensioners due from 01.01.2020, 01.07.2020 & 01.01.2021 was taken in the context of COVID-19, which caused economic disruption, so as to ease pressure on Government finances. if so, whether fiscal condition of the Government is still under pressure and is on the verge of bankruptcy. Answer: The fiscal deficit of the Government of India has narrowed from 9.2 per cent in the Financial Year (FY) 2020-21 to 4.4 per cent in the FY 2025-26 (Budget Estimates). Answer: The adverse financial impact of pandemic in 2020 and the financing of welfare measures taken by the Government had a fiscal spill over beyond FY 2020-21. Therefore, arrears of DA/DR were not considered feasible.

Will Govt Staff Get 18-Month Frozen DA Arrears? Here's What the Finance Ministry Says
Will Govt Staff Get 18-Month Frozen DA Arrears? Here's What the Finance Ministry Says

News18

time10 hours ago

  • News18

Will Govt Staff Get 18-Month Frozen DA Arrears? Here's What the Finance Ministry Says

Last Updated: Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, the central government put a hold on three instalments of dearness allowance to reduce financial strain during the economic disruption. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the central government froze three instalments of Dearness Allowance (DA) and Dearness Relief (DR) for its employees and pensioners. This decision came as a result of severe economic disruption and the need to reduce pressure on government finances. The move affected payments due from January 1, 2020, July 1, 2020, and January 1, 2021. The freeze prompted questions in Parliament regarding when the pending arrears would be cleared and the government's fiscal health during and after the pandemic. Member of Parliament Anand Bhadauria asked the government about the DA and DR arrears, seeking clarity on the reasons behind the freeze and the current status of payments. In response, the government explained that the freeze was necessary due to the pandemic's financial impact and the additional welfare measures undertaken to support citizens during that period. What is Dearness Allowance? Dearness Allowance (DA) is extra money given to government employees to help them keep up with rising prices. Dearness Relief (DR) is the same kind of support, but for pensioners, so inflation doesn't reduce their spending power. When asked whether the freeze was due to economic disruption and to ease pressure on finances, the government stated: 'The decision to freeze three instalments of Dearness Allowance (DA) / Dearness Relief (DR) to Central Government employees/pensioners due from January 1, 2020, July 1, 2020 & January 1, 2021 was taken in the context of COVID-19, which caused economic disruption, to ease pressure on government finances." On the question of the government's fiscal condition, the government clarified: 'The fiscal deficit of the government of India has narrowed from 9.2 per cent in the Financial Year (FY) 2020-21 to 4.4 per cent in the FY 2025-26 (Budget Estimates)." Regarding when the arrears of 18 months' DA/DR would be paid, the government explained that the economic impact of the pandemic, combined with additional welfare spending, left no room in the budget for these payments: 'The adverse financial impact of pandemic in 2020 and the financing of welfare measures taken by the Government had a fiscal spill over beyond FY 2020-21. Therefore, arrears of DA/DR were not considered feasible." This clarification comes amid growing talk about the 8th Pay Commission, which got approval from the Union Cabinet in January this year but hasn't been officially set up yet. Once the commission is formed, it will meet with stakeholders and prepare a detailed report, usually taking over a year. The report will suggest changes to salaries and allowances for central government employees. Typically, when a new pay commission is implemented, the DA is reset to zero. At present, under the 7th Pay Commission, DA is 55 per cent of basic pay. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

7th Pay Commission: BIG update by Govt on payment of 18-months frozen DA arrears, says ‘decision was taken in…'
7th Pay Commission: BIG update by Govt on payment of 18-months frozen DA arrears, says ‘decision was taken in…'

India.com

time10 hours ago

  • India.com

7th Pay Commission: BIG update by Govt on payment of 18-months frozen DA arrears, says ‘decision was taken in…'

7th Pay Commission Big Update 7th Pay Commission: The issue, which has been repeatedly raised in both Houses of Parliament, came up again on 11 August 2025 when Samajwadi Party MP Anand Bhadauria questioned the government in the Lok Sabha. He asked whether the DA/DR freeze from January 2020 to June 2021 was imposed due to economic disruption and to ease pressure on government finances, and if so, whether the fiscal situation still remains under strain. He also asked why the government has not been able to maintain the robust fiscal condition it inherited in 2014, and by when it plans to release the arrears. 7th Pay Commission: What Govt Says On Frozen DA Arrears? Responding on behalf of the Finance Ministry, Minister of State Pankaj Chaudhary confirmed that the decision to withhold the three instalments of DA/DR due on 1 January 2020, 1 July 2020, and 1 January 2021 was taken to manage the severe financial stress caused by the pandemic. Chaudhary highlighted that the government's fiscal deficit has improved significantly, narrowing from 9.2% of GDP in FY 2020-21 to 4.4% in the FY 2025-26 Budget Estimates. However, he added that the economic impact of COVID-19 and the cost of welfare measures taken during the crisis had spillover effects beyond FY 2020-21, making it not feasible to pay the arrears. The adverse financial impact of pandemic in 2020 and the financing of welfare measures taken by the Government had a fiscal spill over beyond FY 2020-21. Therefore, arrears of DA/DR were not considered feasible, Chaudhary responded.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store