Tánaiste to include services from Israeli settlements in trade ban
TÁNAISTE SIMON HARRIS has vowed to include the provision of services to legislation that will ban imports from Israeli settlements if it stands up to legislative scrutiny.
Harris also said he wants to put pressure on the other 26 European countries to consider banning trade with occupied Palestinian territories, and called on opposition parties to contact their counterparts in the bloc.
He said Ireland is the only country to publish legislation to ban imports from the occupied Palestinian territories, saying it is 'pretty lonely out there', adding it would be 'a hell of a lot better' if Europe moved together on it.
The legislation was approved by the Cabinet on Tuesday morning.
Harris brought forward the renamed Israeli Settlements (Prohibition of Importation of Goods) Bill 2025.
The Government opted for fresh legislation instead of progressing the Occupied Territories Bill, first tabled in 2018.
Advertisement
It will now go before an Oireachtas committee for examination.
The Tánaiste said that every Government TD will be expected to back the legislation as it forms part of the Programme for Government.
'Let's not forget one thing before we get into the detail of the legislation, there isn't another country in the European Union that you can visit today and ask a government minister about their Bill to ban trade and the detail of it, because they don't have one,' he added.
'We're the first country in the European Union to take this step. We're the first country in the European Union say, yes, trade is a European competency, and it'll be a hell of a lot better if Europe moves together, and a hell of a lot more impactful.
'But in the absence of Europe moving together, we're going to go ahead with our own domestic legislation.
'I would really ask the opposition here not to do this lazy politicking of you know, opposition good, government bad. Everybody in this country is sickened to the pit of their stomach with the genocide they see in Gaza.
'They don't care, the people of Ireland, who they vote for in an election in relation to this, they just know in their gut what is happening, particularly children in Gaza, is genocide is wrong, and everyone has to do everything they want.
'I have no policy difference, zero policy difference with the opposition in relation to the inclusion of services, but we do have a Constitution, we are members of the European Union, and I'm not in the business of putting together legislation that would fall at the first legal hurdle.
Related Reads
Opinion: We don't need a new Occupied Territories Bill – improve this one and pass it quickly
Occupied Territories Bill to be replaced by new legislation, Martin confirms
'I presume everybody here wants to pass a law that is impactful, a law that is in compliance with the laws of our land.'
Earlier this week, a number of countries, including Ireland, asked the European Commission to examine how goods produced in illegal Jewish settlements 'can be brought into line with international law'.
Harris said he does not believe the European Union has made itself compliant with the ICJ advisory opinion.
'We will do our own legislation, (I am) open to services, absolutely open to working constructively with the opposition, but also keep the pressure on at the European level,' he added.
'What I hope the opposition will be doing today, every opposition leader should be picking up the telephone, and they should be ringing their counterparts in European countries and saying, 'hey, have you seen here in Ireland we're bringing forward a domestic legislation, would you think about doing it yourself?
'Because so far, it's pretty lonely out there. There's not one other country in Europe that has published any legislation to ban trade, and I'd really appreciate the opposition's help with their counterparts in the 26 other European states.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
'Important step' as tribunal on Russian aggression agreed
Ukraine and the Council of Europe human rights body have signed an agreement on forming the basis for a special tribunal intended to bring to justice senior Russian officials for the crime of aggression against Ukraine. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Council of Europe Secretary General Alain Berset signed the accord in the French city of Strasbourg at the Council's headquarters. "This is truly a very important step. Every war criminal must know there will be justice and that includes Russia. We are now boosting the legal work in a serious way," Mr Zelensky told the ceremony. "There is still a long road ahead. Today's agreement is just the beginning. We must take real steps to make it work. It will take strong political and legal cooperation to make sure every Russian war criminal faces justice, including (President Vladimir) Putin". Ukraine has demanded the creation of such a body since Russia's February 2022 invasion, accusing Russian troops of committing thousands of war crimes. It is also intent on prosecuting Russians for orchestrating the invasion. The 46-member Council of Europe, set up after World War II to uphold human rights and the rule of law, approved the tribunal in May, saying it was intended to be complementary to the International Criminal Court and fill legal gaps in prosecutions. The ICC has issued an arrest warrant against Mr Putin, accusing him of illegally deporting hundreds of children from Ukraine. Mr Berset said the next step to set up the tribunal, which the Council of Europe hopes could start work next year, would be an enlarged agreement to "allow the widest possible number of countries to join, to support, and to help manage the tribunal". It has not yet been decided where the tribunal would be based. "International law must apply to all, with no exceptions and no double standards," said Mr Berset. This is the first time such a tribunal has been set up under the aegis of the Council of Europe, the continent's top rights body. The 46-member Council of Europe is not part of the EU and members include key non-EU European states such as Turkey, the UK and Ukraine. Russia was expelled in the wake of its invasion of Ukraine. According to the Council of Europe, the tribunal will be set up within the framework of the body "with the mandate to prosecute senior leaders for the crime of aggression against Ukraine". It said the tribunal "fills the gap" created by the "jurisdictional limitations" of the ICC. Russian Defence Minister Andrei Belousov said that European supplies of arms and mercenaries to Ukraine had increased the threat of destabilisation in Europe, the Interfax news agency reported. "Attempts to prolong military actions by supplying Ukraine with arms and mercenaries increase the threat of destabilisation. Including in Europe itself," Mr Belousov was quoted as saying. Meanwhile Russia's air defence units destroyed 50 Ukrainian drones overnight, the Russian defence ministry said. Nearly half of the drones were downed over the Kursk region on the border with Ukraine, while the rest were destroyed over several Russian regions, including three over the Moscow region, the ministry added. Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin, writing on the Telegram messaging app, said specialists were examining debris on the ground. Moscow's Vnukovo International Airport suspended departures and arrivals in response to the threat, news agencies quoted aviation watchdog Rosaviatsiya as saying. Restrictions were also in place for a time at airports along the Volga River.
Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Nato praises ‘daddy' figure Donald Trump after he secures historic rising defence spend
Agreement comes amid backdrop of heightened global military tension ©UK Independent European leaders in Nato have agreed to a historic 5pc increase in defence spending and have praised Donald Trump for driving the uplift. Nato secretary general Mark Rutte fawned over the US president and praised him for intervening in the conflict between Iran and Israel, comparing him to a 'daddy' figure stuck between the two warring Middle Eastern parties.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
High Court defers judgment in legal row over Athlone asylum seeker centre pending draft legislation
A High Court judge has said the Government is obliged to provide alternative accommodation for 'innocent' and 'vulnerable' asylum seekers at risk of homelessness while legislation aimed at fast-tracking refugee accommodation is drawn up. Ms Justice Emily Farrell said on Wednesday she would defer judgment in an application by the State to quash an order that struck down a statutory instrument used to develop emergency accommodation at Lissywollen in Athlone , Co Westmeath. She said she wants to wait for updates and to see draft legislation from the Oireachtas. The Government intends to remedy a legal issue over the bypassing of environmental assessments for accommodation that has been categorised as having 'emergency' status. READ MORE Ms Justice Farrell said there could be consequences and a 'real risk of homelessness for innocent third parties and families who may be vulnerable' staying at the centre if they could not be rehomed. The judge said that in the interim, there was an obligation on the Minister to attempt to provide alternative accommodation and to show the efforts made to do so. Ms Justice Farrell said nobody but those granted accommodation last February should be offered accommodation at the centre and no new works should be carried out at the facility, with only essential maintenance to be undertaken. Lawyers for the State have told the High Court there is a 'serious risk to the dignity and safety' of asylum seekers if the Government is not allowed to use special powers to fast-track refugee accommodation as the system cannot immediately rehouse the 137 residents in the facility. Earlier this week, Aoife Carroll SC, for the State, asked the court to put a stay on the December quashing of the use of a statutory instrument that had been used to speed up the establishment of the facility at Lissywollen. [ Minister concedes in High Court challenge to order facilitating asylum-seeker housing in Athlone Opens in new window ] Ms Carroll said that while environmental and EU law had been complied with, it had not been entered into record – which amounted to an innocent, procedural error. The action was taken by Independent Ireland councillor Paul Hogan, who successfully applied to the court in December for a judicial review , arguing that the expedited development was unlawful. The State has conceded the statutory instrument used was 'invalid' and is finalising repairing legislation. Cllr Hogan is taking the case against the office of the Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth. A statutory instrument is secondary legislation, made by a Minister, modifying existing laws. Cllr Hogan successfully claimed the Minister failed to adequately 'screen' the project for potential environmental impacts and that the Minister lacked the expertise to carry out such assessments in an expedited manner. [ Kinvara residents seek to bring challenge against housing of asylum seekers at hotel Opens in new window ] Protests have been held in Athlone over the plan to further develop accommodation for a possible 1,000 asylum seekers, in up to 150 tents, on a site to the rear of an existing direct provision centre. Ms Carroll has said amending legislation was presently to come before the Government and was hoped to be passed in November. Ms Carroll is applying to put a stay on the December order striking down the use of the statutory instrument used by the office of the Minister in expediting the development of the centre. Ms Justice Farrell on Wednesday said she would adjourn the matter to July 21st to allow for sight of the draft legislation that Ms Carroll has said is 'imminent'. She said she was conscious of the risk to the residents' safety and dignity should the facility have to be closed. The judge said the number of people accommodated at the centre should be 'diminished substantially' by July 21st. In taking the successful judicial review, Cllr Hogan, who secured 4.8 per cent of first preference votes running for Independent Ireland in Longford-Westmeath, claimed the ministerial process was 'unlawful, irrational and a breach of fair procedures'.
