Forever Chemicals In Your Closet? How PFAS May Be Harming Your Health
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, collectively known as PFAS, are increasingly found in clothing, from yoga leggings to hiking jackets and activewear. Dubbed "forever chemicals" because they don't naturally break down, PFAS persist in our environment and bodies, raising urgent questions about their long-term effect on human and planetary health and safety.
Initially developed in the mid-20th century, PFAS are now ubiquitous in consumer goods, including personal care products, nonstick cookware, food packaging and water-resistant fabrics. In the apparel industry, they're often applied as coatings to make clothes repel water, oil, and dirt, which is convenient for outdoor gear and athletic wear, but at an environmentally hidden expense.
According to a 2022 report by Toxic-Free Future, 72% of products labeled as water- or stain-resistant contained detectable levels of PFAS. These findings align with independent studies, such as one published in Environmental Science & Technology Letters, which found PFAS in multiple mainstream apparel brands, including some marketed as "green" or "eco-conscious."
While PFAS aren't absorbed through the skin as easily as they are ingested, research suggests that chronic, low-level exposure from clothing still contributes to a person's overall toxic burden. That's because PFAS can break down over time, entering the Air as dust, lingering on skin, and washing into water systems, where they accumulate in the environment and human tissue. Here's what the science shows:
Endocrine Disruption
Immune System Suppression
Increased Cancer Risk
Metabolic and Cardiovascular Effects
Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity
This growing body of evidence has prompted researchers to frame PFAS exposure not as an isolated risk, but as a chronic environmental stressor that interacts with other economic and sociocultural issues, including diet, air pollution and systemic health issues.
As scientific awareness grows, so does public pressure. U.S. states like California and New York are leading the way by implementing bans on intentionally added PFAS in textiles, beginning with outerwear and expanding into broader apparel categories. The European Union is considering a comprehensive ban on PFAS in all consumer goods under its REACH regulatory framework.
Still, industry resistance persists. Many apparel brands cite durability and supply chain complexity as reasons for the slow adoption of sustainable practices. Despite the highly complex nature of this worldwide topic, alternatives exist, including wax-based coatings, bio-based repellents, and PFAS-free membranes.
While systemic change is paramount, informed consumer choices remain a powerful force. Here's how to reduce PFAS exposure through your wardrobe:
The comfort of stain-free leggings or rainproof jackets might not be worth the cost to our long-term human and planetary health. As consumers, scientists and changemakers start to challenge the invisible risks woven into our clothes, the fashion industry faces a crucial inflection point: choose short-term performance or long-term responsibility.
Certainly, what we wear is about expression, but also exposure and a more profound commitment to our overall well-being.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
35 minutes ago
- CBS News
Kids impacted by pediatric cancer get MLB star treatment with help from White Sox
Some special kids got to feel what it's like to be a baseball player. The kids, who are impacted by cancer, swapped roles and signed trading cards and baseballs for White Sox players. Inside Rate Field at the Wintrust Scout Lounge, some of the softest spoken voices are making a major impact. "Today was very cool," Ryan Block said. Block, 11, is one of 15 kids from the local non-profit organization, Cal's Angels. "We try to normalize their treatment and their life as much as possible," coordinator Megan Gertz said. The kids were impacted by pediatric cancer. They shared custom-designed trading cards with their faces on them with coaches and players, like pitcher Drew Thorpe. "We go through our day-to-day lives as Major League Baseball players. Just kind of the flip side of it. Like It's cool for them to kind of feel how we feel sometimes," he said. "It's usually they sign our stuff because they're the famous, popular people and we're just like, some kids," Block said. But they're not just some kids. Block was diagnosed with Burkitt's leukemia, a very rare and aggressive form of leukemia, but two years ago, his doctors did a scan and found his body was clear of cancer. "I had my hair, and then I lost it. Then I was like sick, I didn't feel good. I lost like a lot of weight," he said. Cal's Angels said the reverse signing aims to build confidence and celebrate their everyday battle against cancer. "We're six years later from when he first got sick, and we're here, which says something about the organization," Dan McCarthy said. He said his son, 8-year-old James, got sick right before he turned two in 2018. He was on the ventilator for about a month and a half and was in and out of Lurie Children's Hospital for three years. James was diagnosed with JMML, a very rare and aggressive form of leukemia. He's now in remission. "We kind of feel like we're on the other side of it now and he's doing really well," McCarthy said. His son is a man of few words, but he had this to say about the experience. "very, very cool," James said. The organization said next month is Pediatric Cancer Awareness Month. They plan to partner with schools, youth organizations, and businesses to wear gold and have gold ribbons throughout the Chicago area.
CNN
37 minutes ago
- CNN
New ‘Make America Healthy Again' report to be released in weeks
Food & healthFacebookTweetLink Follow Americans will have to wait several weeks for the Trump administration's next steps in its agenda to 'Make America Healthy Again,' according to three people familiar with the matter. While President Donald Trump's MAHA Commission will submit its strategy to the White House on Tuesday — sticking to an executive-ordered deadline — scheduling issues stand in the way of its public release. The commission is 'on track' to deliver its report to the White House by August 12, White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement. 'The report will be unveiled to the public shortly thereafter as we coordinate the schedules of the President and the various cabinet members who are a part of the Commission.' Officials are aiming to launch their strategy by the end of this month, according to the three people familiar. The commission's first MAHA report, issued in May, laid out the case that ultraprocessed foods, pharmaceutical prescriptions and environmental toxins are driving a crisis of childhood chronic disease in America. Much of the reports' findings echoed longtime arguments of health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who leads the commission. The second installment is expected to propose strategies and reforms to tackle those issues. Actions can include, per the president's executive order, ending certain federal practices that 'exacerbate the health crisis' and 'adding powerful new solutions.' Public health experts, MAHA supporters and industry advocates alike have been anxiously awaiting the commission's recommendations, and how far they will go. There is lingering unease among farmers and agricultural groups after the first report flagged studies that suggest links between commonly used pesticides and various illnesses such as cancer and liver problems. Groups like the American Farm Bureau Federation called those 'unproven theories' and warned that calling use of common pesticides into question could jeopardize Americans' confidence in the food supply. Federal health and agricultural officials sought to reassure farmers in the ensuing weeks. This month, a high-ranking Enviornmental Protection Agency official told attendees at a sugar industry conference that agencies would 'respect' the current regulatory framework, as reported by DTN Progressive Farmer, an agriculture news and analysis company. Another potential battleground is the federal path forward on ultraprocessed foods. Kennedy has led a public campaign for major food brands to voluntarily remove artificial additives and dyes from popular products, but nutrition advocates have pushed for the administration to crack down with regulations. This month, a former leader of the US Food and Drug Administration challenged the agency to remove ultraprocessed foods from the market by essentially outlawing certain ingredients. But some have remained skeptical that federal MAHA leaders will take drastic action. 'We need policies to change big food and the food system, so it produces healthier foods,' Jim Krieger, executive director of Healthy Food America, said in a news briefing Monday. 'Will [the MAHA commission] move beyond PR efforts, voluntary agreements and handshakes — none of which have really worked to improve the food system in the past — and suggest regulatory action with real teeth?'
CBS News
39 minutes ago
- CBS News
Protein-packed snacks gain mainstream appeal, experts say
Once the domain of bodybuilders and athletes, protein has moved to the center of many Americans' daily diets, showing up in everything from cereal to doughnuts, according to nutrition experts. For Yisel Soler, a South Florida fitness enthusiast, protein isn't just a box to check — it's central to her routine. "Make sure you have the protein and adequate amount of protein every day, every morning throughout the day," Soler said. She is part of a growing trend. A recent survey by Cargill found that 61% of Americans are actively prioritizing protein in their food choices. Food companies are responding with a flood of protein-enriched snacks like chips, popcorn and cereal. "The protein market exploded," said Monica Auslander Moreno, a registered dietitian and founder of Essence Nutrition in Miami. Moreno said most healthy adults should aim for about 0.8 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight daily, or roughly 61 grams for the average American woman. However, she believes that amount may be too low, especially with new recommendations for strength training, which suggest at least two to three times per week. She also stresses quality over quantity. "I'm reading that this ice cream or these crackers or this cereal has 8 g of protein. Are you absorbing that protein? Is it high-quality protein? And is it actually delivering the benefits which you would expect from this high protein food, meaning, 'Oh, I'm going to have more strength and more muscle growth?'" Moreno said. To measure that quality, she uses the Protein Digestibility-Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS), a scientific scale that ranks how well the body absorbs and uses protein. "The highest is a 1.0. The highest is actually an egg," she added. Moreno advises sticking to whole food sources when possible — a view shared by personal trainer and former bodybuilder Saul Rivera. "The steak, the chicken, the beef, if it's in the morning, eggs, egg whites," Rivera said. Rivera said protein snacks can be a good choice in moderation. "The chips, the protein bars, and there's nothing wrong with that. That's a great alternative to eating a Snickers bar or regular chips, you know? But I firmly believe that in terms of diet, when it comes to protein, you wanna go to the natural sources, right?" he said. He warned against replacing full meals with snacks. "I think people confuse it, because their goal is to lose weight and to look a certain way. They're thinking that by eating less or eating these snacks and then not eating these full meals, that's going to get them to their goal. And it doesn't work that way, you know you gotta build a good diet plan," Rivera said. Soler said she tries to balance her protein intake with her long-term health in mind. "Hopefully you know, in that process, like living longer. But not just living longer but living healthy," she said.
