‘I never thought I'd see that': Why an American pope came as a shock
Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost, born in Chicago, became the new pope Thursday.
Tampa Bay reacts to election of Pope Leo XIV
The Vatican announced Prevost, 69, will be known as Pope Leo XIV.
Vincent Caruso watched the news unfold at Jesuit High School.
'We were watching the livestream, and when the white smoke came up, we all freaked out like, 'Oh, we have a new pope',' Caruso said.
It was a moment celebrated across the globe, but especially here in the U.S. as the first American pope was picked to lead the Catholic church.
'It makes me feel special, because… we're similar,' Chase Pears said. 'We're from the same place.'
The decision came as a surprise to many Catholics in Tampa Bay.
'I never thought I'd see that,' said Jesuit High School Assistant Principal Brian Greenfield. 'Excitement, shock, curiosity.'
Greenfield explained that, he hopes, having a pope from the U.S. will have a positive impact on the nation.
'Hopefully in America, where we need a little more inspiration, faith inspiration, so hopefully this pope will enliven us, inspire us and call us to more,' he said.
So why is everyone so shocked the new pope is American?
News Channel 8 went to USF Associate Professor James Cavendish to find out.
'The United States is a world power, and to also have the pope from the United States seemed like it was just too much of a consolidation of global power for the United States,' he explained.
But Cavendish said, in this case, he doesn't think that's true.
'It seems like he may have spent as much time outside of the United States than inside the United States, so he's very much of a global figure,' he explained.
If you'd like to send Nicole a tip, you can fill out the form below.
Submit a form.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
See where this Green Bay building ranked in survey of 'ugliest' public buildings in U.S.
Green Bay City Hall, built in 1956 at 100 N. Jefferson St., is considered the 33rd "ugliest" public building in America, according to a 3,012-person survey conducted in July by a New Jersey real estate brokerage firm. The New Jersey Real Estate Network asked 3,003 respondents "based on age, gender, and geography" to give their opinions on what America's most unattractive civic buildings were, compiling a ranking of 100 buildings. It concluded, "There's something oddly democratic about this list. These aren't tourist sites or architectural darlings ... They're workhorses, not showpieces. But as this survey makes clear, design still matters to residents." Only the top five buildings got blurbs detailing their perceived unattractiveness with the Flint, Michigan, Municipal Center at No. 1. There was no accompanying description or explanation for Green Bay City Hall, the sole building from Wisconsin on the list, slotted 33rd place. But from the explanations that were given for the top five places, a common architectural theme ran through the buildings that were supposedly harsh on the eyes: boxy-silhouettes cut from stark, straight lines with little details or ornamentation. Such a description describes Green Bay's steel-framed, brick-clad City Hall in a site file to the National Register of Historic Places available through the Wisconsin Historical Society. "The architectural firm of Foeller, Schober, Berners, and Jahn was responsible for the contemporary, box-like style design of the building," read the site file. The building was constructed after a 1953 fire in the old City Hall Annex left several city departments, state offices, civic groups, and some renters homeless, a 1957 Green Bay Press-Gazette article reported. To make way for the new building, the former City Hall — built in 1901 in the colonial revival style popular at the time with an arched entrance, ionic columns, and a bell tower — was razed in late 1956 and became the parking lot for the current City Hall, according to the Wisconsin Historical Society. It stands six stories tall, the first story made of polished red granite. Almost all window openings in the upper floors are identical, and the windows are in regular grids on the sides of the building. "The building ... is an excellent example of mid-century, contemporary style architecture with high-end material finishes," the site file concludes, referring to the mid-century modernist style popular in American federal buildings from 1950 to 1979 for their lack of ornamentation, flat roofs, smooth walls, massive scale, exposed walls meant to project functionality and simplicity. Here are the top 10 ugliest public buildings, according to the survey: City of Flint Municipal Center (Flint, Michigan) Fresno County Superior Court (Fresno, California) Buffalo City Court (Buffalo, New York) Jackson County Courts Building (Pascagoula, Mississippi) Philadelphia Municipal Services Building (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) Akron Municipal Court (Akron, Ohio) Atlantic City Municipal Court (Atlantic City, New Jersey) Bentonville Public Works Maintenance Facility (Bentonville, Arkansas) Tuscaloosa County Public Works Building (Tuscaloosa, Alabama) El Paso County Court Administration Building (El Paso, Texas) Jesse Lin is a reporter covering the community of Green Bay and its surroundings, as well as politics in northeastern Wisconsin. Contact him at 920-834-4250 or jlin@ This article originally appeared on Green Bay Press-Gazette: See Green Bay public building ranked in top 100 ugliest in U.S. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
To the Mom With a Teen Who Just Doesn't Seem to Care
I watched my son walk to my car last Friday after school. I love picking him up; there's something about seeing him with his friends and the visceral relief you see in their smiles. It's nostalgic since I remember feeling the same way, but I love watching him and seeing him in a space different than the one he's in when he's with me and when he doesn't think I'm paying attention. My son doesn't care how he dresses and his room is a mess As he gets closer, I notice something smeared all over his white T-shirt. I have no idea what it is, but I'm sure he doesn't care. He slept at his father's last night, and as I ask him what's all over his shirt, his brother and sister chime in. 'He went to school like that,' they tell me simultaneously. Of course, I could say something to his dad about it and fault him for letting his son arrive at school in such a state, but I don't. I know how their morning went well because I've had many confrontations with him about his clothing if he's taken a shower or done his homework on time, and he doesn't care. Not even a little bit. It doesn't bother him if he walks into school with stained clothing, an oversized whitehead on his nose, or the same pants he's worn the last three days in a row. I don't understand it, and we had many throwdowns about this and other subjects at a very early hour. He keeps his room looking like a nightmare, and when I tell him to clean it up, it consists of him bringing down a sink full of dirty dishes and throwing everything else under the bed. He doesn't try hard in school He doesn't try hard in school despite being an intelligent kid who is excellent in math and science. At 15, I can't read his penmanship, and he doesn't put any effort into projects — he doesn't care. I've tried; I've taken him to counseling; I've loved him hard, and I've backed off. And then… There have been moments I've screamed at him, trying to get across how much I want him to care, how much I want him to live up to his potential, but it doesn't help. Nothing does. If your teen doesn't seem to care, you're not alone I'm telling you this because I want you to know that you aren't alone if you have a teen who doesn't give a flip about many things. I know so many teenagers out there are thriving and thinking about college and how many goals they will score in tonight's game, and then there's your kid. They are good and kind and can be sweet, and, of course, you love them — it's guttural and huge. But you wish they would care. You wish they'd shower more and not treat their room like a junkyard. You wish they would live up to their potential in school and play ball because they have skills they are hiding. You've tried it all, and nothing you do works, and it brings you to tears. You wonder if it's something you've done, if you've pushed too hard or not enough. But I have to tell you; it is not just your child. So many moms are feeling this way despite what they post on social media or what they see on the field. Those are snippets from a highlight reel; it's certainly not the whole story. I know my son has gifts; he's found a few but not all of them. I know he will in time; he's not ready yet, and I've realized I can't squeeze them out of him. I'm not giving up on him I'm not giving up; I've committed myself that I'd let him be because what I'm doing now, what his father is doing now, isn't working. We are both baffled; we both did well in high school and couldn't wait to go to college. Honestly, I wouldn't have been caught dead walking around high school in a stained shirt, and if my room looked like his, I'd cry. We raised him to be a good kid and a good adult; you have raised your kid to be a good human, too. I know you have. That doesn't stop because all our efforts are being blatantly ignored, but maybe we can give ourselves a damn break and realize we can't force them to care about things they don't. We want it to happen organically, of course, and I don't think it's going to if I keep shoving cleanliness, organization, working harder in school, and acne pads down his throat. My son is lovely. He doesn't skip school; he gets his work done by the skin of his teeth, and he takes care of me when I get sick since his father moved out. But he doesn't want to play sports; he couldn't care less if he was wearing clean clothes or has deodorant on or if all his friends are in the National Honor Society, and he could be too if he tried just a bit more. He lacks desire and motivation. My son doesn't care about many things right now, and if your child doesn't either, let's try and remember (together because I need support here) there are worse things. As his mom, I've worried other people will notice his nonchalant attitude and think it means I haven't shown up for him. Maybe you're worried about that too. Perhaps you are worried about it at this very moment. But mother to mother, let's let go of that thought and the fact they could be doing so much more with their life right now despite our support and our nagging and focus on the positive things they bring to the table because there are many. Please know, though, you aren't alone; your child is not alone, and I feel they will be just fine. The writer wishes to remain anonymous. More Great Reads Mom and Dad, Please Stick With Me SaveSave SaveSave The post To the Mom With a Teen Who Just Doesn't Seem to Care appeared first on Grown and Flown. Solve the daily Crossword
Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
US Army Paratroopers to See Major Pay Change
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The U.S. Army is restructuring its airborne forces, leading to pay changes for thousands of parachutist positions. According to a report from the American military newspaper Stars and Stripes, an administrative message delivered to service members on July 30 announced that more than 22,000 paratroopers will no longer receive their monthly $150 "jump pay." This is due to reclassifications of paid parachutist positions which will take effect in the upcoming fiscal year. The reduced number which will remain eligible for the payments will comprise those deemed more likely to deploy these capabilities in combat operations in the foreseeable future, Newsweek understands. When approached for comment, U.S. Army Spokesman Major Travis Shaw told Newsweek: "The decision resulted from a 16-week study, which concluded that transformation was needed because the previous structure exceeded the operational requirements." Why It Matters The removal of jump pay for more than 22,000 parachutists—a significant portion of the roughly 50,000 the army keeps on its rolls—signals a major shift in its priorities, emphasizing the need for combat readiness and resource management over the maintenance of a large and permanent airborne force. What To Know Jump pay—also known as Parachute Duty Pay—is an extra monthly bonus awarded to soldiers who are parachute-qualified and actively serving in airborne roles. The upcoming change will allow soldiers to attain their parachuting qualifications but will not require them to keep these up to date or take part in jump operations. Soldiers are generally required to jump once every three months to maintain jump status, a baseline considered inadequate among Army leadership for achieving proficiency. This change was discussed earlier this year. Lieutenant General Gregory Anderson, head of the 18th Airborne Corps, told Army Times in April that dozens of branches had been discussing how to improve the readiness of airborne operations since September. "We started to assume risk with the high-end forces that have to be ready to go tonight," Anderson told the outlet. "This is not about saving money; it's about getting readiness to where we need it." Paratroopers of the 173rd Airborne Brigade of the US Army in Europe take part in the military exercise Swift Response 2025 at the military base in Rukla, Lithuania, on May 16, 2025. Paratroopers of the 173rd Airborne Brigade of the US Army in Europe take part in the military exercise Swift Response 2025 at the military base in Rukla, Lithuania, on May 16, 2025. AFP via Getty Images/Petras Malukas Anderson added that limited aircraft had led to a broad "decline in collective airborne proficiency," and that devoting resources to over 50,000 airborne positions had reduced the readiness of assault forces. "We're trying to prop up a very big structure of 56,000 with dwindling resources, we're spreading those resources out, and we're undermining our own readiness goals," Anderson said during a podcast appearance in April. He added that many of those currently receiving jump pay are not currently meeting their "proficiency requirements." Major Shaw told Newsweek that removing 22,000 from paid active jump status "will refocus training and resources on critical forces to strengthen operational effectiveness." Soldiers who remain eligible will see an increase in this extra monthly allowance, as announced by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth in May, with jump pay is set to increase from $150 per month to $200 for paratroopers. In addition, jumpmasters, who are responsible for training and leading airborne operations, "are going to receive an additional $150 a month in incentive pay," Hegseth told the audience of current and active members of the 82nd Airborne Division at Fort Bragg, North Carolina. Major Shaw told Newsweek that this will mean jumpmasters will be paid an additional $350 per month for these duties, and that this pay bump is in recognition of "the essential role of jumpmasters in developing combat-ready forces." What People Are Saying Lieutenant General Gregory Anderson, during an episode of the From the Green Notebook podcast, said: "Here's the big change: we're going to reduce the number of paid parachuter positions by 22,000. So currently, as of today, we have 56,000 paid parachuter positions in the Army. For historical context, the 101st and the 82nd at Normandy dropped fewer than 13,000 into Normandy." "It's not about the money per se, it's literally about—for the forces that will jump in the alpha echelon and fight off a potentially contested drop zone—we want them at the highest level of readiness," he added. "And three jumps … is not going to get us the readiness we need." One Redditor on the r/army forum, a community for current and former recruits as well as enthusiasts, wrote: "Even as someone who was Airborne I think this makes sense. The Army was paying over 20,000 people to be on jump status who realistically weren't going to be used as such. By having them still be Airborne qualified though they can quickly recreate Airborne units by having them go through refresher training if they ever needed. Sounds like they aren't going to save all that money though because they are going to boost the pay for the remaining Airborne troops and jumpmasters." What Happens Next? The changes are set to take effect in the 2026 fiscal year which begins October 1.
