More than half of Canadians want cuts to the federal public service: poll
The poll indicates that 54 per cent of respondents want the federal bureaucracy cut, 24 per cent want it maintained and four per cent say it should get bigger. The poll suggests 17 per cent of respondents were not sure what should happen.
The poll, which was conducted online and can't be assigned a margin of error, cites federal records that indicate the government has added almost 99,000 employees since 2016 and personnel costs have increased by more than 70 per cent.
Conducted by Leger for the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, the poll suggests that half of Canadians say the quality of federal services has declined since 2016.
Almost a quarter of Canadians polled say they believe the quality of services has remained stagnant, while 11 per cent say those services have improved and 16 per cent are unsure.
While Prime Minister Mark Carney promised during the election campaign to cap — not cut — the size of the public service, most departments and agencies have since been asked to find program spending cuts of up to 15 per cent by 2028-29.
A recent report by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives said the public service could shed almost 60,000 jobs over the next four years as Ottawa looks to cut costs.
Andrew Enns, Leger's executive vice-president for Central Canada, told The Canadian Press that the poll is timely given the planned fall budget and "noise" from the federal government about looking at the size of the public service.
He said the poll suggests there is a widespread belief among Canadians that the civil service is "on the large side" and needs to shrink.
Enns also said Canadians don't feel they're getting great value in exchange for the increase in the size of the public service and there's a strong sense that "something has to happen."
The poll suggests that Quebecers and Albertans are most strongly in favour of reducing the size and cost of the public service, at 62 and 61 per cent. Half of Ontarians and 53 per cent of people in B.C. also said they'd like to see a reduction.
Just over a third of respondents between the ages of 18 and 34 said they'd like to see a reduction in the size and cost of the public service, compared to almost half of people aged 35 to 54 and 71 per cent of those aged 55 and older.
Enns said those older voters, who played a large role in Carney's election win, are "pretty strongly convinced" the public service is too large and isn't performing as it should.
"In that sense, the argument is probably even stronger for the government to take some action here," Enns said.
Franco Terrazzano, federal director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, said the size of the federal bureaucracy has "ballooned" since 2016 and the cost to taxpayers has gone "extremely high."
He said the polling shows that a bigger public service doesn't equate to better services for taxpayers.
"The government has to cut spending and the government has to shrink the cost and size of its bloated bureaucracy," Terrazzano said, adding that his organization will continue to push for spending cuts.
Arguing that "the government is broke," Terrazzano pointed out that Carney promised to balance the operating budget in the recent election and that interest charges on the federal debt are costing taxpayers.
"Prime Minister Mark Carney, he should look at these polling numbers, he should listen to Canadians and he should know that Canadians support cutting the size and cost of Ottawa's bureaucracy," he said.
The polling industry's professional body, the Canadian Research Insights Council, says online surveys cannot be assigned a margin of error because they do not randomly sample the population.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 11, 2025.
Catherine Morrison, The Canadian Press
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Buzz Feed
an hour ago
- Buzz Feed
20 Moments People Realized We Living In Different Realities
If you think the world feels so divided now, you're not alone. Recently, Reddit user Musicferret asked people to share examples of situations where they thought, "We're not separated by politics. We're separated by reality." People had A LOT to say — the post had over 1,400 comments! Here are some of the best and most interesting replies: "Canadian here. I visited the US recently and took an Uber. I told the driver that I'm from Canada, and he asked me how we're taking the 51st state stuff. I said that Canadians are mad about it. He told me I'm wrong because some folks in Alberta support it and would separate." "I ended the conversation by saying that Texas has a bigger chance of seceding from the US than Alberta leaving Canada, and maybe he's not getting the full story."—judgingyouquietly "My father told me that empathy is just a buzzword for my generation." "I was doing bedside nursing during the pandemic. So many people who'd never set foot inside a hospital told me COVID was a hoax." "In the late 1990s, I was clear to a conservative friend that I think Bill Clinton is a mostly terrible human, and I just voted for him because he did things politically that I liked. My conservative friend said she couldn't get past the sleaze. Now? She's skeptical that Trump has ever cheated on a spouse and is skeptical that he's even racist." —KetosisCat "My mom said she wondered if there really was a war in Ukraine because 'you don't see any videos, just some pictures.' Like, Mom, there are a lot of videos, you're just not seeing them because of the websites you're on." "The whole anti-vaccine movement in the global West, especially for diseases like measles. I grew up in a developing world country, where everyone — rich, poor, and destitute — clamored to get their kids vaccinated. Then I moved to Canada and heard parents say they won't get the measles vaccine for their kids while we're in the middle of an outbreak. Their stupidity is endangering the lives of their children." "The whole United Healthcare CEO assassination showed a clear divide between the upper and lower classes. No matter the politics, the rich couldn't fathom why the middle and lower classes reacted the way we did. The media (controlled by the rich) was saying one thing; meanwhile, social media (where the lower classes are given a platform) was saying something else. That time felt like I was in a dystopian novel." —hideyohuzbandz "I'm trans, and most of my friends are trans. We get together and laugh and cry and have good times and bad. Some of us want to settle down with a house, wife, and kids. Others are extremely ambitious with their art and careers. But they're all good people. Then you speak to someone who's anti-trans, and they claim we're all groomers, rapists, pedophiles, mentally ill, mutilated, radicalized monsters. We live in completely separate realities, but you can't convince these people of our humanity." "A couple of years ago, my wife and I went to California with some other people. One of those people had a very specific and negative opinion of California that came out every once in a while. We were on the boardwalk enjoying a beautiful day and taking in the art, but that guy was adamant about California's 'bums and crime' problem, even though we were perfectly fine. It was a very weird situation just trying (and failing) to get him to look around and see reality." "The ability to drink safe milk products." —Antiolant "My dad maintains that there are no known incidents in all of American history of any Republican politician ever telling a lie or failing to keep a campaign promise — except when they were forced to by a dirty liberal." "My boss laughed when I said masks help you to avoid spreading COVID." "The last time I communicated with my dad, he was subscribed to the idea that the No Kings protestors were all paid." —OrochiKarnov "I recently had a conversation with my dad about the flooding in Texas. He said, 'I don't understand how something like that could happen. Isn't the whole point of the weather service to warn people ahead of time? How did they miss something like that?' I replied, 'It's probably because Trump severely cut their budget and fired a ton of people.' He responded, 'I should have known you'd make this political.'" "When Elon Musk did a 'Nazi-like salute' during Trump's inauguration, some of my friends started making excuses for him. That's when I left my friend group." —Slarg232 "My father told me that my sisters and I were radicalized by going to college." "My dad believes that UFOs are real, but not aliens. He says UFOs are metaphysical evidence of demons interacting with our plane of existence. He learned this on YouTube. And yes, he voted for Trump three times." —himbologic "Climate change. There is an overwhelming amount of evidence that climate change is real and driven by human actions. Differing opinions about how we should handle climate change can be political, but denying that climate change exists in the face of all the evidence is delusion." "One of my coworkers falsely believes that EMF (electric and magnetic fields) waves cause cancer." "I once had a conversation with Republicans who sincerely believed that schools let kids identify as cats and have litter boxes in classrooms for them. This is fake. It never happened. But they genuinely believe it is actively still happening." —StragglingShadow Do you have a similar story to share? Drop in in the comments, or if you'd rather remain anonymous, fill out the form below. Your response could be featured in an upcoming BuzzFeed post. H/T r/AskReddit

Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
The data is in: Many Canadians are still avoiding travel to the US
Canadians are still avoiding travel to the United States. Preliminary data from the Canadian government suggests the number of Canadians visiting the United States by car declined year over year for the seventh straight month in July. Canadian residents returning to the country from the United States via car declined by nearly 37% compared to July 2024, according to Statistics Canada. Road trips typically account for the majority of Canadians traveling to the United States. Return trips by air also declined nearly 26% year-over-year, while Canadian residents returning from overseas countries increased. Canadians started boycotting United States travel and American goods in response to President Donald Trump's tariff policy and expressed desire to make the neighbor to the north the 51st state, Business Insider previously reported. On August 1, Trump raised tariffs on Canada to 35% for goods that don't fall under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. Trump said Canada had failed to secure its border and crack down on drug trafficking. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has said most goods fall under the USMCA. On Friday, he said 85% of Canada's trade with the United States was "tariff-free."However, according to US Census Bureau Data, about 38% of Canadian goods, when measured by value, entered the United States under USMCA in 2024. Canadians told Business Insider earlier this year they were boycotting the United States to protest Trump's policies and that the situation had led to a surge in national pride. Travel companies have previously said Canadians were opting for Europe, Mexico, and the Caribbean instead of the United States. A recent survey by Longwoods International, a market research consultancy focused on the travel tourism industry, found Canadian sentiment has remained icy toward the United States. The survey, which polled 1,000 Canadian adults in July, found that 63% said United States government policies made them less likely to visit the country. It also found that while 84% of respondents believed the United States was full of attractions, only 36% felt it was welcoming to travelers from diverse backgrounds.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
New federal entity to prioritize Canadian-made, affordable housing projects
OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney's promised new entity to spur massive amounts of housing construction will prioritize the building of affordable housing and the use of Canadian materials, says a consultation document published by the government on Monday. The document shared by Canada's housing department says Build Canada Homes is also intended to accelerate the speed at which federal lands are converted to housing, and to stress the use of materials, manufacturing and construction methods that reduce the cost and environmental impact of building. It says financial and non-financial tools being explored include loans, equity investments, real property and housing investments, loan guarantees and contributions. The department is still working on the program's design and says it's accepting feedback from the public until the end of the month. The document, released as part of a consultation process with builders and other industry stakeholders, says Build Canada Homes is positioned to support projects that deliver a "significant number" of affordable housing units. It also says the government will look at projects that expand the supply of housing run by organizations like co-ops, non-profits and Indigenous housing providers. The document says the government will look for opportunities to use Canadian-made materials and regional production hubs, and to boost the efficiency of public dollars through tools like below-market-rate loans or private or philanthropic capital. It will also prioritize projects that use new methods of construction, like prefabricated or 3D-printed construction. Housing affordability was a major issue in the recent federal election, as there haven't been enough homes built in Canada to keep up with population growth. The Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation said in a June report that Canada needs to build between 430,000 and 480,000 new housing units over the next decade, to bring housing costs back to where they were before the pandemic. Carney promised in his election platform that his government would invest $6 billion in the Build Canada Homes initiative. The platform said Build Canada Homes would act as a developer to build affordable housing at scale, including on public lands. It also promised to provide over $25 billion in financing to prefabricated homebuilders in Canada, support affordable homebuilders and incentivize companies to hire apprentices and recent graduates by establishing new requirements on federal contribution agreements to major projects. Caroline Desrochers, parliamentary secretary to the minister of housing and infrastructure, said in a recent interview with The Canadian Press that the government is exploring options for Build Canada Homes, which could potentially become a separate agency or a unit within Housing, Infrastructure and Communities Canada. She said the government is aiming to launch the program in the fall and is "going to start doing work right now with what we have already" while exploring the best governance for the entity. Desrochers said the goal is to not create "more layers of bureaucracy and approvals." Desrochers said representatives from the government and the CMHC are on a task force created to develop the options for the new program. She said the government is also in discussion with several promoters and modular and prefabricated home companies to see what projects are ready for funding and to be built. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 11, 2025. Catherine Morrison, The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data