logo
Air Canada delays plans to resume operations after flight attendants refuse to end strike

Air Canada delays plans to resume operations after flight attendants refuse to end strike

CBS Newsa day ago
Air Canada is delaying its plans to resume services on Sunday after its 10,000 striking flight attendants defied the Canadian government's return-to-work order to remain on the picket lines.
The strike, which began on Saturday morning, stranded more than 100,000 travelers around the world during the peak summer travel season. The Canada Industrial Relations Board ordered airline staff back to work by 2 p.m. Sunday after the Canadian government intervened and Air Canada said it planned to resume flights Sunday evening.
However, the Canadian Union of Public Employees, which represents the flight attendants, said the demonstrations will keep going around the country, despite the airline's statement.
"We invite Air Canada back to the table to negotiate a fair deal, rather than relying on the federal government to do their dirty work for them when bargaining gets a little bit tough," the union said. "We remain on strike. We demand a fair, negotiated contract and to be compensated for all hours worked."
The airline said in a statement Sunday afternoon that it plans to resume flights on Monday evening.
Fewer than 12 hours after workers walked off the job, Federal Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu ordered the 10,000 flight attendants back to work, saying now is not the time to take risks with the economy and noting the unprecedented tariffs the U.S. has imposed on Canada. Hajdu referred the work stoppage to the Canada Industrial Relations Board.
The shutdown of Canada's largest airline early Saturday was impacting about 130,000 people a day. Air Canada operates around 700 flights per day.
According to numbers from aviation analytics provider Cirium, Air Canada had canceled a total of 671 flights by Saturday afternoon, following 199 on Friday. And another 96 flights scheduled for Sunday were already suspended.
The bitter contract fight escalated Friday as the union turned down Air Canada's prior request to enter into government-directed arbitration, which allows a third-party mediator to decide the terms of a new contract.
Flight attendants walked off the job around 1 a.m. EDT on Saturday. Around the same time, Air Canada said it would begin locking flight attendants out of airports.
Last year, the government forced the country's two major railroads into arbitration with their labor union during a work stoppage. The union for the rail workers is suing, arguing the government is removing a union's leverage in negotiations.
The Business Council of Canada had urged the government to impose binding arbitration in this case, too. And the Canadian Chamber of Commerce welcomed the intervention.
Hajdu maintained that her Liberal government is not anti-union, saying it is clear the two sides are at an impasse.
Passengers whose flights are impacted will be eligible to request a full refund on the airline's website or mobile app, according to Air Canada.
The airline said it would also offer alternative travel options through other Canadian and foreign airlines when possible. Still, it warned that it could not guarantee immediate rebooking because flights on other airlines are already full "due to the summer travel peak."
Air Canada and the Canadian Union of Public Employees have been in contract talks for about eight months, but they have yet to reach a tentative deal.
Both sides have said they remain far apart on the issue of pay and the unpaid work flight attendants do when planes aren't in the air.
The airline's latest offer included a 38% increase in total compensation, including benefits and pensions, over four years, that it said "would have made our flight attendants the best compensated in Canada."
But the union pushed back, saying the proposed 8% raise in the first year didn't go far enough because of inflation.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bausch + Lomb board members resign after Icahn agreement ends
Bausch + Lomb board members resign after Icahn agreement ends

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bausch + Lomb board members resign after Icahn agreement ends

(Reuters) -Bausch + Lomb said on Monday Brett Icahn and Gary Hu have resigned from its board of directors after the termination of the agreement with billionaire Carl Icahn and some of his affiliates. The agreement, dated June 21, 2022, ended after the Icahn group's net long position in Bausch Health Companies, Bausch + Lomb's parent, fell below the required threshold. On Friday, Bausch Health said Paulson Capital, along with certain affiliates and managed funds, increased their position in the company and acquired about 34.7 million common shares previously held by the Icahn Group. In April, Carl Icahn had built an economic interest covering about 34% of Bausch Health's shares. Sign in to access your portfolio

S&P 500 Gains and Losses Today: Solar Stocks Surge; Intel Slides After Recent Rally
S&P 500 Gains and Losses Today: Solar Stocks Surge; Intel Slides After Recent Rally

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

S&P 500 Gains and Losses Today: Solar Stocks Surge; Intel Slides After Recent Rally

Key Takeaways The S&P 500 was little changed Monday, Aug. 18, 2025, ahead of results from major retailers set for release this week and a key speech by the Federal Reserve chair Friday. Shares of HR software provider Dayforce surged following reports that a private equity firm was evaluating a potential buyout. Intel shares slipped, bringing their recent rally to a halt as more details emerged about the U.S. government's interest in acquiring a stake in the chipmaker. Major U.S. equities indexes were little changed Monday ahead of key retail sector earnings reports and comments from Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell expected later in the week. The S&P 500 and the Dow ended Monday's session fractionally lower, while the Nasdaq eked out a 0.03% gain. All three finished the session just short of record highs. Dayforce (DAY) shares skyrocketed 26%, securing the S&P 500's top performance on Monday, following reports that private equity firm Thoma Bravo is discussing a potential buyout of the human resources software provider. A deal could within the next few weeks, according to Bloomberg. First Solar (FSLR) shares jumped 9.7%. Other solar Solar stocks also surged, after the U.S. Treasury Department issued guidance on the types of projects that can qualify for clean energy tax credits. Although the latest guidelines limit eligible projects, analysts suggested the new rules are less restrictive than investors previously feared. Shares of The Trade Desk (TTD) rose 5.4%, extending Friday's gains after the provider of tools to help advertisers optimize their digital campaigns stressed the strength of its partnership with Walmart. Reports that the retail giant had ended an exclusive arrangement with The Trade Desk had added to concerns surrounding the stock, which tumbled earlier this month after the company warned tariffs are limiting big ad spending. EQT Corp. (EQT) shares dropped 4.4%, falling the most of any stock in the S&P 500, after Roth Capital downgraded the stock and three of its peers in the natural gas business to "neutral" from "buy." Analysts voiced concerns an oversupply of natural gas could pressure prices and hurt EQT's results. Roth Capital maintained a "buy" rating on Coterra Energy (CTRA) but reduced its price target on the stock, and Coterra shares slipped 3.3%. Intel (INTC) shares lost 3.7%, halting their recent rally amid speculation it could win more government support as more details emerged about the talks. Bloomberg reported Monday that the Trump administration is considering taking a 10% stake, and converting some or all of the company's CHIPS Act grants into equity. Shares of videogame maker Electronic Arts (EA) slid 3.2% on Monday. Since notching a record high last week, bolstered by optimism surrounding its upcoming title Battlefield 6, EA stock has been trending lower. Analysts have expressed concerns about the lofty expectations for Battlefield 6 as well as challenges facing the company's American Football franchise. Read the original article on Investopedia Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Despite Online MAGA Freakout About Her Jeans, Sydney Sweeney's New Movie Bombs
Despite Online MAGA Freakout About Her Jeans, Sydney Sweeney's New Movie Bombs

Gizmodo

time15 minutes ago

  • Gizmodo

Despite Online MAGA Freakout About Her Jeans, Sydney Sweeney's New Movie Bombs

A couple of weeks ago, American Eagle launched a new ad campaign for its blue jeans line that featured actress Sydney Sweeney. In one of the ads, Sweeney weirdly broached the topic of genetics (she said, and I quote: 'genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality and even eye color. My jeans are blue'), but, for the most part, the ads seems to be about how great Sweeney's posterior looks when she's wearing the company's denim. Not long after the jeans ads aired, the internet collectively lost its mind. One TikToker compared the ad to 'Nazi propaganda' and, soon, NPR had dubbed it the 'ad campaign that launched a thousand critiques.' CNN asked what America had 'learned' from the Sweeney 'situation.' Vox used the episode to wax eloquent about the 'unsettling legacy of the blonde bombshell.' Dr. Phil and Lizzo both got upset—for different reasons—and America's president, in a move that was very on-brand for him, issued a mispelling-strewn statement calling 'Sidney' the 'HOTTEST.' Meanwhile, a number of high-profile MAGA folks (including J.D. Vance, Charlie Kirk, and Ted Cruz) attempted to commandeer the topic, and use it to engineer a backlash to the supposed backlash to Sweeney's ads. Meanwhile, Rolling Stone magazine unveiled a timeline of America's conservatives efforts to 'claim' Sweeney for themselves as a cultural icon. Based on the national conversation we were all just forced to have about Sweeney and her jeans, one would've thought MAGA's collective lust for Sweeney could have easily been translated into hefty box office numbers for her newest movie, Americana. After all, if middle America is now collectively salivating over Sweeney, wouldn't they want to go see her every chance they get? Apparently that's not how things worked out, however. Sweeney's new movie only garnered some $500,000 during its opening weekend, The Hollywood Reporter has noted. Film critics have been lukewarm to positive about the film, with Vulture calling it 'a '90s-style ensemble crime movie that engages in a sly exploration of the iconography and mythology we use to define the country' and noting that the film is not 'particularly political' but that it is 'blessed with a fairly strong cast.' However, Americana's real problem would appear to be less the fact that its lead actress's brand endorsements have stirred up controversy and more about the fact that most people haven't heard of it. I go to the movies a lot, and am generally aware of the upcoming developments at my local cinema, and I can't say that I'd even seen an ad for Americana or heard much about it prior to writing this article. The movie's ad, which seems to offer a run-of-the-mill comedic crime romp, doesn't have much of a partisan bent. The internet is not a real place, but not infrequently, through a kind of alchemical magic, it can produce real-world events. Sometimes the web can stir up so much ideological turmoil that it spills offline and into the real world (just look at January 6th, if you need an example). The problem is that no one really cared that deeply about the American Eagle ad in the first place. A few pissed off leftist people online and a gaggle of MAGA commentators attempted to get everyone to care about it, and the news media carried the story into our collective consciousness, if only to have something somewhat entertaining to write about instead of the incessant horrors visited upon us daily by the Trump administration. For Fox News, it was a way to avoid talking about the incessant horrors visited upon us daily by the Trump administration, in a different way. Still, despite the best efforts of a select few to make the Great Jeans War of 2025 happen, America's heart just wasn't in it. A recent poll from The Economist/YouGov showed only 12 percent of Americans found the ad 'offensive.' We've been through a solid half-decade of having our minds messed with by the Extremely Online, and America may have completely exhausted its moral panics.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store