logo
Historians Alarmed by White House Plan to Oversee Smithsonian Exhibits

Historians Alarmed by White House Plan to Oversee Smithsonian Exhibits

New York Times18 hours ago
Historians and free speech advocates have begun to speak out to express their alarm at the White House's announcement of a wide-ranging review of exhibits at the Smithsonian Institution's museums and galleries.
The free expression group PEN America said it feared the review 'will rewrite history and strip truth from exhibits,' while Sarah Weicksel, the executive director of the American Historical Association, described the Trump administration move as a 'major overstep.'
Ms. Weicksel, who leads the country's largest group of professional historians, said she had been hearing from some of its more than 10,000 members who said they have deep concerns.
'Only historians and trained museum professionals are qualified to conduct such a review, which is intended to ensure historical accuracy,' she said. 'To suggest otherwise is an affront to the professional integrity of curators, historians, educators and everyone involved in the creation of solid, evidence-based content.'
The White House's announced review is a challenge to the Smithsonian, which has traditionally operated as an independent institution and regards itself as being outside the control of the executive branch. It is governed by a 17-member Board of Regents that includes Democrats and Republicans and is overseen by Congress.
Earlier this year, when Mr. Trump announced that he was firing the director of the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery, the institution asserted in a statement that it holds the power over personnel. The regents did agree, though, to have the institution perform its own internal review of content for possible bias or partisanship. That review is ongoing, and the museum director, Kim Sajet, resigned shortly afterward.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elizabeth Warren Probes Lutnick Son on Reported Tariff Bets
Elizabeth Warren Probes Lutnick Son on Reported Tariff Bets

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elizabeth Warren Probes Lutnick Son on Reported Tariff Bets

(Bloomberg) — Democratic Senators Elizabeth Warren and Ron Wyden wrote a letter to Cantor Fitzgerald LP Chairman Brandon Lutnick raising questions about possible conflicts of interest and insider trading in bets the firm reportedly made on the legality of Trump administration tariffs. Lutnick is the son of US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, a key figure in the Trump administration's tariff policies. The letter, dated Wednesday, was released by the senators on Thursday morning. The US-Canadian Road Safety Gap Is Getting Wider Sunseeking Germans Face Swiss Backlash Over Alpine Holiday Congestion To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' Five Years After Black Lives Matter, Brussels' Colonial Statues Remain For Homeless Cyclists, Bikes Bring an Escape From the Streets The firm's alleged bets on the legality of the tariffs were reported by Wired in July. 'What is being reported about our business is absolutely false. Cantor is not in the business of positioning any risk, taking views or facilitating business in litigation claims involving the legality of US tariffs,' Cantor Fitzgerald spokesperson Erica Chase said in a statement. —With assistance from Todd Gillespie. Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Dubai's Housing Boom Is Stoking Fears of Another Crash Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan Why It's Actually a Good Time to Buy a House, According to a Zillow Economist The Electric Pickup Truck Boom Turned Into a Big Bust ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump's Beef with Bank of America's Corporate Governance Goes Beyond His Personal Accounts: Exclusive
Trump's Beef with Bank of America's Corporate Governance Goes Beyond His Personal Accounts: Exclusive

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's Beef with Bank of America's Corporate Governance Goes Beyond His Personal Accounts: Exclusive

By Josh Kosman Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan may be a marked man in the White House and not just because his bank would not take President Trump's money, sources said. Trump on August 7 signed an executive order mandating banking regulators to investigate whether banks have discriminated against conservatives and certain industries. President Trump is targeting Brian Moynihan The President said August 5 on CNBC's Squawk Box that BofA and JPMorgan would not accept his deposits after his first term in office. But there may be more to the story. Trump sung the same tune Jan. 23 with Moynihan right next to him on a World Economic Forum stage. 'I hope you start opening your bank to conservatives, because many conservatives complain that the banks are not allowing them to do business within the bank, and that included a place called Bank of America,' the President said. 'I hope you're going to open your banks to conservatives, because what you're doing is wrong.' He was likely referring to when BofA stopped banking private prison company GEO Group, BofA insiders said. Photo by Ye Jinghan on Unsplash 'This is what Trump was pissed about,' a BofA source said. 'Trump needs GEO.' BofA in June 2019 was the last of the big banks to cut off future funding for private prison companies including GEO. 'They did not want to be the last bank standing,' a source with direct knowledge of the situation said. GEO now processes more than one-third of the people ICE detains, 20,000 beds, at 21 facilities, according to GEO. The firm also owns prisons and jails. But back in 2019 there was a big fight within the bank whether to stop doing more business with GEO after one of GEO's other big lenders JPMorgan in March 2019 said it would no longer fund private prisons. A GEO facility according to the company's website Wells Fargo was also pulling back. BofA Vice Chair Anne Finucane argued for staying the course and was very vocal about it, a source said, causing some at the bank to panic, the source said. There were meetings between top bank executives where what to do about lending to private prisons was fiercely debated. Ultimately, BofA's Global Head of ESG Andrew Plepler had the final word and BoA stopped future funding of private prisons, the BofA source said. 'The private sector is attempting to respond to public policy and government needs and demands in the absence of long standing and widely recognized reforms needed in criminal justice and immigration policies,' BofA said in a June 2019 statement to USA Today. 'Lacking further legal and policy clarity, and in recognition of the concerns of our employees and stakeholders in the communities we serve, it is our intention to exit these relationships.' Attorney General Pam Bondi used to work for lobbying firm Ballard Partners. GEO Group Chair George Zoley on June 26, 2019 commented publicly on BofA's decision to no longer extend financing to correctional and rehabilitation services providers. He said he expected there would be no impact on its $900 million revolving line of credit that did not mature until May 17, 2024. 'For over thirty years, we have provided high-quality services to the federal government under both Democrat and Republican administrations. To be clear, The GEO Group has never managed any facilities that house unaccompanied minors, nor have we ever managed border patrol holding facilities,' Zoley said at the time. GEO in 2020 sold shares of its common stock to raise money. ICE arrests a man from Guatemala, according to ICE website President Biden on January 26, 2021 issued an executive order to not renew contracts with for-profit prisons though it made an exception for immigration detention facilities. GEO Group's shares fell to below $6 a share. Under President Trump, with the ban lifted, the price roared to over $36 though it has now fallen to just over $21. Bank of America in Dec. 2023 changed its outright ban on banking private prison companies to a case-by-case assessment. CoreCivic, a GEO rival, now has a BofA deposit account, Semafor reported in June. People in today's Trump White House are likely fully aware of what transpired. Attorney General Pam Bondi was reportedly a GEO lobbyist, and Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick's Cantor Fitzgerald during Biden's term helped GEO sell its shares, sources said and public filings show. Omeed Malik Former BofA Exec Omeed Malik was pushed out in 2018 for personal conduct in violation of firm standards before the GEO ban, and he too is close to the White House. Malik in 2018 filed a $100 million claim against BofA with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and reportedly settled later that year for more than $10 million. In 2022 he formed 1789 Capital to invest in anti-woke companies adding his very close friend Donald Trump Jr. as a partner. CorpGov does not know if Malik has said anything critical about BofA to The White House. Bank of America and Malik spokespeople declined comment. The White House, GEO Group, Anne Finucane and Andrew Plepler (neither of which is still at BofA) did not return calls. Read more from Josh Kosman at Contact: joshpkosman@ Never Miss our Weekly Highlights Click to follow us on LinkedIn The post Trump's Beef with Bank of America's Corporate Governance Goes Beyond His Personal Accounts: Exclusive appeared first on CorpGov. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump meets Putin: Will Alaska be our Yalta?
Trump meets Putin: Will Alaska be our Yalta?

The Hill

time9 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump meets Putin: Will Alaska be our Yalta?

President Trump, hostile to law at home or abroad, hopes to win a Nobel Peace Prize by giving parts of Ukraine to Russia to end the war there. He would arrange this by meeting Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, on American soil, flouting the finding of the International Criminal Court that Putin is a war criminal and must be arrested wherever he sets foot. Unlike the 125 countries that accept the ICC's jurisdiction, the U.S. does not recognize the court and has even tried to punish its officials for indicting Trump's friend Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for war crimes. Another Republican president, Herbert Hoover, faced a problem similar to that posed by Russia's war on Ukraine. In 1931, Japan invaded Manchuria, officially part of China but coveted by Japan for its resources. The U.S. was not prepared to intervene militarily, but Secretary of State Henry L. Stimson announced in 1932 that the government would not recognize any political or territorial change accomplished by force. Hoover's U.S. did not belong to the League of Nations, but most League members endorsed what became known as the Stimson Doctrine. Japan, however, denounced these happenings and withdrew from the League in 1933. The Stimson Doctrine did not stop the invasion of China, but it helped build broad recognition of Imperial Japan's threat to global order. The doctrine shaped U.S. and European refusal to recognize the Soviet takeover of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania in the 1940s. When the three small Baltic nations finally broke free of Soviet rule in 1991, the U.S. and its partners immediately recognized their independent statehoods. The United Nations Charter, signed by Russia as well as the U.S., also bans trans-border aggression, prohibiting the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state. In 1994, Russia, the U.S. and the United Kingdom signed the ' Budapest Decl a ration,' which banned them from threatening or using military force or economic coercion against Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan, 'except in self-defense' or otherwise in accordance with the U.N. Charter. As a result of this declaration and other agreements between 1993 and 1996, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine gave up their Soviet legacy nuclear weapons. When Russia violated that commitment by invading Ukraine in 2014, the U.S., U.K. and France provided Ukraine with financial and military assistance and imposed economic sanctions against Russia but ruled out direct intervention with their own forces. Trump now follows the calamitous 'might makes right' precedents set at Munich in September 1938 and Yalta in February 1945. At Munich, leaders of the U.K., France and Italy authorized Adolf Hitler to seize a key region of Czechoslovakia in order to achieve 'peace in our time' — only to open the door to Nazi aggression soon after. At Yalta, a dying Franklin D. Roosevelt and Winston Churchill consigned Eastern Europe to the USSR in return for Stalin's empty promises of free elections and democracy. As David E. Sanger and Luke Broadwater recently put it in the New York Times, Yalta symbolizes what can go wrong when great powers carve up the world: 'smaller powers suffer the consequences and free people find themselves cast under authoritarian rule.' It is noteworthy that although FDR valued his alliance with Moscow, the U.S. stood by the Stimson Doctrine in the Baltic region. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky bristles at both the suggestion of ceding territory and the prospect of talks being held without Ukraine. 'Any decisions made against us, any decisions made without Ukraine, are at the same time decisions against peace,' he said. They will never work — Zelensky said that Ukraine 'will not give Russia any awards for what it has done.' For Trump, however, what counts are facts on the ground. Brought up to date by his emissary Steve Witkoff — a dilettante with zero knowledge of Russia — Trump believes that Putin still holds the cards. Some experts, to the contrary, believe that the only way Putin does not eventually fold is if he is rescued by Trump. Trump is an unreliable partner for Ukraine and potential plaything for Putin to flatter and manipulate. Walter Clemens is an associate at the Harvard Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies and professor emeritus of political science at Boston University. He is the author of 'Blood Debts: What Putin and Xi Owe Their Victims' (2023) and 'The Republican War on America: Dangers of Trump and Trumpism' (2023).

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store