logo
Ontario NDP candidate apologizes for 'I want to be a Black woman' comment

Ontario NDP candidate apologizes for 'I want to be a Black woman' comment

CBC20-02-2025

Social Sharing
With one week to go before Ontarians cast their ballots, a white Ontario NDP candidate has apologized for comments she made at a conference last year in which she expresses a secret desire "to be a Black woman."
Amanda Zavitz, a sociology professor at Western University running in the riding of Elgin-London-Middlesex, issued the short apology in a Facebook post on Wednesday and in a one-line email to CBC News.
It comes after the Progressive Conservatives highlighted a YouTube video of Zavitz speaking at the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women conference in New York City last March. CBC News captured a copy of the video, which has now been removed.
Zavitz, speaking at a podium at the New York conference, recalls an exercise she and participants did at a Toronto confernce 10 years prior called "post secret." Zavitz said participants were asked to write down their deep-rooted secrets. Some were picked and read to the audience. One included an admission of an affair, another spoke about stealing money from a spouse's bank account.
In relaying this to the audience at the New York event, Zavitz revealed her secret.
"My secret is that I want to be a Black woman," she said. "If you don't know me, you might question this. You might wonder if I'm lying, or if I've really thought this through. If you do know me, you will know 100 per cent for certain, it is true."
Zavtiz goes on to tell the New York audience she's often criticized as being a "Karen" because she's a white women who advocates for equality. The name "Karen" has fallen into use as a generic and pejorative term to refer to any privileged woman, often white, who is perceived as demanding and entitled.
"The easy answer is that I want to lead the fifth wave of feminism and that when you look like I do and people call you a Karen, it's difficult to be taken seriously as a leader of the fifth wave of feminism," Zavitz tells the New York audience.
"The more complicated answer is that I want to know all that I know, I want to be a sociologist and a women's studies professor. I want to be an expert in inequality with lived experiences of poverty and living in addiction and alcoholism. I want to be able to share my ideas without the barrier of looking the way that I do."
CBC Poll Tracker
In a Facebook post on Wednesday, Zavitz apologizes for the comments.
Comments 'deeply concerning' said Stiles
On Thursday, she sent an email to CBC News, and explained herself in this way: "The point I intended to make was that greater awareness of the lived experience of Black people and communities would improve understanding of what it's like to face systemic racism. I apologize for any harm caused by my remarks."
The video was first surfaced by the Progressive Conservative Party campaign which said NDP leader Marit Stiles "owes Ontarians an explanation as yet another problematic NDP candidate has been exposed." In a statement, the party said Zavitz's comments "trivialized the life experience of Black Ontarians."
When asked about the comments Thursday, Stiles told reporters she found them "deeply concerning."
"I think they're inappropriate comments, but she has apologized," said Stiles. She didn't answer when asked if she would keep Zavitz as a candidate.
On her campaign web page, Zavitz describes herself as "a dedicated educator, activist, and small business owner committed to social justice and community advocacy."
The site also says through her teaching work at Western and Fanshawe College she's championed "diversity, equity, and inclusion."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

More than a dozen Canadian Sikhs face active assassination threats, organization warns

time3 hours ago

More than a dozen Canadian Sikhs face active assassination threats, organization warns

More than a dozen Canadian Sikhs live under active threats on their lives, an advocacy organization is warning. Those threats originate from India, said Balpreet Singh, a lawyer and spokesperson for the World Sikh Organization. The group argues it's unconscionable for the federal government to invite Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to next week's G7 meeting (new window) . Singh called for a series of actions to be taken against India at a news conference on Parliament Hill on Thursday alongside Moninder Singh, a spokesperson for the Sikh Federation (Canada). The father of two said he'd been warned by law enforcement about threats on his life about a half-dozen times in the last few years. Moninder Singh described leaving his home for months at a time, making arrangements with child protection services as well as the RCMP. You move around, constantly looking over your shoulder. You want to make sure that you're not in overly public environments, where other people could be harmed, said Moninder Singh. You can't go to your kid's school, you can't go to their practices, you can't go to family events. You avoid weddings, you avoid any type of family gatherings. WATCH | Modi G7 invite sends message 'our lives simply don't matter': Début du widget Widget. Passer le widget ? Fin du widget Widget. Retourner au début du widget ? Modi G7 invite sends message 'our lives simply don't matter': Sikh organization The World Sikh Organization of Canada is calling on Prime Minister Mark Carney to revoke Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's G7 invite unless three conditions are met. Balpreet Singh, the group's legal counsel, calls the invitation a 'betrayal of Canada's core values.' The two men said the Canadian government should not only rescind Modi's invitation, but also launch a public inquiry specifically targeting Indian foreign interference and transnational repression in Canada, as well as cancel intelligence-sharing agreements between the two countries. Earlier on Thursday, Global News cited confidential sources (new window) in reporting that former NDP leader Jagmeet Singh was targeted by a suspected Indian government agent in 2023, resulting in the leader getting police protection. The report says police no longer believe Singh is in imminent danger. CBC News has not independently confirmed that story. At the news conference, Moninder Singh said ending intelligence-sharing with India could make it harder for the country to surveil the NDP leader and Sikh activists. Balpreet Singh said he's heard the former NDP leader no longer has police protection, something he thinks is a mistake. CBC News sent questions to the federal Public Safety Department as well as the RCMP for details on Sikhs who have been targeted, including Jagmeet Singh. The government department deferred to the Mounties, which have yet to provide a statement. The idea to me that the leader of a Canadian political party could be targeted is such a clear indication of foreign interference, said the NDP's foreign affairs critic, Heather McPherson. To find out that Mr. Singh no longer has any sort of protection, when the threat is very real against him, it's appalling. All Canadians have the right to feel safe, said Conservative MP Andrew Scheer, the interim Opposition leader. Scheer said specific threats against a prominent Canadian who's held public office is something that our security officials should take very seriously. WATCH | Liberal calls Modi invite 'a bad idea': Liberal MP says Modi coming to Canada is 'a bad idea' 2 days agoDuration1:58Speaking to reporters in Ottawa, B.C. Liberal MP Sukh Dhaliwal said he met with Prime Minister Mark Carney Wednesday morning to express concerns he says his constituents have with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi being invited to the upcoming G7 summit in Alberta. The WSO's Balpreet Singh said other Canadian Sikh politicians are afraid to criticize India out of fear for their and their loved ones' safety. He declined to say which politicians have told him this. Imagine what that means to our democracy, said McPherson. Carney has said it makes sense to have the leader of the world's most populous country around the table when there are big challenges to discuss. Modi has been present at several recent G7 leaders' summits. At last year's event in Italy, he had a brief one-on-one with former prime minister Justin Trudeau. A dozen members of Carney's own caucus met him on Wednesday to raise their concerns about the decision (new window) , though many Liberals have also defended the invite. Liberal MP Charles Sousa said Canadians are concerned about their position on the world stage. India makes sense to be part of a global discussion, he said. Canada-India relations have been on shaky ground since Trudeau and the RCMP alleged Indian agents were involved in the killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar (new window) , the Canadian Khalistani separatist who was brazenly gunned down outside a Sikh temple in B.C. in 2023. Raffy Boudjikanian (new window) · CBC News

Hong Kong rights group shuts down after years of advocating for workers
Hong Kong rights group shuts down after years of advocating for workers

Winnipeg Free Press

time5 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Hong Kong rights group shuts down after years of advocating for workers

HONG KONG (AP) — A Hong Kong group that advocated for workers rights for decades announced its shutdown abruptly on Thursday, citing financial difficulties and debt issues. China Labor Bulletin planned to stop updating its website content and appeared to have deleted Facebook and Instagram social media accounts used by the nonprofit rights organization. 'The company can no longer maintain operations and has decided to dissolve and initiate the relevant procedures,' it said in a statement on an archived web page Friday. Founded in 1994, organization maintained a database tracking workers' strikes, protests, workplace accidents and other labor rights incidents in China. As dozens of civil society groups disbanded or left Hong Kong in the wake of the 2020 Beijing-imposed national security law, China Labor Bulletin continued providing valuable resources for journalists and academics in the southern Chinese city. Critics say the drastic political changes in Hong Kong indicated the decline of Western-style civil liberties that China promised to keep intact when the former British colony returned to Chinese rule in 1997. However, Beijing and Hong Kong governments insisted the law was crucial to bring stability to the city following massive anti-government protests in 2019. China Labor Bulletin's founder Han Dongfang, a former railway worker who participated in the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests, did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Associated Press. He told the Central News Agency of Taiwan that the shutdown was his decision and he would stay in Hong Kong. Han's decision appeared sudden to many Hong Kong civil society observers. Three weeks ago, he wrote on social media platform LinkedIn about his work anniversary and his team's progress. 'Let's keep our faith up at this abnormal time and continue our important work,' he said.

Carney shows his hand on infrastructure and trade bill
Carney shows his hand on infrastructure and trade bill

National Observer

time8 hours ago

  • National Observer

Carney shows his hand on infrastructure and trade bill

Ever since June 6, when Prime Minister Mark Carney declared that he expects Bill C-5 to become law before summer break, one question has loomed over Parliament: How? It normally takes months for a bill to become law. Proposed legislation (which is what a bill is) must go through several readings and committees run by MPs and senators alike, who all call witnesses to weigh in on the pros and cons, which trigger amendments, which then require further deliberation, all before a final vote is cast. If that sounds slow, that's because it is — and it usually takes even longer in a minority government, where Opposition MPs make up a big portion of the committees and so, have ample opportunity to bog the process down. So how did Carney expect to whiz his signature policy through such a quagmire in a mere two or three weeks? But on Thursday, June 12 – one head-scratching week after Carney unveiled the bill – he dropped his cards: a special parliamentary order that would, if Parliament votes for it, condense the entire process into five days. The order's formal name is ' An Act to enact the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act and the Building Canada Act.' Or as NDP MP Alexandre Boulerice calls it, a super-motion. '[It] will, if passed, speed up the debate and study of that bill in an incredible and scandalous way,' Boulerice said in a phone interview soon after the Act to Enact the Act was introduced. Parliament will vote on this super-motion on Friday. It requires a simple majority to pass. If that happens, a parliamentary committee will be formed next week and given just two days to scrutinize Bill C-5, plus make whatever amendments they can squeeze in. The bill will go through the final two readings and hit the floor next Friday, June 20, for a final vote. On that day, according to the terms of the super-motion, '[t]he House shall not adjourn until the proceedings on the bill have been completed.' Meaning, in other words, MPs are stuck in their seats until the bill either becomes law or dies. The procedural mystery behind the prime minister's plan to rush his treasured legislation has been unveiled. Now it's Parliament's play. All of that hinges on the super-motion. If that passes on June 13, Carney will almost certainly get his legislation by next weekend. 'It's really against the rights of parliamentarians,' Boulerice said. 'It's really anti-democratic. It's all the horrible things that a government can do to shut down debate and pass a really controversial project through the throats of the MPs and the general public and First Nations and environmental groups.' Two Acts in one Bill C-5 is really two bills in one, both named in the unwieldy title. The first part is about breaking down interprovincial barriers to trade and labour mobility, and is, in general, less controversial than the bill's second part: the 'Building Canada Act,' which would give cabinet the power to deem certain megaprojects (from pipelines and electricity grids to ports and high-speed rail) in the 'national interest,' which would then put them on a two-year fast track to federal approval. It's the second part that Boulerice, along with many environmental advocacy groups and Indigenous leaders, have deep misgivings about. ''National interest' is so vague that they can put whatever they want [on that list], and after that, guarantee the two years maximum. … Once it's on the list, it cannot be removed. It cannot be blocked or stopped by anybody – provinces, First Nations, citizens, cities. I think it's the dream of Stephen Harper coming true.' Indeed, Conservatives do appear to like the bill – the party's members, not known for their shyness about legislation they dislike, didn't once mention it or the super-motion to accelerate its passage, in Thursday's Question Period. What's less clear is whether they want to hand Carney the political gift of having his signature policy turned into law in such short order against such odds. The Conservative Party did not immediately respond to an inquiry about their plans. It's far from a done deal yet, however. Boulerice is in talks with the Bloc Quebecois, both of whom are busy scouring the 'really big book' of parliamentary procedure for tools that might at least put the brakes on the super-motion. 'We will try some obstruction procedures,' he said. In addition to motions that could slow the day down, Boulerice said they might try splitting Bill C-5 into two parts, allowing the first to rush through, while reserving the second part on 'national interest' projects for proper scrutiny.' In a best-case scenario for Boulerice, the NDP and Bloc will be able to stall voting on the super-motion until Monday. In that case, 'we'll gain some time to raise awareness' with the public, in the hopes of generating enough bad press that the bill becomes too toxic for Parliament to support. But the government is already working on getting its own message out. In a separate briefing about wildfires, several cabinet ministers were asked by reporters to explain the rush embodied by this super-motion. 'We're in a very difficult situation right now,' said Tim Hodgson, minister of energy and natural resources. 'We have a trade war that is affecting sector after sector after sector. Canadian jobs are at risk, Canadian livelihoods are at risk, and quite frankly, the prosperity of the country is at risk … to deal with this, we need to do things that we have not done in a long time, in time frames we have not done since the end of World War II. What we are doing is allowing for debate – I spent four hours last night in a committee of the whole. There is going to be the same sort of process in the Senate. It is important that we start moving, or we will find ourselves in an increasingly difficult situation.' Asked if the Liberals have spoken with Conservatives for a sense of whether they'll support this push, Hodgson said, 'I don't think it's appropriate to talk about the private conversations that are going on.' Mandy Gull-Masty, the minister of Indigenous services and a former Grand Chief of the Cree Nation government in Quebec, was also at that press conference. Asked if the government had addressed the question of First Nation consultation and support for this legislation, Gull-Masty said that in her view, Bill C-5 is 'not just critical for the Canadian economy, it's also critical for Indigenous people.' She said the prime minister has made himself personally available to Indigenous leaders across the country, and felt that Section 35, which enshrines Indigenous rights in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, along with the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, are both embedded in the process. 'I think this is something that is unique to the One Canada Economy Bill, is that we're not just inviting Indigenous partnership to the table, we're actually asking them, 'What is your process of consultation, and how can we work with you in collaboration to carry out those steps?'' For now, it won't be Indigenous groups, or environmental advocates, or anyone but the MPs inside the House of Commons who decide whether Gull Masty's faith in her new party's good faith is warranted. And of those parliamentarians, it is now the Conservatives who hold the future of Carney's prized legislation in their hands. They could choose to gift it to him all at once, delay it until after summer, or withhold it altogether.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store