14 Rameswaram fishermen return home after release from Sri Lankan prison
CHENNAI: Fourteen fishermen from
Rameswaram
, who were detained in Sri Lanka, arrived safely in
Chennai
on Friday night after their release from a
Sri Lankan
prison. Officials from the Tamil Nadu Fisheries Department welcomed them at the Chennai airport and arranged their transport back to Rameswaram.
The fishermen ventured out to sea on March 17 aboard a mechanised boat when they were apprehended by the Sri Lankan Coast Guard. Although they were reportedly fishing within Indian waters, the fishermen were accused of crossing the maritime boundary. Their boat, fishing nets, and catch were confiscated, and all 14 were taken to Sri Lanka, where they were presented before a court and subsequently imprisoned.
You Can Also Check:
Chennai AQI
|
Weather in Chennai
|
Bank Holidays in Chennai
|
Public Holidays in Chennai
After chief minister
MK Stalin
wrote to the union external affairs minister
S Jaishankar
to secure the immediate release of the detained fishermen, diplomatic efforts ensued. Officials from the Indian embassy in Sri Lanka engaged with Sri Lankan authorities, ultimately leading to a court order for the fishermen's release.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Google Brain Co-Founder Andrew Ng, Recommends: Read These 5 Books And Turn Your Life Around
Blinkist: Andrew Ng's Reading List
Undo
Since the fishermen lacked passports, Indian embassy officials issued emergency certificates and made arrangements for their return. The 14 fishermen were flown from Colombo to Chennai on an Air India flight, with the embassy also facilitating their flight tickets.
Upon their arrival at Chennai airport on Friday night, the fisheries department officials received the fishermen and organised their journey back to Rameswaram in a vehicle provided by the state govt.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Donald Trump imposed ‘sanctions on India' to end war in Ukraine, says White House
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that US President Donald Trump took several actions, including the secondary tariffs on India, to bring the war in Ukraine to an end. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt asserted that Donald Trump wants to move forward and bring the war in Ukraine to an end as quickly as possible.(AFP) This reiteration comes as a top US official said that India made "huge" profits on the sale of Russian oil during and after the war in Ukraine, and Trump said that his sanctions on New Delhi probably played a role in Russian President Vladimir Putin meeting him. Addressing a press briefing, Leavitt said, "The President has put tremendous public pressure to bring this war to a close. He has taken actions as you seen sanctions on India and other actions as well. He has made himself very clear that he wants to see this war and he has rejected the ideas of others that have been raised that we should wait another month before any meetings takes place." She asserted that Donald Trump wants to move forward and bring the war in Ukraine to an end as quickly as possible. Earlier on Tuesday, Trump met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House, with the former signalling his openness to a trilateral meeting with Putin to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine. Trump said that he had a very successful day, while Zelensky noted that this was the "best conversation" he had with the US President so far. Scott Bessent on India tariffs US treasury secretary Scott Bessent, while speaking to CNBC, argued why China has not yet seen any penalties for buying Russian oil, while the case for India has been otherwise. He said that the treatment is different because India has been "profiteering" and "making billions" from its reselling of the oil. Bessent said India had "less than 1 per cent" of its oil from Russia "and now its up to 42 per cent". He added, "India is just profiteering, they are reselling... They made 16 billion in excess profits, some of the richest families in India." "This is a completely different thing. Indian arbitrage, which is buying cheap oil and reselling it, has just sprung up during the [Ukraine] war. This is just unacceptable," Bessent added. Top US advisor criticises India over Russian oil trade Meanwhile, White House trade advisor Peter Navarro criticised India for purchasing Russian energy and defence equipment, pledging to "hit India where it hurts" to get New Delhi to change its policy. He termed India's oil trade with Russia 'opportunistic' and 'corrosive' to global efforts being made to end the war in Ukraine and isolate the Russian economy. 'As Russia continues to hammer Ukraine, helped by India's financial support, American (and European) taxpayers are then forced to spend tens of billions more to help Ukraine's defence. Meanwhile, India keeps slamming the door on American exports through high tariffs and trade barriers. More than 300,000 soldiers and civilians have been killed, while Nato's eastern flank grows more exposed and the west foots the bill for India's oil laundering,' Navarro wrote in an opinion piece for the Financial Times. Before his meeting with Putin in Alaska last week, Trump had told a Fox News Radio show that his 'penalty' on India prompted the Russian President to meet him, saying that "everything has an impact". The US President said that when he told India about the doubled tariffs, it "essentially took them out of buying oil from Russia". He noted that India is the second largest purchaser of Russian oil and said it was getting pretty close to China, the largest buyer of oil from Russia. Before Trump doubled India's tariff to 50 per cent by imposing an additional 25 per cent levy on the previously announced 25 per cent, he said that India was "fueling the war machine" by buying oil from Russia.
India.com
25 minutes ago
- India.com
Why India Can't Accept China's ‘Zero-Tariff' Offer Despite Its Market Appeal
New Delhi: After U.S. President Donald Trump signalled the possibility of higher tariffs on Indian exports, China renewed its pitch to bring India into a zero-tariff Asian trade market. Extending access to a massive consumer base, the offer has been positioned as a strategic opportunity. Analysts say the proposal, however, could pose a far more significant challenge for India than Trump's tariff threats. India's market is enormous. A population of 1.4 billion, coupled with a growing middle class and strong purchasing power, makes it one of the most attractive markets in the world. Global powers cannot achieve maximum economic leverage in the region without India's participation. In response to the rising pressure from Washington, China has once again invited India to join the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). Beijing has been lobbying for New Delhi's inclusion in the RCEP since 2019, offering zero tariffs as a key incentive. Still, India has repeatedly declined. It is wary of Beijing's ambitions and the potential risks to its domestic industries. Understanding RCEP The RCEP is a free-trade agreement encompassing 15 countries: 10 ASEAN members and five of their Free Trade Agreement (FTA) partners – China, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand. The RCEP is the world's largest trade bloc, representing nearly 30 percent of global GDP and covering roughly three billion people. The agreement aims to simplify trade rules, reduce barriers and integrate the markets of its member nations. Signed in November 2020, the RCEP came into effect on January 1, 2022. Its primary goals include lowering or eliminating tariffs, easing non-tariff restrictions and facilitating cross-border investment and commerce. China's Perspective China's state-run Global Times highlighted India's growing vulnerability due to its heavy reliance on the U.S. market, especially in light of Trump's proposed 50 percent tariff increases. The newspaper argued that diversifying toward Asian markets could not only mitigate risks but also provide India with strategic flexibility and greater market opportunities. According to the daily, India must actively explore alternative markets. Asia's expansive economies and untapped potential could provide India with a more stable path for growth. The paper suggested that joining the RCEP would represent a critical step toward restructuring India's trade orientation within the region. The publication also emphasised 'long-term benefits'. Over next 10 to 15 years, it says, RCEP's zero-tariff framework could apply to 90 percent of goods. For India, the daily says, this could act as a protective buffer against the volatility of U.S. trade policies, while opening access to a dynamic and growing market. India's Concerns India has consistently expressed reservations about the RCEP. The government believes the agreement does not adequately reflect India's interests and could have unbalanced outcomes. A primary concern is the potential impact on domestic industries. Cheap imports from China and other Asian nations could flood the Indian market, undermining local manufacturing and making it difficult for Indian products to compete. China's production efficiency exacerbates this risk. India had proposed mechanisms to limit imports of certain goods exceeding set thresholds, but negotiations failed to yield consensus. India also faces a significant trade deficit with China, which reached $99.2 billion in the 2024-25 fiscal year. Joining the RCEP without safeguards could worsen this imbalance. For China, India's inclusion is both an economic and geopolitical priority, supporting regional dominance and the Belt and Road Initiative. India continues to prioritise national interests, self-reliance and strategic autonomy. The government aims to maintain control over supply chains and assert a strong position in any scenario that may challenge its trade or geopolitical stance vis-à-vis China.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Assembly passes amendment keeping Greater Bengaluru Authority out of municipal affairs
Bengaluru: The Greater Bengaluru Governance (Amendment) Bill, 2025, which clarifies that the Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) will not interfere in the functioning of municipal corporations in line with the 74th amendment of the Constitution, was passed in the assembly after much debate. Deputy chief minister and Bengaluru development minister DK Shivakumar , who piloted the bill Monday, said the bill was only to ensure "clarity and prevent disputes in future". "Though the Bill was passed earlier, some people had filed petitions in court," said Shivakumar. "We have now made it clear in this bill that GBA will not interfere in matters of municipal corporations that come under the 74th amendment of the Constitution." You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru | Gold Rates Today in Bengaluru | Silver Rates Today in Bengaluru He explained that under the existing law, GBA had powers to intervene in affairs of municipal corporations. "A PIL was filed alleging municipalities were being brought under govt control," he said. "Although the court did not uphold the PIL, we moved this amendment to avoid confusion in future. Municipalities will function independently and will not be under govt control." He went on to say that mayors and corporators elected directly by the people will have complete authority. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Find your car's value online in minutes. Spinny Click Here Undo "Today, we may be at the helm, tomorrow we may not — but there should not be scope for dispute. That is why we removed the provision (allowing govt control)," Shivakumar said. Reiterating his stand, Shivakumar said: "I do not want others to indulge in politics over Bengaluru's future, nor will I. Municipalities will have powers of taxation, financial autonomy, reservation, elections. The 74th amendment is fully protected. Congress will never allow Rajiv Gandhi's historic amendments to be diluted." Insisting that his heart beats for local bodies, Shivakumar said: "When I was urban development minister, we ensured the Belur Declaration along with then revenue minister MY Ghorpade. At that time, each panchayat received only Rs 1 lakh in grants. During SM Krishna's tenure, this was raised to Rs 5 lakh, and later 27 departments were brought under panchayats to empower them." On Satish Reddy's (BJP) claim that certain villages in their constituencies were not included, Shivakumar said: "If we include villages now, panchayat members would automatically become municipal corporators, which could invite objections. Therefore, we will first conduct elections within existing municipal limits, and later, after discussions with all of you, we will decide on expanding boundaries." Highlighting financial imbalances between different zones, Shivakumar said: "Mahadevapura collects the highest tax revenues, whereas other parts of Bengaluru do not generate as much. But one municipality's money cannot be transferred to another — if we do so, it would violate the 74th amendment again. In such cases, the govt must provide financial support. We have only brought this amendment for the welfare of municipalities. Our purpose is to ensure that when other parties form the govt in the future, they cannot misuse it to bring municipalities under govt control." Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
