Scenes Of Chaos Caught On Camera As Russian Bridge Collapse Kills 7 Ahead Of Ukraine Peace Talks
At least 7 people were killed and 71 others injured after two bridges collapsed in Russian regions bordering Ukraine due to explosions, derailing two trains.
Two bridges in Russian regions bordering Ukraine collapsed due to explosions, derailing two trains overnight and killing at least seven people, while injuring over 70 others. Russia's Investigative Committee described both incidents as being caused by explosions and has labelled them 'terrorist" acts.
A highway bridge over a railway in the Bryansk region was blown up at 10:50 pm (local time) on Saturday night, derailing a passenger train en route to Moscow carrying 388 passengers, and killing seven people, according to authorities.
About four hours later, a separate rail bridge in the neighbouring Kursk region was blown up hours later in the early hours of Sunday, derailing a freight train and injuring the driver.
Pictures and videos uploaded on social media showed passengers trying to climb out of the destroyed carriages in the train that derailed in the Bryansk region. Parts of the train were crushed under a collapsed road bridge.
Rescuers were seen climbing over the mangled chassis of a train belonging to national operator Russian Railways, while screams could be heard in another video. 'How did the bridge collapse? There are children there!" a woman was heard shouting.
JUST IN:An explosion caused a bridge to collapse onto a passenger train in Russia's Bryansk region, near the Ukraine border, killing at least 7 and injuring over 30. #Russia #Ukraine️ #RussiaUkraineWar #PsgInter #MissWorld2025 pic.twitter.com/qVVIjunus2
— Strategic Tunes 🌍 (@strategic_tune) June 1, 2025
The twin bridge collapse came on the eve of a possible meeting between Russian and Ukrainian officials in Istanbul, amid a US-led diplomatic push to end the three-year-long conflict. US President Donald Trump has demanded both sides to make peace, and he has threatened to walk away if they do not.
Was Ukraine Behind The Attacks?
The Russian regions bordering Ukraine have been subject to frequent attacks by Ukraine since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022. Both sides accuse the other of targeting civilians, and both deny such accusations.
Ukraine's military intelligence GUR on Sunday said a Russian military freight train carrying food and fuel had been blown up on its way to Crimea. However, it did not claim responsibility for the bridge collapse, but said it was behind an attack deep inside Russia.
Meanwhile, Russian President Vladimir Putin was briefed on the incidents throughout the night, the Kremlin said. Senior ruling party lawmaker Andrey Klishas blamed Ukraine for the explosions, describing it as a 'terrorist enclave".
'All this is aimed at toughening the position of the Russian Federation and stoking aggression before the negotiations. And also to intimidate people. But they won't succeed," said the chairman of the defence committee of the lower house of the Russian parliament, Andrei Kartapolov.
(with inputs from agencies)
First Published:
June 01, 2025, 17:04 IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Ukrainian strikes cut power to Russian-held areas, officials say
Ukrainian shelling and drone attacks triggered power cuts over swathes of Russian-controlled territory in Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions in the south of Ukraine, Russia-installed officials said early on Tuesday. Officials said there was no effect on operations at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power station - Europe's largest nuclear facility which was seized by Russia in the weeks after Moscow's February 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Russian officials running the plant said radiation levels were normal at the facility, which operates in shutdown mode and produces no power at the moment. Russia-installed governors in the two regions said the Ukrainian attacks prompted authorities to introduce emergency measures and switch key sites to reserve power sources. Power was knocked out to all parts of Zaporizhzhia under Russian control, Russia-installed Governor Yevgeny Belitsky wrote on Telegram. "As a result of shelling by the Ukrainian Armed Forces, high-voltage equipment was damaged in the northwestern part of the Zaporizhzhia region," Belitsky wrote. "There is no electricity throughout the region. The Energy Ministry of Zaporizhzhia region has been instructed to develop reserve sources of power. Health care sites have been transferred to reserve power sources." In adjacent Kherson region, farther west, Russia-appointed Governor Vladimir Saldo said debris from fallen drones had damaged two substations, knocking out power to more than 100,000 residents of 150 towns and villages in Russian-held areas. Emergency crews working to restore power quickly, he said. For many long months in the winter, it was Ukrainian towns and villages that endured repeated electricity cuts as Russian attacks focused strikes on generating capacity. Each side has repeatedly accused the other of launching attacks on the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant and running the risk of a nuclear accident. The UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, said last week in response to a Ukrainian complaint that it saw no sign that Russia was preparing to restart the Zaporizhzhia plant and connect it to the Russian grid. The IAEA has stationed monitors permanently at Zaporizhzhia and Ukraine's other nuclear power stations.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Lower duty on edible oils, nuts; target growth in spice, rice in US deal: Niti Aayog
India should offer concessions on agricultural products from US such as edible oils and nuts where domestic supply gaps exist, and explore duty concessions to boost high-performing exports — including shrimp, fish, spices, rice, tea, coffee, and rubber — in the US market during the Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) negotiations, a Niti Aayog working paper has argued. The need for calibrated negotiations on agricultural trade relations between India and the US arises as India has traditionally maintained relatively high tariffs on politically sensitive agricultural sectors to protect farmers, but the US, under President Donald Trump, has been aggressively pushing for greater market access and lower tariffs, posing a challenge for developing countries such as India. The working paper dated May said India can offer some concessions to the US in the 'import of soybean oil' to meet US demands to reduce the trade imbalance, without harming domestic production, as India is the largest importer of edible oil in the world and the US has a huge export surplus of soybean. 'Import soybean seed from US 'We should also explore the option of importing soybean seed and using it for extracting oil in the coastal areas, then selling the oil in the domestic market and exporting the meal, for which there is adequate overseas demand. This will avoid genetically modified (GM) feed entering the Indian market,' the paper, authored by Senior Adviser at NITI Aayog, Raka Saxena, and Member of NITI Aayog, Ramesh Chand, said. 'Similarly, corn may be imported for ethanol blending, and its by-products — like Distiller's Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS) — can be entirely exported to avoid GM feed in the country. US corn is cheaper and can be used to meet India's biofuel targets without disrupting local food and feed markets,' the paper said. Notably, soybeans and corn are among the US top exports to China, where a trade war may affect agricultural trade between the two countries. According to a Reuters report, US soybean exports may drop 20 per cent and prices could plunge if the United States and China fail to resolve their trade dispute, limiting US soybeans from accessing their largest market. Ease US apple imports 'Indian producers already enjoy supply advantages in commodities like rice and pepper. High tariffs on such products by India, which are regularly exported by the country, can be easily lowered or even removed in the bilateral trade accord. Such tariffs are not relevant for trade with countries like the US,' the paper said. The Niti Aayog paper said India can consider lower tariffs on agricultural commodities where either domestic production is small or imports do not compete with domestic production due to different quality grades and seasons. 'For example, US apples sell at a premium price in Indian retail markets due to different quality, long shelf life, and off-season availability.' Boost exports of fish, spices & coffee 'India should negotiate more access to the US market for high-performing exports like shrimp, fish, spices, rice, tea, coffee, and rubber. India earns approximately $5.75 billion annually from agri-exports to the US. Expanding this through duty waivers or TRQs should be part of trade talks,' the paper said. The authors said that US is expected to remain a big market for export of surplus food from India and all efforts need to be made to keep favorable environment for export to US. 'This should include strategic opening for US imports into India to achieve larger gains in exports. The ongoing negotiations between the two countries for a bilateral trade accord seem to be the best option for resetting long term trade relationships'. 'Export basket should emphasize both, traditional products like fishery and rice sold in large volume and a large number of high value products, differentiated products, ethnic products, attribute-based products, health foods, processed food etc. which are individually small but cumulatively quite large,' the paper said. In the last 10 years, India's agricultural exports to the US grew nearly fivefold, from $1.18 billion to $5.75 billion and the share of the US in India's total agricultural exports saw a slight decline, dropping from 11.5 per cent in 2004 to 9.8 per cent in 2024. Meanwhile, India's agricultural imports from the US increased even faster, rising from $291 million in 2004 to $2,217.9 million in 2024. Ravi Dutta Mishra is a Principal Correspondent with The Indian Express, covering policy issues related to trade, commerce, and banking. He has over five years of experience and has previously worked with Mint, CNBC-TV18, and other news outlets. ... Read More
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
US dismisses India's steel tariff challenge at WTO on legal, procedural grounds
The United States has rejected India's notice at the World Trade Organization (WTO), which proposed retaliatory action against the 25 per cent US tariffs on steel and aluminium, arguing that the tariffs were imposed on national security grounds. The US also pointed out procedural errors in India's case. In its note dated May 23, the US stated that India is wrongly treating the tariffs on steel and aluminium as safeguard measures. It clarified that these duties were imposed under US law (Section 232), which allows such action if imports are considered a threat to national security. This development is significant as US President Donald Trump on Friday announced a move to double import tariffs on steel to 50 per cent — a step Indian exporters have called 'unfortunate', warning that they have already lost $5 billion in exports due to earlier tariffs, and further hikes could deepen losses. 'The United States will not discuss the Section 232 tariffs under the Agreement on Safeguards as we do not view the tariffs as a safeguard measure,' the US told the WTO Council for Trade in Goods in response to India's challenge. In FY2025, India exported $4.56 billion worth of iron, steel, and aluminium products to the US, including $587.5 million in iron and steel, $3.1 billion in articles of iron or steel, and $860 million in aluminium and related goods. These exports now face sharply higher US tariffs, threatening the profitability of Indian producers and exporters. The US also claimed that India had committed procedural errors. 'India never acknowledged the United States' offer to discuss these tariffs in our response dated 16 April 2025. Accordingly, India has not complied with the obligations under the Agreement on Safeguards, the agreement that it mistakenly contends applies to the tariffs in question,' the US note said. Ajay Srivastava, former trade officer and head of the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), said India now has several options. One is to launch a formal WTO dispute, not under the Safeguards Agreement, but under broader GATT rules, challenging the Section 232 tariffs as disguised protectionist measures. 'India could argue that the US is abusing the national security exception, referring to earlier WTO rulings that limit how Article XXI can be invoked. However, this legal path carries risks, as the US has a track record of disregarding WTO rulings on national security,' GTRI said. A more forceful approach would be for India to impose retaliatory tariffs on its own, even without WTO authorisation, Srivastava said. He noted that other countries such as the EU, Canada, and China have already done this in response to the US Section 232 tariffs, as a political signal of resistance. 'While this sends a clear message, it also risks US countermeasures and potential legal battles. GTRI believes that although India has legal and diplomatic options, it may decide not to act immediately,' Srivastava said. GTRI suggested that a pragmatic path would be for India to use the ongoing bilateral Free Trade Agreement (FTA) negotiations with the US as the main platform to resolve the issue. Ravi Dutta Mishra is a Principal Correspondent with The Indian Express, covering policy issues related to trade, commerce, and banking. He has over five years of experience and has previously worked with Mint, CNBC-TV18, and other news outlets. ... Read More
