St. Paul City Council debates creation of public safety budget oversight committee
Against the backdrop of an ongoing and unusual budget battle with the mayor's office, the St. Paul City Council is contemplating an effort to potentially allow them tighter reins over police, fire and other public safety budgets moving forward.
The council has for months called for more guardrails around police overtime spending, but the possible creation of a new council committee dedicated to reviewing public safety expenditures has drawn some criticism from at least one council member who is not fully sold on the idea.
On Wednesday, Council Member Anika Bowie introduced a resolution to create a new 'Public Safety and Community Wellness' committee composed of council members, who will provide 'budgetary oversight' over the St. Paul Police Department, the St. Paul Fire Department, the city attorney's office and the St. Paul Department of Safety and Inspections.
The focus, according to the resolution, is to be 'transparent budgeting, program evaluation and policy development to improve public safety and build trust within the community.'
Bowie said the city is 'experiencing challenging times' and needs 'an ongoing structural commitment' toward examining public safety priorities, rather than responding to projected budget shortfalls as they emerge.
'We are facing a public safety crisis that demands a strong, coordinated transparent and accountable response from this council,' Bowie said. 'The fentanyl crisis is destroying families. Our police force is struggling to recruit and retain officers. The budget … (is) making it harder to fund both emergency response and restorative programs.'
Rather than call for an immediate vote, Bowie asked for 'Version 2' — a newly-revised version of her resolution, which had been reviewed by the city attorney's office — to be revisited by the council on March 26.
The council approved the request for a two-week layover, 6-0, after some critical comments from Council Member Cheniqua Johnson, who noted that the impacted department directors were unfamiliar with the details and had been unaware the resolution was going to be added to the council agenda.
'That's a piece of the communication puzzle for me that still hasn't quite been filled in,' Johnson said. 'To get to a place where I would feel comfortable supporting this committee, I'd also need it to be very clear that some of these directors … are truly behind what you're trying to do here.'
Johnson emphasized that to provide more transparency over hot-button spending items such as police overtime and Office of Neighborhood Safety outreach programs, the committee itself would need more transparency.
She noted that the 'Version 2' resolution was not available to council members when Wednesday's meeting began, though city staff were able to refresh the council agenda electronically while the meeting was already in motion, publishing the proposed language that had just been introduced to the city's Legistar software onto the Internet for public consumption.
'I've been slightly disappointed about the lack thereof of that transparency, including getting the resolution language for Version 2 now, and not even knowing what it says,' said Johnson, adding that she would nevertheless support the two-week layover. 'I was prepared to come and vote against this today.'
Bowie said the two-week layover would provide opportunity to begin those conversations with department leaders.
'I just want to say on record, I hear you, I appreciate the feedback,' she said. 'This revision came before me today.'
On Jan. 28, the council released a written statement announcing Council Member Rebecca Noecker as the new council president, and included in the statement reference to the public safety committee as if it were settled.
'The council also intends to create a new Public Safety Committee whose scope and responsibilities will be defined,' reads the Jan. 28 statement. 'Bowie and (Council Member Nelsie) Yang will serve as chair and vice-chair, respectively.'
Questions around public safety spending dogged last year's budget process and remain unresolved.
Dec. 12, the council voted 4-2 to reject the mayor's 2025 budget proposal and slash $1.2 million from police overtime spending, holding the city tax levy increase to 5.9% through that and other spending changes. Police officials have said robust overtime spending is necessary because the department is short on officers.
The mayor, who had opted for a tax levy increase of 6.9%, issued five line-item vetoes at the 11th hour — the evening of Dec. 18 — to override the council's spending decisions. The council responded the next day by voting to override the mayor's overrides, but it remains unclear if their votes had sticking power.
Under the city charter, the city budget must be finalized no later than 12 days before the final levy numbers are recorded by the state, which was Dec. 30. The question of which budget proposal now governs city finances remains unresolved.
The mayor's office, which has maintained that it remains in the driver's seat of budget implementation, declined official comment last week on the council's proposed public safety committee.
Politics | St. Paul City Council advocates for a Green New Deal
Politics | Downtown St. Paul's historic Commerce Building sold, but apartments will retain 'affordable' designation
Politics | St. Paul City Council to hear appeal of FCC Environmental trash truck site on March 19
Politics | Contest for St. Paul City Council's Ward 4 seat draws Cole Hanson, Molly Coleman, Cristen Incitti
Politics | St. Paul: Tree preservation ordinance on hold for 6 months
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
Elon Musk hasn't stopped bashing Trump's 'big beautiful bill'
Elon Musk isn't done trying to kill President Donald Trump's"Big Beautiful Bill." For two days now, the tech titan has been posting — and reposting — on X about the bill's impact on the debt. Multiple independent forecasters have said that the version of the bill passed by the House last month would add more than $2 trillion to the deficit over the next 10 years. Musk has taken to calling it the "Debt Slavery Bill," said the bill is at odds with the goals of DOGE, exhorted his followers to call members of Congress about to get them to oppose it, and repeatedly urged Republicans to scrap the bill and start anew. He also posted a promotional photo from the 2003 thriller "Kill Bill." — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 4, 2025 Republicans' response has been muted. Trump has yet to publicly weigh in on Musk's ongoing post-storm, while GOP lawmakers on Capitol Hill are largely dismissing it. House Speaker Mike Johnson visibly rolled his eyes when reporters asked him about Musk's call for a new bill on Wednesday. "We don't have time for a brand new bill," Johnson said. "And I want Elon and all my friends to recognize the complexity of what we've accomplished here." Some Republicans have also insinuated that Musk may be upset about the fact that the bill phases out tax credits for electric vehicles that Congress passed under President Joe Biden. NBC News reported that Musk lobbied to keep those tax credits in place, and Johnson even brought up the credits when he initially responded to Musk's criticism on Tuesday. "I know that has an effect on his business, and I lament that," Johnson said. Musk did not immediately respond to a request for comment. All of this comes after Musk's departure from the White House last week, which followed a media blitz in which he expressed disappointment about public perceptions of DOGE and the backlash faced by his companies, including Tesla. His criticism of the "Big Beautiful Bill" has been greeted warmly by Republicans who share his concerns about the deficit, but so far, his comments don't seem to have changed the overall dynamic within the party on the bill.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Don Johnson Talks Smoking Weed in the White House and Reveals How Much Money He Made Gambling with a U.S. President
During a June 4 appearance on Jimmy Kimmel Live!, Don Johnson opened up about his bond with former Presidents Jimmy Carter and George H.W. Bush The actor revealed that he has smoked weed in the White House and that he gambled with Bush Johnson has visited the White House under every president since Carter was in officeDon Johnson has had interesting friendships with several U.S. presidents, and he has done some interesting things in their presence! During a Wednesday, June 4, appearance on Jimmy Kimmel Live, the 75-year-old Miami Vice alum shared that he has visited the White House under every president since the late Jimmy Carter was in office. The conversation started when host Jimmy Kimmel presented Johnson with a photo of himself with Carter, Chuck Leavell and Dickey Betts from 1975 at an Allman Brothers concert. "I don't remember that photo, but we were all stoned," Johnson said about the picture, which appeared to show Betts smoking. The actor was quick to clarify that he was not speaking about Carter, saying, "Well I don't know about him. I don't want to cast any aspersions on the former president. God rest his soul." However, Johnson clearly had a close bond with Carter. After working with the Allman Brothers on a concert during his 1976 presidential campaign, he said that they were invited to the White House. "Then the fun began," he said, prompting Kimmel to point out that "nobody has fun" at the White House. He then walked that back, saying, "I have heard Willie Nelson had fun there," referencing the fact that the country music star smoked marijuana with Carter's son on the roof of the building in the '70s. "Is that the kind of fun you had there?" he asked, clarifying, "Did you smoke at the White House?" Appearing slightly flustered, Johnson replied, "I don't know how to answer this. Well, yes ... I guess I did." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Another president that the star had a close bond with was the late George H.W. Bush. Johnson recalled representing the United States at the 1992 Winter Olympics in Albertville with the former president, whom he described as "fantastic." "He was a great guy," Johnson gushed. Kimmel questioned if Bush was a stoner, which Johnson denied. However, he said that the president had another playful vice — gambling. "He wanted to gamble when we played golf out at Camp David. And so I took his money," he recalled to laughter and applause from the audience. "I'll tell you something else: He's a trash talker, and he ran into a buzzsaw because so am I." While he did win money from the world leader, Johnson clarified that "it wasn't that much." "Eighteen or 20 bucks," he told Kimmel, adding, "But that's the best 18 or 20 bucks you'll ever get." is now available in the Apple App Store! Download it now for the most binge-worthy celeb content, exclusive video clips, astrology updates and more! In his autobiography, Nelson wrote that he smoked with an employee at the White House. However, in 2020, Carter clarified that it was actually with his son James Earl 'Chip' Carter III. "When Willie Nelson wrote his autobiography, he confessed that he smoked pot in the White House one night when he was spending the night with me," the former president said in the documentary Jimmy Carter: Rock & Roll President. "And he says that his companion that shared the pot with him was one of the servants in the White House. That is not exactly true — it actually was one of my sons, which he didn't want to categorize as a pot-smoker like him." Read the original article on People
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill' losing momentum in Senate
The sprawling bill to enact President Trump's 'big, beautiful' agenda is losing momentum in the Senate in the face of blistering attacks from Elon Musk and outspoken opposition from conservatives. Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) warned colleagues at a special conference meeting Wednesday afternoon that there are two likely 'no' votes against the bill within the Senate GOP conference, which means just one more defection would derail the legislation, according to a senator who attended the meeting. 'Crapo just said, 'I think [there] are two of us who are pretty definite no's,' which means we can't lose anybody else,' the source said. Crapo did not name names, but colleagues assumed he was talking about conservative Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.). Paul says he will vote against the bill because it includes language to raise the debt ceiling by $4 trillion, extending the federal government's borrowing authority past the 2026 midterm election. Johnson, meanwhile, has called for Senate GOP colleagues to scrap the House-passed bill and move a smaller measure that would focus on extending the 2017 Trump tax cuts, securing the border and banking on the spending cuts identified by House committee chairs. 'What I am rock-solid on is that I can't accept this as the new normal,' he said of projections that the annual federal deficit will reach $2.2 trillion in 2025 and grow to $2.7 trillion by 2035. 'We have our chance to reverse this,' he said of growing deficits. 'I will not be responsible for continuing this.' Paul and Johnson are stepping up their criticism of the bill just as Musk is urging lawmakers to 'KILL' the legislation, warning it will blow up the deficit. 'Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL,' Musk posted on his social platform X. The Congressional Budget Office projected Wednesday that the 1,116-page bill passed by the House will add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade. Trump has set a July 4 deadline for Congress to get the bill to his desk. But some GOP lawmakers say that's looking increasingly unlikely because of a battle between Republican senators over cuts to Medicaid, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the repeal of renewable energy tax incentives. 'It won't happen,' Johnson said. 'The sooner President Trump recognizes the reality of the situation, the sooner we can work on a smaller version of the bill, do the things that have to be done: Extend current tax law, increase the debt ceiling, provide border funding,' he said. He said the package could include spending cuts already passed by the House, such as a proposal to reduce federal subsidies to Medicaid by $698 billion and reduce SNAP spending by $267 billion. The expectation that Paul and Johnson will vote against the bill could give more leverage to Republicans who want to make other changes, further delaying the effort. Those moderates include Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), who are warning against Medicaid spending cuts that would affect benefits. Senate Republicans control 53 seats, which means they could only afford three defections and still pass the bill. Collins, Murkowski, Hawley and Moran say they are closely following the proposed reforms to Medicaid. 'I am evaluating those provisions,' Collins said of the changes to Medicaid. She said it's difficult to fully assess the bill until the Senate parliamentarian weighs in on what policy changes can remain in the legislation and which need to be stripped out for it to qualify for fast-track consideration on the floor. She said some of the most controversial provisions 'may fall out.' 'We still don't know exactly what we're looking at,' she said. Collins, who is up for reelection in a state that former Vice President Kamala Harris carried in the 2024 election, said she's concerned about changes to the SNAP program that would require Maine to shoulder more of its costs. She said the bill 'switches a lot of the administrative costs' for SNAP 'onto the state.' Murkowski said it will be 'hard' to meet Trump's deadline of passing the bill by July 4, noting that even after Republican senators reach a deal, many of the provisions will need to be vetted by the Senate parliamentarian. Moran said he's 'waiting for where we end up in the Ag [Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry] Committee' on reforms to SNAP. 'What we do will be different from the House. I'm analyzing and participating in the discussion,' he said. He said the negotiations over the nutrition program for low-income Americans are 'taking time.' Republicans at a special meeting Wednesday afternoon discussed expanding their search for savings to Medicaid, despite Trump's warning to House lawmakers last month not to 'f‑‑‑ with Medicaid.' And, notably, they raised the possibility of changes to Medicare. 'There's a legitimate debate about, 'Can we do more with Medicaid? Are we doing too much with Medicaid? How much waste, fraud and abuse is there in Medicare? Why don't we go after that?' I think we should,' Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) said after meeting with colleagues to discuss the bill. Cramer said senators talked about also examining waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare to further reduce future deficits. 'There was a lot of presentation and then debate, people throwing out other ideas, like, 'What about waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare?'' he said. But tackling waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare would be a time-consuming task and likely generate a lot of anxiety among GOP senators who are balking at cuts to Medicaid that they worry could impact benefits. 'Some people are making that case, other people are wringing their hands,' Cramer said of the internal debate. Updated at 8:37 a.m. EDT Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
